Skip to main content

Bias of Ability Estimates Using Warm’s Weighted Likelihood Estimator (WLE) in the Generalized Partial Credit Model (GPCM)

  • Conference paper
New Developments in Psychometrics

Summary

Application of IRT models to practical situations requires that parameter estimates be unbiased. Park & Swaminathan(1998) investigated the properties of maximum likelihood estimator(MLE) and Expected a posterior (EAP) estimators of ability parameters in the Generalized partial credit model (GPCM) and found that there was considerable bias of estimates in the GPCM under all conditions. Warm(1989) proposed the weighted likelihood estimator(WLE) for the 3-PL IRT model to reduce bias of MLE and showed that WLE produced less bias of estimates than ML and Bayesian estimation.

The purpose of this study is to apply WLE to the GPCM to reduce bias of estimates of ability parameters. In addition, this study investigates the properties of WLE, EAP, and ML estimates of ability parameters in the GPCM. The study shows that WLE considerably reduces the bias of estimates of ability parameters in the GPCM. WLE performs especially better than EAP and does similar to ML across all conditions. WL estimates performs better than ML estimate especially with small number of items (3 category 9 items). Conclusively, WLE could be applied to other polytomous IRT models in addition to GPCM to obtain unbiased estimates.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Gifford, J., & Swaminathan, H. (1990) Bias and the effect of priors in Bayesian estimation of parameters of item response models. Applied Psychological Measurement, 11, 33–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muraki, E. (1992) A generalized partial credit model: An application of an EM algorithm. Applied Psychological Measurement, 16, 159–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muraki, E., & Bock, R. D. (1997) PARSCALE 3. 2: IRT based test scoring and item analysis for graded open-ended exercises and performance tasks. Chicago, IL: Scientific Software

    Google Scholar 

  • Park, C., & Swaminathan, H. (1998, April) Accuracy of ability estimates in the generalized Partial Credit Model (GPCM). Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, CA, 1998

    Google Scholar 

  • Samejima, F. (1969) Estimation of latent ability using a response pattern of graded scores. Psychometrika Monograph Supplement, 34 (4, Whole No. 17)

    Google Scholar 

  • Warm, T.A. (1989) Weighted likelihood estimation of ability in the item response theory. Psychometrika, 54, 427–450

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

H. Yanai A. Okada K. Shigemasu Y. Kano J. J. Meulman

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer Japan

About this paper

Cite this paper

Park, C., Muraki, E. (2003). Bias of Ability Estimates Using Warm’s Weighted Likelihood Estimator (WLE) in the Generalized Partial Credit Model (GPCM). In: Yanai, H., Okada, A., Shigemasu, K., Kano, Y., Meulman, J.J. (eds) New Developments in Psychometrics. Springer, Tokyo. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-66996-8_21

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-66996-8_21

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Tokyo

  • Print ISBN: 978-4-431-66998-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-4-431-66996-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics