Skip to main content

Symbol Grounding and the Symbolic Theft Hypothesis

  • Chapter
Simulating the Evolution of Language

Abstract

Scholars studying the origins and evolution of language are also interested in the general issue of the evolution of cognition. Language is not an isolated capability of the individual, but has intrinsic relationships with many other behavioral, cognitive, and social abilities. By understanding the mechanisms underlying the evolution of linguistic abilities, it is possible to understand the evolution of cognitive abilities. Cognitivism, one of the current approaches in psychology and cognitive science, proposes that symbol systems capture mental phenomena, and attributes cognitive validity to them. Therefore, in the same way that language is considered the prototype of cognitive abilities, a symbol system has become the prototype for studying language and cognitive systems. Symbol systems are advantageous as they are easily studied through computer simulation (a computer program is a symbol system itself), and this is why language is often studied using computational models.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Andrews J, Livingston K, Harnad S (1998) Categorical perception effects induced by category learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24: 732–753

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berlin B, Kay P (1969) Basic color terms: Their universality and evolution. University of California Press, Berkley

    Google Scholar 

  • Cangelosi A, Greco A, Harnad S (2000) From robotic toil to symbolic theft: Grounding transfer from entry-level to higher-level categories. Connection Science, 12: 143–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cangelosi A, Harnad S (in press) The adaptive advantage of symbolic theft over sensorimotor toil: Grounding language in perceptual categories. Evolution of Communication

    Google Scholar 

  • Christiansen MH, Chater N (1999) Connectionist natural language processing: The state of the art. Cognitive Science, 23: 417–437

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deacon TW (1997) The Symbolic Species: The coevolution of language and human brain London: Penguin

    Google Scholar 

  • Elman JL (1990) Finding structure in time. Cognitive Science, 14: 179–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fodor JA (1976) The Language of thought, Thomas Y Crowell, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg DE (1989) Genetic algorithms in search, optimization, and machine learning. Addison-Wesley, Reading MA

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Goldstone R (1994) Influences of categorization of perceptual discrimination. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 123: 178–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greco A, Cangelosi A (1999) Language and the acquisition of implicit and explicit knowledge: A pilot study using neural networks. Cognitive Systems, 5: 148–165

    Google Scholar 

  • Harnad S (ed) (1987) Categorical perception: The groundwork of cognition. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Harnad S (1990) The symbol grounding problem. Physica D, 42: 335–346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harnad S (1996) The origin of words: A psychophysical hypothesis. In: Velichkovsky BM, Rumbaugh DM (eds) Communicating meaning: The evolution and development of language. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Harnad S, Hanson SJ, Lubin J (1991) Categorical perception and the evolution of supervised learning in neural nets. In: Powers DW, Reeker L. (eds) Proceedings of the AAAI Spring Symposium on Machine Learning of Natural Language and Ontology

    Google Scholar 

  • Harnad S, Hanson SJ, Lubin, J (1995) Learned categorical perception in neural nets: Implications for symbol grounding. In: Honavar V, Uhr L (eds) Symbol processors and connectionist network models in artificial intelligence and cognitive modelling: Steps toward principled integration. Academic Press, pp 191–206

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurford J (1998) Review of Terrence Deacon, 1997 The Symbolic Species: The co-evolution of language and the human brain. The Times Literary Supplement, October 23rd, 1998,34

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs RA, Kosslyn SM (1994) Encoding shape and spatial relations: The role of receptive field size in coordinating complementary representations. Cognitive Science, 18: 361–386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan F (2000) Talking AIBO: First experimentation of verbal interactions with an autonomous four-legged robot. In: Nijholt A, Heylen D, Jokinen K (eds) Learning to behave: Interacting agents. CELE-TWENTE Workshop on Language Technology, pp 57–63

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirby S (2000) Syntax without natural selection: How compositionality emerges from vocabulary in a population of learners. In: Knight C, Studdert-Kennedy M, Hurford J (eds) The evolutionary emergence of language: Social function and the origins of linguistic form. Cambridge University Press, pp 303–323

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakisa RC, Plunkett K (1998) Evolution of a rapidly learned representation for speech. Language and Cognitive Processes, 13: 105–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliphant M, Batali J (1997) Learning and the emergence of coordinated communication Centre for Research in Language Newsletter, 11(1)

    Google Scholar 

  • Parisi D (1997) An Artificial Life approach to language. Mind and Language, 59, 121–146

    Google Scholar 

  • Peirce CS (1978) Collected Papers (Vol II: Element of Logic). In: Hartshorne C, Weiss P (eds), Belknap Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Pevtzow R, Harnad S (1997) Warping similarity space in category learning by human subjects: The role of task difficulty. In: Ramscar M, Hahn U, Cambouropolos E, Pain H (eds) Proceedings of SimCat 1997: Interdisciplinary Workshop on Similarity and Categorization. Department of Artificial Intelligence, Edinburgh University, pp 189–195

    Google Scholar 

  • Plunkett K, Sinha C, Moller MF, Strandsby O (1992) Symbol grounding or the emergence of symbols? Vocabulary growth in children and a connectionist net. Connection Science, 4:293–312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pylyshyn ZW (1984) Computation and cognition. MIT Press, Bradford Books, Cambridge MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Rumelhart DE, McClelland JL, the PDP Research Group (eds) (1986) Parallel distributed processing: Explorations in the microstructure of cognition (Vol J: Foundations). MIT Press, Cambridge MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Savage-Rumbaugh S, Rumbaugh DM (1978) Symbolization, language, and Chimpanzees: A theoretical reevaluation on Initial language acquisition processes in four Young Pan troglodytes. Brain and Language, 6: 265–300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schafer G, Mareschal D (2001) Modeling infant speech sound discrimination using simple associative networks. Infancy, 2(1)

    Google Scholar 

  • Searle JR (1982) The Chinese room revisited. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 5: 345–348

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steels L (1996) Self-organising vocabularies. In: Langton CG, Shimohara K (eds) Proceedings of the ALIFE V. MIT Press, Cambridge MA, pp 179–184

    Google Scholar 

  • Steels L, Kaplan F (1999) Collective learning and semiotic dynamics. In: Floreano D, Nicoud JD, Mondada F (eds) Proceedings of ECAL99 the Fifth European Conference on Artificial Life (Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence). Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp 679–688

    Google Scholar 

  • Steels L, Vogt P (1997) Grounding adaptive language games in robotic agents. In: Husband P, Harvey I (eds) Proceedings of the Fourth European Conference on Artificial Life. MIT Press, Cambridge MA, pp 474–482

    Google Scholar 

  • Tijsseling A, Harnad S (1997) Warping similarity space in category learning by backprop nets. In: Ramscar M, Hahn U, Cambouropolos E, Pain H (eds) Proceedings of SimCat 1997: Interdisciplinary Workshop on Similarity and Categorization. Department of Artificial Intelligence, Edinburgh University, pp 263–269

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer-Verlag London Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Cangelosi, A., Greco, A., Harnad, S. (2002). Symbol Grounding and the Symbolic Theft Hypothesis. In: Cangelosi, A., Parisi, D. (eds) Simulating the Evolution of Language. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-0663-0_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-0663-0_9

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-85233-428-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-0663-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics