Skip to main content

The Influence of Position on Spatial Representation in Working Memory

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Spatial Cognition XII (Spatial Cognition 2020)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 12162))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Recall and imagery of familiar, distant places occurs in a specific orientation which has been shown to be biased towards the airline direction from the location where recall occurs to the target [11]. This effect has implications for the interaction of different types of spatial representations, such as egocentric working memory and allocentric long-term memory. Here we address the following questions: (i) Does the effect scale with the distance between recall location and target in a continuous way? (ii) Does the effect that was originally demonstrated with sketch maps also occur in a reconstruction task with landmark models? (iii) Does the effect also occur in virtual environments? Results show that hypotheses (ii) and (iii) can be confirmed while more work is needed for hypothesis (i).

Supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft under grand no. MA1038\(\mid \)15-1.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Avraamides, M.N., Kelly, J.W.: Imagined perspective–changing within and across novel environments. In: Freksa, C., Knauff, M., Krieg-Brückner, B., Nebel, B., Barkowsky, T. (eds.) Spatial Cognition 2004. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3343, pp. 245–258. Springer, Heidelberg (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-32255-9_15

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Bisiach, E., Luzzatti, C.: Unilateral neglect of representational space. Cortex 14(1), 129–133 (1978)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Guariglia, C., Padovani, A., Pantano, P., Pizzamiglio, L.: Unilateral neglect restricted to visual imagery. Nature 364(6434), 235–237 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Klatzky, R.L.: Allocentric and egocentric spatial representations: definitions, distinctions, and interconnections. In: Freksa, C., Habel, C., Wender, K.F. (eds.) Spatial Cognition. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 1404, pp. 1–17. Springer, Heidelberg (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-69342-4_1

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Langbehn, E., Lubos, P., Steinicke, F.: Evaluation of locomotion techniques for room-scale VR: joystick, teleportation, and redirected walking. In: Proceedings of the Virtual Reality International Conference-Laval Virtual, pp. 1–9, April 2018

    Google Scholar 

  6. Mallot, H.A., Basten, K.: Embodied spatial cognition: biological and artificial systems. Image Vis. Comput. 27(11), 1658–1670 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Marchette, S.A., Ryan, J., Epstein, R.A.: Schematic representations of local environmental space guide goal-directed navigation. Cognition 158, 68–80 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Meilinger, T., Frankenstein, J., Simon, N., Bülthoff, H.H., Bresciani, J.P.: Not all memories are the same: situational context influences spatial recall within one’s city of residency. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 23(1), 246–252 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Péruch, P., Belingard, L., Thinus-Blanc, C.: Transfer of spatial knowledge from virtual to real environments. In: Freksa, C., Habel, C., Brauer, W., Wender, K.F. (eds.) Spatial Cognition II. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 1849, pp. 253–264. Springer, Heidelberg (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45460-8_19

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Riecke, B.E., McNamara, T.P.: Where you are affects what you can easily imagine: environmental geometry elicits sensorimotor interference in remote perspective taking. Cognition 169, 1–14 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Röhrich, W.G., Hardiess, G., Mallot, H.A.: View-based organization and interplay of spatial working and long-term memories. PLoS ONE 9(11), e112793 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Waller, D., Montello, D.R., Richardson, A.E., Hegarty, M.: Orientation specificity and spatial updating of memories for layouts. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 28(6), 1051 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lilian Le Vinh .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Le Vinh, L., Meert, A., Mallot, H.A. (2020). The Influence of Position on Spatial Representation in Working Memory. In: Šķilters, J., Newcombe, N., Uttal, D. (eds) Spatial Cognition XII. Spatial Cognition 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12162. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-57983-8_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-57983-8_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-57982-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-57983-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics