Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Thinking About Spatial Thinking: New Typology, New Assessments

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Studying Visual and Spatial Reasoning for Design Creativity

Abstract

Our world is a world that exists in space, and a world without space is literally inconceivable. Given this basic truth, it is clear that living in the world requires spatial functioning of some kind. Being creative in this world, and designing new tools and new habitats, probably requires even higher levels of spatial functioning. And people vary in their levels of spatial ability. What do these facts mean for the field of design? There are certain obvious practical questions. For example, should design schools accept only applicants who test high in spatial ability, following the lead of dental schools, which assess spatial thought on the Dental Admissions Test or with practical exercises in assignments such as tooth modeling? Or should design schools strive to enhance the spatial ability of anyone with the desire to do creative design, following the lead of selection committees for surgical residencies, which do not assess spatial ability in any way? The latter course is arguably supported by evidence (to be discussed later) showing that spatial skill is malleable. As another example of a practical question for design, consider what designers should or could know about the potential users of a product. What kinds and levels of spatial abilities should they assume that users will have? How would they be able to predict when a new tool will be too hard to master for many users, or when a building design will result in an environment in which many people easily get lost?

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Balcomb F, Newcombe NS, Ferrara K (2009) Convergence and divergence in representational systems: place learning and language in toddlers. In Taatgen N et al (eds) Proceedings of the 31st Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society, pp 596–601

    Google Scholar 

  2. Boyer TW, Levine SC (under review) Child proportional scaling: is 1/3 = 2/6 = 3/9 = 4/12?

    Google Scholar 

  3. Boyer T, Levine SC, Huttenlocher J (2008) Development of proportional reasoning: where young children go wrong. Dev Psychol 44:1478–1490

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Carroll J (1993) Human cognitive abilities: a survey of factoranalytic studies. Cambridge University, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  5. Chatterjee A (2008) The neural organization of spatial thought and language. Semin Speech Lang 29:226–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Fisher K, Nash B, Hirsh-Pasek K, Newcombe N, Golinkoff R (2009) Breaking the mold: altering preschoolers’ concepts of geometric shapes. Poster presented at the Society for Research in Child Development Biennial Meeting, Denver, Colorado (April, 2009)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Forbus K, Nielsen P, Faltings B (1991) Qualitative spatial reasoning: the clock project. Artif Intell 51(1–3):417–471

    Google Scholar 

  8. Freksa C, Barkowsky T, Klippel A (1999) Spatial symbol systems and spatial cognition: a computer science perspective on perception-based symbol processing. Behav Brain Sci 22:616–617

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Frick A, Newcombe NS (in prep.) Development of spatial scaling abilities. Manuscript in preparation

    Google Scholar 

  10. Gentner D, Lovett A, Smith L (in preparation) Tests of children’s analogical ability

    Google Scholar 

  11. Harris J, Newcombe N (2010) Measuring spatial visualization through folding. Poster session presented at the inter-Science of Learning Center Student and Post-doc Conference, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  12. Heckman JJ (2006) Skill formation and the economics of investing in disadvantaged children. Science 312:1900–1902

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Hegarty M, Waller DA (2005) Individual differences in spatial abilities. In: Shah P, Miyake A (eds) The Cambridge handbook of visuospatial thinking. Cambridge University, New York, pp 121–169

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Hegarty M, Crookes RD, Dara-Abrams D, Shipley TF (in press) Do all science disciplines rely on spatial abilities? Preliminary evidence from self-report questionnaires. To appear in Christian Freksa and Nora S. Newcombe (eds) Spatial Cognition V. Learning, Reasoning, and Talking 5 about Space, International Conference Spatial Cognition 2010, Portland, USA. Proceedings Lecture Notes in Computer Science Springer

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hegarty M, Montello DR, Richardson AE, Ishikawa T, Lovelace K (2006) Spatial abilities at different scales: individual differences in aptitude-test performance and spatial-layout learning. Intelligence 34:151–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Holden M, Curby K, Newcombe NS, Shipley TF (in press) A category adjustment approach to memory for spatial location in natural scenes. J Exp Psychol: Learn, Mem Cogn

    Google Scholar 

  17. Huttenlocher J, Presson CC (1973) Mental rotation and the perspective problem. Cogn Psychol 4:277–299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Huttenlocher J, Hedges LV, Vevea JL (2000) Why do categories affect stimulus judgment? J Exp Psychol Gen 129:1–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ishikawa T, Montello DR (2006) Spatial knowledge acquisition from direct experience in the environment: individual differences in the development of metric knowledge and the integration of separately learned places. Cogn Psychol 52:93–129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kali Y, Orion N (1996) Spatial abilities of high-school students in the perception of geologic structures. J Res Sci Teach 33:369–391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Kastens KA, Ishikawa T (2006) Spatial thinking in the geosciences and cognitive sciences: a cross-disciplinary look at the intersection of the two fields. In: Manduca CA, Mogk DW (eds) Earth and mind: how geologists think and learn about the Earth. Geological Society of America, Boulder, pp 53–76

    Google Scholar 

  22. Kozhevnikov M, Hegarty M (2001) A dissociation between object-manipulation spatial ability and spatial orientation ability. Mem Cogn 29:745–756

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Kozhevnikov M, Hegarty M, Mayer RE (2002) Revising the visualizer-verbalizer dimension: evidence for two types of visualizers. Cogn Instr 20:47–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Kozhevnikov M, Kosslyn S, Shephard J (2005) Spatial versus object visualizers: a new characterization of visual cognitive style. Mem Cogn 33:710–726

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Kozhevnikov M, Motes M, Rasch B, Blajenkova O (2006) Perspective-taking vs. mental rotation transformations and how they predict spatial navigation performance. Appl Cogn Psychol 20:397–417

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Levine SC, Huttenlocher J, Taylor A, Langrock A (1999) Early sex differences in spatial skill. Dev Psychol 35:940–949

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Levine SC, Vasilyeva M, Lourenco SF, Newcombe NS, Huttenlocher J (2005) Socio-economic status modifies the sex difference in spatial skills. Psychol Sci 16:841–845

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Linn MC, Peterson AC (1985) Emergence and characterization of sex differences in spatial ability: a meta-analysis. Child Dev 56:1479–1498

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Loewenstein J, Gentner D (2001) Spatial mapping in preschoolers: close comparisons facilitate far mappings. J Cogn Dev 2:189–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Lourenco SF, Levine SC (2009) Location representation following early unilateral brain injury: Evidence of distinct deficits and degrees of plasticity. Paper presented at the Society for Research in Child Development Biennial Meeting, Denver, Colorado (April, 2009)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Palmer SE (1978) Fundamental aspects of cognitive representation. In: Rosch E, Lloyd BB (eds) Cognition and categorization. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, pp 259–303

    Google Scholar 

  32. Ratliff KR, McGinnis CR, Levine SC (2010) The development and assessment of cross-sectioning ability in young children. Paper submitted to the 32nd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Portland, OR (August, 2010)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Schinazi VR, Epstein RA, Nardi D, Newcombe NS, Shipley TF (2009) The acquisition of spatial knowledge in an unfamiliar campus environment. Psychonomic Society. November 2009, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  34. Shipley T, Manduca C, Resnick I, Schilling C (2009) Expertise in spatial visualization: can geologists reverse time? Psychonomic Society, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  35. Uttal DH, Meadow N, Hand L, Lewis A, Warren C, Newcombe NS (under review) Spatial training: what works, for whom and for how long?

    Google Scholar 

  36. Wai J, Lubinski D, Benbow CP (2009) Spatial ability for STEM domains: aligning over fifty years of cumulative psychological knowledge solidifies its importance. J Educ Psychol 101:817–835

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Temple University, Philadelphia, USA

    Nora S. Newcombe & Thomas F. Shipley

Authors
  1. Nora S. Newcombe
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Thomas F. Shipley
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nora S. Newcombe .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Krasnow Institute for Advanced Study, Fairfax, Virginia, USA

    John S. Gero

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this paper

Cite this paper

Newcombe, N., Shipley, T. (2015). Thinking About Spatial Thinking: New Typology, New Assessments. In: Gero, J. (eds) Studying Visual and Spatial Reasoning for Design Creativity. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9297-4_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9297-4_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-017-9296-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-017-9297-4

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation