Skip to main content

Cross-Modality Matching of Money Against Other Continua

  • Chapter

Abstract

Cross-modality matching of hypothetical increments of money against loudness recover the previously proposed exponent of the utility function for money within a few percent. Similar cross-modality matching experiments for decrements give a disutility exponent of 0.59, larger than the utility exponent for increments. This disutility exponent was checked by an additional cross-modality matching experiment against the disutility of drinking various concentrations of a bitter solution. The parameter estimated in this fashion was 0.63.

Partial support of Miss Pliner’s efforts was provided by a grant from the General Electric Company. The research was supported in part by the Office of Naval Research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Anderson, N. Algebraic models in perception. In Carterette and Friedman (Eds.), Handbook of Perception. Vol. II. New York: Academic Press, Inc. In press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coombs, C., Dawes, R., & Tversky, A. Mathematical Psychology: An Elementary Introduction. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, Inc., 1970.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Festinger, L. A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press, 1957.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M. & Savage, L. The utility analysis of choices involving risk. Journal of Political Economics, 1948, 56, 279–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galanter, E. The direct measurement of utility and subjective probability. American Journal of Psychology, 1962, 75, 208–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galanter, E. Psychological decision mechanisms and perception. In Carterette and Friedman (Eds.), Handbook of Perception. Vol. II. New York: Academic Press, Inc. In press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galanter, E. & Holman, G. Some invariances of the isosensitivity function and their implications for the utility function of money. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1967, 73, 333–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, W. Decision Theory and Human Behavior. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1971.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1974 D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht-Holland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Galanter, E., Pliner, P. (1974). Cross-Modality Matching of Money Against Other Continua. In: Moskowitz, H.R., Scharf, B., Stevens, J.C. (eds) Sensation and Measurement. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-2245-3_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-2245-3_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-2247-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-010-2245-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics