Skip to main content

Relationships Between Adaptive Behavior and Impairment

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Assessing Impairment

Abstract

Adaptive behavior generally refers to one's ability to meet daily living responsibilities and to respond to the needs of others. The American Association on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities (AAIDD) defines adaptive behavior as “the collection of conceptual, social, and practical skills that have been learned by people in order to function in their everyday lives” (American Association on Mental Retardation [AAMR], 2002, p. 73). The AAIDD's 1992 definition cited the following 10 adaptive skills that constitute adaptive behavior: communication, community use, functional academics, home and school living, health and safety, leisure, self-care, self-direction, social, and work (Table 4.1). These 10 skills have been incorporated into either the conceptual, social, or practical domains. The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) emphasizes the importance of these 10 skills in its diagnostic criteria for mental retardation (American Psychiatric Association [APA], 2000).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • American Association on Mental Retardation. (1992). Definitions, classifications, and systems of supports (9th ed.) . Washington, DC:Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Association on Mental Retardation. (2002). Mental retardation: Definition, classification, and systems of support (10th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Bar Association. Task Force on Mental Disability and the Death Penalty. (2006). Recommendations and report on the death penalty and persons with mental disabilities. Mental and Physical Disability Law Reporter, 30, 668–677.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, and National Council on Measurement in Education.(1999). The standards for educational and psychological testing.Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Psychiatric Association. (1995). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders(4th ed., international version with ICD-10 codes).Washington, DC: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Psychiatric Association. (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed., text revision). Washington, DC: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Psychological Association. (2002). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. Washington, DC: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Apling, R. N., & Jones, N. L. (2005). Congressional Research Service report for Congress, Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): Analysis of changes made by P.L. 108–446.Washington, DC: Library of Congress.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkins v Virginia, 536 U.S. 304 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bölte, S., & Poustka, F. (2002). The relation between general cognitive level and adaptive behavior domains in individuals with autism with and without co-morbid mental retardation. Child Psychiatry and Human Development, 33, 165–172.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bonnie, R. J. (2004). The American Psychiatric Association's resource document on mental retardation and capital sentencing: Implementing Atkins v. Virginia. Journal of the American Association of Psychiatry and the Law, 32, 304–308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonnie, R. J., & Gustafson, K. (2007). The challenges of implementing Atkins v. Virginia: How legislatures and courts can promote accurate assessments and adjudications of mental retardation in death penalty cases. University of Richmond Law Review, 41, 810–860.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruininks, R., Woodcock, R., Weatherman, R., & Hill, B. (1996). Scales of Independent behavior-Revised. Chicago: Riverside.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burns, M. K. (2005). Review of the Adaptive Behavior Assessment System-Second Edition. In SpiesR.PlakeB. and (Eds.) , The sixteenth mental measurements yearbook. Lincoln, NE: Buros Institute of Mental Measurements.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, C., Prior, M., & Kinsella, G. (2002). The relationship between executive function abilities, adaptive behaviour, and academic achievement in children with externalising behaviour problems.Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 43, 785–796.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Council for Exceptional Children. (2004). The new IDEA: CEC's summary of significant issues. Arlington, VA: Council for Exceptional Children.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ditterline, J., Banner, D., Oakland, T., & Becton, D. (2008). Adaptive behavior profiles of students with disabilities. Journal of Applied School Psychology, 24, 191–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duvall, J. C., & Morris, R. J. (2006). Assessing mental retardation in death penalty cases: Critical issues for psychology and psychological practice. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 37, 658–665.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, J. W. (2003). Mental retardation and the death penalty: A guide to legislative issues. Mental and Physical Disability Law Reporter, 27(1), 11–24.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Endicott, J., Spitzer, R. L., Fleiss, J. L., & Cohen, J. (1976). The global assessment scale. Archives of General Psychiatry, 33, 766–771.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fisch, G. S., Simensen, R. J., & Schroer, R. J. (2002). Longitudinal changes in cognitive and adaptive behavior scores in children and adolescents with the fragile X mutation or autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 32, 107–114.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, B. J., Del'Homme, M., Guthrie, D., & Zhang, F. (1999). Vineland adaptive behavior scale scores as a function of age and initial IQ in 210 autistic children. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 29, 379–384.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gilotty, L., Kenworthy, L., Sirian, L., Black, D. O., & Wagner, A. E. (2002). Adaptive skills and executive function in autism spectrum disorders. Child Neuropsychology, 8, 241–248.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, P. (1990). Mental retardation, adaptive behavior assessment, and giftedness In KaufmanA. S.(Ed.) , Assessing adolescent and adult intelligence(pp. 533–585).Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, P., & Oakland, T. (2003a). Adaptive Behavior Assessment System-Second Edition. San Antonio, TX: Harcourt Assessment.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, P., & Oakland, T. (2003b). Technical report: Adaptive Behavior Assessment System Second EditionTX: San Antonio, Psychological Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leigh, J. (1987). Adaptive behavior of children with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 9, 557–562.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liss, M., Harel, B., Fein, D., Allen, D., Dunn, M., Feinstein, C., et al. (2001). Predictors and correlates of adaptive functioning in children with developmental disorders. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 31, 219–230.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Maccow, G., & Zlomke, L. (2001). Review of the Scales of Independent behavior-Revised. In PlakeB. and ImparaJ.(Eds.), The fourteenth mental measurements yearbook. Lincoln, NE: Buros Institute of Mental Measurements.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meikamp, J., & Suppa, C. H. (2005). Review of the Adaptive Behavior Assessment System-Second Edition. In R. Spies and B. Plake (Eds.), The sixteenth mental measurements yearbook. Lincoln, NE: Buros Institute of Mental Measurements (pp 19–21.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Olley, J. G., & Cox, A. W. (2008). Assessment of adaptive behavior in adult forensic cases: The use of the Adaptive Behavior Assessment System-II. In T. Oakland and P. Harrison(Eds.) , Adaptive Behavior Assessment System-II: Use, interpretation, and application in assessment practice. New York: Elsevier (pp 198–214.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Olley, J. G., Greenspan, S., & Switzky, H. (2006). Division 33 Ad Hoc Committee on Mental Retardation and the Death Penalty. Psychology in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 31(2). 11–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2004). Equity in education: Students with disabilities, learning difficulties, and disadvantages. Paris: Author

    Google Scholar 

  • Reschly, D. J. (1990). Best practices in adaptive behavior. In Thomas and A. Grimes J. (Eds.), Best practices in school psychology (2nd ed., pp. 29–42).Washington, DC: National Association of School Psychologists.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rust, J. O., & Wallace, M. A. (2004). Test review: Adaptive Behavior Assessment System-Second Edition. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 22, 367–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schatz, J., and Hamdan-Allen, G. (1995). Effects of age and IQ on adaptive behavior domains for children with autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 25, 51–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Social Security Administration. (2006). Disability evaluation under Social Security. SSA Publication Number 64-039 ICN 468600. Retrieved June 14, 2007, from http://www.ssa.gov/disability/professionals/bluebook/

  • Sparrow, S. S., and Cicchetti, D. V. (1987). Adaptive behavior and the psychologically disturbed child. The Journal of Special Education, 21, 89–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sparrow, S., Cicchetti, D., and Balla, D. (2005). Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales (2nd ed.). Circle Pines, MN: AGS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spies, R. A., & Plake, B. S. (Eds.). (2005). The sixteenth mental measurements yearbook. Lincoln, NE: Buros Institute of Mental Measurements.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spitzer, R. L., Gibbon, M., Williams, J. B. W., and Endicott, J. (1996). Global assessment of functioning (GAF) scale. In SedererL. I. and DickeyB. (Eds.), Outcomes assessment in clinical practice (pp. 76–77). Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strawser, S., and Weller, C. (1985). Use of adaptive behavior and discrepancy criteria to determine learning disabilities severity subtypes. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 18, 205–212.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Social Security Administration (2007). Social Security online: Disability programs. Retrieved June 14, 2007, from http://www.ssa.gov/disability/

  • U,S. Code Service. (2007). 20 USCS Section 1400: Individuals with Disabilities Education Act. Retrieved June 12, 2007, from http://web.lexis-nexis.com/universe/document?_m=6af9d78cf01c007d8151e26c38f4192dand_docnum=1andwchp=dGLbVlz-zSkVband_md5=412bb646231d76b75426f221f837233a

  • U.S. Department of Education. (2006). The Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004. Retrieved June 13, 2007, from http://www.ed.gov/about/offices/list/osers/osep/index.html.

  • Wei, Y., Oakland, T., and Algina, J. (2008). Multigroup confirmatory factor analysis for the parent form, ages 5–21, of the Adaptive Behavior Assessment System-II. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 113, 178–186.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Weller, C., and Strawser, S. (1987). Adaptive behavior of subtypes of learning disabled individuals. The Journal of Special Education, 21, 102–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organization. (1992a). The international classification of diseases and related health problems (10th ed.). Geneva: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organization. (1992b). International statistical classification of disease and related health problems: Tenth revision. Geneva: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Heath Organization. (1999). International classification of functioning and disability. Geneva: Author

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ditterline, J., Oakland, T. (2009). Relationships Between Adaptive Behavior and Impairment. In: Naglieri, J., Goldstein , S. (eds) Assessing Impairment. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-387-87542-2_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics