Skip to main content

Nonparametric Models for Dichotomous Responses

  • Chapter
Handbook of Modern Item Response Theory

Abstract

The development of nonparametric approaches to psychometric and sociometric measurement dates back to the days before the establishment of regular item response theory (IRT). It has its roots in the early manifestations of scalogram analysis (Guttman, 1950), latent structure analysis (Lazarsfeld, 1950), and latent trait theory (Lord, 1953).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Birnbaum, A. (1968). Some latent trait models and their use in inferring an examinee’s ability. In F.M. Lord and M.R. Novick, Statistical Theories of Mental Test Scores (pp. 397–479 ). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Debets, P., Sijtsma, K., Brouwer, E., and Molenaar, I.W. (1989). MSP: A computer program for item analysis according to a nonparametric IRT approach. Psychometrika 54, 534–536.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giampaglia, G. (1990). Lo Scaling Unidimensionale Nella Ricerca Sociale. Napoli: Liguori Editore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillespie, M., TenVergert, E.M., and Kingma, J. (1988). Secular trends in abortion attitudes: 1975–1980–1985. Journal of Psychology 122, 232–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grayson, D.A. (1988). Two-group classification in latent trait theory: Scores with monotone likelihood ratio. Psychometrika 53, 383–392.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Guttman, L. (1950). The basis for scalogram analysis. In S.A. Stouffer et al. (Eds.), Measurement and Prediction (pp. 60–90 ). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heinz, W. (1981). Klassifikation und Latente Struktur. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Rheinischen Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität, Bonn, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henning, H.J. (1976). Die Technik der Mokken-Skalenanalyse. Psychologische Beiträge 18, 410–430.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henning, H.J. and Six, B. (1977). Konstruktion einer MachiavellismusSkala. Zeitschrift für Sozial Psychologie 8, 185–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holland, P.W. and Rosenbaum, P.R. (1986). Conditional association and unidimensionality in monotone latent variable models. Annals of Statistics 14, 1523–1543.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Karlin, S. (1968). Total Positivity I. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Lazarsfeld, P.F. (1950). The logical and mathematical foundation of latent structure analysis. In S.A. Stouffer et al. (Eds), Measurement and Prediction (pp. 362–412 ). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, C. (1983). Bayesian inference for latent abilities. In S.B. Anderson and J.S. Helmick (Eds.), On Educational Testing (pp. 224–251 ). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lippert, E., Schneider, P., and Wakenhut, R. (1978). Die Verwendung der Skalierungsverfahren von Mokken und Rasch zur Überprüfung und Revision von Einstellungsskalen. Diagnostica 24, 252–274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loevinger, J. (1947). A systematic approach to the construction and evaluation of tests of ability. Psychological Monographs 61, No. 4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loevinger, J. (1948). The technic of homogeneous tests compared with some aspects of “scale analysis” and factor analysis. Psychological Bulletin 45, 507–530.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lord, F.M. (1953). An application of confidence intervals and of maximum likelihood to the estimation of an examinee’s ability. Psychometrika 18, 57–77.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Lord, F.M. and Novick, M.R. (1968). Statistical Theories of Mental Test Scores. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Meijer, R.R. and Sijtsma, K. (1993). Reliability of item scores and its use in person fit research. In R. Steyer, K.F. Wender, and K.F. Widaman (Eds.), Psychometric Methodology: Proceedings of the 7th European Meeting of the Psychometric Society (pp. 326–332 ). Stuttgart, Germany: Gustav Fischer Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meijer, R.R., Sijtsma, K., and Smid, N.G. (1990). Theoretical and empirical comparison of the Mokken and the Rasch approach to IRT. Applied Psychological Measurement 11, 283–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mokken, R.J. (1971). A Theory and Procedure of Scale Analysis with Applications in Political Research. New York, Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, Mouton.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mokken, R.J. and Lewis, C. (1982). A nonparametric approach to the analysis of dichotomous item responses. Applied Psychological Measurement 6, 417–430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Molenaar, I.W., Debets, P., Sijtsma, K., and Hemker, B.T. (1994). MSP, A Program for Mokken Scale Analysis for Polytomous Items, Version 3.0, (User’s Manual). Groningen, The Netherlands: iec ProGAMMA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niemöller, B. and van Schuur, W.H. (1980). Stochastic Cumulative Scaling. STAP User’s Manual, Vol. 4. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Technisch Centrum FSW, University of Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niemöller, B. and van Schuur, W.H. (1983). Stochastic models for unidimensional scaling: Mokken and Rasch. In D. McKay, N. Schofield, and P. Whiteley (Eds.), Data Analysis and the Social Sciences (pp. 120–170 ). London: Francis Pinter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rasch, G. (1960). Probabilistic Models for Some Intelligence and Attainment Tests. Copenhagen: Nielsen and Lydiche.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenbaum, P.R. (1984). Testing the conditional independence and mono-tonicity assumptions of item response theory. Psychometrika 49, 425–435.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenbaum, P.R. (1987a). Probability inequalities for latent scales. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology 40, 157–168.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenbaum, P.R. (1987b). Comparing item characteristic curves. Psychometrika 52, 217–233.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Schriever, B.F. (1985). Order Dependence. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Free University. Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sijtsma, K. (1988). Contributions to Mokken’s Nonparametric Item Response Theory. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Free University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sijtsma, K. and Molenaar, I.W. (1987). Reliability of test scores in non-parametric item response theory. Psychometrika 52, 79–97.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Sijtsma, K. and Meijer, R.R. (1992). A method for investigating the intersection of item response functions in Mokken’s nonparametric IRT model. Applied Psychological Measurement 16, 149–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stouffer, S.A., Guttman, L., Suchman, E.A., Lazarsfeld, P.F., Star, S.A., and Clausen, J.A. (1950). Measurement and Prediction. Studies in Social Psychology in World War II, vol. IV. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1997 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Mokken, R.J. (1997). Nonparametric Models for Dichotomous Responses. In: van der Linden, W.J., Hambleton, R.K. (eds) Handbook of Modern Item Response Theory. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-2691-6_20

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-2691-6_20

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-2849-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-2691-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics