Skip to main content

Assessment of Character Strengths in Children and Adolescents

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Research, Applications, and Interventions for Children and Adolescents

Abstract

Positive psychology urges psychologists to ask a deeper and loftier question, what is right with children and adolescents, in addition to exploring their weaknesses. This chapter discusses a strength-based assessment approach in detail, arguing that that such an approach yields useful information above and beyond the information produced by traditional measures of psychopathology. Some salient measures of strengths are listed, and in particular the VIA Youth Survey, which is used to determine an individual’s signature strengths, is discussed in detail. Previous findings have suggested that the frequent use of signature strengths is associated with greater well-being. This assertion has not been tested widely with children and adolescents. The chapter presents results of three intervention studies including one that has demonstrated that a multi-informant approach (i.e., strengths identified by teacher, parent, and a peer) of assessing signature strengths that boosts well-being and social skills. The chapter concludes with practical strategies for professionals to incorporate various ways to assess and develop strengths of children and adolescents.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    CSA Illumina can be accessed at: http://www.csa.com

  2. 2.

    Conducted in compliance with the Research Services of the Toronto District School Board.

  3. 3.

    Students were asked compared to their peers, how would they rate their academic performance in general on a scale of 1 = weak to 5 = excellent.

  4. 4.

    * p < .05; ** p < .01.

References

  • Achenbach, T. M. (1992). Manual for the child behavior checklist/2-3 and 1992 profile. Burlington: University of Vermont Department of Psychiatry.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Psychiatric Association. (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed., text rev.). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asplund, J., Lopez, S. J., Hodges, T., & Harter, J. (2007). The Clifton StrengthsFinder® 2.0 technical report: Development and validation. Princeton: The Gallup Organization.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beaver, B. R. (2008). A positive approach to children’s internalizing problems. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 39, 129–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bird, V. J., Le Boutillier, C., Leamy, M., Larsen, J., Oades, L. G., Williams, J., & Slade, M. (2012). Assessing the strengths of mental health consumers: A systematic review. Psychological Assessment, 24, 1024–1033. doi:10.1037/a0028983.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bundick, M. J. (2011). Extracurricular activities, positive youth development, and the role of meaningfulness of engagement. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 6, 57–74. ­doi:10.1080/17439760.2010.536775.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cassidy, J., & Asher, S. (1992). Loneliness and peer relations in young children. Child Development, 63, 350–365.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Conners, K. C. (2008). Conners (3rd ed.). Toronto: Multi-Health Systems.

    Google Scholar 

  • Constantine, N., Benard, B., & Diaz, M. (1999). Measuring protective factors and resilience traits in youth: The Healthy Kids Resilience assessment. Paper presented at the Seventh Annual Meeting of the Society for Prevention Research, New Orleans, LA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cottrell, C. A., & Neuberg, S. L. (2005). Different emotional reactions to different groups: A sociofunctional threat-based approach to “prejudice”. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88(5), 770–789. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.88.5.770.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Crocker, J., Luhtanen, R. K., Cooper, M. L., & Bouvrette, A. (2003). Contingencies of self-worth in college students: Theory and measurement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 894–908. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.85.5.894.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Duckworth, A. L., Steen, T. A., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2005). Positive Psychology in clinical practice. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 1(1), 629–651.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duckworth, A. L., & Quinn, P. D. (2009). Development and validation of the Short Grit Scale (Grit-S). Journal of Personality Assessment, 91, 166–174.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Duckworth, A. L., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2005). Self-discipline outdoes IQ in predicting academic performance of adolescents. Psychological Science, 16(12), 939–944. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2005.01641.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ebesutani, C., Okamura, K., Higa-McMillan, C., & Chorpita, B. F. (2011). A psychometric analysis of the positive and negative affect schedule for children – Parent version in a school sample. Psychological Assessment, 33, 406–416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, M. H. (2004). Behavioral and emotional rating scale (2nd ed.). Austin: PRO-ED.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, J. L., & McPartland, J. M. (1976). The concept and measurement of the quality of school life. American Educational Research Journal, 13(1), 15–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, M. H., & Sharma, J. (1998). Behavioral and emotional rating scale: A strength-based approach to assessment. Austin: PRO-ED.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flinchbaugh, C. L., Moore, E. W. G., Chang, Y. K., & May, D. R. (2012). Student well-being interventions: The effects of stress management techniques and gratitude journaling in the management education classroom. Journal of Management Education, 36, 191–219. doi:10.1177/1052562911430062.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flückiger, C., & Grosse Holtforth, M. (2008). Focusing the therapist’s attention on the patient’s strengths: A preliminary study to foster a mechanism of change in outpatient psychotherapy. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 64(7), 876–890. doi:10.1002/jclp.20493.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fox Eades, J. M. (2008). Celebrating strengths: Building strength-based schools. Coventry: CAPP Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, H. L., & MacDonal, D. A. (2006). Humanistic testing and assessment. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 46, 510–529.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Froh, J. J., Kashdan, T. B., Ozimkowski, K. M., & Miller, N. (2009). Who benefits the most from a gratitude intervention in children and adolescents? Examining positive affect as a moderator. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 4, 408–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gillham, J. E., Reivich, K. J., Jaycox, L. H., & Seligman, M. E. P. (1995). Prevention of depressive symptoms in school children: Two-year follow-up. Psychological Science, 6, 343–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gillham, J., Adams-Deutsch, Z., Werner, J., Reivich, K., Coulter-Heindl, V., Linkins, M., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2011). Character strengths predict subjective well-being during adolescence. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 6, 31–44. doi:10.1080/17439760.2010.536773.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilman, R., Huebner, S., & Furlong, M. (2009). Handbook of positive psychology in schools. New York: Rutledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Govindji, R., & Linley, P. A. (2007). Strengths use, self-concordance and well-being: Implications for strengths coaching and coaching psychologists. International Coaching Psychology Review, 2, 143–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenspoon, P. J., & Saklofske, D. H. (2001). Toward an integration of subjective well-being and psychopathology. Social Indicators Research, 54, 81–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gresham, F. M., & Elliot, S. N. (1990). Social skills rating system manual. Circle Pines: American Guidance Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gresham, F. M., & Elliot, S. N. (2008). Social skills improvement system manual. Circle Pines: Pearson Assessment.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harter, S. (1985). Manual for the self-perception profile for adolescents. Denver: University of Denver.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huebner, E. (1991). Further validation of the students’ life satisfaction scale: The independence of satisfaction and affect ratings. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 9, 363–368. doi:10.1177/073428299100900408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huebner, E. S. (1994). Preliminary development and validation of a multidimensional life satisfaction scale for children. Psychological Assessment, 6, 149–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunter, J. P., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2003). The positive psychology of interested adolescents. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 32(1), 27–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huta, V., & Hawley, L. (2010). Psychological strengths and cognitive vulnerabilities: Are they two ends of the same continuum or do they have independent relationships with well-being and ill-being? Journal of Happiness Studies, 11, 71–93. doi:10.1007/s10902-008-9123-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, J., Gooding, P., Wood, A. M., & Tarrier, N. (2010). Resilience as positive coping appraisals: Testing the schematic appraisals model of suicide (SAMS). Behaviour Research and Therapy, 48, 179–186.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1984). Choices, values, and frames. American Psychologist, 39, 341–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keyes, C. L. M. (2009). The Black–White paradox in health: Flourishing in the face of social inequality and discrimination. Journal of Personality, 77, 1677–1706. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.2009.00597.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kovacs, M. (1992). Children depression inventory: Manual. New York: Multi Health System.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larsen, D., & Stege, R. (2010). Hope-focused practices during early psychotherapy sessions: Part I: Implicit approaches. Journal of Psychotherapy Integration, 20(3), 271–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laursen, E. K. (2003). Frontiers in strength-based treatment. Reclaiming Children and Youth, 12, 12–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linley, P. A., Nielsen, K. M., Gillett, R., & Biswas-Diener, R. (2010). Using signature strengths in pursuit of goals: Effects on goal progress, need satisfaction, and well-being, and implications for coaching psychologists. International Coaching Psychology Review, 5, 6–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lopez, S. J., & Snyder, C. R. (2003). Positive psychological assessment: A handbook of models and measures. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lounsbury, J. W., Fisher, L. A., Levy, J. J., & Welsh, D. P. (2009). An investigation of character strengths in relation to the academic success of college students. Individual Differences Research, 7, 52–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyubomirsky, S., Tkach, C., & DiMatteo, M. R. (2006). What are the differences between happiness and self-esteem. Social Indicators Research, 78(3), 363–404. doi:10.1007/s11205-005-0213-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, H. W. (1992). Self Description Questionnaire (SDQ) I: A theoretical and empirical basis for the measurement of multiple dimensions of preadolescent self-concept. An interim test manual and research monograph. Macarthur: University of Western Sydney, Faculty of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCullough, M. E., Emmons, R. A., & Tsang, J.-A. (2002). The grateful disposition: A conceptual and empirical topography. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 112–127.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Merrell, K. W. (2002). School social behavior scales (2nd ed.). Eugene: Assessment-Intervention Resources.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mongrain, M., & Anselmo-Matthews, T. (2012, March). Do positive psychology exercises work? A replication of Seligman et al. (2005). Journal of Clinical Psychology, 68, 382–389.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niemiec, R. M., & Wedding, D. (2008). Positive psychology at the movies: Using films to build virtues and character strengths. Cambridge, MA: Hogrefe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ong, A. D., & van Dulmen, M. (Eds.). (2006). Handbook of methods in positive psychology. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Park, N., & Peterson, C. (2006a). Moral competence and character strengths among adolescents: The development and validation of the values in action inventory of strengths for youth. Journal of Adolescence, 29(6), 891–909.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Park, N., & Peterson, C. (2006b). Character strengths and happiness among young children: Content analysis of parental descriptions. Journal of Happiness Studies, 7, 323–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, N., & Peterson, C. (2008). Positive psychology and character strengths: Application to strengths-based school counseling. Professional School Counseling, 12(2), 85–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, N., & Peterson, C. (2009). Strengths of character in schools. In R. Gilman, E. S. Huebner, & M. J. Furlong (Eds.), Handbook of positive psychology in schools (pp. 65–76). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Park, N., Peterson, C., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2004). Strengths of character and well-being. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 23, 603–619.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pedrotti, J., Edwards, L., & Lopez, S. (2008). Promoting hope: Suggestions for school counselors. Professional School Counseling, 12, 100–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, C. (2006). A primer in positive psychology. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, T. D., & Peterson, E. W. (2008). Stemming the tide of law student depression: What law schools need to learn from the science of positive psychology. Yale Journal of Health Policy, Law, and Ethics, 9(2), 357. Available at: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1277303

  • Peterson, C., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2004). Character strengths and virtues: A handbook and classification. New York/Washington, DC: Oxford University Press/American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piers, E. V., & Harris, D. B. (1984). Piers-Harris children’s self-concept scale. Los Angeles: Western Psychological Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poston, J. M., & Hanson, W. E. (2010). Meta-analysis of psychological assessment as a therapeutic intervention. Psychological Assessment, 22, 203–212. doi:10.1037/a0018679.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Proctor, C., Maltby, J., & Linley, P. (2011a). Strengths use as a predictor of well-being and health-­related quality of life. Journal of Happiness Studies, 12, 153–169. doi:10.1007/s10902-009-9181-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Proctor, C., Tsukayama, E., Wood, A. M., Maltby, J., Fox Eades, J. M., & Linley, P. A. (2011b). Strengths gym: The impact of a character strengths-based intervention on the life satisfaction and well-being of adolescents. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 6, 377–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rapp, C. A. (1997). Preface. In D. Saleeby (Ed.), The strengths perspective in social work practice. New York: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rashid, T., & Anjum, A. (2007). Positive psychotherapy for children and adolescents. In J. R. Z. Abela & B. L. Hankin (Eds.), Depression in children and adolescents: Causes, treatment and prevention. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rashid, T., & Ostermann, R. F. (2009). Strength-based assessment in clinical practice. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 65(5), 488–498. doi:10.1002/jclp. 20595.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, C. R., & Kamphaus, R. W. (1992). Behavior assessment system for children. Circle Pines: American Guidance Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, C. R., & Kamphaus, R. W. (2004). Behavior assessment system for children (2nd ed.). Circle Pines: American Guidance Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhee, S., Furlong, M., Turner, J., & Harari, I. (2001). Integrating strength-based perspectives in psychoeducational evaluations. The California School Psychologist, 6, 5–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards, M., & Huppert, F. (2011). Do positive children become positive adults: Evidence from a longitudinal birth cohort study. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 6, 75–87.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rust, T., Diessner, R., & Reade, L. (2009). Strengths only or strengths and relative weaknesses? A preliminary study. Journal of Psychology, 143, 465–476.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Scheier, M. F., Carver, C. S., & Bridges, M. W. (1994). Distinguishing optimism from neuroticism (and trait anxiety, self-mastery, and self-esteem): A re-evaluation of the life orientation test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 1063–1078.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schmid, K. L., Phelps, E. M., Kiely, M. K., Napolitano, C. M., Boyd, M. J., & Lerner, R. M. (2011). The role of adolescents’ hopeful futures in predicting positive and negative developmental trajectories: Findings from the 4-H Study of Positive Youth Development. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 6, 45–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seligman, M. E. P. (2002). Authentic happiness: Using the new positive psychology to realize your potential for lasting fulfillment. Toronto: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seligman, M. E. P. (2011). Flourish: A visionary new understanding of happiness and well-being. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seligman, M., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2000). Positive psychology: An introduction. American Psychologist, 55, 5–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Seligman, M. E. P., Steen, T. A., Park, N., & Peterson, C. (2005). Positive psychology progress: Empirical validation of interventions. American Psychologist, 60, 410–421.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Seligman, M. E. P., Rashid, T., & Parks, A. C. (2006). Positive psychotherapy. American Psychologist, 61(8), 774–788. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.61.8.774.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Seligman, M. E. P., Ernst, R. M., Gillham, J., Reivich, K., & Linkins, M. (2009). Positive education: Positive psychology and classroom interventions. Oxford Review of Education, 35, 293–311. doi:10.1080/03054980902934563.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, C. R., Hoza, B., Pelham, W. E., Rapoff, M., Ware, L., Danovsky, M., et al. (1997). The development and validation of the Children’s Hope Scale. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 22(3), 399–421.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ungar, M., & Liebenberg, L. (2009). The Child and Youth Resilience Measure (CYRM) – 28. Halifax: Resilience Research Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, H. M., & McConnell, S. R. (1995). Walker-McConnell scale of social competence and school adjustment. Belmont: Cengage Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, A. M., & Joseph, S. (2010). The absence of positive psychological (eudemonic) well-being as a risk factor for depression: A ten year cohort study. Journal of Affective Disorder, 122, 213–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood, A. M., Maltby, J., Gillett, R., Linley, P. A., & Joseph, S. (2008). The role of gratitude in the development of social support, stress, and depression: Two longitudinal studies. Journal of Research in Personality, 42, 854–871. doi:10.1016/j.jrp. 2007.11.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood, A. M., Linley, P. A., Maltby, J., Kashdan, T. B., & Hurling, R. (2011). Using personal and psychological strengths leads to increases in well-being over time: A longitudinal study and the development of the strengths use questionnaire. Personality and Individual Differences, 50, 15–19. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2010.08.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xanthopoulou, D., Bakker, A. B., Demerouti, E., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2007). The role of personal resources in the job demands-resources model. International Journal of Stress Management, 14, 121–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are deeply thankful to Carolyn Lennox, Ruth Baumal, Joy Reiter, James Bowen, Tamara Kornaki, Aarti Kumar, Nina Vitopolous, Peter Chang, and Neal Mayerson for their support in the running of the intervention studies.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tayyab Rashid .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendices

Appendices

1.1 Appendix 6.1

Sample feedback report: Signature strengths of your child

  1. 1.

    Zest, Enthusiasm, and Vitality: You are an energetic, cheerful, and full-of-life person. You approach most things with excitement and enthusiasm. Nothing is done half-way or half-heartedly for you. You wake up most mornings feeling energized and happy. The enthusiasm and passion you bring to activities often attract others to join you. When you experience something well done, you feel inspired and motivated.

    Balance: Too much zest and enthusiasm can make you overactive and can cause social challenges with peers who may experience you as “intense”. On the other hand, if you do not use this signature strength, you will come across as passive and inhibited, maybe even withdrawn.

  2. 2.

    Love of Learning: You love to learn new things – in school or on your own. You make very good use of opportunities where you can gain knowledge about skills, concepts, ideas, and facts. You have always enjoyed school and reading. When it comes to learning, you are persistent; even if you get frustrated or distracted, you refocus and don’t give up until you have mastered the topic or skill.

    Balance: Too much use of this signature strength may result in less participation in fun extra-curricular activities. Also, overuse of this strength could compromise your social interactions – you could be considered a geek who knows everything but isn’t much fun to hang out with. Then again, a lack of “love of learning” may keep you naively uninformed and unaware of many facts of life.

  3. 3.

    Humor and Playfulness: It is very easy for you to find opportunities to laugh, be witty, playful, and humorous in most situations. You are known for bringing smiles to other people and making them comfortable. You are also very good at seeing the lighter side of most situations and therefore use humor to take the edge off a stressful situation. Your sense of humor bonds you with others.

    Balance: An overuse of this signature strength may find you expressing playfulness and humor in some situations that require demonstration of other strengths – such as self-regulation or caution. Moreover, use of playfulness and humor during classroom activities may distract you and others, and you may not be able to attend specific details of a challenging assignment. On the other hand, a lack of playfulness and humor may make you too serious and inhibited and it may impact your interpersonal relationships.

  4. 4.

    Leadership: You excel at leadership tasks and activities. You are very good at organizing group activities and seeing that they happen. That is why you are the one children like to follow or often prefer that you take the lead. You also make everyone feel included. As a leader, whenever differences or conflicts occur, you are able to resolve these amicably and keep the harmony of the group intact. In fact, you are often able to bring best out of every member.

    Balance: An overuse of this strength may show you as bossy or dominating. A lack of this strength may show overly compliant behavior or lack of necessary independence.

  5. 5.

    Appreciation of Beauty and Excellence: You are very good at perceiving and appreciating beauty and excellence in many areas of life, from nature to art to mathematics to science. Display of excellence inspires you. You love to incorporate things of beauty in your surroundings. You feel at ease when you are amid art or watching a great performance.

    Balance: An overuse of this strength may not let you be sensitive to those who do not have access to great art or performances and are more concerned with meeting basic needs of everyday living. Also, an overuse of this strength may give other people the impression at times that you are bit snobbish and have an elitist attitude. An underuse of this strength may manifest in naïve ignorance or disrespect of great performances (including in sports) or pieces of art.

1.2 Appendix 6.2

Signature strength action project – Years resolution: Using my signature

Dear Child: Visualize what kind of person you would like to be in 2011? Perhaps nicer, kinder, more social, inquisitive, spiritual, courageous, playful, knowledgeable, modest, cheerful and perhaps more engaged…etc. Think and consult with your parents and friends; how you could use your signature strengths to become that person? Briefly describe your plan below. What exactly you would like to do? How frequently? What kind of support you would like from your parents and friends in making this plan a success? We would like you to complete this by June 2011. What are some timelines and phases of this plan (beginning, middle and ending)? What would happen if you become that person?

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Three things you like (or dislike) about your signature strength profile?

1. -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

2. -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

3. -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Rashid, T. et al. (2013). Assessment of Character Strengths in Children and Adolescents. In: Proctor, C., Linley, P. (eds) Research, Applications, and Interventions for Children and Adolescents. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6398-2_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics