Skip to main content

Definition

The bi-factor model is a confirmatory factor analytic model originally proposed for measurement data by Holzinger and Swineford in 1937 (Holzinger & Swineford, 1937) and then generalized to the case of discrete item-response data by Gibbons and Hedeker in 1992 (Gibbons & Hedeker, 1992). The bi-factor restriction requires that each item load on a primary dimension of interest and no more than one secondary dimension. The secondary dimensions or subdomains can be nuisance variables such as positively and negatively worded questions (i.e., a methodologic factor) or content domains from which the items are sampled (e.g., component dimensions underlying the overall quality of one’s life). When appropriate the bi-factor model provides numerous advantages over an unrestricted exploratory item factor analysis model, including rotational invariance and unlimited dimensionality. For categorical item responses, the likelihood of the model can be evaluated using two-dimensional...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 6,499.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 9,499.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bock, R. D., & Aitkin, M. (1981). Marginal maximum likelihood estimation of item parameters: Application of an EM algorithm. Psychometrika, 46, 443–459.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bock, R. D., Gibbons, R. D., & Muraki, E. (1988). Full-information item factor analysis. Applied Psychological Measurement, 12, 261–280.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cai, L. (2010). A two-tier full-information item factor analysis model with applications. Psychometrika, 75, 581–612.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cai, L., du Toit, S. H. C., & Thissen, D. (forthcoming). IRTPRO: Flexible, multidimensional, multiple categorical IRT modeling. Chicago: Scientific Software International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fryback, D. G., Palta, M., Cherepanov, D., Bolt, D., & Kim, J. S. (2010). Comparison of 5 health-related quality of life indexes using item response theory analysis. Medical Decision Making, 30, 5–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbons, R. D., & Hedeker, D. (1992). Full-information item bi-factor analysis. Psychometrika, 57, 423–436.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbons, R. D., Bock, R. D., Hedeker, D., Weiss, D. J., Segawa, E., Bhaumik, D. K., et al. (2007). Full-information item bifactor analysis of graded response data. Applied Psychological Measurement, 31, 4–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbons, R. D., & Hedeker, D. (2007). POLYBIF [Computer software]. Chicago: Center for Health Statistics, University of Chicago. Available from www.healthstats.org

  • Gibbons, R. D., Weiss, D. J., Kupfer, D. J., Frank, E., Fagiolini, A., Grochocinski, V. J., et al. (2008). Using computerized adaptive testing to reduce the burden of mental health assessment. Psychiatric Services, 59, 361–368.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbons, R. D., Weiss, D. J., Pilkonis, P. A., Frank, E., Moore, T., et al. (2012). Development of a computerized adaptive test for depression. Archives of General Psychiatry, 69, 1104–1112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holzinger, K. J., & Swineford, F. (1937). The bi-factor method. Psychometrika, 2, 41–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jöreskog, K. G. (1969). A general approach to confirmatory maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika, 34, 183–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehman, A. F. (1988). A quality of life interview for the chronically mentally ill. Evaluation and Program Planning, 11, 51–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muraki, E. (1990). Fitting a polytomous item response model to Likert-type data. Applied Psychological Measurement, 14, 59–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muthén, B. O. (1989). Latent variable modeling in heterogeneous populations. Psychometrika, 54, 557–585.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patrick, C. J. (2007). A bifactor approach to modeling the structure of the psychopathy checklist revised. Journal of Personality Disorders, 21, 118–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rebollo, P., Castejon, I., Cuervo, J., Villa, G., Garcia-Cueto, E., Diaz-Cuervo, H., et al. (2010). Validation of a computer-adaptive test to evaluate generic health-related quality of life. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 8, 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reininghaus, U., McCabe, R., Burns, T., Croudace, T., & Priebe, S. (2011). Measuring patients’ views: A bifactor model of distinct patient-reported outcomes in psychosis. Psychological Medicine, 41, 277–289.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reise, S. P., Moore, T. M., & Haviland, M. G. (2010). Bifactor models and rotations: Exploring the extent to which multidimensional data yield univocal scale scores. Journal of Personality Assessment, 92, 544–559.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rijmen, F. (2010). Formal relations and an empirical comparison among the bi-factor, the testlet, and a second-order multidimensional IRT model. Journal of Educational Measurement, 47, 361–372.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samejima, F. (1969). Estimation of latent ability using a response pattern of graded scores. Psychometrika Monograph Supplement, 17, 1–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thurstone, L. L. (1947). Multiple factor analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tucker, L. R. (1958). An inter-battery method of factor analysis. Psychometrika, 23, 111–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, D. J. (1985). Adaptive testing by computer. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 53, 774–789.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, F. M., Tommet, D., & Jones, R. N. (2009). Disparities in self-reported geriatric depressive symptoms due to sociodemographic differences: An extension of the bi-factor item response theory model for use in differential item functioning. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 43, 1025–1035.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robert Gibbons .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this entry

Cite this entry

Gibbons, R. (2014). Bi-factor Analysis. In: Michalos, A.C. (eds) Encyclopedia of Quality of Life and Well-Being Research. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0753-5_207

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0753-5_207

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-007-0752-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-007-0753-5

  • eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and Law

Publish with us

Policies and ethics