Skip to main content

Psychometric Properties of the Trait Emotional Intelligence Questionnaire (TEIQue)

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Assessing Emotional Intelligence

Part of the book series: The Springer Series on Human Exceptionality ((SSHE))

Abstract

This chapter presents an introduction to the theory and psychometric properties of the Trait Emotional Intelligence Questionnaire (TEIQue). We discuss the necessity of conceptualizing the increasing number of faux intelligences as personality traits, rather than as cognitive abilities, and give a detailed description of the TEIQue as the operationalization vehicle for trait emotional intelligence (trait EI or trait emotional self-efficacy). The inventory shows adequate reliability and temporal stability at the global, factor (4), and facet (15) levels. It has a clear and replicable factor structure comprising four distinct, but interrelated, dimensions: Emotionality, Self-control, Sociability, and Well-being. Self-other TEIQue correlations are substantial and similar to those observed for the Big Five. Preliminary data are presented for the new adolescent form of the TEIQue (TEIQue-AFF), which also shows satisfactory psychometric characteristics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    This research was supported by grant SGS-33965 from the Nuffield Foundation. All TEIQue forms and versions are available, free of charge, for research purposes from www.psychometriclab.com

References

  • Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 1–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bar-On, R. (1997). Bar-On Emotional Quotient Inventory: Technical manual. Toronto: Multi-Health Systems Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, I. H., & Teng, G. (1989). Factoring items and factoring scales are different: Spurious evidence for multidimensionality due to item categorization. Psychological Bulletin, 105, 167–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brody, N. (2004). What cognitive intelligence is and what emotional intelligence is not. Psychological Inquiry, 15, 234–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connolly, J. J., Kavanagh, E. J., & Viswesvaran, C. (2007). The convergent validity between self and observer ratings of personality: A meta-analytic review. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 15, 110–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costa, P. T., Jr., Terracciano, A., & McCrae, R. R. (2001). Gender differences in personality traits across cultures: Robust and surprising findings. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 322–331.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Diener, E. (1996). Traits can be powerful, but are not enough: Lessons from subjective well-being. Journal of Research in Personality, 30, 389–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eysenck, H. J. (1998). Intelligence: A new look. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freudenthaler, H. H., Neubauer, A. C., Gabler, P., & Scherl, W. G. (2008). Testing the Trait Emotional Intelligence Questionnaire (TEIQue) in a German-speaking sample. Personality and Individual Differences, 45, 673–678.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Furnham, A. (2005, July). Exploring no-man’s land in differential psychology. Presidential address presented at the biennial meeting of the International Society for the Study of Individual Differences, Adelaide, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Furnham, A. (2006). Explaining the popularity of emotional intelligence. In K. R. Murphy (Ed.), A critique of emotional intelligence. Mahwah, NJ: LEA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Furnham, A., & Rawles, R. (1999). Correlations between self-estimated and psychometrically measured IQ. Journal of Social Psychology, 139, 405–410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gana, K., Alaphilippe, D., & Bailly, N. (2004). Positive illusions and mental and physical health in later life. Aging and Mental Health, 8, 58–64.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goleman, D. (1995). Emotional intelligence: Why it can matter more than IQ. London: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottfredson, L. S. (2003). Dissecting practical intelligence theory: Its claims and evidence. Intelligence, 31, 343–397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harman, H. H. (1976). Modern factor analysis (3rd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogan, R. (1983). A socioanalytic theory of personality. In M. M. Page (Ed.), 1982 Nebraska symposium on motivation. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hough, L. M., & Paullin, C. (1994). Construct – oriented scale construction: The rational approach. In G. S. Stokes, M. D. Mumford, & W. A. Owens (Eds.), The biodata handbook: Theory, research, and use of biographical information in selection and performance prediction. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, A. R. (1998). The g factor. Westport, CT: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurtz, J. E., & Sherker, J. L. (2003). Relationship quality, trait similarity, and self-other agreement on personality ratings in college roommates. Journal of Personality, 71, 21–48.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Legree, P. J. (1995). Evidence for an oblique social intelligence factor established with a Likert-based testing procedure. Intelligence, 21, 247–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacCann, C., Roberts, R. D., Matthews, G., & Zeidner, M. (2004). Consensus scoring and empirical option weighting of performance-based emotional intelligence (EI) tests. Personality and Individual Differences, 36, 645–662.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, H. W., Trautwein, U., Ludtke, O., Koller, O., & Baumert, J. (2006). Integration of multidimensional self-concept and core personality constructs: Construct validation and relations to well-being and achievement. Journal of Personality, 74, 403–456.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mavroveli, S., Petrides, K. V., Shove, C., & Whitehead, A. (2008). Validation of the construct of trait emotional intelligence in children. European Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 17, 516–526.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mikolajczak, M., Luminet, O., Leroy, C., & Roy, E. (2007). Psychometric properties of the Trait Emotional Intelligence Questionnaire (TEIQue). Journal of Personality Assessment, 88, 338–353.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mischel, W. (1968). Personality and assessment. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mischel, W., & Shoda, Y. (1995). A cognitive-affective system theory of personality: Reconceptualizing situations, dispositions, dynamics, and invariance in personality structure. Psychological Review, 102, 246–268.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • O'Connor, B. P. (2002). A quantitative review of the comprehensiveness of the five-factor model in relation to popular personality inventories. Assessment, 9, 188–203.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Sullivan, M., & Ekman, P. (2005). Facial expression recognition and emotional intelligence. In G. Geher (Ed.), Measuring emotional intelligence: Common ground and controversy. Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paulhus, D. L., Lysy, D. C., & Yik, M. S. N. (1998). Self-report measures of intelligence: Are they useful as proxy IQ tests? Journal of Personality, 66, 525–554.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pervin, L. A. (1999). Epilogue: Constancy and change in personality theory and research. In L. A. Pervin & O. P. John (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research. New York: Guildford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petrides, K. V. (2001). A psychometric investigation into the construct of emotional intelligence. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University College London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petrides, K. V., & Furnham, A. (2001). Trait emotional intelligence: Psychometric investigation with reference to established trait taxonomies. European Journal of Personality, 15, 425–448.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petrides, K. V., & Furnham, A. (2003). Trait emotional intelligence: Behavioural validation in two studies of emotion recognition and reactivity to mood induction. European Journal of Personality, 17, 39–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petrides, K. V., Furnham, A., & Mavroveli, S. (2007). Trait emotional intelligence: Moving forward in the field of EI. In G. Matthews, M. Zeidner, & R. Roberts (Eds.), Emotional intelligence: Knowns and unknowns. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petrides, K. V., Pita, R., & Kokkinaki, F. (2007). The location of trait emotional intelligence in personality factor space. British Journal of Psychology, 98, 273–289.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, R. D., Schulze, R., Zeidner, M., & Matthews, G. (2005). Understanding, measuring, and applying emotional intelligence: What have we learned? What have we missed? In R. Schulze & R. D. Roberts (Eds.), Emotional intelligence: An international handbook. Cambridge, MA: Hogrefe & Huber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, B. W., Walton, K., & Viechtbauer, W. (2006). Patterns of mean-level change in personality traits across the life course: A meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 1–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Salovey, P., & Mayer, J. D. (1990). Emotional intelligence. Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 9, 185–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scriven, M. (1959). Explanation and prediction in evolutionary theory. Science, 130, 477–482.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, S. E., & Brown, J. D. (1988). Illusion and well-being: A social psychological perspective on mental health. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 193–210.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Terracciano, A., McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T., Jr. (2006a). Personality plasticity after age 30. Personality Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 999–1099.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Terracciano, A., McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T., Jr. (2006b). Longitudinal trajectories in Guilford-Zimmerman temperament survey data: Results from the Baltimore longitudinal study of aging. Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 61B, P108–P116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thorndike, E. L. (1920). Intelligence and its uses. Harper’s Magazine, 140, 227–235.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warwick, J., & Nettelbeck, T. (2004). Emotional intelligence is…? Personality and Individual Differences, 37, 1091–1100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waterhouse, L. (2006). Inadequate evidence for multiple intelligences, Mozart effect, and emotional intelligence theories. Educational Psychologist, 41, 247–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeidner, M., Shani-Zinovich, I., Matthews, G., & Roberts, R. D. (2005). Assessing emotional intelligence in gifted and non-gifted high school students: Outcomes depend on the measure. Intelligence, 33, 369–391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to K. V. Petrides .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Petrides, K.V. (2009). Psychometric Properties of the Trait Emotional Intelligence Questionnaire (TEIQue). In: Parker, J., Saklofske, D., Stough, C. (eds) Assessing Emotional Intelligence. The Springer Series on Human Exceptionality. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-88370-0_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics