Skip to main content

The Relationship between Parental Distancing Strategies and the Child’s Cognitive Behavior

  • Chapter
Families as Learning Environments for Children

Abstract

To map the terrain of the family as a functioning system is a complex task. Nevertheless, there has been a resurgence of interest in family dynamics, with current advocates espousing a multicausal, multidisciplinary, multieverything approach. The recognition that the family is a complex organization and that it cannot be understood from the conceptualization or methodology of any one discipline may not be new. Nevertheless, it is only recently that the family has been the unit of study for psychologists (e.g., Cochran & Brassard, 1979; Hetherington, 1979; Lamb, 1978; Lewis & Lee-Painter, 1974; Parke & O’Leary, 1975). Recent discoveries of family networks (Cochran & Brassard, 1979; Lewis & Feiring, 1979) and of child effects on the family (Bell & Harper, 1977)—in addition to the traditional studies—are, in my estimation, signs of a rapprochement between the idealized world of the psychologist’s view of human behavior and the realities of family interaction. In spite of this increased convergence between the reality and the idealized image of the social scientist’s conception of the family, there is still a considerable gap between our sophisticated awareness of the complexities and the methodological competence we now have to cope with this complex phenomenon. Consequently, we modify our conceptualization in practice to conform to the practical methods we have for data analysis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Becker, W. C. Consequences of different kinds of parental discipline. In M. L. Hoffman & L. W. Hoffman (Eds.), Review of child development research (Vol. 1). New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bee, H. L., Van Egeren, L. F., Streissguth, A. P., Nyman, B. A., & Leckie, M. S. Social class differences in maternal teaching strategies and speech patterns. Developmental Psychology, 1969, 1 (6), 726–734.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell, C. S., Johnson, J. E., McGillicuddy-DeLisi, A. V., & Sigel, I. E. The effects of family constellation and child gender on parental use of evaluative feedback. Child Development, 1981, 53, 701–704.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell, R. Q., & Harper, L. V. Child effects on adults. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradfield, R. Hello rock. Racine, Wis.: Whitman, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cochran, M. M., & Brassard, J. A. Child development and personal social networks. Child Development, 1979, 50, 601–616.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Croft, R., Stern, S., Siegelbaum, H., & Goodman, D. Manual for description and functionalanalysis of continuous didactic interactions. Rochester, N.Y.: University of Rochester, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emmerich, W. The parental role: A functional-cognitive approach. Monographs of theSociety for Research in Child Development, 1969, 34 (8, Serial No. 132).

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, D. A rainbow of my own. New York: Viking Press, 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gauch, P. L. Christina Katerina and the box. New York: Coward, McCann & Geoghegan, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grusec, J. E., & Kuczynski, L. Direction of effect in socialization: A comparison of the parent versus the child’s behavior as determinants of disciplinary techniques. Developmental Psychology, 1980, 16, 1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helfman, H. Origami. New York: Child Guidance Press, 1960.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hess, R. D., & Shipman, V. C. Early experience and the socialization of cognitive modes in children. Child Development, 1965, 36, 869–886.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hetherington, E. M. Divorce: A child’s perspective. American Psychologist, 1979, 34, 851–858.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill, R. Modern systems theory and the family: A confrontation. Social Science Information, 1973, 10, 7–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holland, M. A big ball of string. New York: Random House, 1958.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamb, M. E. The influence of the child on marital quality and family interaction during prenatal, paranatal and infancy periods. In R. M. Lerner & G. B. Spanier (Eds.) Childinfluences on marital and family interaction. New York: Academic Press, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laosa, L. M. Maternal teaching strategies in Chicano and Anglo-American families: The influence of culture and education on maternal behavior. Child Development, 1980, 51, 759–765.(a)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laosa, L. M. The impact of schooling on interactions between parents and children. Paper presented at the Conference on Changing Families, Educational Testing Service, Princeton, N.J., November 1980. (b)

    Google Scholar 

  • Lerner, R. M., & Spanier, G. B. A dynamic interactional view of the child and family development. In R. M. Lerner & G. B. Spanier (Eds.), Child influences on marital andfamily interaction. New York: Academic Press, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewin, K. Principles of topological psychology. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1936.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, M., & Feiring, C. The child’s social network: Social object, social functions, and their relationship. In M. Lewis & L. Rosenblum (Eds.), The child and its family: The genesisof behavior (Vol. 2). New York: Plenum Press, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, M., & Lee-Painter, S. An interactional approach to the mother-infant dyad. In M. Lewis & L. A. Rosenblum (Eds.), The effects of the infant on its caregiver. New York: Wiley, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGillicuddy-DeLisi, A. V., Sigel, I. E., & Johnson, J. E. The family as a system of mutual influences: Parental beliefs, distancing behaviors, and children’s representational thinking. In M. Lewis & L. A. Rosenblum, The child and its family. New York: Plenum Press, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray, F. B., The acquisition of conservation through social interation. Developmental Psychology, 1972, 6, 1–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parke, R. D., & O’Leary, S. Father-mother-infant interaction in the newborn period: Some findings, some observations, and some unresolved issues. In K. F. Riegel & J. Meacham (Eds.), The developing individual in a changing world (Vol. 2). Social and environmental issues. The Hague: Mouton, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, G. W., Hooper, F. H., Wanska, S. K., & DeFrain, J. An investigation of instructionaltransfer effects for conservation, transitive inference and class inclusion reasoning inkindergarten and first grade children. Madison, Wis.: Wisconsin Research and Development Center, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J. The child’s conception of number. New York: Humanities Press, 1952.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J. Play, dreams and imitation in childhood. New York: Norton, 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J. Biology and knowledge. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sigel, I. E., Anderson, L. M., & Shapiro, H. Categorization behavior of lower- and middle-class Negro preschool children: Differences in dealing with representation of familiar objects. Journal of Negro Education, 1966, Summer, 218–229.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sigel, I. E., & Olmsted, P. The development of classification and representational competence. In I. J. Gordon (Ed.), Readings in research in developmental psychology. Glenview, Ill.: Scott, Foresman, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sigel, I. E., Flaugher, J., Johnson, J., & Schauer, A. Parent-Child Interactions ObservationSchedule (PCI). Unpublished manual, 1977. (Available from authors, Educational Testing Service, Princeton, N.J. 08541.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Sigel, I. E., & Saunders, R. An inquiry into inquiry: Question asking as an instructional model. In L. Katz (Ed.), Current topics in early childhood education (Vol. II). Norwood, N.J.: Ablex Publishing Corp., 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spivak, G., & Shure, M. B. The PIPS Test Manual: A cognitive measure of interpersonalproblem solving ability. Philadelphia; Community Mental Health/Mental Retardation. Center, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Volpe, J. Children’s concepts of friendship. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, Washington, D.C., 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. S. Thought and language. Cambridge, Mass.: M.I.T. Press, 1962.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1982 Plenum Press, New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Sigel, I.E. (1982). The Relationship between Parental Distancing Strategies and the Child’s Cognitive Behavior. In: Laosa, L.M., Sigel, I.E. (eds) Families as Learning Environments for Children. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-4172-7_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-4172-7_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4684-4174-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4684-4172-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics