Skip to main content

The Active Eye: Perspectives on Eye Movement Research

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Current Trends in Eye Tracking Research

Abstract

Many of the behaviours that humans engage in require visual information for their successful completion. In order to acquire this visual information, we point our high-resolution foveae at those locations from which information is required. The foveae are relocated to new locations around three times every second. Eye movements, therefore, offer crucial insights into understanding human behaviour for two reasons. First, the locations selected for fixation provide us with insights into the changing moment-to-moment information requirements for the behaviours we engage in. Second, despite the fact that our eyes move, on average, three or four times per second, we are unaware of this and most of the time we are not conscious of where we are pointing our eyes. Thus, eye movements provide an ideal and powerful objective measure of ongoing cognitive processes and information requirements during behaviour. The utility of eye movements for understanding aspects of human behaviour is now recognised in a wide diversity of research disciplines. Indeed, the prevalence, diversity and utility of eye movements as research tools are evident from the contributions to be found in this volume.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ahlstrom, U., & Friedman-Berg, F. J. (2006). Using eye movement activity as a correlate of cognitive workload. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 36, 623–636.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anstey, K. J., Wood, J., Lord, S., & Walker, J. G. (2004). Cognitive, sensory and physical factors enabling driving safety in older adults. Clinical Psychology review, 25, 45–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ballard, D. H., Hayhoe, M. M., Li, F., & Whitehead, S. D. (1992). Hand-eye coordination during sequential tasks. Philosophical Transactions of The Royal Society B, 337, 331–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ballard, D. H., Hayhoe, M. M., & Pelz, J. B. (1995). Memory representations in natural tasks. Journal Of Cognitive Neuroscience, 7(1), 66–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baron-Cohen, S. (1995). Mindblindness: An essay on autism and theory of mind. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bekkering, H., & Neggers, S. F. W. (2002). Visual search is modulated by action intentions. Psychological Science, 13(4), 370–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benedetto, S., Pedrotti, M., Minin, L., Baccino, T., Re, A., & Montanari, R. (2011). Driver workload and blink duration. Transportation Research: Part F, 14, 199–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benson, P. J., Beedie, S. A., Shephard, E., Giegling, I., Rujescu, D., & Clair, D. S. (2012). Simple viewing tests can detect eye movement abnormalities that distinguish schizophrenia cases from controls with exceptional accuracy. Biological psychiatry, 72(9), 716–724. doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2012.04.019..

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Birmingham, E., Bischof, W. F., & Kingstone, A. (2009). Get real! resolving the debate about equivalent social stimuli. Visual Cognition, 17(6–7), 904–924.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bridgeman, B., & Tseng, P. (2011). Embodied cognition and the perception-action link. Physics of life reviews, 8(1), 73–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castelhano, M. S., Wieth, M., & Henderson, J. M. (2007). I see what you see: Eye movements in real-world scenes are affected by perceived direction of gaze. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 4840, 251–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, A. T., & Gergle, D. (2011). Mobile dual eye-tracking methods: challenges and opportunities. Paper presented at DUET 2011: Duel Eye Tracking workshop at ECSCW 2011

    Google Scholar 

  • Di Stasi, L. L., Renner, R., Staehr, P., Helmert, J. R., Velichkovsky, B. M., Cañas, J. J., Catena, A., & Pannasch, S. (2010). Saccadic peak velocity is sensitive to variations in mental workload in complex environments. Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine, 81, 413–417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diefendorf, A. R., & Dodge, R. (1908). An experimental study of the ocular reactions of the insane from photographic records. Brain. A Journal of Neurology, 31, 451–489.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eckstein, M. P. (2011). Visual search: a retrospective. Journal of Vision, 11(5):14, 1–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fagioli, S., Hommel, B., & Schubotz, R. I. (2007). Intentional control of attention: Action planning primes action-related stimulus dimensions. Psychological research, 71(1), 22–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeth, M., Foulsham, T., & Kingstone, A. (2013). What affects social attention? Social presence, eye contact and autistic traits. PLoS ONE, 8(1), e53286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galfano, G., Dalmaso, M., Marzoli, D., Pavan, G., Coricelli, C., & Castelli, L. (2012). Eye gaze cannot be ignored (but neither can arrows). Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 65, 1895–1910.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallup, A. C., Chong, A., & Couzin, I. D. (2012). The directional flow of visual information transfer between pedestrians. Biology Letters, 8(4), 520–522.

    Google Scholar 

  • Groeger, J. A. (2000). Understanding driving. Hove: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanna, J. E., & Brennan, S. E. (2007). Speakers’ eye gaze disambiguates referring expressions early during face-to-face conversation. Journal of Memory and Language, 57, 596–615.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayhoe, M. M. (2000). Vision using routines: A functional account of vision. Visual Cognition, 7, 43–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hommel, B., Müsseler, J., Aschersleben, G., & Prinz, W. (2001). The theory of event coding (TEC): a framework for perception and action planning. The behavioural and brain sciences, 24(5), 849–78; discussion 878–937

    Google Scholar 

  • Knoeferle, P., & Kreysa, H. (2012). Can speaker gaze modulate syntactic structuring and thematic role assignment during spoken sentence comprehension? Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 538.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kobayashi, H., & Kohshima, S. (1997). Unique morphology of the human eye. Nature, 387, 767–768.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Konstantopoulos, P., Chapman, P., & Crundall, D. (2010). Driver’s visual attention as a function of driving experience and visibility. Using a driving simulator to explore drivers’ eye movements in day, night and rain driving. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 42, 827–834.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kowler, E. (2011). Eye movements: The past 25 years. Vision Research, 51(13): 1457-83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, G., & Tatler, B. W. (2005). Magic and fixation: Now you don’t see it, now you do. Perception, 34, 1155–1161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, G., & Martinez, L. M. (2011). Misdirection–past, present, and the future. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 5, 172

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, G., & Tatler, B. W. (2011). Misdirected by the gap: The relationship between inattentional blindness and attentional misdirection. Consciousness and Cognition, 20(2), 432–436. doi:10.1016/j.concog.2010.09.013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, G., Amlani, A. A., & Rensink, R. A. (2008). Towards a science of magic. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12(9), 349–354. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2008.05.008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, G., Kourkoulou, A., & Leekam, S. R. (2010). How magic changes our expectations about autism. Psychological Science, 21(10), 1487–1493. doi:10.1177/0956797610383435.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, G., Tatler, B. W., & Cole, G. (2009). You look where I look! Effects of gaze cues on overt and covert attention in misdirection. Visual Cognition, 17, 925–944.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laidlaw, K. E. W., Foulsham, T., Kuhn, G., & Kingstone, A. (2011). Potential social interactions are important to social attention. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108, 5548–5553

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamont, P., & Wiseman, R. (1999). Magic in theory. Hartfield: Hermetic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Land, M. F. (1992). Predictable eye-head coordination during driving. Nature, 359(6393), 318–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Land, M. F., Mennie, N., & Rusted, J. (1999). The roles of vision and eye movements in the control of activities of daily living. Perception, 28, 1311–1328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lipton, R. B., Levy, D. L., Holzman, P. S., & Levin, S. (1983). Eye movement dysfunctions in psychiatric patients. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 9(1), 13–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macdonald, R. G., & Tatler, B. W. (2013). Do as eye say: Gaze cueing and language in a real-world social interaction. Journal of Vision, 13(4):6, 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macknik, S. L., Martinez-Conde, S., & Blakeslee, S. (2010). Sleights of Mind: What the Neuroscience of Magic Reveals about Our Everyday Deceptions. New York: Henry Holt and Company

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackworth, N. H., & Thomas, E. L. (1962). Head-mounted eye-movement camera. J. Opt. Soc. America, 52, 713–716.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martinez-Conde, S., & Macknik, S. L. (2008). Magic and the brain. Scientific American, 299(6), 72–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nappa, R., Wessel, A., McEldoon, K. L., Gleitman, L. R., & Trueswell, J. C. (2009). Use of speaker’s gaze and syntax in verb learning. Language learning and Development (Cambridge, England), 5, 203–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Posner, M. I. (1980). Orienting of attention. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 32, 3–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Przyrembel, M., Smallwood, J., Pauen, M., & Singer, T. (2012). Illuminating the dark matter of social neuroscience: Considering the problem of social interaction from philosophical, psychological, and neuroscientific perspectives. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6, 190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rayner, K. (1998). Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychological bulletin, 124(3), 372–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Recarte, M. A., & Nunes, L. M. (2003). Mental workload while driving: Effects on visual search, discrimination and decision making. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 9, 119–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Recarte, M. A., Pérez, E., Conchillo, A., & Nunes, L. M. (2008). Mental workload and visual impairment: Differences between pupil, blink, and subjective rating. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 11, 374–385.

    Google Scholar 

  • Regan, M. A., Lee, J. D., & Young, K. L. (2008). Driver distraction: Theory, effects and mitigation. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricciardelli, P., Bricolo, E., Aglioti, S. M., & Chelazzi, L. (2002). My eyes want to look where your eyes are looking: Exploring the tendency to imitate another individual’s gaze. Neuroreport, 13(17), 2259–2264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Risko, E. F., Laidlaw, K., Freeth, M., Foulsham, T., & Kingstone, A. (2012). Social attention with real versus reel stimuli: Toward an empirical approach to concerns about ecological validity. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6, 143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Savage, S. W., Potter, D. D., & Tatler, B. W. (2013). Does preoccupation impair hazard perception? A simultaneous EEG and Eye Tracking study. Transportation Research Part F, 17, 52–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schütz, A. C., Braun, D. I., & Gegenfurtner, K. R. (2011). Eye movements and perception: A selective review. Journal of Vision, 11(5), 1–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Senju, A., & Csibra, G. (2008). Gaze following in human infants depends on communicative signals. Current Biology, 18, 668–671.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skarratt, P. A., Cole, G. G., & Kuhn, G. (2012). Visual cognition during real social interaction. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6, 196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Staudte, M., & Crocker, M. W. (2011). Investigating joint attention mechanisms through spoken human-robot interaction. Cognition, 120, 268–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Symes, E., Tucker, M., Ellis, R., Vainio, L., & Ottoboni, G. (2008). Grasp preparation improves change detection for congruent objects. Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance, 34(4), 854–871.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Symons, L. A., Lee, K., Cedrone, C. C., & Nisimura, M. (2004). What are you looking at? Acuity for triadic eye gaze. Journal of General Psychology, 131, 451–469.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tatler, B. W., & Kuhn, G. (2007). Don’t look now: The magic of misdirection. Eye Movements: A window on mind and brain, 697–714

    Google Scholar 

  • Tatler, B. W., & Land, M. F. (2011). Vision and the representation of the surroundings in spatial memory. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 366(1564), 596–610. doi:10.1098/rstb.2010.0188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tatler, B. W., & Tatler, S. L. (2013). The influence of instructions on object memory in a real-world setting. Journal of Vision, 13(2):5, 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tatler, B. W., Hayhoe, M. M., Land, M. F., & Ballard, D. H. (2011). Eye guidance in natural vision: Reinterpreting salience. Journal of Vision, 11(5), 5, 1–23. doi:10.1167/11.5.5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, E. L. (1968). Movements of the eye. Scientific American, 219(2), 88–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tipples, J. (2002). Eye gaze is not unique: Automatic orienting in response to uninformative arrows. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, 314–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trillenberg, P., Lencer, R., & Heide, W. (2004). Eye movements and psychiatric disease. Current Opinion in Neurology, 17(1), 43–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Velichkovsky, B. M., Rothert, A., Kopf, M., Dornhoefer, S. M., & Joos, M. (2002). Towards an express-diagnostics for level of processing and hazard perception. Transportation Research. Part F, 5, 145–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Veltman, J. A., & Gaillard, A. W. K. (1996). Physiological indices of workload in a simulated flight task. Biological Psychology, 42, 323–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Benjamin W. Tatler .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Tatler, B., Kirtley, C., Macdonald, R., Mitchell, K., Savage, S. (2014). The Active Eye: Perspectives on Eye Movement Research. In: Horsley, M., Eliot, M., Knight, B., Reilly, R. (eds) Current Trends in Eye Tracking Research. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02868-2_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics