Skip to main content
Top

2017 | OriginalPaper | Hoofdstuk

9. Alternatief DSM-5 model voor persoonlijkheidsstoornissen

Auteurs : Dr. Theo Ingenhoven, Dr. Joost Hutsebaut, Mevrouw drs. Hilde de Saeger, Dr. Ad Kaasenbrood, Dr. Han Berghuis

Gepubliceerd in: Handboek persoonlijkheidspathologie

Uitgeverij: Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail

Samenvatting

De introductie van as-II in de DSM-III heeft ons sinds 1980 veel wetenschappelijke informatie opgeleverd over de diagnostiek en behandeling van persoonlijkheidsstoornissen. Toch bleef er fundamentele kritiek op deze wijze van classificeren. In aanloop naar de DSM-5 besloot de APA-werkgroep niet langer te sleutelen aan de diagnostische criteria uit de DSM-IV, maar een nieuw model te introduceren dat meer recht doet aan recente wetenschappelijke inzichten en de praktijk van diagnostiek, indicatiestelling en behandeling. Bij de introductie van de DSM-5 bleek dit model nog onvoldoende uitontwikkeld en gevalideerd. Uiteindelijk werden daarom de persoonlijkheidsstoornissen uit de DSM-IV onveranderd opgenomen in de DSM-5 (in deel II), en werd het alternatieve model met al zijn innovaties vooralsnog opgenomen in deel III van de DSM-5. Hierin wordt een nieuwe ernstmaat voor persoonlijkheidsstoornissen geïntroduceerd, evenals een model om persoonlijkheidstrekken dimensioneel in kaart te brengen. Over dit revolutionaire Alternatief DSM-5-model voor persoonlijkheidsstoornissen gaat dit hoofdstuk.
Literatuur
go back to reference Abraham, R. E. (2005). Het Ontwikkelingsprofiel in de praktijk. Assen: Van Gorcum. Abraham, R. E. (2005). Het Ontwikkelingsprofiel in de praktijk. Assen: Van Gorcum.
go back to reference American Psychiatric Association (1980). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorder (3rd ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press. American Psychiatric Association (1980). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorder (3rd ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press.
go back to reference APA. (2014). Handboek voor de classificatie van psychische stoornissen. DSM-5. Nederlandse vertaling. Amsterdam: Boom. APA. (2014). Handboek voor de classificatie van psychische stoornissen. DSM-5. Nederlandse vertaling. Amsterdam: Boom.
go back to reference Bender, D. S., Morey, L. C., & Skodol, A. E. (2011). Toward a model for assessing level of personality functioning in DSM-5, Part I: A review of theory and methods. Journal of Personality Assessment, 93, 332–346.CrossRef Bender, D. S., Morey, L. C., & Skodol, A. E. (2011). Toward a model for assessing level of personality functioning in DSM-5, Part I: A review of theory and methods. Journal of Personality Assessment, 93, 332–346.CrossRef
go back to reference Berghuis, H. (2014). General Assessment of Personality Disorder (GAPD). Version 2014. Tiel: Pro Persona. Berghuis, H. (2014). General Assessment of Personality Disorder (GAPD). Version 2014. Tiel: Pro Persona.
go back to reference Berghuis, H., Kamphuis, J. H., Verheul, R., Larstone, R., & Livesley, J. (2013). The General Assessment of Personality Disorder (GAPD) as an instrument for assessing the core features of personality disorders. Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, 20, 544–557.CrossRef Berghuis, H., Kamphuis, J. H., Verheul, R., Larstone, R., & Livesley, J. (2013). The General Assessment of Personality Disorder (GAPD) as an instrument for assessing the core features of personality disorders. Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, 20, 544–557.CrossRef
go back to reference Clarkin, J. F., & Huprich, S. K. (2011). Do DSM-5 Personality Disorder proposals meet criteria for clinical utility? Journal of Personality Disorders, 25, 192–205.CrossRef Clarkin, J. F., & Huprich, S. K. (2011). Do DSM-5 Personality Disorder proposals meet criteria for clinical utility? Journal of Personality Disorders, 25, 192–205.CrossRef
go back to reference Clercq, B. de , Fruyt, F. de , Leeuwen, K. van, & Mervielde, I. (2006). The structure of maladaptive personality traits in childhood: A step toward an integrative developmental perspective for DSM-V. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 115, 639–657. Clercq, B. de , Fruyt, F. de , Leeuwen, K. van, & Mervielde, I. (2006). The structure of maladaptive personality traits in childhood: A step toward an integrative developmental perspective for DSM-V. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 115, 639–657.
go back to reference Cloninger, C. R. (2000). A practical way to diagnose personality disorder: A proposal. Journal of Personality Disorders, 14, 99–108.CrossRef Cloninger, C. R. (2000). A practical way to diagnose personality disorder: A proposal. Journal of Personality Disorders, 14, 99–108.CrossRef
go back to reference Eurelings-Bontekoe, E. H. M., et al. (2009). Structural personality organization as assessed with theory driven profile interpretation of the Dutch Short Form of the MMPI predicts drop out and treatment response in short term cognitive behavioral group therapy for axis I disorders. Journal of Personality Assessment, 91(5), 439–452.CrossRef Eurelings-Bontekoe, E. H. M., et al. (2009). Structural personality organization as assessed with theory driven profile interpretation of the Dutch Short Form of the MMPI predicts drop out and treatment response in short term cognitive behavioral group therapy for axis I disorders. Journal of Personality Assessment, 91(5), 439–452.CrossRef
go back to reference Eurelings-Bontekoe, E. H. M., & Snellen, W. M. (2012). Dynamische persoonlijkheidsdiagnostiek. Amsterdam: Pearson. Eurelings-Bontekoe, E. H. M., & Snellen, W. M. (2012). Dynamische persoonlijkheidsdiagnostiek. Amsterdam: Pearson.
go back to reference Harkness, A. R., & McNulty, J. L. (1994). The Personality Psychopathology Five (PSY-5): Issue from the pages of a diagnostic manual instead of a dictionary. In S. Strack & M. Lorr (Red.), Differentiating normal and abnormal personality, (pag. 291–315). New York: Springer. Harkness, A. R., & McNulty, J. L. (1994). The Personality Psychopathology Five (PSY-5): Issue from the pages of a diagnostic manual instead of a dictionary. In S. Strack & M. Lorr (Red.), Differentiating normal and abnormal personality, (pag. 291–315). New York: Springer.
go back to reference Heijden, P. van der, Ingenhoven, T., Berghuis, H., & Rossi, G. (2014). Vragenlijst voor de DSM-5 persoonlijkheid (PID-5-NL). Amsterdam: Boom. Heijden, P. van der, Ingenhoven, T., Berghuis, H., & Rossi, G. (2014). Vragenlijst voor de DSM-5 persoonlijkheid (PID-5-NL). Amsterdam: Boom.
go back to reference Hoekstra, H. A., Ormel, J., & Fruyt, F. de. (1996, 2007, 2014). Neo-PI-R. Amsterdam: Hogrefe. Hoekstra, H. A., Ormel, J., & Fruyt, F. de. (1996, 2007, 2014). Neo-PI-R. Amsterdam: Hogrefe.
go back to reference Hopwood, C. J., et al. (2011). Personality assessment in DSM-5: Empirical support for rating severity, style, and traits. Journal of Personality Disorders, 25, 305–320.CrossRef Hopwood, C. J., et al. (2011). Personality assessment in DSM-5: Empirical support for rating severity, style, and traits. Journal of Personality Disorders, 25, 305–320.CrossRef
go back to reference Huprich, S. K., & Hopwood, C. J. (2013). Personality assessment in the DSM-5. London: Routledge, New York: Taylor & Francis. Huprich, S. K., & Hopwood, C. J. (2013). Personality assessment in the DSM-5. London: Routledge, New York: Taylor & Francis.
go back to reference Hutsebaut, J., Berghuis, H., Saeger, H. de, Ingenhoven T., & Kamphuis, J. H. (2014). Development, clinical utility, and preliminary psychometric evaluation of the semi-structured interview for personality functioning (STiP-5). In symposium: Assessment DSM-5 level of personality functioning: New measures and findings. Third international congress on borderline personality disorders. Rome: ESSPD. Hutsebaut, J., Berghuis, H., Saeger, H. de, Ingenhoven T., & Kamphuis, J. H. (2014). Development, clinical utility, and preliminary psychometric evaluation of the semi-structured interview for personality functioning (STiP-5). In symposium: Assessment DSM-5 level of personality functioning: New measures and findings. Third international congress on borderline personality disorders. Rome: ESSPD.
go back to reference Hutsebaut, J., Berghuis, H., Kaasenbrood, A., Saeger, H. de, & Ingenhoven, T. (2015). Semi-gestructureerd Interview voor Persoonlijkheidsfunctioneren DSM-5 (STiP-5.1). Podium DSM-5. Kenniscentrum Persoonlijkheidsstoornissen. Utrecht: Trimbos-instituut. Hutsebaut, J., Berghuis, H., Kaasenbrood, A., Saeger, H. de, & Ingenhoven, T. (2015). Semi-gestructureerd Interview voor Persoonlijkheidsfunctioneren DSM-5 (STiP-5.1). Podium DSM-5. Kenniscentrum Persoonlijkheidsstoornissen. Utrecht: Trimbos-instituut.
go back to reference Ingenhoven, T. J. M., & Abraham, R. E. (2010). Making diagnosis more meaningful. The Developmental Profile: A psychodynamic assessment of personality. American Journal of Psychotherapy, 64, 215–238.CrossRef Ingenhoven, T. J. M., & Abraham, R. E. (2010). Making diagnosis more meaningful. The Developmental Profile: A psychodynamic assessment of personality. American Journal of Psychotherapy, 64, 215–238.CrossRef
go back to reference Kampen, D. van, & Beurs, E. de (2009). DAPP-BQ. Dimensionale Assessment van Persoonlijkheids Pathologie, Handleiding (Dimensional Assessment of Personality Pathology, Manual). Amsterdam: Hogrefe. Kampen, D. van, & Beurs, E. de (2009). DAPP-BQ. Dimensionale Assessment van Persoonlijkheids Pathologie, Handleiding (Dimensional Assessment of Personality Pathology, Manual). Amsterdam: Hogrefe.
go back to reference Kernberg, O. F. (1984). Severe personality diosrders. New Haven: Yale University Press. Kernberg, O. F. (1984). Severe personality diosrders. New Haven: Yale University Press.
go back to reference Krueger, R. F., & Eaton, N. R. (2010). Personality traits and the classification of mental disorders: Toward a more complete integration in DSM-5 and an empirical model of psychopathology. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 1, 97–118.CrossRef Krueger, R. F., & Eaton, N. R. (2010). Personality traits and the classification of mental disorders: Toward a more complete integration in DSM-5 and an empirical model of psychopathology. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 1, 97–118.CrossRef
go back to reference Krueger, R. F., et al. (2011). Deriving an empirical structure of personality pathology for DSM-5. Journal of Personality Disorders, 25, 170–191.CrossRef Krueger, R. F., et al. (2011). Deriving an empirical structure of personality pathology for DSM-5. Journal of Personality Disorders, 25, 170–191.CrossRef
go back to reference Livesley, W. J. (2006). General Assessment of Personality Disorder (GAPD). Department of Psychiatry. Vancouver: University of British Columbia. Livesley, W. J. (2006). General Assessment of Personality Disorder (GAPD). Department of Psychiatry. Vancouver: University of British Columbia.
go back to reference Livesley, W. J., & Jackson, D. N. (2009). Manual for the Dimensional Assessment of Personality Pathology-Basic Questionnaire (DAPP-BQ). Port Huron, MI: Sigma Assessment Systems. Livesley, W. J., & Jackson, D. N. (2009). Manual for the Dimensional Assessment of Personality Pathology-Basic Questionnaire (DAPP-BQ). Port Huron, MI: Sigma Assessment Systems.
go back to reference Livesley, W. J., & Jang, K. L. (2000). Toward an empirically based classification of personality disorder. Journal of Personality Disorders, 14, 137–151.CrossRef Livesley, W. J., & Jang, K. L. (2000). Toward an empirically based classification of personality disorder. Journal of Personality Disorders, 14, 137–151.CrossRef
go back to reference Livesley, W. L., & Jang, K. L. (2005). Differentiating normal, abnormal, and disordered personality. European Journal of Personality, 19(4), 257–268. Livesley, W. L., & Jang, K. L. (2005). Differentiating normal, abnormal, and disordered personality. European Journal of Personality, 19(4), 257–268.
go back to reference Livesley, W. J. (2003). Practical management of personality disorders. New York/ London: The Guilford Press. Livesley, W. J. (2003). Practical management of personality disorders. New York/ London: The Guilford Press.
go back to reference Livesley, W. J. (2010). Confusion and incoherence in the classification of Personality Disorder: Commentary on the preliminary proposals for DSM-5. Psychological Injury and Law, 3, 304–313.CrossRef Livesley, W. J. (2010). Confusion and incoherence in the classification of Personality Disorder: Commentary on the preliminary proposals for DSM-5. Psychological Injury and Law, 3, 304–313.CrossRef
go back to reference Livesley, W. J. (2012). Disorders in the proposed DSM-5 classification of personality disorders (commentary). Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, 19, 364–368.CrossRef Livesley, W. J. (2012). Disorders in the proposed DSM-5 classification of personality disorders (commentary). Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, 19, 364–368.CrossRef
go back to reference Luteijn, F., & Kok, A. R. (1985). Herziene NVM handleiding. Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger. Luteijn, F., & Kok, A. R. (1985). Herziene NVM handleiding. Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger.
go back to reference McCrae, R., & Costa, P. (1990). Personality in adulthood. New York: Guilford Press. McCrae, R., & Costa, P. (1990). Personality in adulthood. New York: Guilford Press.
go back to reference McCrae, R., & Costa, P. (1997). Personality trait structure as a human universal. American Psychologist, 52, 509–516.CrossRef McCrae, R., & Costa, P. (1997). Personality trait structure as a human universal. American Psychologist, 52, 509–516.CrossRef
go back to reference Morey, L. C., Berghuis, H., Bender, D. S., Verheul, R., Kreuger, R. F., & Skodol, A. E. (2011). Towards a model for assessing Level of Personality Functioning in DSM-5, part II: Empirical articulation of a core dimension of personality pathology. Journal of Personality Assessment, 93, 347–353.CrossRef Morey, L. C., Berghuis, H., Bender, D. S., Verheul, R., Kreuger, R. F., & Skodol, A. E. (2011). Towards a model for assessing Level of Personality Functioning in DSM-5, part II: Empirical articulation of a core dimension of personality pathology. Journal of Personality Assessment, 93, 347–353.CrossRef
go back to reference Parker, G., Hadzi-Pavlovic, D., Both, L., Kumar, S., Wilhelm, K., & Olley, A. (2004). Measuring disordered personality functioning: To love and work reprised. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 110, 230–239.CrossRef Parker, G., Hadzi-Pavlovic, D., Both, L., Kumar, S., Wilhelm, K., & Olley, A. (2004). Measuring disordered personality functioning: To love and work reprised. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 110, 230–239.CrossRef
go back to reference Ronningstam, E. (2011). Narcissistic Personality Disorder in DSM-V – In support of retaining a significant diagnosis. Journal of Personality Disorders, 25, 248–259.CrossRef Ronningstam, E. (2011). Narcissistic Personality Disorder in DSM-V – In support of retaining a significant diagnosis. Journal of Personality Disorders, 25, 248–259.CrossRef
go back to reference Rossi, G., Alphen, B. van, Weerdt, M. de, Markon, K. E., & Krueger, R. F. (2014). Vragenlijst voor de DSM-5® persoonlijkheid: Informantenversie (PID-5-IBF-NL). Amsterdam: Boom. Rossi, G., Alphen, B. van, Weerdt, M. de, Markon, K. E., & Krueger, R. F. (2014). Vragenlijst voor de DSM-5® persoonlijkheid: Informantenversie (PID-5-IBF-NL). Amsterdam: Boom.
go back to reference Skodol, A. E., et al. (2011a). Proposed changes in Personality and Personality Disorder Assessment and Diagnosis for DSM-5. Part I Description and rationale. Journal of Personality Disorders: Theory, Research and Treatment, 2, 4–22.CrossRef Skodol, A. E., et al. (2011a). Proposed changes in Personality and Personality Disorder Assessment and Diagnosis for DSM-5. Part I Description and rationale. Journal of Personality Disorders: Theory, Research and Treatment, 2, 4–22.CrossRef
go back to reference Skodol, A. E., et al. (2011b). Proposed changes in Personality and Personality Disorder Assessment and Diagnosis for DSM-5. Part II: Clinical application. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research and Treatment, 2, 23–40.CrossRef Skodol, A. E., et al. (2011b). Proposed changes in Personality and Personality Disorder Assessment and Diagnosis for DSM-5. Part II: Clinical application. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research and Treatment, 2, 23–40.CrossRef
go back to reference Trull, T. J., & Durrett, C. A. (2005). Categorical and dimensional models of personality disorder. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 1, 355–380.CrossRef Trull, T. J., & Durrett, C. A. (2005). Categorical and dimensional models of personality disorder. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 1, 355–380.CrossRef
go back to reference Tyrer, P. (1988). What’s wrong with DSM-III personality disorders? Journal of Personality Disorders, 2, 281–291.CrossRef Tyrer, P. (1988). What’s wrong with DSM-III personality disorders? Journal of Personality Disorders, 2, 281–291.CrossRef
go back to reference Verheul, R. (2005). Clinical utility for dimensional models of personality pathology. Journal of Personality Disorders, 19, 283–302.CrossRef Verheul, R. (2005). Clinical utility for dimensional models of personality pathology. Journal of Personality Disorders, 19, 283–302.CrossRef
go back to reference Verheul, R., et al. (2008). Severity Indices of Personality Problems (SIPP-118): Development, factor structure, reliability, and validity. Psychological Assessment, 20, 23–34.CrossRef Verheul, R., et al. (2008). Severity Indices of Personality Problems (SIPP-118): Development, factor structure, reliability, and validity. Psychological Assessment, 20, 23–34.CrossRef
go back to reference Verheul, R. (2012). Personality proposal for DSM-5: A heroic and innovative but nevertheless fundamentally flawed attempt to improve DSM-IV (commentary). Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, 19, 369–371.CrossRef Verheul, R. (2012). Personality proposal for DSM-5: A heroic and innovative but nevertheless fundamentally flawed attempt to improve DSM-IV (commentary). Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, 19, 369–371.CrossRef
go back to reference Widiger, T. A. (2011). The DSM-5 Dimensional model of Personality Disorder: Rationale and empirical Support. Journal of Personality Disorders, 25, 222–234.CrossRef Widiger, T. A. (2011). The DSM-5 Dimensional model of Personality Disorder: Rationale and empirical Support. Journal of Personality Disorders, 25, 222–234.CrossRef
go back to reference Widiger, T. A., & Presnall, J. R. (2013). Clinical application of the Five-Factor Model. Journal of Personality, 81, 515–527.CrossRef Widiger, T. A., & Presnall, J. R. (2013). Clinical application of the Five-Factor Model. Journal of Personality, 81, 515–527.CrossRef
go back to reference Widiger, T. A., & Simonsen, E. (2005). Alternative dimensional models of personality disorder. Journal of Personality Disorder, 19, 110–130.CrossRef Widiger, T. A., & Simonsen, E. (2005). Alternative dimensional models of personality disorder. Journal of Personality Disorder, 19, 110–130.CrossRef
go back to reference Widiger, T. A., & Trull, T. J. (2007). Plate tectonics in the classification of personality disorder: Shifting to a dimensional model. American Psychologist, 62, 71–83.CrossRef Widiger, T. A., & Trull, T. J. (2007). Plate tectonics in the classification of personality disorder: Shifting to a dimensional model. American Psychologist, 62, 71–83.CrossRef
go back to reference Zanarini, M. C., Frankenburg, F. R., Reich, D. B., & Fitzmaurice, G. (2012). Attainment and stability of sustained symptomatic remission and recovery among patients with borderline personality disorder and axis II comparison subjects: A 16-year prospective follow-up study. American Journal of Psychiatry, 169, 476–483.CrossRef Zanarini, M. C., Frankenburg, F. R., Reich, D. B., & Fitzmaurice, G. (2012). Attainment and stability of sustained symptomatic remission and recovery among patients with borderline personality disorder and axis II comparison subjects: A 16-year prospective follow-up study. American Journal of Psychiatry, 169, 476–483.CrossRef
go back to reference Zimmerman, M. (2011). A critique of the proposed rating system for Personality Diroders in DSM-5. Journal of Personality Disorders, 25, 206–221.CrossRef Zimmerman, M. (2011). A critique of the proposed rating system for Personality Diroders in DSM-5. Journal of Personality Disorders, 25, 206–221.CrossRef
Metagegevens
Titel
Alternatief DSM-5 model voor persoonlijkheidsstoornissen
Auteurs
Dr. Theo Ingenhoven
Dr. Joost Hutsebaut
Mevrouw drs. Hilde de Saeger
Dr. Ad Kaasenbrood
Dr. Han Berghuis
Copyright
2017
Uitgeverij
Bohn Stafleu van Loghum
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-368-0931-3_9