Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Foundations of Neuropsychology ((FNPS,volume 2))

Abstract

Over the past decade the conceptual model guiding the assessment and treatment of adults with neurologic communication disorders has shifted from a more formal linguistic approach to a functional, pragmatic approach. Traditionally, speech and language tests were designed to evaluate isolated component processes, free from confounding effects of natural contexts. The major focus was on analyzing the comprehension and production of discrete linguistic units (words and grammatical structures). The purposes of testing were to determine the presence and degree of deficit in auditory comprehension, visual/reading comprehension, oral expression, and written expression and to determine the presence/classification of aphasia. Test batteries developed from this approach include the Boston Diagnostic Aphasia Examination (Goodglass & Kaplan, 1972), the Porch Index of Communicative Ability (Porch, 1967), and the Western Aphasia Battery (Kertesz, 1982).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Allen, R., & Brown, K. (1976). Developing communication competence in children Skokie, IL: National Textbook Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aten, J., Caligiuri, M., & Holland, A. (1982). The efficacy of functional communication therapy for chronic aphasie patients. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 41, 93–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Backlund, P., Brown, K., Gurry, K., & Jandt, F. (1982). Recommendations for assessing speaking and listening skills. Communication Education, 31, 9–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker, H., & Leland, B. (1967). Detroit Tests of Learning Aptitude Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merril.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bates, E. (1976). Pragmatics and sociolinguistics in child language. In D. M. Morehead & A. E. Morehead (Eds.), Normal and deficient child language (pp. 411–463). Baltimore: University Park Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bates, E. (1979). The emergency of symbols New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Behrmann, M., & Penn, C. (1984). Non-verbal communication of aphasie patients. British Journal of Disorders of Communication, 19, 155–168.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Berko-Gleason, J. B., Goodglass, H., Obler, L., Green, E., Hyde, M., & Weintraub, S. (1980). Narrative strategies of aphasie and normal-speaking subjects. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 23, 370–382.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beukelman, D., Yorkston, K., & Lossing, C. (1984). Functional communication assessment of adults with neurogenic disorders. In A. Halpern & M. Fuhrer (Eds.), Functional assessment in rehabilitation (pp. 101–115). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bluestone, E., & Dean, R. (1986). The reliability of an interactional communication profile for use with aphasic patients. In R. Brookshire (Ed.), Clinical aphasiology conference proceedings (pp. 145–153). Minneapolis: BRK Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyce, N., & Larson, V. (1983). Adolescents’ communication development and disorders Eau Claire, WI: Thinking Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braunling-McMorrow, D., Lloyd, K., & Fralish, K. (1986). Teaching social skills to head injured adults. Journal of Rehabilitation, January/February/March, 39–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, N., McKinlay, W., Symington, C., Beattie, A., & Campsie, L. (1987). Return to work within the first seven years of severe head injury. Brain Injury, 1, 5–19.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brookshire, R., & Nicholas, L. (1984). Comprehension of directly and indirectly stated main ideas and details in discourse by brain-damaged and non-brain-damaged listerners. Brain and Language, 21, 21–36.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brownell, H., Potter, H., Bihrle, M., & Gardner, H. (1986). Inference deficits in right braindamaged patients. Brain and Language, 21, 310–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burns, M., Halper, A., & Mogil, S. (1985). Clinical management of right hemisphere dysfunction Rockdale, MD: Aspen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buschke, H. (1973). Selective reminding for analysis of memory and learning. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 12, 543–550.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cicerone, K., & Tupper, D. (1986). Cognitive assessment in the neuropsychological rehabilitation of head-injured adults. In B. Uzzell & Y. Gross (Eds.), Clinical neuropsychology of intervention (pp. 59–84). Boston: Martinus Nijhoff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curran, J. (1982). A procedure for the assessment of social skills: The Simulated Social Interaction Test. In J. Curran & P. Monti (Eds.), Social skills training (pp. 348–373). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curran, J., & Monti, P. (1982). Social skills training New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, G. A., & Wilcox, M. J. (1985). Adult aphasia rehabilitation: Applied pragmatics San Diego: College-Hill Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, L., & Dunn, L. (1981). Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test-Revised Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrlich, J. S. (1988). Selective characteristics of narrative discourse in head-injured and normal adults. Journal of Communication Disorders, 21, 1–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ehrlich, J. S., & Sipes, A. (1985). Group treatment of communication skills for head trauma patients. Cognitive Rehabilitation, January-February, 32–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekman, P., & Friesen, W. (1969). The repertoire of non-verbal behavior: Categories, origins, usage, and coding. Semiotica, 1, 49–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foldi, N. (1987). Appreciation of pragmatic interpretations of indirect commands: Comparison of right and left hemisphere brain-damaged patients. Brain and Language, 31, 88–108.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Foldi, N., Cicone, M., & Gardner, H. (1983). Pragmatic aspects of communication in braindamaged patients. In S. Segalowitz (Ed.), Language functions and brain organization (pp. 51–86). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, H., Brownell, H., Wapner, W., & Michelow, D. (1983). Missing the point: The role of the right hemisphere in the processing of complex linguistic materials. In E. Perecman (Ed.), Cognitive processes in the right hemisphere (pp. 161–191). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, A., Sprafkin, R., Gershaw, N., & Klein, P. (1980). Skillstreaming the adolescent Champaign, IL: Research Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodglass, H., & Kaplan, E. (1972). Boston Diagnostic Aphasia Examination Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodglass, H., Quadfasel, F., & Timberlake, W. (1964). Phrase length and the type and severity of aphasia. Cortex, 1, 133–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graesser, A. (1978). How to catch a fish: The memory and representation of common procedures. Discourse Processes, 1, 72–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grice, H. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J. Morgan (Eds.), Studies in syntax and semantics: Vol. 3. Speech acts (pp. 41–58). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gurland, G., Chwat, S., & Wollner, S. (1982). Establishing a communication profile in adult aphasia: Analysis of communicative acts and conversational sequences. In R. Brookshire (Ed.), Clinical aphasiology conference proceedings (pp. 18–27). Minneapolis: BRK Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagen, C. (1984). Language disorders in head injury. In A. Holland (Ed.), Language disorders in adults: Recent advances (pp. 245–281). San Diego: College-Hill Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halliday, M., & Hasan, R. (1976). Cohesion in English London: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hannay, J., & Levin, H. (1985). Selective reminding test: An examination of the equivalence of four forms. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 7, 251–263.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hartley, L. (1986). Syntactic abilities of closed head injured patients in narrative discourse. Presented at National Convention of American Speech-Language-Hearing Association, Detroit, MI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartley, L., & Jensen, P. (1985). Discourse abilities of closed head injured patients: Descriptive profiles. Presented at National Convention of American Speech-Language-Hearing Association, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartley, L., & Jensen, P. (1990). Narrative and procedural discourse after closed head injury Manuscript in preparation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartley, L., & Scofelia, R. (1988). Narrative and procedural discourse following mild to moderate head injury. Presented at National Convention of American Speech-Language-Hearing Association, Boston, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heaton, R. K., & Pendleton, M. G. (1981). Use of neuropsychological tests to predict adult patients’ everyday functioning. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 49, 807–821.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Holland, A. (1977). Some practical considerations in aphasia rehabilitation. In M. Sullivan & M. Kommers (Eds.), Rationale for adult aphasia therapy (pp. 167–180). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Medical Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holland, A. (1980). Communicative Abilities in Daily Living Baltimore: University Park Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holland, A. (1982a). Observing functional communication of aphasie adults. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 41, 50–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holland, A. (1982b). When is aphasia aphasia?: The problem of closed head injury. In R. Brook-shire (Ed.), Clinical aphasiology conference proceedings (pp. 345–439). Minneapolis: BRK Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Houghton, P., Pettit, J., & Towey, M. (1982). Measuring communication competence in global aphasia. In R. Brookshire (Ed.), Clinical aphasiology conference proceedings (pp. 28–39). Minneapolis: BRK Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huber, W., & Gleber, J. (1982). Linguistic and nonlinguistic processing of narratives in aphasia. Brain and Language, 16, 1–18.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jorgenson, C., Barrett, M., Huisingh, R., & Zachman, L. (1981). The Word Test Moline, IL: LinguiSystems.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, E., Goodglass, H., & Weintraub, S. (1983). Boston Naming Test Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kertesz, A. (1982). Western Aphasia Battery New York: Grune & Stratton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Labov, W. (1972). Language in the inner city Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • LaPointe, L., & Horner, J. (1979). Reading Comprehension Battery for Aphasia Tigard, OR: CC Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, H. S., Benton, A. L., & Grossman, R. (1982). Neurobehavioral consequences of closed head injury New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, H. S., Grossman, R., & Kelly, P. J. (1976). Aphasia disorder in patients with closed head injury. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry, 39, 1062–1070.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Levinson, S. C. (1983). Pragmatics Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lezak, M. (1982). The problem of assessing executive functions. International Journal of Psychology, 17, 281–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lezak, M. (1983). Neuropsychological assessment (2nd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lezak, M. (1987). Assessment for rehabilitation planning. In M. Meier, A. Benton, & L. Diller (Eds.), Neuropsychological rehabilitation (pp. 41–58). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liberman, R. P. (1982). Assessment of social skills. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 8, 62–83.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Loban, W. (1976). Language development: Kindergarten through grade twelve (Research report No. 18). Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundsteen, S. (1979). Listening Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.

    Google Scholar 

  • McSweeny, A. J., Grant, I., Heaton, R. K., Prigatano, G., & Adams, K. M. (1985). Relationship of neuropsychological status to everyday functioning in healthy and chronically ill persons. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 7, 281–291.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McTear, M. (1985). Pragmatic disorders: A case study of conversational disability. British Journal of Disorders of Communication, 20, 129–142.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mehrabian, A. (1968). Communication without words. Psychology Today, 2, 51–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mentis, M., & Prutting, C. (1987). Cohesion in the discourse of normal and head-injured adults. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 30, 88–98.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Millar, J., & Whitaker, H. (1983). The right hemisphere’s contribution to language: A review of the evidence from brain-damaged subjects. In S. Segalowitz (Ed.), Language functions and brain organization (pp. 87–113). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milton, S. (1985). Compensatory memory strategy training. Cognitive Rehabilitation, November-December, pp. 8–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milton, S. (1988). Management of subtle cognitive-communication deficits: Close but no cigar. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 3, 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milton, S., Prutting, C., & Binder, G. (1984). Appraisal of communicative competence in head injured adults. In R. Brookshire (Ed.), Clinical aphasiology conference proceedings (pp. 114–123). Minneapolis: BRK Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milton, S., & Wertz, R. (1986). Management of persisting communication deficits in patients with traumatic brain injury. In B. P. Uzzell & Y. Gross (Eds.), Clinical neuropsychology of intervention (pp. 223–256). Boston: Martinus Nijhoff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newton, A., & Johnson, D. (1985). Social adjustment and interaction after severe head injury. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 24, 225–234.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Oddy, M. (1984). Head injury and social adjustment. In N. Brooks (Ed.), Closed head injury: Psychological, social, and family consequences (pp. 108–192). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pang, D. (1985). Pathophysiologic correlates of neurobehavioral syndromes following closed head injury. In M. Ylvisaker (Ed.), Head injury rehabilitation: Children and adolescents (pp. 3–70). San Diego; College-Hill Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Payne-Johnson, J. (1986). Evaluation of communication competence in patients with closed head injury. Journal of Communication Disorders, 19, 237–249.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Penn, C. (1983). Syntactic and pragmatic aspects of aphasic language Doctoral dissertation, University of Wiwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Penn, C., & Cleary, J. (1988). Compensatory strategies in the language of closed head injured patients. Brain Injury, 2, 3–17.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Porch, B. (1967). The Porch Index of Communicative Ability Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porch, B. (1971). The Porch Index of Communicative Ability, Volume 2: Administration, scoring, and interpretation (rev. ed.). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prigatano, G., Pepping, M., & Klonoff, P. (1986). Cognitive, personality and psychosocial factors in neuropsychological adjustment of brain-injured patients. In B. Uzzell & Y. Gross (Eds.), Clinical neuropsychology of intervention (pp. 135–166). Boston: Martinus Nijhoff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prigatano, G., Roueche, J., & Fordyce, D. (1986). Nonaphasic language disturbances after brain injury. In G. P. Prigatano et al., Neuropsychological rehabilitation after brain injury (pp. 18–28). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prutting, C., & Kirchner, D. (1983). Applied pragmatics. In T. Gallagher & C. Prutting (Eds.), Pragmatic assessment and intervention issues in language (pp. 29–64). San Diego: College-Hill Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prutting, C., & Kirchner, D. (1987). A clinical appraisal of the pragmatic aspects of language. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 52, 105–119.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Roman, M., Brownell, H., Potter, H., Seibold, M., & Gardner, H. (1987). Script knowledge in right hemisphere-damaged and in normal elderly adults. Brain and Language, 31, 151–170.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Roth, F., & Spekman, N. (1984). Assessing the pragmatic abilities of children: Part I. Organizational framework and assessment parameters. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 49, 2–11.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sacks, H., Schegloff, E., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50, 606–735.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarno, M. T. (1969). The Functional Communication Profile: Manual of directions New York: New York University Medical Center, Institute of Rehabilitation Medicine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarno, M. T. (1980). The nature of verbal impairment after closed head injury. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 168, 685–692.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sarno, M. T. (1984). Functional measurement in verbal impairment secondary to brain damage. In C. Granger & G. Gresham (Eds.), Functional assessment in rehabilitation medicine (pp. 210–222). Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarno, M. T., Buonaguro, A., & Levita, E. (1986). Characteristics of verbal impairment in closed head injured patients. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 61, 400–405.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarno, M. T., & Levita, E. (1979). Recovery in treated aphasia in the first year post stroke. Stroke, 10, 663–670.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sarno, M. T., & Levita, E. (1981). Some observations on the nature of recovery in global aphasia. Brain and Language, 13, 1–12.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schuell, M. (1965). The Minnesota Test for Differential Diagnosis of Aphasia Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Searle, J. R. (1969). Speech acts London: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, L. (1985). Communicative activities of dysphasic adults: A survey. British Journal of Disorders of Communication, 20, 31–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sohlberg, M. M., & Mateer, C. (1987). Effectiveness of an attention-training program. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 9, 117–130.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Spradlin, J., & Siegel, G. (1982). Language training in natural and clinical environments. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 41, 2–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spreen, O., & Benton, A. (1977). Neurosensory Center Comprehensive Examination for Aphasia: Manual of directions (Rev. ed.). Victoria, B.C.: Neuropsychology Laboratory, University of Victoria.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stein, N. L., & Glenn, C. G. (1979). An analysis of story comprehension in elementary school children. In R. O. Freedle (Ed.), New directions in discourse processing (pp. 53–120). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swindell, C., Pashek, G., & Holland, A. (1982). A questionnaire for surveying personal and communicative style. In R. Brookshire (Ed.), Clinical aphasiology conference proceedings (pp. 50–63). Minneapolis: BRK Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szekeres, S., Ylvisaker, M., & Holland, A. (1985). Cognitive rehabilitation therapy: A framework for intervention. In M. Ylvisaker (Ed.), Head injury rehabilitation: Children and adolescents (pp. 219–246). San Diego: College-Hill Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor-Sarno, M. (1965). A measurement of functional communication in aphasia. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 46, 101–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tucker, D., Watson, R., & Heilman, K. (1977). Discrimination and evocation of affectively intoned speech in patients with right parietal disease. Neurology, 21, 947–950.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulatowska, H., & Bond, S. (1983). Aphasia: Discourse considerations. Topics in Language Disorders, 3, 21–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ulatowska, H., Freedman-Stern, R., Doyel, A., Macaluso-Haynes, S., & North, A. (1983). Production of narrative discourse in aphasia. Brain and Language, 19, 317–334.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ulatowska, H., North, A., & Macaluso-Haynes, S. (1981). Production of narrative and procedural discourse in aphasia. Brain and Language, 13, 345–371.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Waller, M., & Darley, F. (1978). The influence of context on the auditory comprehension of paragraphs by aphasic subjects. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 21, 732–745.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wapner, W., Hamby, S., & Gardner, H. (1981). The role of the right hemisphere in the apprehension of complex linguistic materials. Brain and Language, 14, 15–33.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wechsler, D. (1945). A standardized memory scale for clinical use. Journal of Psychology, 19, 87–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Werner, E. (1975). A study of communication time Masters Thesis, University of Maryland, College Park, MD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiener, M., Devoe, S., Rubinow, S., & Geller, J. (1972). Nonverbal behavior and nonverbal communication. Psychological Review, 19, 185–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiig, E. (1982a). Let’s talk: Developing prosocial communication skills Columbus, OH: Charles E. Merrill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiig, E. (1982b). Let’s Talk Inventory for Adolescents Columbus, OH: Charles E. Merrill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiig, E., & Semel, E. (1974). Development of comprehension of logico-grammatical sentences by grade school children. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 38, 171–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilcox, M. J. (1983). Aphasia: Pragmatic considerations. Topics in Language Disorders, 3, 35–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winograd, T. (1977). A framework for understanding discourse. In M. Just & P. Carpenter (Eds.), Cognitive processes in comprehension (pp. 63–88). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, R. (1984). Behavior disorders following severe head injury: Their presentation and psychological management. In N. Brooks (Ed.), Closed head injury: Psychological, social, and family consequences (pp. 195–219). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ylvisaker, M. (Ed.). (1985). Head injury rehabilitation: Children and adolescents San Diego: College-Hill Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ylvisaker, M., & Gobble, E. M. (Eds.). (1987). Community re-entry for head injured adults San Diego: College-Hill Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ylvisaker, M., & Holland, A. (1985). Coaching, self-coaching, and rehabilitation of head injury. In D. Johns (Ed.), Clinical management of neurogenic communicative disorders (2nd ed., pp. 243–257). Boston: Little, Brown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yorkston, K., & Beukelman, D. (1980). An analysis of connected speech samples of aphasic and normal speakers. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 45, 27–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yorkston, K., & Beukelman, D. (1981). Assessment of Intelligibility of Dysarthric Speech Tigard, OR: C.C. Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yorkston, K., Beukelman, D., & Bell, K. (1988). Clinical management of dysarthric speakers San Diego: College-Hill Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1990 Kluwer Academic Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hartley, L.L. (1990). Assessment of Functional Communication. In: Tupper, D.E., Cicerone, K.D. (eds) The Neuropsychology of Everyday Life: Assessment and Basic Competencies. Foundations of Neuropsychology, vol 2. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-1503-2_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-1503-2_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4612-8808-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4613-1503-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics