Skip to main content

Marital Relationships in the Twenty-First Century

  • Chapter
Handbook of Marriage and the Family

Abstract

Nearly 50 years ago, when the first edition of the Handbook of Marriage and Family was published, family scholars underscored the central importance of marriage in individuals’ lives and accordingly advocated for a better understanding of those factors that predict marital success and positive marital adjustment (Bernard, 1964; Bowerman, 1964). It is unclear whether these pioneering family scholars recognized as early as 1964 that they were on the precipice of significant social changes that would define the latter half of the twentieth century as a period of marital “deinstitutionalization” (Cherlin, 2004) or the “world-historic transformation” of marriage (Coontz, 2004). Prior to the Handbook’s second edition in 1987, however, they certainly knew something was up (see Bernard’s The Future of Marriage, 1972). Evidenced by marriage rate declines, increases in nonmarital cohabitation and childbearing, the postponement of marriage, and elevated divorce rates, marriage has become one of several legitimate options for organizing couple relationships and reproduction in the United States and other Western countries (Amato, 2004; Fincham & Beach, 2010). Whether or not these trends signify declines in the value of marriage or simply reflect societal change has been hotly debated. Religious leaders, politicians, clinicians, and the federal government have all weighed in on the debate and have allocated significant resources to promote marriage as the ideal. Although skepticism remains about the utility of these steps (Huston & Melz, 2004; Karney & Bradbury, 2005), most scholars agree that the current coexistence of marriage with multiple forms of other relationship and childrearing options is unprecedented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Adams, B. N. (2005). Theorizing the particulars of marriage. In V. L. Bengtson, A. C. Acock, K. R. Allen, P. Dilworth-Anderson, & D. M. Klein (Eds.), Sourcebook of family theory and research (pp. 284–285). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amato, P. R. (2004). Tension between institutional and individual views of marriage. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66, 959–965.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amato, P. R., & DeBoer, D. D. (2001). The transmission of marital instability across generations: Relationship skills or commitment to marriage? Journal of Marriage and Family, 63, 1038–1051.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amato, P. R. (2007). Transformative processes in marriage: Some thoughts from a sociologist. Journal of Marriage and Family, 69, 305–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amato, P. R., & Hohmann-Marriott, B. (2007). A comparison of high- and low-distress marriages that end in divorce. Journal of Marriage and Family, 69, 621–638.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atkins, D. C., & Kessel, D. E. (2008). Religiousness and infidelity: Attendance, but not faith and prayer, predict marital fidelity. Journal of Marriage and Family, 70, 407–418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Axinn, W. G., & Thornton, A. (2000). The transformation in the meaning of marriage. In L. Waite, M. Bachrach, M. Hindin, E. Thomson, & A. Thornton (Eds.), Ties that bind: Perspectives on marriage and cohabitation (pp. 147–165). Hawthorne, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, R. C., Gareis, K. C., & Brennan, R. T. (2008). Wives’ shift work schedules and husbands’ and wives’ well-being in dual-earner couples with children: A within-couple analysis. Journal of Family Issues, 29, 396–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beach, S. R. H. (2000). Marital and family processes in depression: A scientific foundation for clinical practice. Washington, DC: APA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beach, S. R. H., Sandeen, E. E., & O’Leary, K. D. (1990). Depression in marriage: A model for etiology and treatment. New York, NY: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beaton, J. M., Norris, J. E., & Pratt, M. W. (2003). Unresolved issues in adult children’s marital relationships involving intergenerational problems. Family Relations, 52, 143–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bengtson, V. L. (2001). Beyond the nuclear family: The increasing importance of multigenerational bonds (The Burgess Award Lecture). Journal of Marriage and Family, 63, 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernard, J. (1964). The adjustment of married mates. In H. T. Christensen (Ed.), Handbook of marriage and the family (pp. 675–739). Chicago, IL: Randy McNally.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernard, J. (1972). The future of marriage. New York, NY: World.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berscheid, E. (1999). The greening of relationship science. American Psychologist, 54, 260–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bose, S., & South, S. J. (2003). Sex composition of children and marital disruption in India. Journal of Marriage and Family, 65, 996–1006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowerman, C. E. (1964). Prediction studies. In H. T. Christensen (Ed.), Handbook of marriage and the family (pp. 215–246). Chicago: Randy McNally.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradbury, T. M. (2002). Invited program overview: Research on relationships as a prelude to action. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 19, 571–599.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradbury, T. N., Fincham, F. D., & Beach, S. R. H. (2000). Research on the nature and determinants of marital satisfaction: A decade in review. Journal of Marriage & the Family, 62, 964–980.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradbury, T. N., & Karney, B. R. (2004). Understanding and altering the longitudinal course of marriage. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66, 862–879.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Browning, C. R. (2002). The span of collective efficacy: Extending social disorganization theory to partner violence. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 64, 833–850.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bryant, C. M., Conger, R. D., & Meehan, J. M. (2001). The influence of in-laws on change in marital success. Journal of Marriage & the Family, 63, 614–626.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bryant, C. M., & Wickrama, K. A. S. (2005). Marital relationships of African Americans: A contextual approach. In V. McLoyd, N. Hill, & K. A. Dodge (Eds.), Emerging issues in African American family life: Context, adaptation, and policy (pp. 111–134). New York, NY: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, J. S., Knapp, S. J., & Holman, T. B. (2005). Theorizing about marriage. In V. L. Bengtson, A. C. Acock, K. R. Allen, P. Dilworth-Anderson, & D. M. Klein (Eds.), Sourcebook of family theory and research (pp. 263–288). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cherlin, A. J. (2004). The deinstitutionalization of American marriage. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66, 848–861.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Claxton, A., & Perry-Jenkins, M. (2008). No fun anymore: Leisure and marital quality across the transition to parenthood. Journal of Marriage and Family, 70, 28–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conger, R. D., Elder, G. H., Lorenz, F. O., Conger, K., Simons, R. L., Whitbeck, L. B., Huck, S., & Melby, J. N. (1990). Linking economic hardship to marital quality and instability. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 52, 643–656.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conger, R. D., Rueter, M. A., & Elder, G. H., Jr. (1999). Couple resilience to economic pressure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 54–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conger, R. D., Wallace, L. E., Sun, Y., Simons, R. L., McLoyd, V. C., & Brody, G. H. (2002). Economic pressure in African American families: A replication and extension of the family stress model. Developmental Psychology, 38, 179–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coontz, S. (2004). The world historical transformation of marriage. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66, 974–979.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crawford, D. W., Houts, R. M., Huston, T. L., & George, L. J. (2002). Compatibility, leisure, and satisfaction in marital relationships. Journal of Marriage and Family, 64, 433–449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crespo, C., Davide, I. N., Costa, M. E., & Fletcher, G. J. O. (2008). Family rituals in married couples: Links with attachment, relationship quality, and closeness. Personal Relationships, 15, 191–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crouter, A. C., & Booth, A. (2003). Children’s influence on family dynamics: The neglected side of family relationships. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crouter, A. C., & Booth, A. (2004). Work-family challenges for low-income parents and their children. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crouter, A. C., & Helms-Erikson, H. M. (2000). Work and family from a dyadic perspective: Variations in inequality. In R. Milardo & S. Duck (Eds.), Families as relationships (pp. 99–115). New York, NY: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cullen, J. C., Hammer, L. B., Neal, M. B., & Sinclair, R. R. (2009). Development of a typology of dual-earner couples caring for children and aging parents. Journal of Family Issues, 30, 458–483.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Curran, M., Hazen, N., Jacobvitz, D., & Sasaki, T. (2006). How representations of the parental marriage predict marital emotional attunement during the transition to parenthood. Journal of Family Psychology, 20, 477–484.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Curtis, K. T., & Ellison, C. G. (2002). Religious heterogamy and marital conflict. Journal of Family Issues, 23, 551–576.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cutrona, C. E., Russell, D. W., Abraham, W. T., Gardner, K. A., Melby, J. M., Bryant, C., & Conger, R. D. (2003). Neighborhood context and financial strain as predictors of marital interaction and marital quality in African American couples. Personal Relationships, 10, 389–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cutrona, C. E., Shaffer, P. A., Wesner, K. A., & Gardner, K. A. (2007). Optimally matching support and perceived spousal sensitivity. Journal of Family Psychology, 21, 754–758.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davey, A., & Szinovacz, M. E. (2004). Dimensions of marital quality and retirement. Journal of Family Issues, 25, 431–464.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeLongis, A., Capreol, M., Holtzman, S., O’Brien, T., & Campbell, J. (2004). Social support and social strain among husbands and wives: A multilevel analysis. Journal of Family Psychology, 18, 470–479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeMaris, A. (2007). The role of relationship inequity in marital disruption. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 24, 177–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dush, C. M., Cohan, C. L., & Amato, P. R. (2003). The relationship between cohabitation and marital quality and stability: Change across cohorts? Journal of Marriage and Family, 65, 539–549.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • England, P., & Edin, K. (2007). Unmarried couples with children. New York, NY: Russell Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erickson, R. J. (1993). Reconceptualizing family work: The effect of emotion work on perceptions of marital quality. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 55, 888–900.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fincham, F. D., & Beach, S. R. H. (2010). Marriage in the new millennium. Journal of Marriage and Family, 72(3), 630–649.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fincham, F. D., Beach, S. T., & Davila, J. (2007). Longitudinal relations between forgiveness and conflict resolution in marriage. Journal of Family Psychology, 21, 542–545.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fincham, F. D., & Bradbury, T. N. (1987). The assessment of marital quality: A reevaluation. Journal of Marriage & the Family, 49, 797–809.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fincham, F. D., Harold, G. T., & Gano-Phillips, S. (2000). The longitudinal association between attributions and marital satisfaction: Direction of effects and role of efficacy expectations. Journal of Family Psychology, 14, 267–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fincham, F. D., & Linfield, K. J. (1997). A new look at marital quality: Can spouses feel positive and negative about their marriage? Journal of Family Psychology, 11, 489–502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fincham, F. D., Paleari, F. G., & Regalia, C. (2002). Forgiveness in marriage: The role of relationship quality, attributions, and empathy. Personal Relationships, 9, 27–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fincham, F. D., Stanley, S. M., & Beach, S. R. (2007). Transformative processes in marriage: An analysis of emerging trends. Journal of Marriage and Family, 69, 275–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fingerman, K. L., & Hay, E. L. (2002). Searching under the streetlight?: Age biases in the personal and family relationships literature. Personal Relationships, 9, 415–433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frye, N. E., & Karney, B. R. (2006). The context of aggressive behavior in marriage: A longitudinal study of newlyweds. Journal of Family Psychology, 20, 12–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, K. C., Hughes, F. M., Tomcik, N. D., Dixon, L. J., & Litzinger, S. C. (2009). Widening spheres of impact: The role of forgiveness in marital and family functioning. Journal of Family Psychology, 23, 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gottman, J. M. (1993). A theory of marital dissolution and stability. Journal of Family Psychology, 7, 57–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helms, H. M., Crouter, A. C., & McHale, S. M. (2003). Marital quality and spouses’ marriage work with close friends and each other. Journal of Marriage and Family, 65, 963–977.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helms, H. M., Proulx, C. M., Klute, M. M., McHale, S. M., & Crouter, A. C. (2006). Patterns of spouses’ gender-typed attributes and their links with marital quality: A pattern analytic approach. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 23, 843–864.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helms, H. M., Supple, A. J., & Proulx, C. M. (2011). Mexican origin couples in the early years of parenthood: Marital well-being in ecological context. Journal of Family Theory and Review, 3(2), 67–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helms, H. M., Walls, J. K., Crouter, A. C., & McHale, S. M. (2010). Provider role attitudes, marital satisfaction, role overload, and housework: A dyadic approach. Journal of Family Psychology, 24(5), 568–577.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helms, H. M., Walls, J. K., & Demo, D. H. (2010). Everyday hassles and family stress. In S. J. Price & C. Price (Eds.), Families and change: Coping with stressful events (4th ed., pp. 357–380). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hetherington, E. M. (2003). Intimate pathways: Changing patterns in close personal relationships across time. Family Relations, 52, 318–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howe, G. W., Levy, M. L., & Caplan, R. D. (2004). Job loss and depressive symptoms in couples: Common stressors, stress transmission, or relationship disruption? Journal of Family Psychology, 18, 639–650.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huston, T. L. (2000). The social ecology of marriage and other intimate unions. Journal of Marriage and Family, 62, 298–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huston, T. D., & Melz, H. (2004). The case for (promoting) marriage: The devil is in the details. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66, 943–958.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, M. P., Caughlin, J. P., & Huston, T. L. (1999). The tripartite nature of marital commitment: Personal, moral, and structural reasons to stay married. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 61, 160–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kan, M. L., McHale, S. M., & Crouter, A. C. (2008). Interparental incongruence in differential treatment of adolescent siblings: Links with marital quality. Journal of Marriage and Family, 70, 466–479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karney, B. R. (2007). Not shifting but broadening marital research: Comments on Fincham, Stanley, and Beach. Journal of Marriage and Family, 69, 310–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karney, B. R., & Bradbury, T. N. (1995). The longitudinal course of marital quality and stability: A review of theory, method, and research. Psychological Bulletin, 118, 3–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karney, B. R., & Bradbury, T. N. (2000). Attributions in marriage: State or trait? A growth curve analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 295–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karney, B. R., & Bradbury, T. N. (2005). Contextual influences on marriage: Implications for policy and intervention. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14, 171–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karney, B. R., & Crown, J. S. (2007). Families under stress: An assessment of data, theory, and research on marriage and divorce in the military (MG-599-OSD). Santa Monica, CA: RAND.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kearns, J. N., & Leonard, K. E. (2004). Social networks, structural interdependence, and marital quality over the transition to marriage: A prospective analysis. Journal of Family Psychology, 18, 383–395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelley, H. H., Berscheid, E., Christensen, A., Harvey, J. H., Huston, T. L., Levinger, G., & Peterson, D. R. (1983). Close relationships. New York, NY: Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, S., & Floyd, F. J. (2006). Impact of racial perspectives and contextual variables on marital trust and adjustment for African American couples. Journal of Family Psychology, 20, 79–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klute, M. M., Crouter, A. C., Sayer, A. G., & McHale, S. M. (2002). Occupational self-direction, values, and egalitarian relationships: A study of dual-earner families. Journal of Marriage and Family, 64, 139–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kenny, D. A., Kashy, D. A., & Cook, W. L. (2006). The analysis of dyadic data. New York, NY: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurdek, L. A. (2002). Predicting the timing of separation and marital satisfaction: An eight-year prospective longitudinal study. Journal of Marriage and Family, 64, 163–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kurdek, L. A. (2003). Methodological issues in growth-curve analyses with married couples. Personal Relationships, 10, 235–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laurenceau, J., Barrett, L. F., & Rovine, M. J. (2005). The interpersonal process model of intimacy in marriage: A daily-diary and multilevel modeling approach. Journal of Family Psychology, 19, 314–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, E., & Bradbury, K. (2007). Trajectories of change in physical aggression and marital satisfaction. Journal of Family Psychology, 21, 236–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leidy, M. S., Parke, R. D., Cladis, M., Coltrane, S., & Duffy, S. (2009). Positive marital quality, acculturative stress, and child outcomes among Mexican Americans. Journal of Marriage and Family, 71, 833–847.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mattson, R. E., Paldino, M., & Johnson, M. D. (2007). The increased construct validity and clinical utility of assessing relationship quality using separate positive and negative dimensions. Psychological Assessment, 19, 146–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McAdoo, H., Martinez, E., & Hughes, H. (2005). Ecological changes in ethnic families of color. In V. Bengtson, A. Acock, K. Allen, P. Dilworth-Anderson, & D. Klein (Eds.), Sourcebook of family theory and research: An interactive approach (pp. 191–212). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKee-Ryan, F. M., Song, Z., Wanberg, C. R., & Kinicki, A. J. (2005). Psychological and physical well-being during unemployment: A meta-analytic study. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 53–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meijer, A. M., & van den Wittenboer, G. L. H. (2007). Contribution of infants’ sleep and crying to marital relationship of first-time parent couples in the 1st year after childbirth. Journal of Family Psychology, 21, 49–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milardo, R. M., & Helms-Erikson, H. (2000). Network overlap and third-party influences in close relationships. In C. Hendrick & S. Hendrick (Eds.), Close relationships: A sourcebook (pp. 33–45). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Murry, V. M., Brown, P. A., Brody, G. H., Cutrona, C. E., & Simons, R. L. (2001). Racial discrimination as a moderator of the links among stress, maternal psychological functioning, and family relationships. Journal of Marriage and Family, 63, 915–926.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murry, V. M., Harrell, A. W., Brody, G. H., Chen, Y., Simons, R. L., Black, A. R., et al. (2008). Long term effects of stressors on relationship well-being and parenting among rural African American women. Family Relations., 57, 117–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neff, L. A., & Karney, B. R. (2007). Stress crossover in newlywed marriage: A longitudinal and dyadic perspective. Journal of Marriage and Family, 69, 594–607.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Leary, S. G., & Slep, A. M. (2006). Precipitants of partner aggression. Journal of Family Psychology, 20, 344–347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osborne, C., Manning, W. D., & Smock, P. J. (2007). Married and cohabiting parents’ relationship stability: A focus on race and ethnicity. Journal of Marriage and Family, 69, 1345–1366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pasley, K., Kerpelman, J., & Guilbert, D. E. (2001). Gendered conflict, identity disruption, and marital instability: Expanding Gottman’s model. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 18, 5–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perry-Jenkins, M., Repetti, R. L., & Crouter, A. C. (2000). Work and family in the 1990s. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62, 981–998.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peters, M. F., & Massey, G. C. (1983). Mundane extreme environmental stress in family stress theories: The case of Black families in White America. Marriage and Family Review, 6, 193–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Presser, H. B. (2000). Nonstandard work schedules and marital instability. Journal of Marriage and Family, 62, 93–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Previti, D., & Amato, P. R. (2004). Is infidelity a cause or a consequence of poor marital quality? Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 21, 217–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Proulx, C. M., Helms, H. M., & Buehler, C. (2007). Marital quality and personal well-being: A meta-analysis. Journal of Marriage and Family, 69, 576–593.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Proulx, C. M., Helms, H. M., & Payne, C. C. (2004). Wives’ domain specific “marriage work” with spouse and friend: Links to marital quality. Family Relations, 53, 393–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robles, T. F., & Kiecolt-Glaser, J. K. (2003). The physiology of marriage: Pathways to health. Physiology and Behavior, 79, 409–416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sayer, A. G., & Klute, M. M. (2005). Analyzing couples and families. In V. L. Bengtson, A. Acock, K. R. Allen, P. Dilworth-Anderson, & D. M. Klein (Eds.), Sourcebook of family theory and research (pp. 289–313). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoebi, D. (2008). The coregulation of daily affect in marital relationships. Journal of Family Psychology, 22, 595–604.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Serewicz, M. C. M., & Canary, D. J. (2008). Assessments of disclosure from the in-laws: Links among disclosure topics, family privacy orientations, and relational quality. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 25, 333–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simons, R. L., Whitebeck, L. B., Melby, J. N., & Wu, C. I. (1994). Economic pressure and harsh parenting. In R. D. Conger & G. H. Elder (Eds.), Families in troubled times: Adapting to change in rural America (pp. 207–222). New York, NY: Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spotts, E. L., Prescott, C., & Kendler, K. (2006). Examining the origins of gender differences in marital quality: A behavior genetic analysis. Journal of Family Psychology, 20, 605–613.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sroufe, L. A., Egeland, B., Carlson, E., & Collins, W. A. (2005). The development of the person: The Minnesota study of risk and adaptation from birth to adulthood. New York, NY: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanley, S. M., Rhoades, G. K., & Markman, H. J. (2006). Sliding versus deciding: Inertia and the premarital cohabitation effect. Family Relations, 55, 499–509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stets, J. E. (1993). Control in dating relationships. Journal of Marriage and Family, 55, 673–685.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stets, J. E. (1995). Modeling control in relationships. Journal of Marriage and Family, 57, 489–501.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stets, J. E., & Hammons, S. A. (2002). Gender, control, and marital commitment. Journal of Family Issues, 23, 3–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tach, L., & Halpern-Meekin, S. (2009). How does premarital cohabitation affect trajectories of marital quality? Journal of Marriage and Family, 71, 298–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trent, K., & South, S. J. (2003). Spousal alternatives and marital relations. Journal of Family Issues, 24, 787–810.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tucker, M. B., & Crouter, A. C. (2008). Enduring couples in varying sociocultural contexts. Family Relations, 57(2), 113–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Umberson, D., Williams, K., Powers, D. A., Liu, H., & Needham, B. (2005). Stress in childhood and adulthood: Effects on marital quality over time. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67, 1332–1347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Updegraff, K. A., Crouter, A. C., Umaña-Taylor, A., & Cansler, E. (2007). Work-family linkages in the lives of families of Mexican origin. In J. Lansford, K. Deater-Deckard, & M. Bornstein (Eds.), Immigrant families in contemporary society (pp. 250–267). New York, NY: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Voydanoff, P. (2005). Social integration, work-family conflict and facilitation, and job and marital quality. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67, 666–679.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker, A. (2004). A symposium on marriage and its future. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66, 843–847.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whisman, M. A., Gordon, K. C., & Chatav, Y. (2007). Predicting sexual infidelity in a population-based sample of married individuals. Journal of Family Psychology, 21, 320–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whiteman, S. D., & Loken, E. (2006). Comparing analytic techniques to classify dyadic relationships: An example using siblings. Journal of Marriage and Family, 68, 1370–1382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wickrama, K. A. S., Bryant, C. M., & Wickrama, T. K. A. (2010). Perceived community disorder, hostile marital interactions, and self-reported health of African American couples: An interdyadic process. Personal Relationships, 17, 525–531.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. (2005, November). Migration can deliver welfare gains, reduce poverty, says global economic prospects 2006. Retrieved March 19, 2008, from http://web.worldbank.org/WBSITE/EXTERNAL/NEWS/0,,contentMDK:20724214~pagePK:64257043~piPK:437376~theSitePK:4607,00.html.

  • Yeong, C. L. (2008, March 13). Pilgrim’s Pride to close N. C. facility. Charlotte Observer. Retrieved March 25, 2008 from http://www.charlotte.com/business/story/534230.html.

  • Zhang, Y., & Van Hook, J. (2009). Marital dissolution among interracial couples. Journal of Marriage and Family, 71, 95–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The author is grateful to Jill Walls and Yuliana Rodriguez for their assistance in the preparation of this chapter, including the initial selection and coding of studies for the content analysis and editorial assistance.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Heather M. Helms PhD .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Helms, H.M. (2013). Marital Relationships in the Twenty-First Century. In: Peterson, G., Bush, K. (eds) Handbook of Marriage and the Family. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3987-5_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics