Skip to main content

Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire (FFMQ)

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Handbook of Assessment in Mindfulness Research

Abstract

The Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire (FFMQ) is a 39-item instrument derived by factor analyzing the combined pool of items from five independently developed mindfulness questionnaires. It has five subscales: observing, describing, acting with awareness, nonjudging of internal experience, and nonreactivity to internal experience. The five subscales have demonstrated good internal consistency and test-retest reliability, concurrent validity, and change with mindfulness training. The FFMQ has been validated in a wide range of samples, including clinical, community, meditating, and student samples. In addition to the original 39-item version, several short forms have been developed, and the measure is available in a number of languages. Psychometric properties in other languages are generally similar to those in the original English version. Based on consistent findings demonstrating differential relationships between the observing facet and other variables and differential factor structures (with and without observing), in people with and without meditation experience, it is advisable for studies to exclude the observing subscale from total scores when comparing meditators with nonmeditators or scores before and after mindfulness interventions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baer, R. A. (2003). Mindfulness training as a clinical intervention: A conceptual and empirical review. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 10, 125–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baer, R. A. (2011). Measuring mindfulness. Contemporary Buddhism, 12, 241–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baer, R. A. (2015). Assessing mindfulness in multiple contexts: A comment on Christopher, Woodrich, & Tiernan (2015). Mindfulness, 6, 687–692.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baer, R. A., Smith, G. T., & Allen, K. B. (2004). Assessment of mindfulness by self-report: The Kentucky Inventory of Mindfulness Skills. Assessment, 11, 191–206.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Baer, R. A., Smith, G. T., Hopkins, J., Krietemeyer, J., & Toney, L. (2006). Using self-report assessment methods to explore facets of mindfulness. Assessment, 13, 27–45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Baer, R., Smith, G., Lykins, E., Button, D., Krietemeyer, J., Sauer, S., & Williams, JMG. (2008). Construct validity of the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire in meditating and nonmeditating samples. Assessment, 115, 329–342.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baer, R. A., Carmody, J., & Hunsinger, M. (2012). Weekly change in mindfulness and perceived stress in a mindfulness-based stress reduction program. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 68(7), 755–765.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bohlmeijer, E., ten Klooster, P. M., Fledderus, M., Veehof, M., & Baer, R. (2011). Psychometric properties of the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire in depressed adults and development of a short form. Assessment, 18, 308–320.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, K. W., & Ryan, R. M. (2003). The benefits of being present: Mindfulness and its role in psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 822–848.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Buchheld, N., Grossman, P., & Walach, H. (2001). Measuring mindfulness in insight meditation (Vipassana) and meditation-based psychotherapy: The development of the Freiburg Mindfulness Inventory (FMI). Journal for Meditation and Meditation Research, 1, 11–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carmody, J., & Baer, R. A. (2008). Relationships between mindfulness practice and levels of mindfulness, medical and psychological symptoms and well-being in a mindfulness-based stress reduction program. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 31(1), 23–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cebolla, A., García-Palacios, A., Soler, J., Guillen, V., Baños, R., & Botella, C. (2012). Psychometric properties of the Spanish validation of the five facets of mindfulness questionnaire (FFMQ). The European Journal of Psychiatry, 26(2), 118–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chadwick, P., Hember, M., Symes, J., Peters, E., Kuipers, E., & Dagnan, D. (2008). Responding mindfully to unpleasant thoughts and images: Reliability and validity of the Southampton mindfulness questionnaire (SMQ). British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 47, 451–455.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Christopher, M. S., Neuser, N. J., Michael, P. G., & Baitmangalkar, A. (2012). Exploring the psychometric properties of the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire. Mindfulness, 3(2), 124–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cicchetti, D. V. (1994). Guidelines, criteria, and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instruments in psychology. Psychological Assessment, 6, 284–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, L., & Watson, D. (1995). Constructing validity: Basic issues in objective scale development. Psychological Assessment, 7(3), 309–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Curtiss, J., & Klemanski, D. H. (2014). Factor analysis of the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire in a heterogeneous clinical sample. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 36(4), 683–694.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Bruin, E. I., Topper, M., Muskens, J., Bögels, S., & Kamphuis, J. (2012). Psychometric properties of the Five Facets Mindfulness Questionnaire (FFMQ) in a meditating and a non-meditating sample. Assessment, 19(2), 187–197.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Deng, Y.-Q., Liu, X.-H., Rodriguez, M. A., & Xia, C.-Y. (2011). The Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire: Psychometric properties of the Chinese version. Mindfulness, 2(2), 123–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Desrosiers, A., Vine, V., Curtiss, J., & Klemanski, D. H. (2014). Observing nonreactively: A conditional process model linking mindfulness facets, cognitive emotion regulation strategies, and depression and anxiety symptoms. Journal of Affective Disorders, 165, 31–37.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dimidjian, S., & Linehan, M. M. (2003). Mindfulness practice. In W. O’Donohue, J. E. Fisher, & S. C. Hayes (Eds.), Empirically supported techniques of cognitive behavior therapy: A step-by-step guide for clinicians. Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenlohr-Moul, T. A., Walsh, E. C., Charnigo, R. J., Jr., Lynam, D. R., & Baer, R. A. (2012). The “what” and the “how” of dispositional mindfulness: Using interactions among subscales of the Five-Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire to understand its relation to substance use. Assessment, 19(3), 276–286.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, G. C., Hayes, A. M., Kumar, S. M., Greeson, J. G., & Laurenceau, J. P. (2007). Mindfulness and emotion regulation: The development and initial validation of the Cognitive and Affective Mindfulness Scale–Revised (CAMS-R). Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 29, 177–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giovannini, C., Giromini, L., Bonalume, L., Tagini, A., Lang, M., & Amadei, G. (2014). The Italian Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire: A contribution to its validity and reliability. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 36(3), 415–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, P., Niemann, L., Schmidt, S., & Walach, H. (2004). Mindfulness-based stress reduction and health benefits: A meta-analysis. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 57(1), 35–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gu, J., Strauss, C., Bond, R., & Cavanagh, K. (2015). How do mindfulness-based cognitive therapy and mindfulness-based stress reduction improve mental health and wellbeing? A systematic review and meta-analysis of mediation studies. Clinical Psychology Review, 37, 1–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gu, J., Strauss, C., Crane, C., Barnhofer, T., Karl, A., Cavanagh, K., & Kuyken, W. (2016). Examining the factor structure of the 39-item and 15-item versions of the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire before and after mindfulness-based cognitive therapy for people with recurrent depression. Psychological Assessment, 28, 791–802.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Haynes, S., & Lench, H. (2003). Incremental validity of new clinical assessment measures. Psychological Assessment, 15(4), 456–466.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Heeren, A., Douilliez, C., Peschard, V., Debrauwere, L., & Philippot, P. (2011). Cross-cultural validity of the Five Facets Mindfulness Questionnaire: Adaptation and validation in a French-speaking sample. European Review of Applied Psychology/Revue Européenne de Psychologie Appliquée, 61(3), 147–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heeren, A., Lannoy, S., Coussement, C., Hoebeke, Y., Verschuren, A., Blanchard, M. A., & Gierski, F. (2021). A network approach to the five-facet model of mindfulness. Scientific Reports, 11(1), 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hou, J., Wong, S., Lo, H., Mak, W., & Ma, H. (2014). Validation of a Chinese version of the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire in Hong Kong and development of a short form. Assessment, 21(3), 363–371.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Khoury, B., Lecomte, T., Fortin, G., Masse, M., Therien, P., Bouchard, V., & Hofmann, S. G. (2013). Mindfulness-based therapy: A comprehensive meta-analysis. Clinical Psychology Review, 33, 763–771.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kornfield, J. (1993). A path with heart: A guide through the perils and promises of spiritual life. Bantam Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lilja, J. L., Frodi-Lundgren, A., Hanse, J., Josefsson, T., Lundh, L.-G., Sköld, C., Hansen, E., & Broberg, A. (2011). Five Facets Mindfulness Questionnaire – Reliability and factor structure: A Swedish version. Cognitive Behaviour Therapy, 40(4), 291–303.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • May, L. M., & Reinhardt, K. M. (2018). Self-other agreement in the assessment of mindfulness using the five-facet mindfulness questionnaire. Mindfulness, 9(1), 105–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Medvedev, O. N., Siegert, R. J., Kersten, P., & Krägeloh, C. U. (2017). Improving the precision of the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire using a Rasch approach. Mindfulness, 8(4), 995–1008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Medvedev, O. N., Titkova, E. A., Siegert, R. J., Hwang, Y.-S., & Krägeloh, C. U. (2018). Evaluating short versions of the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire using Rasch analysis. Mindfulness, 9, 1411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Medvedev, O. N., Cervin, M., Barcaccia, B., Siegert, R. J., Roemer, A., & Krägeloh, C. U. (2020). Network analysis of mindfulness facets, affect, compassion, and distress. Mindfulness, 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michalak, J., Zarbock, G., Drews, M., Otto, D., Mertens, D., Ströhle, G., & Heidenreich, T. (2016). Erfassung von Achtsamkeit mit der deutschen version des Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaires (FFMQ-D). Translated title: Assessment of mindfulness with the German version of the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaires (FFMQ-D). Zeitschrift für Gesundheitspsychologie, 24(1), 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pang, D., & Ruch, W. (2018). Scrutinizing the components of mindfulness: Insights from current, past, and non-meditators. Mindfulness, 10, 492–505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Segal, Z. V., Williams, J. M. G., & Teasdale, J. D. (2002). Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy for depression: A new approach to preventing relapse. Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, G. T., Fischer, S., & Fister, S. M. (2003). Incremental validity principles in test construction. Psychological Assessment, 15, 467–477.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sugiura, Y., Sato, A., Ito, Y., & Murakami, H. (2012). Development and validation of the Japanese version of the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire. Mindfulness, 3, 85–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tomfohr, L. M., Pung, M. A., Mills, P. J., & Edwards, K. (2015). Trait mindfulness is associated with blood pressure and interleukin-6: Exploring interactions among subscales of the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire to better understand relationships between mindfulness and health. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 38(1), 28–38.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tran, U. S., Glück, T. M., & Nader, I. W. (2013). Investigating the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire (FFMQ): Construction of a short form and evidence of a two-factor higher order structure of mindfulness. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 69, 951–965.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Truong, Q. C., Krägeloh, C. U., Siegert, R. J., Landon, J., & Medvedev, O. N. (2020). Applying generalizability theory to differentiate between trait and state in the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire (FFMQ). Mindfulness, 11(4), 953–963.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Visted, E., Vøllestad, J., Nielsen, M. B., & Nielsen, G. H. (2015). The impact of group-based mindfulness training on self-reported mindfulness: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Mindfulness, 6, 501–522.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, M. J., Dalgleish, T., Karl, A., & Kuyken, W. (2014). Examining the factor structures of the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire and the Self-Compassion Scale. Psychological Assessment, 26(2), 407–418.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ruth Baer .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Baer, R., Gu, J., Strauss, C. (2022). Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire (FFMQ). In: Medvedev, O.N., Krägeloh, C.U., Siegert, R.J., Singh, N.N. (eds) Handbook of Assessment in Mindfulness Research. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-77644-2_15-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-77644-2_15-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-77644-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-77644-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Behavioral Science and PsychologyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics