Abstract
Research comparing prospective and retrospective duration-judgment paradigms has produced diverse findings and conclusions. Two experiments reported here reveal that information-processing tasks influence duration judgment differently in the two paradigms. Experiment 1 shows that performing a more difficult task shortens prospective judgments but does not influence retrospective judgments. Experiment 2 shows that performing different kinds, rather than a single kind, of processing during a duration lengthens retrospective judgments but does not influence prospective judgments. Memory for nontemporal (stimulus) information processed during a time period cannot account for either prospective or retrospective duration judgment, because the pattern of effects and interactions is different. This finding rejects memory-storage models of duration judgment. Interactions of task and paradigm support a contextual-change model, which says that different kinds of contextual information subserve prospective and retrospective duration judgments.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Arlin, M. (1986) The effects of quantity and depth of processing on children’s time perception’, Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 42, 84–96.
Bakan, P. (1955) `Effect of set and work speed on time estimation’, Perceptual and Motor Skills 5, 147–148.
Block, R. A. (1979) `Time and consciousness’, in G. Underwood and R. Stevens (eds.), Aspects of Consciousness: Vol. 1. Psychological Issues, Academic Press, London, pp. 179–217.
Block, R. A. (1982) `Temporal judgments and contextual change’, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory, and Cognition 8, 530–544.
Block, R. A. (1990) `Models of psychological time’, in R. A. Block (ed.), Cognitive Models of Psychological Time, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 1–35.
Block, R. A., George, E. J., and Reed, M. A. (1980) `A watched pot sometimes boils: A study of duration experience’, Acta Psychologica 46, 81–94.
Block, R. A., and Reed, M. A. (1978) `Remembered duration: Evidence for a contextual-change hypothesis’, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory 4, 656–665.
Brown, S. W. (1985) `Time perception and attention: The effects of prospective versus retrospective paradigms and task demands on perceived duration’, Perception and Psychophysics 38, 115–124.
Brown, S. W., and Stubbs, D. A. (1988) `The psychophysics of retrospective and prospective duration timing’, Perception 17, 297–310.
Brown, S. W., and West, A. N. (1990) `Multiple timing and the allocation of attention’, Acta Psychologica 75, 103–121.
Craik, F. I. M., and Tulving, E. (1975) `Depth of processing and the retention of words in episodic memory’, Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 104, 268–294.
Dobson, W. R. (1954) ‘An investigation of various factors involved in time perception as manifested by different nosological groups’, Journal of General Psychology 50, 277–298.
Gray, C. (1982) `Duration differences: Attentional demand or time error?’ Perception 11, 97–102.
Hanley, J. R., and Morris, N. (1982) `Time estimation as a function of recall: A test of Ornstein’s theory of temporal judgment’, Current Psychological Research 2, 45–54.
Harton, J. J. (1938) `The influence of the difficulty of activity on the estimation of time. II’, Journal of Experimental Psychology 23, 428–433.
Hicks, R. E., Miller, G. W., and Kinsbourne, M. (1976) `Prospective and retrospective judgments of time as a function of amount of information processed’, American Journal of Psychology 89, 719–730.
Hintzman, D. L., and Block, R. A. (1971) `Repetition and memory: Evidence for a multiple-trace hypothesis’, Journal of Experimental Psychology 88, 297–306.
Hintzman, D. L., Block, R. A., and Summers, J. J. (1973) `Contextual associations and memory for serial position’, Journal of Experimental Psychology 97, 220–229.
Hintzman, D. L., Summers, J. J., and Block, R. A. (1975) `Spacing judgments as an index of study-phase retrieval’, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory 1, 31–40.
James, W. (1890) The Principles of Psychology, Vol. 1, Henry Holt, New York.
Kikkawa, M. (1983) `The effect of distribution of attention upon prospective and retrospective estimations of long temporal intervals’, Journal of Child Development 19, 14–22.
McClain, L. (1983) `Interval estimation: Effect of processing demands on prospective and retrospective reports’, Perception and Psychophysics 34, 185–189.
Miller, G. W., Hicks, R. E., and Willette, M. (1978) `Effects of concurrent verbal rehearsal and temporal set upon judgments of temporal duration’,Acta Psychologica 42, 173–179.
Ornstein, R. E. (1969) On the Experience of Time, Penguin, Harmondsworth, England.
Posner, M. I., Petersen, S. E., Fox, P. T., and Raichle, M. E. (1988) Localization of cognitive operations in the human brain’, Science 240, 1627–1631.
Schacter, D. L. (1989) Memory’, in M. I. Posner (ed.), Foundations of Cognitive Science, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 683–725.
Thomas, E. A. C., and Weaver, W. B. (1975) Cognitive processing and time perception’, Perception and Psychophysics 17, 363–367.
Tversky, A., and Kahneman, D. (1973) Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability’, Cognitive Psychology 5, 207–232.
Underwood, G., and Swain, R. A. (1973) Selectivity of attention and the perception of duration’, Perception 2, 101–105.
Zakay, D. (1989) `Subjective time and attentional resource allocation: An integrated model of time estimation’, in I. Levin and D. Zakay (eds.), Time and Human Cognition: A Life-span Perspective, North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 365–397.
Zakay, D. (1990) `The evasive art of subjective time measurement: Some methodological dilemmas’, in R. A. Block (ed.), Cognitive Models of Psychological Time, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 59–84.
Zakay, D., and Fallach, E. (1984) Immediate and remote time estimation: A comparison’, Acta Psychologica, 57, 69–81.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1992 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Block, R.A. (1992). Prospective and Retrospective Duration Judgment: The Role of Information Processing and Memory. In: Macar, F., Pouthas, V., Friedman, W.J. (eds) Time, Action and Cognition. NATO ASI Series, vol 66. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-3536-0_16
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-3536-0_16
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-4166-1
Online ISBN: 978-94-017-3536-0
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive