Skip to main content

Sozialpsychologische Determinanten –Gruppenzugehörigkeit und soziale Kategorisierung

  • Chapter
Diskriminierung und Toleranz

Zusammenfassung

In Politik und Medien sind Themen der sozialen Diskriminierung und Toleranz häufig vertreten. Das Interesse an diesen Themen wird insbesondere angeregt durch abstoßende Vorfälle – von Pöbeleien bis hin zu physischen Angriffen – gegenüber Personen, die ihrem Aussehen oder Auftreten nach Fremde sind. Es können aber auch Personen sein, die – wie beispielsweise Behinderte oder Obdachlose – in anderer Hinsicht abweichen und das „Bild stören“, das man sich von der eigenen Gruppe macht, etwa als Einheimischer im eigenen Dorf, im Stadtteil oder im eigenen Land.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Weiterführende Literatur

  • Mummendey, A. & Wenzel, M. (1999). Social discrimination and tolerance in intergroup relations: Reactions to intergroup difference. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 3, 158–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mummendey, A. & Otten, S. (2001). Aversive Discrimination. In R. Brown & S. Gaertner (Eds.), Blackwell Handbook in Social Psychology, Volume 4: Intergroup Processes. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

Literatur

  • Allport, G. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Reading: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bar-Tal, D. (1989) Deligitimization: The extreme case of stereotyping and prejudice. In D. Bar-Tal, C. F. Graumann, A. W. Kruglanski & W. Stroebe (Eds.), Stereotyping and prejudice (pp. 169–182). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bless, H. & Fiedler, K. (1995). Affective states and the influence of activated general knowledge. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 766–778.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brewer, M. B. (1999). The psychology of prejudice: Ingroup love or outgroup hate? Journal of Social Issues, 55, 429–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dovidio, J. F., Gaertner, S. L. & Loux, S. (2000). Subjective experiences and intergroup relations: The role of positive affect. In H. Bless & J. Forgas (Eds.), The message within: The role of subjective states in social cognition and behavior (pp. 340–371). Philadelphia: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaertner, S. L. & Dovidio, J. F. (2000). Reducing intergroup bias: The common ingroup identity model. Philadelphia: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gasper, K. & Clore, G. L. (2002). Attending to the big picture: Mood and global versus local processing of visual information. Psychological Science, 13, 34–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graumann, C. F. & Wintermantel, M. (1989). Discriminatory speech acts. A functional approach. In D. Bar-Tal, C. F. Graumann, A. W. Kruglanski & W. Stroebe (Eds.), Stereotyping and prejudice (pp. 183–204). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hewstone, M., Rubin, M. & Willis, H. (2002). Intergroup Bias. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 575–604.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Isen, A. M. & Daubman, K. A. (1984). The influence of affect on categorization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 1206–1217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kessler, T. & Mummendey, A. (2001). Is there any scapegoat around? Determinants of intergroup conflict at different categorization levels. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 1090–1102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mummendey, A. & Kessler, T. (2008). Akzeptanz oder Ablehnung von Andersartigkeit: Die Beziehung zwischen Zuwanderern und Einheimischen aus einer sozialpsychologischen Perspektive. Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpszchologie, 48, 513–528.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mummendey, A. & Otten, S. (1998). Positive-negative asymmetry in social discrimination. In W. Stroebe & M. Hewstone (Eds.), European Review of Social Psychology, Volume 9 (pp. 107–143). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mummendey, A., Otten, S., Berger, U. & Kessler, T. (2001). Positive-negative asymmetry in social discrimination: valence of evaluation and salience of categorization. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 1258–1270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mummendey, A. & Wenzel, M. (1999). Social discrimination and tolerance in intergroup relations: Reactions to intergroup difference. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 3, 158–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Otten, S. (2002). „Me” and „us” or „us” and „them”? - The self as heuristic for defining novel ingroups. European Review of Social Psychology, 13, 1–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sassenberg, K. & Moskowitz, G. B. (2005). Don’t stereotype, think different! Overcoming automatic stereotype activation by mindset priming. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 41, 506–514.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sherif, M. (1966). In common predicament. Social Psychology of intergroup conflict and cooperation. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sumner, W. G. (1906). Folkways: A study of the sociological importance of usages, manners, customs, mores and morals. Boston: Ginn.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tajfel, H. & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S. Worchel & W. G. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (2nd ed., pp. 7–24). Chicago: Nelson-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waldzus, S., Mummendey, A., Wenzel, M. & Weber, U. (2002). Towards tolerance: Representations of superordinate categories and perceived ingroup prototypicality. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39, 31–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walzer, M. (1998). Über Toleranz: Von der Zivilisierung der Differenz. Hamburg: RotbuchVerlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenzel, M., Mummendey, A. & Waldzus, S. (2007). Superordinate identities and intergroup conflict: The ingroup projection model. European Review of Social Psychology, 18, 331–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften | GWV Fachverlage GmbH

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Mummendey, A., Kessler, T., Otten, S. (2009). Sozialpsychologische Determinanten –Gruppenzugehörigkeit und soziale Kategorisierung. In: Beelmann, A., Jonas, K.J. (eds) Diskriminierung und Toleranz. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-91621-7_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-91621-7_2

  • Publisher Name: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-531-15732-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-531-91621-7

  • eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Science (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics