Definition
Reliable Change Index (RCI) is a concept in measurement and assessment. An RCI is a psychometric criterion used to evaluate whether a change over time of an individual score (i.e., the difference score between two measurements in time) is considered statistically significant. Computationally, RCIs represent a ratio, in which the numerator represents an actual observed difference score between two measurements, and the denominator is some form of standard error of measurement of the difference. An RCI indicates whether an individual change score (e.g., between a patient’s pre-intervention and post-intervention assessment) is statistically significantly greater than a difference that could have occurred due to random measurement error alone.
Description
The concept of Reliable Change Index(RCI) refers to a method that is used to test whether a change over time – that...
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Christensen, L., & Mendoza, J. L. (1986). A method of assessing change in a single subject: An alteration of the RC index. Behavior Therapy, 17, 305–308.
Hinton-Bayre, A. (2000). Reliable change formula query. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 6, 362–363.
Jacobson, N. S., Follette, W. C., & Revenstorf, D. (1984). Psychotherapy outcome research: Methods for reporting variability and evaluating clinical significance. Behavior Therapy, 15, 336–352.
Jacobson, N. S., & Truax, P. (1991). Clinical significance: A statistical approach to defining meaningful change in psychotherapy research. Journal of Clinical and Consulting Psychology, 59, 12–19.
Ley, P. (1972). Quantitative aspects of psychological assessment. London: Gerald Duckworth.
Lord, F. M., & Novick, M. R. (1968). Statistical theories of mental test scores. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Maassen, G. H. (2000). Principles of defining reliable change indices. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 22, 622–632. doi:10.1076/1380-3395(200010)22:5;1-9;FT622.
Maassen, G. H. (2004). The standard error in the Jacobson and Truax reliable change index: The classical approach to the assessment of reliable change. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 10, 888–893. doi:10.10170S1355617704106097.
Maassen, G. H. (2005). Reliable change assessment in sports concussion research: A comment on the proposal and reviews of Collie et al. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 39, 483–488. doi:10.1136/bjsm.2004.015594.
Maassen, G. H., Bossema, E., & Brand, N. (2009). Reliable change and practice effects: Outcomes of various indices compared. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 31, 339–352. doi:10.1080/13803390802169059.
McNemar, Q. (1962). Psychological statistics (3rd ed.). New York: Wiley.
Mellenbergh, G. J., & Van den Brink, W. P. (1998). The measurement of individual change. Psychological Methods, 3, 470–485.
Perdices, M. (2005). How do you know whether your patient is getting better (or worse)? A user’s guide. Brain Impairment, 6, 219–226. doi:10.1375/brim.2005.6.3.219.
Temkin, N. R., Heaton, R. K., Grant, I., & Dikmen, S. S. (1999). Detecting significant change in neuropsychological test performance: A comparison of four models. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 5, 357–369.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this entry
Cite this entry
Guhn, M., Forer, B., Zumbo, B.D. (2014). Reliable Change Index. In: Michalos, A.C. (eds) Encyclopedia of Quality of Life and Well-Being Research. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0753-5_2465
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0753-5_2465
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-0752-8
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-0753-5
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and Law