Abstract
This chapter will describe how many of the ethical judgments about the appropriate application of mindfulness rest on various assumptions and value judgments about what it means for something to be “religious” or “secular,” and so on. It will discuss how the framing of concepts such as the religious and the secular have evolved through the modern period to the postmodern period, and how this has a bearing on the contemporary mindfulness debates. It will be argued that the contemporary mindfulness debates are most fruitfully understood in postmodern, postsecular terms, and that doing so opens the door to mutually beneficial dialogue between narratives and disciplines.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Anderson, W. T. (1990). Reality is not what it used to be: Theatrical politics, ready-to-wear religion, global myths, primitive chic, and other wonders of the postmodern world. San Francisco: Harper & Collins.
Armstrong, K. (2009). The case for God. New York: Knopf.
Baer, R. (2015). Ethics, values, virtues, and character strengths in mindfulness-based interventions: A psychological science perspective. Mindfulness, 6(4), 956–969.
Beauchamp, T. L., & Childress, J. F. (2001). Principles of biomedical ethics. New York: Oxford University Press.
Benner, P. (1997). A dialogue between virtue ethics and care ethics. Theoretical Medicine, 18(1), 47–61.
Braun, E. (2013). The birth of insight: Meditation, modern Buddhism, and the Burmese monk Ledi Sayadaw. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Casanova, J. (2013). Exploring the postsecular: Three meanings of the “Secular” and their possible transcendence. In C. Calhoun, E. Mendieta, & J. VanAntwerpen (Eds.), Habermas and religion. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Cassell, E. J. (1998). The nature of suffering and the goals of medicine. Loss, Grief and Care, 8(1–2), 129–142.
Charon, R. (2006). Narrative medicine: Honoring the stories of illness. New York: Oxford University Press.
Compson, J., & Monteiro, L. (2015). Still exploring the middle path: A response to commentaries. Mindfulness, 7(2), 548–564.
Esposito, J. L., Fasching, D. J., & Lewis, T. T. (2002). World religions today. New York: Oxford University Press.
Farias, M., & Wikholm, C. (2015). The Buddha pill: Can meditation change you? London: Watkins.
Fronsdal, G. (1998). Life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness in the American insight community. In C. S. Prebish (Ed.), The faces of Buddhism in America. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Gardiner, P. (2003). A virtue ethics approach to moral dilemmas in medicine. Journal of Medical Ethics, 29(5), 297–302.
Gleig, A. (2018, forthcoming). WORKING TITLE: Enlightenment after the enlightenment: American Buddhism after modernity.
Habermas, J. (2008). Notes on post-secular society. New Perspectives Quarterly, 25(4), 17–29.
Harrison, P. (2006). “Science” and “religion”: Constructing the boundaries. The Journal of Religion, 86(1), 81–106.
Heuman, L. (2014). The science delusion: An interview with cultural critic Curtis White. Tricycle Magazine, Spring 2014. Retrieved on March 7, 2017 from https://tricycle.org/magazine/science-delusion/
Hitchens, C. (2008). God is not great: How religion poisons everything. Toronto: McClelland & Stewart.
Kabat-Zinn, J. (2000). Indra’s net at work: The mainstreaming of Dharma practice in society. In G. Watson, S. Batchelor, & G. Claxton (Eds.), The psychology of awakening: Buddhism, science, and our day-to-day lives (pp. 225–249). York Beach, ME: Weiser.
Lewis, B. (2016). Mindfulness, mysticism, and narrative medicine. Journal of Medical Humanities, 37(4), 401–417.
Loewy, E. H. (1986). Teaching medical ethics to medical students. Academic Medicine, 61(8), 661–665.
Masuzawa, T. (2005). The invention of world religions: Or, how European universalism was preserved in the language of pluralism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
McMahan, D. L. (2008). The making of Buddhist modernism. New York: Oxford University Press.
Monteiro, L. M., Musten, R. F., & Compson, J. (2015). Traditional and contemporary mindfulness: Finding the middle path in the tangle of concerns. Mindfulness, 6(1), 1–13.
Neale, M. (2015). Frozen Yoga and McMindfulness: Miles Neale on the mainstreaming of contemplative religious practices. Retrieved March 3, 2017 from https://www.lionsroar.com/frozen-yoga-and-mcmindfulness-miles-neale-on-the-mainstreaming-of-contemplative-religious-practices/
Puchalski, C. (2016). A message from Dr. Puchalski. George Washington Institute for Spirituality and Health. Retrieved from https://smhs.gwu.edu/gwish/about/message
Purser, R. & Loy, D. (2013, July 1). Beyond McMindfulness. Huffington Post. Retrieved March 3, 2017, from http://www.huffingtonpost.com/ron-purser/beyond-mcmindfulness_b_3519289.html
Segall, S. (2013). In defense of mindfulness. The Existential Buddhist, December 19, 2013. Retrieved on February 28, 2017 from http://www.existentialbuddhist.com/2013/12/in-defense-of-mindfulness/
Sharf, R. H. (2015). Is mindfulness Buddhist? (and why it matters). Transcultural Psychiatry, 52(4), 470–484.
Smith, W. C. (1963). The meaning and end of religion. New York: Macmillan.
Stone, M. (2014). Abusing the Buddha: How the U.S. Army and Google co-opt mindfulness. Salon, March 17, 2014. Retrieved on March 6, 2017 from http://www.salon.com/2014/03/17/abusing_the_buddha_how_the_u_s_army_and_google_co_opt_mindfulness/. Accessed X.
Veatch, R. M. (1981). A theory of medical ethics. New York: Basic Books.
Veatch, R. (2012). Hippocratic, religious, and secular medical ethics : The points of conflict. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
Wilson, J. (2014). Mindful America: Meditation and the mutual transformation of Buddhism and American culture. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Compson, J.F. (2017). Is Mindfulness Secular or Religious, and Does It Matter?. In: Monteiro, L., Compson, J., Musten, F. (eds) Practitioner's Guide to Ethics and Mindfulness-Based Interventions . Mindfulness in Behavioral Health. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64924-5_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64924-5_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-64923-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-64924-5
eBook Packages: Behavioral Science and PsychologyBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)