Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Detection of Malingering in Psychic Damage Ascertainment

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
P5 Medicine and Justice

Abstract

Malingering is the intentional feigning or exaggeration of physical or psychological symptoms. Since the beginning of 1900 malingering detection has been one of the main challenges in medico-legal practice and in particular in psychiatric and cognitive assessment, as behavioral symptoms are very easy to produce, so that the need for specific tools and strategies for malingering detection is crucial. Although several tools and strategies are available, conclusions are often derived from mere subjective impressions and in many cases they lead to misclassifications. Here we present a non-exhaustive review of strategies for the detection of malingering, starting from the logic underlying a qualitative analysis of symptoms, to validated tools specifically designed to detect attempts at simulating or exaggerating psychopathological, psychiatric or cognitive diseases. Finally, we describe two recent approaches to the malingering detection problem. These approaches are grounded on the analysis of the reaction-times and on the dynamic analysis of kinematic features of mouse trajectories while an examinee is answering to double-choice questions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Mittenberg W, Patton C, Canyock EM, Condit DC (2002) Base rates of malingering and symptom exaggeration. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 24(8):1094–1102

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Larrabee GJ (2013) Detection of malingering using atypical performance patterns on standard neuropsychological tests. Clin Neuropsychol 17(3):410–425

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ardolf BR, Denney RL, Houston CM (2007) Base rates of negative response bias and malingered neurocognitive dysfunction among criminal defendants referred for neuropsychological evaluation. Clin Neuropsychol 21(6):899–916

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Green P, Rohling ML, Lees-Haley PR, Allen LM 3rd (2001) Effort has a greater effect on test scores than severe brain injury in compensation claimants. Brain Inj 15(12):1045–1060

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Drob SL, Meehan KB, Waxman SE (2009) Clinical and conceptual problems in the attribution of malingering in forensic evaluations. J Am Acad Psychiatry Law 37(1):98–106

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Sartori G, Agosta S, Zogmaister C, Ferrara SD, Castiello U (2008) How to accurately detect autobiographical events. Psychol Sci 19(8):772–780

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Cornell DG, Hawk GL (1989) Clinical presentation of malingerers diagnosed by experienced forensic psychologists. Law Hum Behav 13:375–383

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Larrabee GJ (1990) Cautions in the use of neuropsychological evaluation in legal settings. Neuropsychology 4:239–247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Berry DTR, Baer RA, Harris MJ (1991) Detection of malingering on the MMPI: a meta-analysis. Clin Psychol Rev 11:585–598. In: Psychol Inj and Law (2010) 3:295–303

    Google Scholar 

  10. Boone KB (ed) (2007) Assessment of feigned cognitive impairment: a neuropsychological perspective. Guilford Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  11. Larrabee GJ (ed) (2007) Assessment of malingered neuropsychological deficits. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  12. Butcher JN, Dahlstrom WG, Graham JR, Tallagen A, Kaemmer B (eds) (1989) MMPI-2: manual for administration and scoring. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis

    Google Scholar 

  13. Rogers R, Bagby RM, Dickens SE (1992) Structured interview of reported symptoms: professional manual. Psychological Assessment Resources, Odessa

    Google Scholar 

  14. Smith GP, Burger GK (1997) Detection of malingering: validation of the Structured Inventory of Malingered Symptomatology (SIMS). J Am Acad Psychiatry Law 25(2):183–189

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Morey LC (1991) Personality assessment inventory: professional manual. Psychological Assessment Resources, Odessa

    Google Scholar 

  16. Beaber RJ, Marston A, Michelli J, Mills MJ (1985) A brief test for measuring malingering in schizophrenic individuals. Am J Psychiatry 142(12):1478–1481

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Tombaugh TN (1996) Test of memory malingering. Multi-Health Systems, Toronto

    Google Scholar 

  18. Tombaugh TN (1997) The Test of Memory Malingering (TOMM): normative data from cognitively intact and cognitively impaired individuals. Psychol Assess 9(3):260–268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Green P, Allen l, Astner K (eds) (1997) The word memory test: a manual for the oral and computerized forms. CogniSyst Inc, Durham

    Google Scholar 

  20. Allen LM, Conder RL, Green P, Cox DR (1997) CARB 97 manual for the computerized assessment of response bias. CogniSyst, Durham

    Google Scholar 

  21. Lezak MD, Howieson DB, Bigler ED, Tranel D (1995) Neuropsychological assessment. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  22. Rey A (1941) L’examen psychologie dans las cas d’encephalopathie traumatique. Archives de Psychologie 23(112):286–340

    Google Scholar 

  23. Rey A (ed) (1964) L’examen clinique en psychologie. Presses Universitaires de France, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  24. Granhag PA, Vrij A, Verschuere B (2015) Deception detection: current challenges and new approaches. Wiley, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  25. Walczyk JJ, Igou FP, Dixon AP, Tcholakian T (2013) Advancing lie detection by inducing cognitive load on liars: a review of relevant theories and techniques guided by lessons from polygraph-based approaches. Front Psychol 4:14

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Verschuere B, Ben-Shakhar G, Meijer E (2011) Memory detection: theory and application of the concealed information test. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  27. Greenwald AG, McGhee DE, Schwartz JLK (1998) Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: the implicit association test. J Pers Soc Psychol 74(6):1464–1480

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Agosta S, Sartori G (2013) The autobiographical IAT: a review. Front Psychol 4:519

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Freng S, Kehn A (2013) Determining true and false witnessed events: can an eyewitness-implicit association test distinguish between the seen and unseen? Psychiatry Psychol Law 20:761–780

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Sartori G, Agosta S, Gnoato F (2007) High accuracy detection of malingered whiplash syndrome. Paper presented at the International Whiplash Trauma Congress, Miami

    Google Scholar 

  31. Mitchell TM (1997) Machine learning. WCB/McGraw-Hill, Columbus

    Google Scholar 

  32. Mitchell TM, Hutchinson R, Niculescu RS, Pereira F, Wang X, Just M, Newman S (2004) Learning to decode cognitive states from brain images. Mach Learn 57:145–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Haynes JD, Rees G (2006) Decoding mental states from brain activity in humans. Nat Rev Neurosci 7:523–534

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Monaro M, Gamberini L, Sartori G (2016) Identity verification using a kinematic memory detection technique. Proceeding of 7th International Conference on Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics (in press)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Vrij A (ed) (2015) Deception detection: current challenges and new approaches. Wiley, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  36. Freeman JB, Dale R, Farmer TA (2011) Hand in motion reveals mind in motion. Front Psychol 2:59

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Duran N, Dale R, McNamara DS (2010) The action dynamics of overcoming the truth. Psychon Bull Rev 17(4):486–491

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Hibbeln M, Jenkins J, Schneider C, Valacich J, Weinmann M (2014) Investigating the effect of fraud on mouse usage in human-computer interactions. International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS 2014)

    Google Scholar 

  39. Valacich JS, Jenkins JL, Nunamaker JF Jr, Hariri S, Howie J (2013) Identifying insider threats through monitoring mouse movements in Concealed Information Tests. Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Deception Detection Symposium

    Google Scholar 

  40. Vitacco MJ, Jackson RL, Rogers R, Neumann CS, Miller HA, Gabel J (2008) Detection strategies for malingering with the miller forensic assessment of symptoms test—a confirmatory factor analysis of its underlying dimensions. Assessment 15(1):97–103

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of General Psychology, University of Padova, Via Venezia 8, 35131, Padova, Italy

    Giuseppe Sartori, Andrea Zangrossi, Graziella Orrù & Merylin Monaro

Authors
  1. Giuseppe Sartori
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Andrea Zangrossi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Graziella Orrù
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Merylin Monaro
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Giuseppe Sartori .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Legal and Occupational Medicine, Toxicology and Public Health, University-Hospital of Padova, Padova, Italy

    Santo Davide Ferrara

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Sartori, G., Zangrossi, A., Orrù, G., Monaro, M. (2017). Detection of Malingering in Psychic Damage Ascertainment. In: Ferrara, S. (eds) P5 Medicine and Justice. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67092-8_21

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation