Definition
Robot-assisted therapy is a promising area of translational neuroscience for children with autism spectrum disorders (ASD). The robot-assisted cognitive behavioral therapy (RA-CBT) is a robot-assisted therapy focused on cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT), which shows promising evidence of efficacy and represents a viable intervention for children with ASD. This type of treatment consists of a human-assisted social robot acting as an intervention mediator to increase the emotional competence and to improve the socio-emotional understanding skills in children with ASD. RA-CBT can be used as a complementary therapy for ASD children with the potential to reduce the workload of the therapist and to improve the social skills.
Historical Background
Heterogeneity in clinical symptoms is the main characteristic of children with ASD, including high rates of comorbid medical conditions (e.g., sleep disorders, gastrointestinal dysfunction, autoimmune disorders), neurological conditions...
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
References and Reading
Berkovits, L., Eisenhower, A., & Blacher, J. (2017). Emotion regulation in young children with autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 47(1), 68–79.
Bird, G., Leighton, J., Press, C., & Heyes, C. (2007). Intact automatic imitation of human and robot actions in autism spectrum disorders. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 274(1628), 3027–3031. http://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2007.1019.
Cabibihan, J. J., Javed, H., Ang, M., Jr., & Aljunied, S. M. (2013). Why robots? A survey on the roles and benefits of social robots in the therapy of children with autism. International Journal of Social Robotics, 5, 593–618. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-013-0202-2.
Chaminade, T., Da Fonseca, D., Rosset, D., Lutcher, E., Cheng, G., & Deruelle, C. (2012). FMRI study of young adults with autism interacting with a humanoid robot. In Proceedings of the 21st IEEE international symposium on robot and human interactive communication (pp. 380–385). Paris: IEEE.
Gottesman, I. I., Gould, T. D. T., Manschreck, T. C. T., & Pogue-Geile, M. F. M. (2003). The endophenotype concept in psychiatry: Etymology and strategic intentions. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 160(4), 636–645.
Goulart, C., Valadão, C., Caldeira, E., & Bastos, T. (2019). Brain signal evaluation of children with autism Spectrum disorder in the interaction with a social robot. Biotechnology Research and Innovation, 3, 60–68.
Jung, C. E., Strother, L., Feil-Seifer, D. J., & Hutsler, J. J. (2016). Atypical asymmetry for processing human and robot faces in autism revealed by fNIRS. PLoS One, 11(7), e0158804. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0158804.
Kim, E. S., Berkovits, L. D., Bernier, E. P., Leyzberg, D., Shic, F., Paul, R., & Scassellati, B. (2013). Social robots as embedded reinforcers of social behavior in children with autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 43(5), 1038–1049. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-012-1645-2.
Klin, A., Lin, D. J., Gorrindo, P., Ramsay, G., & Jones, W. (2009). Two-year-olds with autism orient to non-social contingencies rather than biological motion. Nature, 459(7244), 257–261.
Lai, M. C., Lombardo, M. V., & Baron-Cohen, S. (2014). Autism. Lancet, 383(9920), 896–910.
Lau, W. K. W., Leung, M. K., & Lau, B. W. M. (2019). Resting-state abnormalities in autism spectrum disorders: A meta-analysis. Scientific Reports, 9(1), 3892.
Leekam, S. (2016). Social cognitive impairment and autism: what are we trying to explain? Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B, 371(1686). https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2015.0082.
Maglione, M. A., Gans, D., Das, L., Timbie, J., & Kasari, C. (2012). Nonmedical interventions for children with ASD: Recommended guidelines and further research needs. Pediatrics, 130(Suppl 2), S169–S178.
Mahajan, R., & Mostofsky, S. H. (2015). Neuroimaging endophenotypes in autism spectrum disorder. CNS Spectrums, 20(4), 412–426.
Marino, F., Chilà, P., Trusso Sfrazzetto, S., Carrozza, C., Crimi, I., Failla, C., Busà, M., Bernava, G., Tartarisco, G., Vagni, D., Ruta, L., & Pioggia, G. (2020). Outcomes of a robot-assisted social-emotional understanding intervention for young children with autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 50(6), 1973–1987. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-019-03953-x
Masi, A., DeMayo, M. M., Glozier, N., & Guastella, A. J. (2017). An overview of autism spectrum disorder, heterogeneity and treatment options. Neuroscience Bulletin, 33(2), 183–193. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12264-017-0100-y.
Mengoni, S. E., Irvine, K., Thakur, D., Barton, G., Dautenhahn, K., Guldberg, K., Robins, B., Wellsted, D., & Sharma, S. (2017). Feasibility study of a randomised controlled trial to investigate the effectiveness of using a humanoid robot to improve the social skills of children with autism spectrum disorder (Kaspar RCT): A study protocol. Paediatrics, BMJ Open, 7, e017376.
Nikopoulos, C. K., & Keenan, M. (2003). Promoting social initiation children with autism using video modeling. Behavioral Interventions, 18(2), 87–108.
Pennisi, P., Tonacci, A., Tartarisco, G., Billeci, L., Ruta, L., Gangemi, S., & Pioggia, G. (2016). Autism and social robotics: A systematic review. Autism Research, 9(2), 165–183.
Quirmbach, L. M., Lincoln, A. J., Feinberg-Gizzo, M. J., Ingersoll, B. R., & Andrews, S. M. (2009). Social stories: Mechanisms of effectiveness in increasing game play skills in children diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder using a pretest posttest repeated measures randomized control group design. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 39(2), 299–321.
Ruparelia, K., Manji, K., Abubakar, A., & Newton, C. R. (2017). Investigating the evidence of Behavioral, cognitive, and psychiatric Endophenotypes in autism: A systematic review. Autism Research and Treatment, 2017, 6346912. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/6346912.
Sartorato, F., Przybylowski, L., & Sarko, D. K. (2017). Improving therapeutic outcomes in autism spectrum disorders: Enhancing social communication and sensory processing through the use of interactive robots. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 9, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychires.2017.02.00.
Sharma, S. R., Gonda, X., & Tarazi, F. I. (2018). Autism spectrum disorder: Classification, diagnosis and therapy. Pharmacology and Therapeutics. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.pharmthera.2018.05.007.
Thill, S., Pop, C. A., Belpaeme, T., et al. (2012). Robot-assisted therapy for autism spectrum disorders with (partially) autonomous control: Challenges and outlook. Paladyn, 3, 209–217.
Yun, S. S., Choi, J., Park, S. K., Bong, G. Y., & Yoo, H. (2017). Social skills training for children with autism spectrum disorder using a robotic behavioral intervention system. Autism Research, 10(7), 1306–1323.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature
About this entry
Cite this entry
Marino, F., Ruta, L., Vagni, D., Tartarisco, G., Cerasa, A., Pioggia, G. (2020). Robot-Assisted Cognitive Behavioural Therapy for Young Children with Autism Spectrum Disorders. In: Volkmar, F. (eds) Encyclopedia of Autism Spectrum Disorders. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6435-8_102457-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6435-8_102457-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-6435-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-6435-8
eBook Packages: Springer Reference Behavioral Science and PsychologyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences