Skip to main content

Self-Handicapping

Historical Roots and Contemporary Branches

  • Chapter
Self-Handicapping

Part of the book series: The Springer Series in Social / Clinical Psychology ((SSSC))

Abstract

From time to time in the history of science an idea emerges “before its time” and is destined to languish in relative obscurity until the way somehow is prepared for it to assume its rightful place in the order of things. Sometimes, the idea is so precocious that there is no basis in contemporary science or cultural development for its significance to be comprehended or evaluated. Perhaps the most dramatic example of this was Democritus’s fifth-century b. c. proposal that the atom was the fundamental building block of matter. It wasn’t until the twentieth-century a. d. that physical science had advanced to the point that Niels Bohr was finally able to describe the atom as we now understand it. There are other times when an idea “submerges” because there are repressive cultural or ideological forces at work. As an instance of this, consider that Copernicus’s heliocentric (sun-centered) model of the then-known universe was actively suppressed by the Catholic church, based on theological convictions that God’s earth must be the center of the universe. Moreover, Copernicus’s later advocates (e. g., Galileo) were zealously persecuted by the Inquisition.

The patient selects certain symptoms and develops them until they impress him as real obstacles. Behind his barricade of symptoms the patient feels hidden and secure. To the question, ‘What use are you making of your talents?’ he answers, ‘This thing stops me; I cannot go ahead,’ and points to his self-erected barricade. (Alfred Adler, 1929, p. 13)

The self-handicapper, we are suggesting, reaches out for impediments, exaggerates handicaps, embraces any factor reducing personal responsibility for mediocrity and enhancing personal responsibility for success. One does this to shape the implications of performance feedback both in one’s own eyes and in the eyes of others. (Edward E. Jones & Steven Berglas, 1978, p. 202)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Adler, A. (1926). The neurotic constitution. New York: Dodd, Mead.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adler, A. (1929). Problems of neurosis: A book of case histories. London: Kegan, Paul/Trench, Truebner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adler, A. (1930). Problems of neurosis. New York: Cosmopolitan Book Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allport, G. W. (1937). Personality: A psychological interpretation. New York: Holt.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Psychiatric Association. (1980). DSM-III: Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (3rd ed.). Washington, DC: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Psychiatric Association. (1987). DSM-III-R: Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (3rd ed. revised). Washington, DC: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ansbacher, H. L., & Ansbacher, R. R. (1967). The individual psychology of Alfred Adler. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arkin, R. M., & Baumgardner, A. H. (1985). Self-handicapping. In J. H. Harvey & G. W. Weary (Eds.), Attribution: Basic issues and applications (pp. 169–202). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Artiss, K. (1959). The symptom as communication in schizophrenia. New York: Grune and Stratton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumeister, R. F., & Kahn, J. (1982). Obesity as a self-handicapping strategy: Don’t blame me, blame my fat. Unpublished manuscript, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belknap, I. (1956). Human problems of a state mental hospital. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berglas, S. (1976). “I have some good news and some bad news: You’re the ‘greatest’.” Unpublished manuscript, Department of Psychology, Duke University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berglas, S. (1985). Self-handicapping and self-handicappers: A cognitive/attributional model of interpersonal self-protective behavior. In R. Hogan (Ed.), Perspectives in personality (Vol 1, pp. 235–270). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berglas, S. (1988a). The three faces of self-handicapping: Protective self-presentation, a strategy for self-esteem enhancement, and a character disorder. In S. L. Zelen (Ed.), Self-representation: The second attribution-personality theory conference, CSPP-LA, 1986 (pp. 133–169). New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berglas, S. (1988b, March). The “self-protective” subtype of the self-defeating personality disorder. The Psychiatric Times (Vol V, No. 3).

    Google Scholar 

  • Berglas, S., & Jones, E. E. (1978). Drug choice as a self-handicapping strategy in response to noncontingent success. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 405–417.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Berne, E. (1964). Games people play: The psychology of human relationships. New York: Grove Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradley, G. W. (1978). Self-serving biases in the attribution process: A reexamination of the fact or fiction question. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 56–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braginsky, B. M., & Braginsky, D. D. (1967). Schizophrenic patients in the psychiatric interview: An experimental study of their effectiveness at manipulation. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 31, 546–551.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braginsky, B. M. Braginsky, D. D., & Ring, K. (1969). Methods of madness: The mental hospital as a last resort. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braginsky, B. M., Grosse, M., & Ring, K. (1966). Controlling outcomes through impression-management: An experimental study of the manipulative tactics of mental patients. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 30, 295–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braginsky, B. M., Holzberg, J., Ridley, D., & Braginsky, D. D. (1968). Patient styles of adaptation to a mental hospital. Journal of Personality, 36, 283–298.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Carson, R. C. (1969). Interaction concepts of personality. Chicago: Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coyne, J. C. (1976). Toward an interactional description of depression. Psychiatry, 39, 28–40.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • DeGree, C. E., & Snyder, C. R. (1985). Adler’s psychology (of use) today: Personal history of traumatic life events as a self-handicapping strategy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 1512–1519.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dunham, H. W., & Weinberg, S. K. (1960). The culture of the state mental hospital. Detroit: Wayne State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fontana, A. F., & Gessner, T. (1969). Patient’s goals and the manifestation of psychopathology. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 33, 247–253.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fontana, A. F., & Klein, E. B. (1968). Self-presentation and the schizophrenic “deficit.” Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 32, 250–256.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fontana, A. F., Klein, E. B., Lewis, E., & Levine, L. (1968). Presentation of self in mental illness. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 32, 110–119.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Freud, A. (1948). The ego and the mechanisms of defence. London: Hogarth Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freud, S. (1936). Inhibitions, symptoms and anxiety London: Hogarth Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freud, S. (1943). A general introduction to psychoanalysis. New York: Garden City Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freud, S. (1953). Sigmund Freud: Collected Papers (Vol. 1). London: Hogarth Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. New York: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E. (1961). Asylums. Garden City, NY: Anchor Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, K. (1939). The organism; A holistic approach to biology derived from pathological data in man. New York: American Book Company.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, J., Pyszczynski, T., & Paisley, C. (1985). Effect of extrinsic incentives on the use of test anxiety as an anticipatory attributional defense: Playing it cool when the stakes are high. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 1136–1145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haley, J. (1963). Strategies of psychotherapy. New York: Grune and Stratton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Handelsman, M. M., Kraiger, K., & King, C. S. (1985, April). Self-handicapping by task choice: An attribute ambiguity analysis. Paper presented at the meeting of the Rocky Mountain Psychological Association, Tucson, AZ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, R. N., & Snyder, C. R. (1986). The role of uncertain self-esteem in self-handicapping. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 451–458.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, R. N., Snyder, C. R., Higgins, R. L., & Schrag, J. L. (1986). Enhancing the prediction of self-handicapping. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1191–1199.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hastorf, A., Schneider, D., & Polefka, J. (1970). Person perception. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heider, F. (1944). Social perception and phenomenal causality. Psychological Review, 51, 358–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York: Wiley.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Higgins, R. L., & Harris, R. N. (1988). Strategic “alcohol” use: Drinking to self-handicap. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 6, 191–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Higgins, R. L., & Harris, R. N. (1989, April 14). Self-handicapping social performance through “alcohol” use: The interaction of drinker history and expectancy. Paper presented at the meeting of the Southwestern Psychological Association, Houston, TX.

    Google Scholar 

  • Higgins, R. L., & Snyder, C. R. (1989). Excuses gone awry: An analysis of self-defeating excuses. In R. C. Curtis (Ed.), Self-defeating behaviors: Experimental research, clinical impressions, and practical implications (pp. 99–130). New York: Plenum.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Horney, K. (1950). Neurosis and human growth. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, W. (1890). The principles of psychology (Vols. 1 & 2). New York: Holt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, E. (1955). The life and work of Sigmund Freud, Vol, 2. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, E. E. (1964). Ingratiation: A social-psychological analysis. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, E. E., & Berglas, S.(1975, April). Strategies of externalization and the appeal of alcohol and drugs. Paper presented at the UCLA Conference on the Social Psychology of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, Los Angeles.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, E. E., & Berglas, S. (1978). Control of attributions about the self through self-handicapping strategies: The appeal of alcohol and the role of underachievement. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 4, 200–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, E. E., & Davis, K. E. (1965). From acts to dispositions: The attribution process in person perception. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology, (Vol. 2, pp. 219–266). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, E. E., & Rhodewalt, F. (1982). Self-Handicapping Scale. (Available from the authors at the Department of Psychology, Princeton University or the Department of Psychology, University of Utah.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, E. E., & Wortman, C. B. (1973). Ingratiation: An attributional approach. Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, S. C. (1973) Self-and interpersonal evaluations: Esteem theories versus consistency theories. Psychological Bulletin, 79, 185–199.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, H. B. (1980). Deviant behavior in defense of self. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelley, H. H. (1967). Attribution theory in social psychology. In D. Levine (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation, 1967 (pp. 192–238). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelley, H. H. (1971). Attribution in social interaction. New York: General Learning Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolditz, T. A., & Arkin, R. M. (1982). An impression management interpretation of the self-handicapping strategy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 492–502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ludwig, A. M., & Farrelly, F. (1966). The code of chronicity. Archives of General Psychiatry, 15, 562–568.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ludwig, A. M., & Farrelly, F. (1967). The weapons of insanity. American Journal of Psychotherapy, 21, 737–749.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • MacAndrew, E., & Edgerton, R. B. (1969). Drunken comportment. Chicago: Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maslow, A. H. (1954). Motivation and personality. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCaghy, C. H. (1968). Drinking and deviance disavowal: The case of child molesters. Social Problems, 16, 43–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D. T., & Ross, M. (1975). Self-serving bias in the attribution of causality: Fact or fiction? Psychological Bulletin, 82, 213–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D. T., Norman, S. A., & Wright, E. (1978). Distortion in person perception as a consequence of the need for effective control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 598–607.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mozdzierz, G., Macchitelli, F., & Lisiecki, J. (1976). The paradox in psychotherapy: An Adlerian perspective. Journal of Individual Psychology, 32, 169–184.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Munroe, R. L. (1955). Schools of psychoanalytic thought. New York: Dryden Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nunberg, H., & Federn, E. (1974). Minutes of the Vienna Psychoanalytic Society, Vol III: 1910–1911 (Translated by M. Nunberg). New York: International Universities Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peter, L. J., & Hull, R. (1969). The Peter principle. New York: Bantam Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhodewalt, F., & Davison, J. (1986). Self-handicapping and subsequent performance: Role of outcome valence and attributional ambiguity. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 7, 307–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rhodewalt, F., Saltzman, A. T., & Wittmer, J. (1984). Self-handicapping among competitive athletes: The role of practice in self-esteem protection. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 5, 197–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, C. R. (1965). Client-centered therapy. Boston: Houghton Mifflin. (Originally published by the Riverside Press, Cambridge, MA, 1951.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandler, J., & Freud, A. (1985). The analysis of defense: The ego and the mechanisms of defense revisited. New York: International Universities Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarbin, T. R., & Mancuso, J. C. (1980). Schizophrenia: Medical diagnosis or moral verdict? New York: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheff, T. J. (1971). Being mentally ill: A sociological theory. Chicago: Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlenker, B. R. (1980). Impression management: The self-concept, social identity, and interpersonal relations. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, B. (1982). Stress and depression: A cognitive perspective. In R. W. J. Neufeld (Ed.), Psychological stress and psychopathology (pp. 125–146). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shepperd, J. A., & Arkin, R. M. (1989). Determinants of self-handicapping: Task importance and the effects of pre-existing handicaps on self-generated handicaps. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 15, 101–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shepperd, J. A., Miller, P. J., & Arkin, R. M. (1986, May). Self-handicapping and self-consciousness. Paper presented at the meeting of the Midwestern Psychological Association, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slaughter, J. G., Shaver, K. G., & Arkin, R. M. (1988, May). Self-assessment and self-protection: The roles of uncertainty and response context. Paper presented at the meeting of the Midwestern Psychological Association, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, T. W., Snyder, C. R., & Handelsman, M. M. (1982). On the self-serving function of an academic wooden leg: Test anxiety as a self-handicapping strategy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 314–321.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, T. W., Snyder, C. R., & Perkins, S. C. (1983). The self-serving function of hypochondriacal complaints: Physical symptoms as self-handicapping strategies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 787–797.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, C. R., & Higgins, R. L. (1988). Excuses: Their effective role in the negotiation of reality. Psychological Bulletin, 104 (1), 23–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, C. R., & Smith, T. W. (1982). Symptoms as self-handicapping strategies: The virtues of old wine in a new bottle. In G. Weary & H. L. Mirels (Eds.), Integrations of clinical and social psychology (pp. 104–127). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, C. R., Higgins, R. L., & Stucky, R. J. (1983). Excuses: Masquerades in search of grace. New York: Wiley Interscience.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, C. R., Smith, T. W., Augelli, R. W., & Ingram, R. E. (1983). On the self-serving function of social anxiety: Shyness as a self-handicapping strategy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 970–980.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, M. L., & Wicklund, R. A. (1981). Attribute ambiguity. In J. A. Harvey, W. J. Ickes, & R. F. Kidd (Eds.), New directions in attribution research (Vol. 3, pp. 197–221). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steffenhagen, R. A. (1974). Drug abuse and related phenomena: An Adlerian approach. Journal of Individual Psychology, 30, 238–250.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stepansky, P. E. (1983). In Freud’s shadow: Adler in context. Hillsdale, NJ: The Analytic Press. Distributed by Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strube, M. J. (1986). An analysis of the Self-Handicapping Scale. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 13, 211–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strube, M. J., & Roemmele, L. A. (1985). Self-enhancement, self-assessment, and self-evaluative task choice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 981–993.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, H. S. (1953). The interpersonal theory of psychiatry. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szasz, T. (1961). The myth of mental illness. New York: Paul B. Hoeber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tice, D. M., & Baumeister, R. F. (1984, May). Self-handicapping, self-esteem and self-presentation. Paper presented at the meeting of the Midwestern Psychological Association, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tucker, J. A., Vuchinich, R. E., & Sobell, M. B. (1981). Alcohol consumption as a self-handicapping strategy. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 90, 220–230.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ullmann, L. F., & Krasner, L. (1969). A psychological approach to abnormal behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaihinger, H. (1925). The philosophy of “as if”; A system of the theoretical, practical and religious fictions of mankind. New York: Harcourt, Brace.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weeks, G. R., & L’Abate, L. (1982). Paradoxical psychotherapy: Theory, and practice with individuals, couples, and families. New York: Brunner/Mazel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weidner, G. (1980). Self-handicapping following learned helplessness treatment and the Type A coronary-prone behavior pattern. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 24, 319–325.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Weinstein, E. (1968). The development of interpersonal competence. In D. Goslin (Ed.), Handbook of socialization theory and research (pp. 753–775). Chicago: Rand McNally.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wortman, C. B. (1976). Causal attributions and personal control. In J. H. Harvey, W. J. Ickes, & R. F. Kidd (Eds.), New directions in attribution research (Vol. 1, pp. 23–52). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimbardo, P. G., & Radl, S. (1981). The shy child. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zuckerman, M. (1979). Attribution of success and failure revisited, or: The motivational bias is alive and well in attribution theory. Journal of Personality, 47, 245–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1990 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Higgins, R.L. (1990). Self-Handicapping. In: Self-Handicapping. The Springer Series in Social / Clinical Psychology. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-0861-2_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-0861-2_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4899-0863-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4899-0861-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics