Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Cognition Beyond the Classical Information Processing Model: Cognitive Interactivity and the Systemic Thinking Model (SysTM)

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Cognition Beyond the Brain

Abstract

In this chapter , we propose a systemic model of thinking (SysTM) to account for higher cognitive operations such as how an agent makes inferences, solves problems and makes decisions. The SysTM model conceives thinking as a cognitive process that evolves in time and space and results in a new cognitive event (i.e., a new solution to a problem). This presupposes that such cognitive events are emerging from cognitive interactivity, which we define as the meshed network of reciprocal causations between an agent’s mental processing and the transformative actions she applies to her immediate environment to achieve a cognitive result. To explain how cognitive interactivity results in cognitive events, SysTM builds upon the classical information processing model but breaks from the view that cognitive events result from a linear information processing path originating in the perception of a problem stimulus that is mentally processed to produce a cognitive event. Instead, SysTM holds that information processing in thinking evolves through a succession of deductive and inductive processing loops. Both loops give rise to transformative actions on the physical information layout, resulting in new perceptual inputs which inform the next processing loop. Such actions result from the enaction of mental action plans in deductive loops and from unplanned direct perception of action possibilities or affordances in inductive loops. To account for direct perception, we introduce the concept of an affordance pool to refer to a short term memory storage of action possibilities in working memory . We conclude by illustrating how SysTM can be used to derive new predictions and guide the study of cognitive interactivity in thinking.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    A similar effect could be achieved through sub-vocalizing a string of articulatory moves. While this would be an instance of agentive activity, we would expect its ephemeral result to only offer a limited offloading support.

  2. 2.

    As such, our use of the term ‘systemic thinking’ bears no conceptual resemblance to the term “systems thinking” coined by Senge (1991) in reference to the need of a shared vision and a focus on team learning to foster organizational transformation.

References

  • Baber, C., Cengiz, T. G., & Parekh, M. (2014). Tool use as distributed cognition: How tools help, hinder and define manual skill. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1–14. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baddeley, A. (1996). Exploring the central executive. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 49, 5–28. doi:10.1080/713755608.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baddeley, A. (2012). Working memory: Theories, models, and controversies. Annual Review of Psychology, 63, 1–29. doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baddeley, A. D. (1966). Short-term memory for word sequences as a function of acoustic, semantic and formal similarity. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18, 362–365. doi:10.1080/14640746608400055.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baddeley, A. D., Thomson, N., & Buchanan, M. (1975). Word length and the structure of short-term memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 14, 575–589. doi:10.1016/S0022-5371(75)80045-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartlett, F. C. (1995). Remembering: A study in experimental and social psychology (2nd ed.). Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press (Original work published 1932).

    Google Scholar 

  • Brighton, H., & Todd, P. M. (2009). Situating rationality: Ecologically rational decision making with simple heuristics. In P. Robbins & M. Aydede (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of situated cognition (pp. 322–346). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broadbent, D. E. (1957). A mechanical model for human attention and immediate memory. Psychological Review, 64, 205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Craik, K. J. W. (1948). Theory of the human operator in control systems: II. Man as an element in a control system. British Journal of Psychology: General Section, 38, 142–148. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8295.1948.tb01149.x.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, J. E. (1995). The suddenness of insight. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), The nature of insight (pp. 125–155). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ericsson, K. A., & Kintsch, W. (1995). Long-term working memory. Psychological Review, 102, 211–245.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fioratou, E., & Cowley, S. J. (2009). Insightful thinking: Cognitive dynamics and material artifacts. Pragmatics & Cognition, 17, 549–572. doi:10.1075/pc.17.3.04fio.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fleck, J. I., & Weisberg, R. W. (2013). Insight versus analysis: Evidence for diverse methods in problem solving. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 25, 436–463. doi:10.1080/20445911.2013.779248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fleming, M., & Maglio, P. P. (2015). How physical interaction helps performance in a scrabble-like task. In D. C. Noelle, R. Dale, A. S. Warlaumont, J. Yoshimi, T. Matlock, C. D. Jennings, & P. P. Maglio (Eds.), Proceedings of the 37th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 716–721). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fodor, J. A., & Pylyshyn, Z. W. (1981). How direct is visual perception?: Some reflections on Gibson’s “ecological approach”. Cognition, 9, 139–196. doi:10.1016/0010-0277(81)90009-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frederick, S. (2005). Cognitive reflection and decision making. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 19, 25–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fürst, A. J., & Hitch, G. J. (2000). Separate roles for executive and phonological components of working memory in mental arithmetic. Memory & Cognition, 28, 774–782.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, J. J. (1977). The theory of affordances. In R. Shaw & J. Bransford (Eds.), Perceiving, acting, and knowing: Toward an ecological psychology (pp. 67–82). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, J. J. (1986). The ecological approach to visual perception. Hillsdale, NJ (Original work published 1979): Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gigerenzer, G., & Hoffrage, U. (1995). How to improve Bayesian reasoning without instruction: Frequency formats. Psychological Review, 102, 684–704. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.102.4.684

  • Goldin-Meadow, S. (1999). The role of gesture in communication and thinking. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 3, 419–429. doi:10.1016/S1364-6613(99)01397-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldin-Meadow, S., Nusbaum, H., Kelly, S. D., & Wagner, S. (2001). Explaining math: Gesturing lightens the load. Psychological Science, 12, 516–522. doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greeno, J. G. (1994). Gibson’s affordances. Psychological Review, 101, 336–342. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.101.2.336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guthrie, L. G., Vallée-Tourangeau, F., Vallée-Tourangeau, G., & Howard, C. (2015). Learning and interactivity in solving a transformation problem. Memory & Cognition, 43, 723–735. doi:10.3758/s13421-015-0504-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gyr, J. W. (1972). Is a theory of direct visual perception adequate? Psychological Bulletin, 77, 246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hecht, S. A. (2002). Counting on working memory in simple arithmetic when counting is used for problem solving. Memory & Cognition, 30, 447–455. doi:10.3758/BF03194945.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hertwig, R., Barron, G., Weber, E. U., & Erev, I. (2004). Decisions from experience and the effect of rare events in risky choice. Psychological Science, 15, 534–539. doi:10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00715.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hertwig, R., & Erev, I. (2009). The description–experience gap in risky choice. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 13, 517–523. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2009.09.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hollan, J., Hutchins, E., & Kirsh, D. (2000). Distributed cognition: Toward a new foundation for human-computer interaction research. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 7, 174–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hurley, S. (2001). Perception and action: Alternative views. Synthese, 129, 3–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hutchins, E. (1995). Cultural cognition. Cognition in the wild (pp. 353–374). Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchins, E. (2001). Cognition, Distributed. In N. J. Smelser & P. B. Baltes (Eds.), International encyclopedia of the social & behavioral sciences (pp. 2068–2072). Oxford: Pergamon. doi:10.1016/B0-08-043076-7/01636-3.

  • Ingold, T. (2010). The textility of making. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 34, 91–102. doi:10.1093/cje/bep042.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inhelder, B., & Piaget, J. (2013). The growth of logical thinking from childhood to adolescence: An essay on the construction of formal operational structures. Abington, UK: Routledge (Original work published 1958).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D. (2012). Thinking, fast and slow. London: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47, 263–292.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Kane, M. J., Hambrick, D. Z., & Conway, A. R. A. (2005). Working memory capacity and fluid intelligence are strongly related constructs: Comment on Ackerman, Beier, and Boyle (2005). Psychological Bulletin, 131, 66–71. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.131.1.66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirsh, D. (2010). Thinking with external representations. AI & Society, 25, 441–454. doi:10.1007/s00146-010-0272-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirsh, D., & Maglio, P. (1994). On distinguishing epistemic from pragmatic action. Cognitive Science, 18, 513–549.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knappett, C. (2005). Thinking through material culture: An interdisciplinary perspective. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kool, W., McGuire, J. T., Rosen, Z. B., & Botvinick, M. M. (2010). Decision making and the avoidance of cognitive demand. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 139, 665–682. doi:10.1037/a0020198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maglio, P., Matlock, T., Raphaely, D., Chernicky, B., & Kirsh, D. (1999). Interactive skill in scrabble. In Proceedings of the Twenty-First Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 326–330).

    Google Scholar 

  • Malafouris, L. (2013). How things shape the mind: A theory of material engagement. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Metcalfe, J., & Wiebe, D. (1987). Intuition in insight and noninsight problem solving. Memory & Cognition, 15, 238–246. doi:10.3758/BF03197722.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, G. A. (2003). The cognitive revolution: a historical perspective. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 141–144. doi:10.1016/S1364-6613(03)00029-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miyake, A., Friedman, N. P., Rettinger, D. A., Shah, P., & Hegarty, M. (2001). How are visuospatial working memory, executive functioning, and spatial abilities related? A latent-variable analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130, 621–640. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.130.4.621.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norman, J. (2002). Two visual systems and two theories of perception: An attempt to reconcile the constructivist and ecological approaches. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 25(01), 73–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norman, D. A. (2013). The design of everyday things (2nd ed.). New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Novack, M., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2015). Learning from gesture: How our hands change our minds. Educational Psychology Review, 27, 405–412. doi:10.1007/s10648-015-9325-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ohlsson, S. (2011). Deep learning: How the mind overrides experience. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rauscher, F. H., Krauss, R. M., & Chen, Y. (1996). Gesture, speech, and lexical access: The role of lexical movements in speech production. Psychological Science, 7, 226–231. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.1996.tb00364.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salamé, P., & Baddeley, A. (1986). Phonological factors in STM: Similarity and the unattended speech effect. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 24, 263–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, L. (2011). Embodied cognition. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, B. F. (1935). Two types of conditioned reflex and a pseudo type. The Journal of General Psychology, 12, 66–77. doi:10.1080/00221309.1935.9920088.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F. (1999). Discrepancies between normative and descriptive models of decision making and the understanding/acceptance principle. Cognitive Psychology, 38, 349–385. doi:10.1006/cogp.1998.0700.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Senge, P. (1991). The art and practice of the fifth discipline. London: Century.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steffensen, S. V. (2013). Human interactivity: Problem-solving, solution-probing and verbal patterns in the wild. In S. Cowley & F. Vallée-Tourangeau (Eds.), Cognition beyond the brain: Computation, interactivity and human artifice (pp. 195–221). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steffensen, S. V., Vallée-Tourangeau, F., & Vallée-Tourangeau, G. (2016). Cognitive events in a problem-solving task: a qualitative method for investigating interactivity in the 17 Animals problem. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 28, 79–105. doi:10.1080/20445911.2015.1095193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tolman, E. C. (1932). Purposive behavior in animals and men. New York: Century.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tolman, E. C. (1948). Cognitive maps in rats and men. Psychological Review, 55, 189–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vallée-Tourangeau, F. (2013). Interactivity, efficiency, and individual differences in mental arithmetic. Experimental Psychology, 60, 302–311. doi:10.1027/1618-3169/a000200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vallée-Tourangeau, F. (2014). Insight, interactivity and materiality. Pragmatics & Cognition, 22(1), 27–44. doi:10.1075/pc.22.1.02val.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vallée-Tourangeau, F., Sirota, M., & Vallée-Tourangeau, G. (2016). Interactivity mitigates the impact of working memory depletion on mental arithmetic performance. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 1, 26. doi:10.1186/s41235-016-0027-2.

  • Vallée-Tourangeau, F., Steffensen, S, V., Vallée-Tourangeau, G., & Makri, A. (2015a). Insight and cognitive ecosystems. In D. C. Noelle, R. Dale, A. S. Warlaumont, J. Yoshimi, T. Matlock, C. D. Jennings, & P. P. Maglio (Eds.), Proceedings of the 37th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 2457–2462). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vallée-Tourangeau, G., Abadie, M., & Vallée-Tourangeau, F. (2015b). Interactivity fosters Bayesian reasoning without instruction. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 144, 581–603. doi:10.1037/a0039161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vallée-Tourangeau, F., Steffensen, S. V., Vallée-Tourangeau, G., & Sirota, M. (2016). Insight with hands and things. Acta Psychologica, 170, 195–205. doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2016.08.006

  • Vallée-Tourangeau, F., & Wrightman, M. (2010). Interactive skills and individual differences in a word production task. AI & Society, 25, 433–439. doi:10.1007/s00146-010-0270-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vallée-Tourangeau, G., & Vallée-Tourangeau, F. (2014). The spatio-temporal dynamics of systemic thinking. Cybernetics & Human Knowing, 21, 113–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagenaar, W. A., Keren, G., & Lichtenstein, S. (1988). Islanders and hostages: Deep and surface structures of decision problems. Acta Psychologica, 67, 175–189. doi:10.1016/0001-6918(88)90012-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watson, J. B. (1913). Psychology as the behaviorist views it. Psychological Review, 20, 158. doi:10.1037/h0074428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M. (1978). Economy and society: An outline of interpretive sociology. Berkeley: University of California Press (Original work published 1922).

    Google Scholar 

  • Weisberg, R. W. (2015). Toward an integrated theory of insight in problem solving. Thinking & Reasoning, 21, 5–39. doi:10.1080/13546783.2014.886625.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weller, A., Villejoubert, G., & Vallée-Tourangeau, F. (2011). Interactive insight problem solving. Thinking & Reasoning, 17, 424–439. doi:10.1080/13546783.2011.629081.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wickens, C. D., & Carswell, C. M. (2012). Information processing. In G. Salvendi (Ed.), Handbook of human factors and ergonomics (4th ed., pp. 117–161). New York: Wiley.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, A. D., & Golonka, S. (2013). Embodied cognition is not what you think it is. Frontiers in Psychology, 4. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00058.

  • Wynn, T., & Coolidge, F. L. (2014). Technical cognition, working memory and creativity. Pragmatics & Cognition, 22, 45–63. doi:10.1075/pc.22.1.03wyn.

    Google Scholar 

  • Withagen, R., & Chemero, A. (2012). Affordances and classification: On the significance of a sidebar in James Gibson’s last book. Philosophical Psychology, 25, 521–537. doi:10.1080/09515089.2011.579424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Management, Kingston Business School, Kingston University, Kingston, UK

    Gaëlle Vallée-Tourangeau

  2. Department of Psychology, School of Social and Behavioural Sciences, Kingston University, Kingston, UK

    Frédéric Vallée-Tourangeau

Authors
  1. Gaëlle Vallée-Tourangeau
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Frédéric Vallée-Tourangeau
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Gaëlle Vallée-Tourangeau or Frédéric Vallée-Tourangeau .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Language and Communication, University of Southern Denmark, Slagelse, Denmark

    Stephen J. Cowley

  2. Department of Psychology, Kingston University, Kingston upon Thames, United Kingdom

    Frédéric Vallée-Tourangeau

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Vallée-Tourangeau, G., Vallée-Tourangeau, F. (2017). Cognition Beyond the Classical Information Processing Model: Cognitive Interactivity and the Systemic Thinking Model (SysTM). In: Cowley, S., Vallée-Tourangeau, F. (eds) Cognition Beyond the Brain. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49115-8_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49115-8_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-49114-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-49115-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation