Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Shape from texture for smooth curved surfaces in perspective projection

  • Published:
Journal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Projective distortion of surface texture observed in a perspective image can provide direct information about the shape of the underlying surface. Previous theories have generally concerned planar surfaces; this paper presents a systematic analysis of first- and second-order texture distortion cues for the case of a smooth, curved surface. In particular, several kinds of texture gradients are analyzed and are related to surface orientation and surface curvature. The local estimates obtained from these cues can be integrated to obtain a global surface shape, and it is shown that the two surfaces resulting from the well-known tilt ambiguity in the local foreshortening cue typically have qualitatively different shapes. As an example of a practical application of the analysis, a shape-from-texture algorithm based on local orientation-selective filtering is described, and some experimental results are shown.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. J. Gibson, The Perception of the Visual World, Houghton Mifflin: Boston, 1950.

    Google Scholar 

  2. J. Aloimonos, “Shape from texture”, Biol. Cybernet., vol. 58, pp. 345–360, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  3. R. Bajcsy and L. Lieberman, “Texture gradients as a depth cue”, Comput. Graph. Image Process., vol. 5, pp. 52–67, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  4. A. Blake and C. Marions, “Shape from texture: the homogeneity hypothesis”, in Proc. IEEE 3rd Int. Conf. on Computer Vision, Osaka, Japan, IEEE Computer Society Press, pp. 350–353, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  5. D. Blostein and N. Ahuja, “Shape from texture: integrating texture element extraction and surface estimation”, IEEE Trans. Patt. Anal. Mach. Intell., vol. 11, pp. 1233–1251, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  6. J. Gårding, “Shape from texture and contour by weak isotropy”, J. Artificial Intell., in press.

  7. K. Kanatani and T.C. Chou, “Shape from texture: general principle”, J. Artificial Intell., vol. 38, pp. 1–48, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  8. A.P. Pentland, “Shading into texture”, J. Artificial Intell., vol. 29, pp. 147–170, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  9. A.P. Witkin, “Recovering surface shape and orientation from texture”, J. Artificial Intell., vol. 17, pp. 17–45, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  10. D. Buckley, J.P. Frisby, and E. Spivey, “Stereo and texture cue combination in ground planes: an investigation using the table stereometer”, Perception, vol. 20, pp. 91, 1991.

  11. J.E. Cutting and R.T. Millard, “Three gradients and the perception of flat and curved surfaces”, J. Exp. Psychol. [Gen.], vol. 113, pp. 198–216, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  12. J.T. Todd and R.A. Akerstrom, “Perception of threedimensional form from patterns of optical texture”, J. Psychol. [Human Percept.], vol. 13, pp. 242–255, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  13. J. Gibson, The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception, Houghton Mifflin: Boston, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  14. J.J. Koenderink, Solid Shape, MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  15. B. O'Neill, Elementary Differential Geometry, Academic Press: Orlando, FL, 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  16. K.A. Stevens, “The information content of texture gradients”, Biol. Cybernet., vol. 42, pp. 95–105, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  17. J. Gårding, “Shape from surface markings”, Ph.D. thesis, Department of Numerical Analysis and Computing Science, Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, 1991.

  18. A.C. Bovik, M. Clark, and W.S. Geisler, “Multichannel texture analysis using localized spatial filters”, IEEE Trans. Patt. Anal. Mach. Intell., vol. 12, pp. 55–73, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  19. M.R. Turner, “Texture discrimination by Gabor function”, Biol. Cybernet., vol. 55, pp. 71–82, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  20. J. Jones and L. Palmer, “An evaluation of the twodimensional Gabor filter model of simple receptive fields in cat striate cortex”, J. Neurophysiol., vol. 58, pp. 1233–1258, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  21. P. Kube, “Using frequency-and orientation-tuned channels to determine surface slant”, in Proc. 8th Ann. Conf. of the Cognitive Science Society, Amherst, MA, 1986, pp. 235–244, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

  22. M.R. Turner, G.L. Gerstein, and R. Bajcsy, “Underestimation of visual texture slant by human observers: a model”, Biol. Cybernet., vol. 65, pp. 215–226, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  23. L.G. Brown and H. Shvaytser, “Surface orientation from projective foreshortening of isotropic texture autocorrelation”, IEEE Trans. Patt. Anal. Mach. Intell., vol. 12, pp. 584–588, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Computational Vision and Active Perception Laboratory (CVAP), Department of Numerical Analysis and Computing Science, Royal Institute of Technology, S-100 44, Stockholm, Sweden

    Jonas Gårding

Authors
  1. Jonas Gårding
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gårding, J. Shape from texture for smooth curved surfaces in perspective projection. J Math Imaging Vis 2, 327–350 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00121877

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00121877

Key words

Search

Navigation