Abstract
In this chapter, we will discuss some issues in multicultural positive psychology research. A general discussion on common methodological issues will be provided first. We will then discuss the following four methodological issues: linguistic equivalence, conceptual equivalence, metric equivalence, and functional equivalence. Linguistic equivalence is achieved if all items of two questionnaires in different languages have identical meanings. Conceptual equivalence refers to whether the same concept represents the same set of behaviour in different cultures. Metric equivalence focuses on the psychometric properties of the same questionnaire in different language versions. Functional equivalence refers to whether the same behaviour or concept plays the same function role in different cultures. Our research on well-being (happiness), posttraumatic growth, and character strengths among Chinese adults will be used for illustration. Since positive psychology is developed in the era of globalization, there is the need to better understand the nuances of culture and positive psychology.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Berry, J. W. (1980). Acculturation as varieties of adaptation. In A. M. Padilla (Ed.), Acculturation: Theory, models and some new findings (pp. 9–25). Boulder: Westview Press.
Brunet, J., McDonough, M. H., Hadd, V., Crocker, P. R. E., & Sabiston, C. M. (2010). The posttraumatic growth inventory: An examination of the factor structure and invariance among breast cancer survivors. Psycho-Oncology, 19, 830–838. doi:10.1002/pon.1640.
Chen, Z., & Davey, G. (2008). Happiness and subjective wellbeing in Mainland China. Journal of Happiness Studies, 9, 589–600. doi:10.1007/s10902-008-9092-7.
Cheung, F. M. (2002). Universal and indigenous dimensions of Chinese personality. In K. S. Kurasaki & S. Sue (Eds.), Asian American Mental Health: Assessment theories and methods (pp. 141–157). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Cheung, F. M., van de Vijver, F. J. R., & Leong, F. T. L. (2011). Toward a new approach to the study of personality in culture. American Psychologist, 66, 593–603. doi:10.1037/a0022389.
Church, A. T. (2010). Measurement issues in cross-cultural research. In G. Walford, E. Tucker, & M. Viswanathan (Eds.), The Sage handbook of measurement (pp. 151–177). Los Angeles: Sage.
Diener, E. (2000). Subjective well-being: The science of happiness and a proposal for a national index. American Psychologists, 55, 34–43. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.34.
Diener, E., & Diener, M. (1995). Cross-cultural correlates of life satisfaction and self-esteem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68(4), 653–663. doi:10.1007/978-90-481-2352-0_4.
Diener, E., & Suh, E. M. (1999). National differences in subjective well-being. In D. Kahneman, E. Diener, & N. Schwartz (Eds.), Well-being: The foundations of hedonic psychology (pp. 434–450). New York: Russell Sage.
Diener, E., & Suh, E. (Eds.). (2000). Culture and subjective well-being. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larson, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49, 71–75. doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_13.
Duan, W., Ho, S. M. Y., Yu, B., Tang, X., Zhang, Y., Li, T., & Yuen, T. (2012). Factor structure of the Chinese Virtues Questionnaire. Research on Social Work Practice, 22, 680–688. doi:10.1177/1049731512450074.
Gable, S. L., & Haidt, J. (2005). What (and why) is positive psychology? Review of General Psychology, 9, 103–110. doi:10.1037/1089-2680.9.2.103.
Greenfield, P. M. (1997). You can’t take it with you: Why ability assessments don’t cross cultures. American Psychologist, 52(10), 1115–1124.
Ho, S. M. Y. (2010). Universal happiness. In L. Bormans (Ed.), The world book of happiness (pp. 253–255). Singapore: Page One Publishing.
Ho, S. M. Y., & Cheung, M. W. L. (2007). Using the combined etic-emic approach to develop a measurement of interpersonal subjective well-being in Chinese populations. In A. D. Ong & M. van Dulmen (Eds.), Oxford handbook of methods in positive psychology (pp. 139–152). New York: Oxford University Press.
Ho, S. M. Y., Chan, C. L. W., & Ho, R. T. H. (2004). Post-traumatic growth in Chinese cancer survivors. Psycho-Oncology, 13, 377–389. doi:10.1002/pon.758.
Ho, S. M. Y., Law, L. S. C., Wang, G.-L., Shih, S.-M., Hsu, S.-H., & Hou, Y.-C. (2013). Psychometric analysis of the Chinese version of the Posttraumatic Growth Inventory with cancer patients in Hong Kong and Taiwan. Psycho-Oncology, 22(3), 715–719. doi:10.1002/pon.3024.
Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture’s consequences: International differences in work-related values. Beverly Hills: Sage.
Hui, C. H., & Triandis, H. (1985). Measurement in cross-cultural psychology: A review and comparison of strategies. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 16, 131–152. doi:10.1177/0022002185016002001.
Johnson, T. P. (1998). Approaches to equivalence in cross-cultural and cross-national survey research. ZUMA-Nachrichten Spezial, 3, 1–40. Retrieved from http://www.gesis.org/fileadmin/upload/forschung/publikationen/zeitschriften/zuma_nachrichten_spezial/znspezial3.pdf
Kahneman, D., Diener, E., & Schwatz, N. (Eds.). (1999). Well-being: The foundations of hedonic psychology. New York: Russell Sage.
Kankaraš, M., & Moors, G. (2010). Researching measurement equivalence in cross-cultural studies. Psihologija, 43, 121–135. doi:10.2298/PSI1002121K.
Kim, H., & Markus, H. R. (1999). Deviance or uniqueness, harmony or conformity? A cultural analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 785–800. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.77.4.785.
Knight, J., & Gunatilaka, R. (2009). Great expectations? The subjective well-being of rural-urban migrants in China. World Development, 38, 113–124. doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2009.03.002.
Kubokawa, A., & Amber, O. (2009). Positive psychology and cultural sensitivity: A review of the literature. Graduate Journal of Counseling Psychology, 1(2, Article 13). Retrieved from http://epublications.marquette.edu/gjcp/vol1/iss2/13
Lee, J. A., Luxton, D. D., Reger, G. M., & Gahm, G. A. (2010). Confirmatory factor analysis of the Posttraumatic Growth Inventory with a sample of soldiers previously deployed in support of the Iraq and Afghanistan wars. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 66, 813–819. doi:10.1002/jclp.20692.
Leong, F. T. L., Leung, K., & Cheung, F. M. (2010). Integrating cross-cultural psychology research methods into ethnic minority psychology. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 16, 590–597. doi:10.1037/a0020127.
Linley, P. A., Maltby, J., Wood, A. M., Joseph, S., Harrington, S., Peterson, C., Park, N., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2007). Character strengths in the United Kingdom: The VIA inventory of strengths. Personality and Individual Differences, 43(2), 341–351. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2006.12.004.
Lonner, W. J., & Berry, J. W. (1986). Field methods in cross-cultural research. Beverly Hills: Sage.
Lu, L. (2001). Understanding happiness: A look into the Chinese folk psychology. Journal of Happiness Studies, 2, 407–432. doi:10.1023/A:1013944228205.
Lyubomirsky, S., & Lepper, H. S. (1999). A measure of subjective happiness: Preliminary reliability and construct validation. Social Indicators Research, 46, 137–155. doi:10.1023/A:1006824100041.
Maercker, A., & Langner, R. (2001). Posttraumatic personal growth: Validation of German versions of two questionnaires. Diagnostics, 47, 153–162. doi:10.1026//0012-1924.47.3.153.
Mallinckrodt, B., & Wang, C. C. (2004). Quantitative methods for verifying semantic equivalence of translated research instruments: A Chinese version of the experiences in close relationships scale. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 51(3), 368–379. doi:10.1037/0022-0167.51.3.368.
Park, N., Peterson, C., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2006). Character strengths in fifty-four nations and the fifty US states. Journal of Positive Psychology, 1, 118–129. doi:10.1080/17439760600619567.
Peterson, C., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2004). Character strengths and virtues: A handbook and classification. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Peterson, C., Stephens, J. P., Park, N., Lee, F., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2010). Strengths of character and work. In P. A. Linley, S. Harrington, & N. Garcea (Eds.), Oxford handbook of positive psychology and work. New York: Oxford University Press.
Powell, S., Rosner, R., Butollo, W., Tedeschi, R. G., & Calhoun, L. G. (2003). Posttraumatic growth after war: A study with former refugees and displaced people in Sarajevo. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 59, 71–83. doi:10.1002/jclp.10117.
Rochelle, T. L., & Marks, D. F. (2010). Medical pluralism of the Chinese in London: An exploratory study. British Journal of Health Psychology, 15, 715–728. doi:10.1348/135910709X479195.
Rochelle, T. L., & Marks, D. F. (2011). Health behaviours and use of Chinese medicine among the British Chinese. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 42, 390–405. doi:10.1177/0022022110362745.
Rochelle, T. L., Shardlow, S. M., & Ng, S. H. (2009). Ageing in Hong Kong and the UK: A comparison of the Chinese at home and abroad. Journal of Comparative Asian Development, 8, 25–41. doi:10.1080/15339114.2009.9678472.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2001). On happiness and human potentials: A review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 141–166. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.141.
Seligman, M. E. P., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2000). Positive psychology: An introduction. American Psychologist, 55, 5–14. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.5.
Shu, X., & Zhu, Y. (2009). The quality of life in China. Social Indicators Research, 92, 191–225. doi:10.1007/s11205-008-9350-4.
Steger, M. F., Hicks, B., Kashdan, T. B., Krueger, R. F., & Bouchard, T. J., Jr. (2007). Genetic and environmental influences on the positive traits of the values in action classification, and biometric covariance with normal personality. Journal of Research in Personality, 41, 524–539. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2006.06.002.
Suh, E., Diener, E., Oishi, S., & Triandis, H. C. (1998). The shifting basis of life satisfaction judgments across cultures: Emotions versus norms. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 482–493. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.74.2.482.
Suinn, R. M. (2010). Reviewing acculturation and Asian Americans: How acculturation affects health, adjustment, school achievement, and counseling. Asian American Journal of Psychology, 1(1), 5–17. doi:10.1037/a0018798.
Taku, K., Calhoun, L. G., Tedeschi, R. G., Gil-Rivas, V., Kilmer, R. P., & Cann, A. (2007). Examining posttraumatic growth among Japanese university students. Anxiety, Stress and Coping: An International Journal, 20, 353–367. doi:10.1080/10615800701295007.
Taku, K., Cann, A., Calhoun, L. G., & Tedeschi, R. G. (2008). The factor structure of the Posttraumatic Growth Inventory: A comparison of five models using confirmatory factor analysis. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 21, 158–164. doi:10.1002/jts.20305.
Tedeschi, R. G., & Calhoun, L. G. (1995). Trauma and transformation: Growing in the aftermath of suffering. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Tedeschi, R. G., & Calhoun, L. G. (1996). The Posttraumatic Growth Inventory: Measuring the positive legacy of trauma. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 9, 455–471. doi:10.1002/jts.2490090305.
Waterman, A. S. (1993). Two conceptions of happiness: Contrasts of personal expressiveness (eudaimonia) and hedonic enjoyment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 678–691. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.64.4.678.
Weiss, T., & Berger, R. (2006). Reliability and validity of a Spanish version of the Posttraumatic Growth Inventory. Research on Social Work Practice, 16, 191–199. doi:10.1177/1049731505281374.
Wild, D., Grove, A., Martin, M., Eremenco, S., McElroy, S., Verjee-Lorenz, A., & Erikson, P. (2005). Principles of good practice for the translation and cultural adaptation process for patient-reported outcomes (PRO) measures: Report of the ISPOR task force for translation and cultural adaptation. Value in Health, 8, 94–104. doi:10.1111/j.1524-4733.2005.04054.x.
World Health Organization. (2011). Process of translation and adaptation of instruments. Retrieved November 25, 2011, from http://www.who.int/substance_abuse/research_tools/translation/en/
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ho, S.M.Y., Rochelle, T.L., Law, L.S.C., Duan, W., Bai, Y., Shih, SM. (2014). Methodological Issues in Positive Psychology Research with Diverse Populations: Exploring Strengths Among Chinese Adults. In: Teramoto Pedrotti, J., Edwards, L. (eds) Perspectives on the Intersection of Multiculturalism and Positive Psychology. Cross-Cultural Advancements in Positive Psychology, vol 7. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-8654-6_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-8654-6_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-017-8653-9
Online ISBN: 978-94-017-8654-6
eBook Packages: Behavioral ScienceBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)