Abstract
In tertiary paediatric centres, gas enema reduction of intussusception appears to be more effective and perhaps safer than barium enema reduction. Despite the higher success rate of reduction when gas is used, there remain some patients in whom the technique fails but who at operation have an intussusception that theoretically should have been reducible with the gas enema: easy to reduce manually, no necrosis of the bowel, and no pathological lesion at the leadpoint. After a gas enema failed, manual reduction of an intussusception was achieved in 41 of 49 patients and was difficult in less than one-half. It is suggested that a significant proportion might have been reducible had the technique of gas reduction been modified, either by repeating the enema some hours after the first attempt or by using higher insufflation pressures. In practice, clinical features were not useful in predicting in which patients gas enema would be unsuccessful or whether operative reduction would be successful without resection.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Beasley SW (1988) Can the outcome of intussusception be improved? Aust Paediatr J 24: 99–100.
Bettenay F, Beasley SW, De Campo JF et al (1988) Intussusception: can the clinician predict the outcome? Aust N Z J Surg 58: 899–902.
De Campo JF, Phelan E (1989) Gas reduction of intussusception. Pediatr Radiol 19: 297–298.
Fiorito ES, Cuestas LAR (1959) Diagnosis and treatment of acute intussusception with controlled insufflation of air. Pediatrics 24: 241–244.
Guo JZ, Ma XY, Zhou QH (1986) Results of air pressure enema reduction of intussusception: 6396 cases in 13 years. J Pediatr Surg 21: 1201–1203.
Phelan E, De Campo JF, Malecky G (1988) Comparison of oxygen and barium reduction of intussusception. Amer J Radiol 150: 1349–1352.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Glover, J.M., Beasley, S.W. & Phelan, E. Intussusception: effectiveness of gas enema. Pediatr Surg Int 6, 195–197 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00176067
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00176067