Abstract
This book chapter identifies the importance and different uses for multigroup analysis, such as research interests in cross-cultural or gender differences. Multigroup analysis via partial least squares structural equations modeling, which tests a single structural relationship at a time, is an effective way to evaluate moderation across multiple relationships versus standard moderation. Step-by-step instructions and guidelines using SmartPLS 3.0 are provided using a sample dataset. The instructions include an assessment of the measurement characteristics of the constructs by including the MICOM procedure, which adds an additional level of accuracy. Examples of both positive and negative outcomes as well as potential solutions to problems are provided in order to help users understand how to apply multigroup analysis to their own dataset. By using multigroup analysis, researchers are able to uncover differences of subsamples within the total population that is not evident when examined as a whole. Researchers having the ability to run multigroup analysis considerably improve the likelihood of identifying significant and meaningful differences in various relationships across group-specific results.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Aguinis, H., Beaty, J. C., & Boik, R. K. (2005). Effect size and power in assessing moderating effects of categorical variables using multiple regression: A 30-year review. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 94–107.
Becker, J.-M., Rai, A., Ringle, C. M., & Völckner, F. (2013). Discovering unobserved heterogeneity in structural equation models to avert validity threats. MIS Quarterly, 37, 665–694.
Brettel, M., Engelen, A., Heinemann, F., & Vadhanasindhu, P. (2008). Antecedents of market orientation: A cross-cultural comparison. Journal of International Marketing, 16, 84–119.
Chin, W. W., & Dibbern, J. (2010). A permutation based procedure for multi-group PLS analysis: Results of tests of differences on simulated data and a cross cultural analysis of the sourcing of information system services between Germany and the USA. In V. Esposito Vinzi, W. W. Chin, J. Henseler, & H. Wang (Eds.), Handbook of partial least squares: Concepts, methods and applications, Springer Handbooks of Computational Statistics Series (Vol. II, pp. 171–193). Heidelberg: Springer.
Cohen, J. A. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 155–519.
Diamantopoulos, A., Sarstedt, M., Fuchs, C., Wilczynski, P., & Kaiser, S. (2012). Guidelines for choosing between multi-item and single-item scales for construct measurement: A predictive validity perspective. Journal of Academy of Market Science, 40(3), 434–449. doi:10.1007/s11747-011-0300-3.
Dijkstra, T. K., & Henseler, J. (2011). Linear indices in nonlinear structural equation models: Best fitting proper indices and other composites. Quality and Quantity, 45, 1505–1518. doi:10.1007/s11135-010-9359-z.
Dijkstra, T. K., & Henseler, J. (2015). Consistent partial least squares path modeling. MIS Quarterly, 39, 297–316.
Grewal, R., Chakravarty, A., Ding, M., & Liechty, J. (2008). Counting chickens before the eggs hatch: Associating new product development portfolios with shareholder expectations in the pharmaceutical sector. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 25, 261–272.
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. (2010). Multivariate data analysis. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson/Prentice Hall.
Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2011). PLS-SEM: Indeed a silver bullet. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 19(2), 139–152.
Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2012a). Partial least squares: The better approach to structural equations modeling? Journal of Long Range Planning, 45(5–6), 312–319. doi:10.1016/j.lrp.2012.09.011.
Hair, J. F., Sarstedt, M., Pieper, T. M., & Ringle, C. M. (2012b). The use of partial least squares structural equation modeling in strategic management research: A review of past practices and recommendations for future applications. Long Range Planning, 45(5–6), 320–340. doi:10.1016/j.lrp.2012.09.008.
Hair, J. F., Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., & Mena, J. A. (2012c). An assessment of the use of partial least squares structural equation modeling in marketing research. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 40(3), 414–433. doi:10.1007/s11747-011-0261-6.
Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2013). Partial least squares structural equation modeling: Rigorous applications, better results and higher acceptance. Journal of Long Range Planning, 46(1–2), 1–12.
Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2014a). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Hair, J. F., Sarstedt, M., Hopkins, L., & Kuppelwieser, V. (2014b). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM): An emerging tool in business research. European Business Review, 26(2), 106–121. doi:10.1108/EBR-10-2013-0128.
Hair, J. F., Celsi, M., Money, A., Samouel, P., & Page, M. (2016a). Essentials of business research methods. New York: Routledge.
Hair, J. F., Sarstedt, M., Matthews, L., & Ringle, C. (2016b). Identifying and treating unobserved heterogeneity with FIMIX-PLS: Part I – Method. European Business Review, 28(1), 63–76.
Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., Sarstedt, M., & Thiele, K. O. (2017a). Mirror, mirror on the wall: A comparative evaluation of composite-based structural equation modeling methods. Journal of Academy of Marketing Science (in press)
Hair, J. F., Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., & Gudergan, S. (2017b). Advanced issues in partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Henseler, J., & Chin, W. W. (2010). A comparison of approaches for the analysis of interaction effects between latent variables using partial least squares path modeling. Structural Equation Modeling, 17(1), 82–109. doi:10.1080/10705510903439003.
Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sinkovics, R. R. (2009). The use of partial least squares path modeling in international marketing. In R. R. Sinkovics & P. N. Ghauri (Eds.), Advances in International Marketing (Vol. 20, pp. 277–320). Bingley: Emerald.
Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 34, 115–135.
Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2016). Testing measurement invariance of composites using partial least squares. International Marketing Review, 33(3), 405–431. doi:10.1108/IMR-09-2014-0304.
Horn, J. L., & McArdle, J. J. (1992). A practical and theoretical guide to measurement invariance in aging research. Experimental Aging Research, 18(3–4), 117–144.
Hult, G. T. M., Ketchen, D. J., Griffith, D. A., et al. (2008). Data equivalence in cross-cultural international business research: Assessment and guidelines. Journal of International Business Studies, 39(6), 1027–1044. doi:10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400396.
Jedidi, K., Jagpal, H. S., & Desarbo, W. S. (1997). Finite-mixture structural equation models for response-based segmentation and unobserved heterogeneity. Marketing Science, 16(1), 39–59.
Keil, M., Tan, B. C. Y., Wei, K.-K., et al. (2000). A cross-cultural study on escalation of commitment behavior in software projects. MIS Quarterly, 24(2), 299–325.
Kock, N., & Hadaya, P. (2016). Minimum sample size estimation in PLS-SEM: The inverse square root and gamma-exponential methods. Information Systems Journal (in press). doi:10.1111/isj.12131.
Lohmöller, J.-B. (1989). Latent variable path modeling with partial least squares. Berlin: Springer.
Matthews, L., Sarstedt, M., Hair, J. F., & Ringle, C. (2016). Identifying and treating unobserved heterogeneity with FIMIX-PLS: Part II – A case study. European Business Review, 28(2), 208–224. doi:10.1108/EBR-09-2015-0095.
Patel, V. K., Manley, S., Ferrell, O. C., Hair, J. F., & Pieper, T. M. (2016). Is stakeholder theory relevant for European firms? European Management Journal, 34(6), 650–660.
Picon-Berjoyo, A., Ruiz-Moreno, C., & Castro, I. (2016). A mediating and multi-group analysis of customer loyalty. European Management Journal, 34(6), 701–713.
Rasoolimanesh, S. M., Roldan, J. L., Jaafar, M., & Ramayah, T. (2016). Factors influencing residents’ perceptions toward tourism development; differences across rural and urban world heritage sites. Journal of Travel Research. doi:10.1177/0047287516662354.
Ringle, C., Wende, S., & Becker, J. (2015). SmartPLS 3. Bönningstedt: SmartPLS GmbH. Retrieved from http://www.smartpls.com.
Rutherford, B. N., Park, J., & Han, S. L. (2011). Increasing job performance and decreasing salesperson propensity to leave: An examination of an Asian sales force. Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, 31(2), 171–183.
Sarstedt, M., & Mooi, E. A. (2014). A concise guide to market research: The process, data, and methods using IBM SPSS statistics. Berlin: Springer.
Sarstedt, M., Schwaiger, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2009). Do we fully understand the critical success factors of customer satisfaction with industrial goods? – Extending Festge and Schwaiger’s model to account for unobserved heterogeneity. Journal of Business Market Management, 3(3), 185–206.
Sarstedt, M., Henseler, J., & Ringle, C. M. (2011). Multi-group analysis in partial least squares (PLS) path modeling: Alternative methods and empirical results. In M. Sarstedt, M. Schwaiger, & C. R. Taylor (Eds.), Advances in international marketing (Vol. 22, pp. 195–218). Bingley: Emerald. doi:10.1108/S1474-7979(2011)0000022012.
Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., & Hair, J. F. (2014). PLS-SEM: Looking back and moving forward. Long Range Planning, 47(3), 132–137. doi:10.1016/j.lrp.2014.02.008.
Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., & Gudergan, S. P. (2016a). Guidelines for treating unobserved heterogeneity in tourism research: A comment on Marques and Reis (2015). Annals of Tourism Research, 57, 279–284. doi:10.1016/j.annals.2015.10.006.
Sarstedt, M., Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., Thiele, K. O., & Gudergan, S. P. (2016b). Estimation issues with PLS and CBSEM: Where the bias lies! Journal of Business Research, 69(10), 3998–4010. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.06.007.
Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., & Hair, J. F. (2018). Treating unobserved heterogeneity in PLS-SEM: A multi-method approach. In H. Latan & R. Noonan (Eds.), Partial least squares structural equation modeling: Basic concepts, methodological issues and applications. Heidelberg: Springer.
Schlagel, C., & Sarstedt, M. (2016). Assessing the measurement invariance of the four-dimensional cultural intelligence scale across countries: A composite model approach. European Management Journal, 34(6), 633–649.
Wilson, S. R., Whitmoyer, J. G., Pieper, T. M., et al. (2014). Method trends and method needs: Examining methods needed for accelerating the field. Innovative and Established Research Methods in Family Business, 5(1), 4–14. doi:10.1016/j.jfbs.2014.01.011.
Acknowledgments
This chapter refers to the use of the statistical software SmartPLS (http://www.smartpls.com) (Ringle et al. 2015).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Matthews, L. (2017). Applying Multigroup Analysis in PLS-SEM: A Step-by-Step Process. In: Latan, H., Noonan, R. (eds) Partial Least Squares Path Modeling. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64069-3_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64069-3_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-64068-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-64069-3
eBook Packages: Mathematics and StatisticsMathematics and Statistics (R0)