Abstract
There is a considerable amount of research being done on attention by cognitive psychologists. I claim that in the process of measuring and mapping consciousness, these researchers have missed important phenomenological findings. After a synopsis and illustration of the nature of attention as described by Aron Gurwitsch, I critique the assumptions of current psychological research on this topic. Included is discussion of the metaphor of attention as a “beam” or “spotlight”, the concept of selective attention as the standard accomplishment, and the cognitive bestowal of organization on otherwise unorganized data. It is concluded that cognitive psychologists and others working on attention can benefit from Gurwitsch's work, and that a credible account of attention is crucial to the success of any comprehensive statement on the nature of consciousness.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arvidson, P. S. (1992a). On the origin of organization in consciousness. Journal of the British Society ofPhenomenology 23(1): 53–65.
Arvidson, PS. (1992b). The field of consciousness: James and Gurwitsch. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 28(4): 833–856.
Cohen, R. (1993). The neuropsychology of attention. New York: Plenum Press.
Eysenck, M. (1982). Attention and arousal: Cognition and performance. New York: Springer-Verlag.
Gurwitsch, A. (1929). Phdnomenologie der Thematik and des reinen Ich. Psychologische Forschung 12.
Gurwitsch, A. (1964). The field of consciousness. Pittsburgh. PA: Duquesne University Press.
Gurwitsch, A. (1966). Studies in phenomenology and psychology. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
Gurwitsch, A. (1985). Marginal consciousness. (Ed.) L. Embree. Athens, CH: Ohio University Press.
Hanson, N. (1958). Patterns of discovery: An inquiry into the conceptual foundations of science. London: Cambridge University Press.
Hodgson, D. (1991) The mind matters: Consciousness and choice in a quantum world. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
James, W. (1899/1983). Talks to teachers on psychology and to students on some of life's ideals. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Johnston, W.A. and Dark, V.J. (1986). Selective attention. Annual Review of Psychology 37: 43–75.
Koffka, K. (1925). Psychologie. In M. Dessoir (Ed.), Lehrbuch der Philosophie, Volume II. Berlin.
Koffka, K. (1935). Principles ofgestalt psychology. New York: Harcourt, Brace and Co.
Lind, R. (1980). Attention and the aesthetic object. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 39(1): 131–142.
Mangun, G. and Hillyard, S. (1988). Spatial gradients of visual attention: Behavioral and electrophysical evidence. Electro-encephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 70: 417–428.
Naatanen, R. (1992). Attention and brain function. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Rubin, E. (1921). Visuell wahrgenommene Figuren. (Copenhagen).
Treisman, A. and Gelade, G. (1980) A feature integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology 12: 97–136.
Treisman, A. (1993). The perception of features and objects. In A. Braddeley A. and L. Weiskrantz (Eds.), Attention: Selection, awareness, and control: a tribute to Donald Broadbent. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Arvidson, P.S. Toward a phenomenology of attention. Hum Stud 19, 71–84 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00142856
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00142856