Skip to main content

Cross-Cultural Reading the Mind in the Eyes and Its Consequences for International Relations

  • Chapter

Part of the book series: International and Cultural Psychology ((ICUP))

Abstract

Franklin, Stevenson, Ambady, and Adams observe that there is little cross-cultural research in the ability to perceive information (emotion, cognitions, etc.) from the eyes of an individual. The authors argue that the eyes play a major role in social interaction and looking at within- and between-culture use of information from the eyes, what is referred to as mind reading, is important to understanding nonverbal communication.

The authors report on their research on this topic where they studied participants’ ability to mind read within and between cultures. While participants were accurate in their mind reading ability for both groups, they did show an advantage for their own culture. This advantage was marked by an increase in activity in the posterior superior temporal sulcus. This is consistent with other research on emotion recognition.

The authors also report on their research looking at how gender can play a role in mind reading accuracy. Additionally, they studied how multiple category differences, gender and culture, may affect mind reading ability. They found that women were more accurate in the mind reading task than men regardless of culture. fMRI revealed that women showed greater activation of the inferior frontal gyrus and cerebellum during the task while men showed greater activation of the superior temporal sulcus. These areas are known for reading facial cues, expressing empathy, and mirroring behavior.

Implications for how this work can affect nonverbal communication between cultures are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The N100 and P200 components are generally considered to be associated with early attentional effects. Specifically, increased amplitude is associated with increased attention directed at a feature of a visual stimulus. The P300 component is generally considered to be associated with working memory operations, with increased amplitude indicative of a greater degree of encoding (see Ito & Urland, 2003).

References

  • Adams, Jr., R. B., Rule, N. O., Franklin, R. G., Wang, E., Stevenson, M. T., Yoshikawa, S., et al. (2010). Cross-cultural reading the mind in the eyes: An fMRI investigation. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 22, 97–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adolphs, R., Gosselin, F., Buchanan, T. W., Tranel, D., Schyns, P., & Damasio, A. R. (2005). A mechanism for impaired fear recognition after amygdala damage. Nature, 433(7021), 68–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Allison, T., Puce, A., & McCarthy, G. (2000). Social perception from visual cues: role of the STS region. Trends in cognitive sciences, 4, 267–278.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Aronson, J., Lustina, M. J., Good, C., Keough, K., Steele, C. M., & Brown, J. (1999). When white men can’t do math: Necessary and sufficient factors in stereotype threat. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 35, 29–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Avis, J., & Harris, P. L. (1991). Belief-desire reasoning among Baka children: Evidence for a universal conception of mind. Child Development, 62(3), 460–467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baron-Cohen, S. (1995). Mindblindness: An essay on autism and theory of mind. Boston: MIT Press/Bradford Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baron-Cohen, S., Ring, H. A., Wheelwright, S., Bullmore, E. T., Brammer, M. J., Simmons, A., et al. (1999). Social intelligence in the normal and autistic brain: An fMRI study. European Journal of Neuroscience, 11, 1891–1898.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Baron-Cohen, S., Riviere, A., Fukushima, M., French, D., Hadwin, J., Cross, P., et al. (1996). Reading the mind in the face: A cross-cultural and developmental study. Visual Cognition, 3, 39–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baron-Cohen, S., Wheelwright, S., Hill, J., Raste, Y., & Plumb, I. (2001). The “reading the mind in the eyes” test revised version: A study with normal adults, and adults with asperger syndrome or high-functioning autism. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 42, 241–251.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Baron-Cohen, S., Wheelwright, S., & Jolliffe, T. (1997). Is there a “language of the eyes?” Evidence from normal adults, and adults with autism or asperger syndrome. Visual Cognition, 4, 311–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, M. J., Young, S. G., & Hugenberg, K. (2007). The cross-category effect mere social categorization is sufficient to elicit an own-group bias in face recognition. Psychological Science, 18, 706–712.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bruce, V., & Young, A. (1986). Understanding face recognition. British Journal of Psychology, 77, 305–327.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brune, M., & Brune-Cohrs, U. (2006). Theory of mind: Evolution, ontogeny, brain mechanisms and psychopathology. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 30, 437–455.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Caldara, R., Rossion, B., Bovet, P., & Hauert, C. (2004). Event-related potentials and time course of the “other-race” face classification advantage. Neuroreport, 15(5), 905–910.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Caldara, R., Thut, G., Servoir, P., Michel, C. M., Bovet, P., & Renault, B. (2003). Face versus non-face object perception and the “other-race” effect: A spatio-temporal event-related potential study. Clinical Neurophysiology, 114, 515–528.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chiao, J. Y., & Ambady, N. (2007). Cultural neuroscience: Parsing universality and diversity across levels of analysis. In D. Cohen & S. Kitayama (Eds.), Handbook of cultural psychology (pp. 237–254). New York, NY: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chiroro, P., & Valentine, T. (1995). An investigation of the contact hypothesis of the own-race bias in face recognition. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 48, 879–894.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corenblum, B., & Meissner, C. A. (2006). Recognition of faces of ingroup and outgroup children and adults. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 93, 187–206.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Correll, J., Park, B., Wittenbrink, B., & Judd, C. M. (2002). The police officer’s dilemma: Using ethnicity to disambiguate potentially threatening individuals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 1314–1329.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cross, J. F., Cross, J., & Daly, J. (1971). Sex, race, age, and beauty as factors in recognition of faces. Perception & Psychophysics, 10, 393–396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darwin, C. (1872/1965). The expression of the emotions in man and animals. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennett, D. C. (1978). Beliefs about beliefs. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1, 568–570.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DePaulo, B. M., & Friedman, H. S. (1998). Nonverbal communication. In D. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (4th ed., Vol. 2, pp. 3–40). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dovidio, J. F., Gaertner, S. L., & Saguy, T. (2009). Commonality and the complexity of “we”: Social attitudes and social change. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 13, 3–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Eberhardt, J. L., Goff, P. A., Purdie, V. J., & Davies, P. G. (2004). Seeing black: Race, crime, and visual processing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87(6), 876–893.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Eckel, C. C., & Grossman, P. J. (2001). Chivalry and solidarity in ultimatum games. Economic Inquiry, 39(2), 171–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ekman, P. (1972). Universals and cultural differences in facial expressions of emotion. In J. Cole (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation; 1971 (Vol. 19, pp. 207–282). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elfenbein, H. A., & Ambady, N. (2002). On the universality and cultural specificity of emotion recognition: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 128(2), 203–235.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Elfenbein, H. A., & Ambady, N. (2003a). Universals and cultural differences in recognizing emotions. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 12(5), 159–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elfenbein, H. A., & Ambady, N. (2003b). When familiarity breeds accuracy: Cultural exposure and facial emotion recognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 276–290.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Flavell, J. H. (1999). Cognitive development: Children’s knowledge about the mind. Annual Review of Psychology, 50, 21–45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gaertner, S. L., & Dovidio, J. F. (2000). Reducing intergroup bias: The common ingroup identity model. Philadelphia: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaertner, S. L., Dovidio, J. F., Banker, B. S., Houlette, M., Johnson, K. M., & McGlynn, E. A. (2000). Reducing intergroup conflict: From superordinate goals to decategorization, recategorization, and mutual differentiation. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 4(1), 98–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, J. (1978). Gender effects in decoding nonverbal cues. Psychological Bulletin, 85, 845–858.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hancock, K. J., & Rhodes, G. (2008). Contact, configural coding and the other‐race effect in face recognition. British Journal of Psychology, 99(1), 45–56.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hugenberg, K., & Sacco, D. F. (2008). Social categorization and stereotyping: How social categorization biases person perception and face memory. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2, 1052–1072.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Irani, F., Platek, S. M., Panyavin, I. S., Calkins, M. E., Kohler, C., Siegel, S. J., et al. (2006). Self-face recognition and theory of mind in patients with schizophrenia and first-degree relatives. Schizophrenia Research, 88, 151–160.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ito, T. A., Thompson, E., & Caioppo, J. T. (2004). Tracking the timecourse of social perception: The effects of racial cues on event-related brain potentials. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 1267–1280.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ito, T. A., & Urland, G. R. (2003). Race and gender on the brain: Electrocortical measures of attention to the race and gender of multiply categorizable individuals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(4), 616–626.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ito, T. A., & Urland, G. R. (2005). The influence of processing objectives on the perception of faces: An ERP study of race and gender perception. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 5(1), 21–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kawaguchi, D. (2007). A market test for sex discrimination: Evidence from Japanese firm-level panel data. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 25, 441–460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, D. J., Quinn, P. C., Slater, A. M., Lee, K., Gibson, A., Smith, M., & Pascalis, O. (2005). Three-month-olds, but not newborns, prefer own-race faces. Developmental Science, 8, F31–F36.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kobayashi, C., Glover, G. H., & Temple, E. (2006). Cultural and linguistic influence on neural bases of “theory of mind”: An fMRI study with Japanese bilinguals. Brain and Language, 98, 210–220.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kobayashi, C., Glover, G. H., & Temple, E. (2007). Children’s and adults’ neural bases of verbal and nonverbal ‘theory of mind’. Neuropsychologia, 45, 1522–1532.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Levin, D. T. (1996). Classifying faces by race: The structure of face categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 22, 1364–1382.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, D. T. (2000). Race as a visual feature: Using visual search and perceptual discrimination tasks to understand face categories and the cross-race recognition deficit. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 128(4), 559–574.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leyens, J. P., Rodriguez-Perez, A., Rodriguez-Torres, R., Gaunt, R., Paladino, M. P., Vaes, J., et al. (2001). Psychological essentialism and the differential attribution of uniquely human emotions to ingroups and outgroups. European Journal of Social Psychology, 31, 395–411.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lillard, A. S. (1998). Ethnopsychologies: Cultural variations in theories of mind. Psychological Bulletin, 123, 3–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Locke, V., Macrae, C. N., & Eaton, J. L. (2005). Is person categorization modulated by exemplar typicality? Social Cognition, 23(5), 417–428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maass, A., Cadinu, M., Guarnieri, G., & Grasselli, A. (2003). Sexual harassment under social identity threat: The computer harassment paradigm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 853–870.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Maclin, O. H., & Malpass, R. S. (2001). Racial categorization of faces: The ambiguous race face effect. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 7(1), 98–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macrae, C. N., & Martin, D. (2007). A boy primed sue: Feature-based processing and person construal. European Journal of Social Psychology, 37, 793–805.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maddox, K. B. (2004). Perspectives on racial phenotypicality bias. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8(4), 383–401.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Markus, H., Kitayama, S., & Heiman, R. (1996). Culture and “basic” psychological principles. In E. T. Higgins & A. W. Kruglanski (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles. New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason, M. F., Cloutier, J., & Macrae, C. N. (2006). On construing others: Category and stereotype activation from facial cues. Social Cognition, 24, 540–562.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mason, M. F., & Macrae, C. N. (2004). Categorizing and individuating others: The neural substrates of person perception. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16, 1785–1795.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McKone, E., Brewer, J. L., MacPherson, S., Rhodes, G., & Hayward, W. G. (2007). Familiar other-race faces show normal holistic processing and are robust to perceptual stress. Perception, 36(2), 224.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Meissner, C. A., & Brigham, J. C. (2001). Thirty years of investigating the own-race bias in memory for faces. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 7, 3–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michel, C., Rossion, B., Han, J., Chung, C., & Caldara, R. (2006). Holistic processing is finely tuned for faces of one’s own race. Psychological Science, 17, 608–615.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, J. P., Banaji, M. R., & Macrae, C. N. (2005). The link between social cognition and self-referential thought in the medial prefrontal cortex. Journal of cognitive neuroscience, 17(8), 1306–1315.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, J. P., Macrae, C. N., & Banaji, M. R. (2006). Dissociable medial prefrontal contributions to judgments of similar and dissimilar others. Neuron, 50, 655–663.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Morton, J., & Johnson, M. H. (1991). CONSPEC and CONLERN: a two-process theory of infant face recognition. Psychological Review, 98, 164–181.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Navarrete, C. D., McDonald, M. M., Molina, L. E., & Sidanius, J. (2010). Prejudice at the nexus of race and gender: An outgroup male target hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98(6), 933–945.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nemoto, K. (2013). When culture resists progress: Masculine organizational culture and its impacts on the vertical segregation of women in Japanese companies. Work, Employment & Society, 27, 153–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, T. M., & Sedikides, C. (1992). Out-group homogeneity effects in natural and minimal groups. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 536–552.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paladino, P. M., Leyens, J. P., Rodriguez, R. T., Rodriguez, A. P., Gaunt, R., & Demoulin, S. (2002). Differential association of uniquely and nonuniquely human emotions to the ingroup and the outgroups. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 5, 105–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pauker, K., Ambady, N., Weisbuch, M., Sommers, S. R., Adams, R. B., Jr., & Ivcevic, Z. (2009). Not so black and white: Memory for ambiguous group members. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 795–810.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Perner, J., Ruffman, T., & Leekam, S. R. (1994). Theory of mind is contagious: You catch it from your sibs. Child Development, 65, 1228–1238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, C. C. & Siegal M. (1997). Psychological, physical, and biological thinking in normal, autistic, and deaf children. In The Emergence of Core Domains of Thought: Children’s Reasoning About Physical, Psychological, and Biological Phenomena (New Directions for Child Development, No. 75) (pp. 55–70). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rule, N. O., Ambady, N., Adams, R. B., Jr., & Macrae, C. N. (2008). Accuracy and awareness in the perception and categorization of male sexual orientation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 1019–1028.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sabbagh, M. A. (2004). Understanding orbitofrontal contributions to theory-of-mind reasoning: Implications for autism. Brain and Cognition, 55, 209–219.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sangrigoli, S., & De Schonen, S. (2004a). Effect of visual experience on face processing: a developmental study of inversion and non-native effects. Developmental Science, 7, 74–87.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sangrigoli, S., & De Schonen, S. (2004b). Recognition of own-race and other-race faces by three-month-old infants. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 45, 1219–1227.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shamay-Tsoory, S. G., Aharon-Peretz, J., & Perry, D. (2009). Two systems for empathy: A double dissociation between emotional and cognitive empathy in inferior frontal gyrus versus ventromedial prefrontal lesions. Brain, 132, 617–627.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shamay-Tsoory, S. G., Tomer, R., Berger, B. D., Goldsher, D., & Aharon-Peretz, J. (2005). Impaired “affective theory of mind” is associated with right ventromedial prefrontal damage. Cognitive and Behavioral Neurology, 18, 55–67.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sherif, M. (1958). Superordinate goals in the reduction of intergroup conflict. American Journal of Sociology, 63, 349–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skwerer, D. P., Verbalis, A., Schofield, C., Faja, S., & Tager-Flusberg, H. (2006). Social-perceptual abilities in adolescents and adults with Williams syndrome. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 23(2), 338–349.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sporer, S. L. (2001). Recognizing faces of other ethnic groups: An integration of theories. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 7, 36–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steele, C. M., & Aronson, J. (1995). Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of African Americans. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 797–811.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson, M. T., Soto, J. A., & Adams, R. B., Jr. (2012). More than meets the eye: The role of self-identity in decoding complex emotional states. Emotion, 12, 882–886.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tager-Flusberg, H. (2001). A reexamination of the theory of mind hypothesis of autism. In J. A. Burack, T. Charman, N. Yimiya, & P. R. Zelazo (Eds.), The development of autism: Perspectives from development and theory (pp. 173–193). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tajfel, H. (1969). Cognitive aspects of prejudice. Journal of Social Issues, 25(4), 79–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33–48). Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanaka, J. W., Kiefer, M., & Bukach, C. M. (2004). A holistic account of the own-race effect in face recognition: Evidence from a cross-cultural study. Cognition, 93, B1–B9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Toh, S. M., & Leonardelli, G. J. (2012). Cultural constraints on the emergence of women as leaders. Journal of World Business, 47(4), 604–611.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turk, D. J., Handy, T. C., & Gazzaniga, M. S. (2005). Can perceptual expertise account for the own-race bias in face recognition? A split-brain study. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 22, 877–883.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Turner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S. D., & Wetherell, M. S. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaes, J., Paladino, M. P., & Leyens, J. (2006). Priming uniquely human emotion and the in-group(but not the out-group) activates humanity concepts. European Journal of Social Psychology, 36, 169–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valentine, T., & Endo, M. (1992). Towards an exemplar model of face processing: The effects of race and distinctiveness. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 44(4), 671–703.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Van Overwalle, F., Baetens, K., Mariën, P., & Vandekerckhove, M. (2014). Social cognition and the cerebellum: A meta-analysis of over 350 fMRI studies. NeuroImage, 86, 554–572.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, W., & Eagly, A. H. (2002). A cross-cultural analysis of the behavior of women and men: Implications for the origins of sex differences. Psychological Bulletin, 128(5), 699–729.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zebrowitz, L. A. (2006). Finally, faces find favor. Social Cognition, 24, 657–701.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

While writing this paper, we lost our dear friend and co-author Nalini Ambady. It is with our deepest sadness and greatest respect that we dedicate this paper to her memory.

We thank Sakiko Yoshikawa of Kyoto University for helping us generate the Asian Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test and to which we owe our data from Japanese participants (reported in Study 1).

This research was supported in part by the Social Science Research Institute, the Pennsylvania State University to RBA, Jr.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Reginald B. Adams Jr. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Franklin, R.G., Stevenson, M.T., Ambady, N., Adams, R.B. (2015). Cross-Cultural Reading the Mind in the Eyes and Its Consequences for International Relations. In: Warnick, J., Landis, D. (eds) Neuroscience in Intercultural Contexts. International and Cultural Psychology. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-2260-4_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics