Skip to main content

Applying Multigroup Analysis in PLS-SEM: A Step-by-Step Process

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Partial Least Squares Path Modeling

Abstract

This book chapter identifies the importance and different uses for multigroup analysis, such as research interests in cross-cultural or gender differences. Multigroup analysis via partial least squares structural equations modeling, which tests a single structural relationship at a time, is an effective way to evaluate moderation across multiple relationships versus standard moderation. Step-by-step instructions and guidelines using SmartPLS 3.0 are provided using a sample dataset. The instructions include an assessment of the measurement characteristics of the constructs by including the MICOM procedure, which adds an additional level of accuracy. Examples of both positive and negative outcomes as well as potential solutions to problems are provided in order to help users understand how to apply multigroup analysis to their own dataset. By using multigroup analysis, researchers are able to uncover differences of subsamples within the total population that is not evident when examined as a whole. Researchers having the ability to run multigroup analysis considerably improve the likelihood of identifying significant and meaningful differences in various relationships across group-specific results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aguinis, H., Beaty, J. C., & Boik, R. K. (2005). Effect size and power in assessing moderating effects of categorical variables using multiple regression: A 30-year review. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 94–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, J.-M., Rai, A., Ringle, C. M., & Völckner, F. (2013). Discovering unobserved heterogeneity in structural equation models to avert validity threats. MIS Quarterly, 37, 665–694.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brettel, M., Engelen, A., Heinemann, F., & Vadhanasindhu, P. (2008). Antecedents of market orientation: A cross-cultural comparison. Journal of International Marketing, 16, 84–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chin, W. W., & Dibbern, J. (2010). A permutation based procedure for multi-group PLS analysis: Results of tests of differences on simulated data and a cross cultural analysis of the sourcing of information system services between Germany and the USA. In V. Esposito Vinzi, W. W. Chin, J. Henseler, & H. Wang (Eds.), Handbook of partial least squares: Concepts, methods and applications, Springer Handbooks of Computational Statistics Series (Vol. II, pp. 171–193). Heidelberg: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. A. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 155–519.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diamantopoulos, A., Sarstedt, M., Fuchs, C., Wilczynski, P., & Kaiser, S. (2012). Guidelines for choosing between multi-item and single-item scales for construct measurement: A predictive validity perspective. Journal of Academy of Market Science, 40(3), 434–449. doi:10.1007/s11747-011-0300-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dijkstra, T. K., & Henseler, J. (2011). Linear indices in nonlinear structural equation models: Best fitting proper indices and other composites. Quality and Quantity, 45, 1505–1518. doi:10.1007/s11135-010-9359-z.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dijkstra, T. K., & Henseler, J. (2015). Consistent partial least squares path modeling. MIS Quarterly, 39, 297–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grewal, R., Chakravarty, A., Ding, M., & Liechty, J. (2008). Counting chickens before the eggs hatch: Associating new product development portfolios with shareholder expectations in the pharmaceutical sector. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 25, 261–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. (2010). Multivariate data analysis. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson/Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2011). PLS-SEM: Indeed a silver bullet. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 19(2), 139–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2012a). Partial least squares: The better approach to structural equations modeling? Journal of Long Range Planning, 45(5–6), 312–319. doi:10.1016/j.lrp.2012.09.011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hair, J. F., Sarstedt, M., Pieper, T. M., & Ringle, C. M. (2012b). The use of partial least squares structural equation modeling in strategic management research: A review of past practices and recommendations for future applications. Long Range Planning, 45(5–6), 320–340. doi:10.1016/j.lrp.2012.09.008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hair, J. F., Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., & Mena, J. A. (2012c). An assessment of the use of partial least squares structural equation modeling in marketing research. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 40(3), 414–433. doi:10.1007/s11747-011-0261-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2013). Partial least squares structural equation modeling: Rigorous applications, better results and higher acceptance. Journal of Long Range Planning, 46(1–2), 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2014a). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Hair, J. F., Sarstedt, M., Hopkins, L., & Kuppelwieser, V. (2014b). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM): An emerging tool in business research. European Business Review, 26(2), 106–121. doi:10.1108/EBR-10-2013-0128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hair, J. F., Celsi, M., Money, A., Samouel, P., & Page, M. (2016a). Essentials of business research methods. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hair, J. F., Sarstedt, M., Matthews, L., & Ringle, C. (2016b). Identifying and treating unobserved heterogeneity with FIMIX-PLS: Part I – Method. European Business Review, 28(1), 63–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., Sarstedt, M., & Thiele, K. O. (2017a). Mirror, mirror on the wall: A comparative evaluation of composite-based structural equation modeling methods. Journal of Academy of Marketing Science (in press)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hair, J. F., Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., & Gudergan, S. (2017b). Advanced issues in partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henseler, J., & Chin, W. W. (2010). A comparison of approaches for the analysis of interaction effects between latent variables using partial least squares path modeling. Structural Equation Modeling, 17(1), 82–109. doi:10.1080/10705510903439003.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sinkovics, R. R. (2009). The use of partial least squares path modeling in international marketing. In R. R. Sinkovics & P. N. Ghauri (Eds.), Advances in International Marketing (Vol. 20, pp. 277–320). Bingley: Emerald.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 34, 115–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2016). Testing measurement invariance of composites using partial least squares. International Marketing Review, 33(3), 405–431. doi:10.1108/IMR-09-2014-0304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horn, J. L., & McArdle, J. J. (1992). A practical and theoretical guide to measurement invariance in aging research. Experimental Aging Research, 18(3–4), 117–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hult, G. T. M., Ketchen, D. J., Griffith, D. A., et al. (2008). Data equivalence in cross-cultural international business research: Assessment and guidelines. Journal of International Business Studies, 39(6), 1027–1044. doi:10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jedidi, K., Jagpal, H. S., & Desarbo, W. S. (1997). Finite-mixture structural equation models for response-based segmentation and unobserved heterogeneity. Marketing Science, 16(1), 39–59.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Keil, M., Tan, B. C. Y., Wei, K.-K., et al. (2000). A cross-cultural study on escalation of commitment behavior in software projects. MIS Quarterly, 24(2), 299–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kock, N., & Hadaya, P. (2016). Minimum sample size estimation in PLS-SEM: The inverse square root and gamma-exponential methods. Information Systems Journal (in press). doi:10.1111/isj.12131.

  • Lohmöller, J.-B. (1989). Latent variable path modeling with partial least squares. Berlin: Springer.

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, L., Sarstedt, M., Hair, J. F., & Ringle, C. (2016). Identifying and treating unobserved heterogeneity with FIMIX-PLS: Part II – A case study. European Business Review, 28(2), 208–224. doi:10.1108/EBR-09-2015-0095.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patel, V. K., Manley, S., Ferrell, O. C., Hair, J. F., & Pieper, T. M. (2016). Is stakeholder theory relevant for European firms? European Management Journal, 34(6), 650–660.

    Google Scholar 

  • Picon-Berjoyo, A., Ruiz-Moreno, C., & Castro, I. (2016). A mediating and multi-group analysis of customer loyalty. European Management Journal, 34(6), 701–713.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rasoolimanesh, S. M., Roldan, J. L., Jaafar, M., & Ramayah, T. (2016). Factors influencing residents’ perceptions toward tourism development; differences across rural and urban world heritage sites. Journal of Travel Research. doi:10.1177/0047287516662354.

  • Ringle, C., Wende, S., & Becker, J. (2015). SmartPLS 3. Bönningstedt: SmartPLS GmbH. Retrieved from http://www.smartpls.com.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rutherford, B. N., Park, J., & Han, S. L. (2011). Increasing job performance and decreasing salesperson propensity to leave: An examination of an Asian sales force. Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, 31(2), 171–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarstedt, M., & Mooi, E. A. (2014). A concise guide to market research: The process, data, and methods using IBM SPSS statistics. Berlin: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sarstedt, M., Schwaiger, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2009). Do we fully understand the critical success factors of customer satisfaction with industrial goods? – Extending Festge and Schwaiger’s model to account for unobserved heterogeneity. Journal of Business Market Management, 3(3), 185–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarstedt, M., Henseler, J., & Ringle, C. M. (2011). Multi-group analysis in partial least squares (PLS) path modeling: Alternative methods and empirical results. In M. Sarstedt, M. Schwaiger, & C. R. Taylor (Eds.), Advances in international marketing (Vol. 22, pp. 195–218). Bingley: Emerald. doi:10.1108/S1474-7979(2011)0000022012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., & Hair, J. F. (2014). PLS-SEM: Looking back and moving forward. Long Range Planning, 47(3), 132–137. doi:10.1016/j.lrp.2014.02.008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., & Gudergan, S. P. (2016a). Guidelines for treating unobserved heterogeneity in tourism research: A comment on Marques and Reis (2015). Annals of Tourism Research, 57, 279–284. doi:10.1016/j.annals.2015.10.006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarstedt, M., Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., Thiele, K. O., & Gudergan, S. P. (2016b). Estimation issues with PLS and CBSEM: Where the bias lies! Journal of Business Research, 69(10), 3998–4010. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.06.007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., & Hair, J. F. (2018). Treating unobserved heterogeneity in PLS-SEM: A multi-method approach. In H. Latan & R. Noonan (Eds.), Partial least squares structural equation modeling: Basic concepts, methodological issues and applications. Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlagel, C., & Sarstedt, M. (2016). Assessing the measurement invariance of the four-dimensional cultural intelligence scale across countries: A composite model approach. European Management Journal, 34(6), 633–649.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, S. R., Whitmoyer, J. G., Pieper, T. M., et al. (2014). Method trends and method needs: Examining methods needed for accelerating the field. Innovative and Established Research Methods in Family Business, 5(1), 4–14. doi:10.1016/j.jfbs.2014.01.011.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This chapter refers to the use of the statistical software SmartPLS (http://www.smartpls.com) (Ringle et al. 2015).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lucy Matthews .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Matthews, L. (2017). Applying Multigroup Analysis in PLS-SEM: A Step-by-Step Process. In: Latan, H., Noonan, R. (eds) Partial Least Squares Path Modeling. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64069-3_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics