Skip to main content

Feminist Theories

The Social Construction of Gender in Families and Society

  • Chapter
Sourcebook of Family Theories and Methods

Abstract

Where are the women? That short question, raised and put forward by feminist movements, has opened fresh perspectives on social and historical life. Clearly, women were not absent from traditional research on families, as they were from studies of politics and paid work. In fact, women have often been equated with and conceptually confined to “family.” But that assumption, like others basic to traditional ways of thinking about families, has distorted women’s—and men’s—experiences. Feminist theories ask us to step back and to rethink our assumptions, especially about issues of gender, power, and the very nature and boundaries of “family.” These are, of course, fundamental concerns, and one of our main goals in this chapter is to dislodge feminist theory and research on gender from the rubric of marginalized “special issues” and to place these perspectives where they belong: at the center of thinking about families.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Abel, E. (1986). Adult daughters and care to the elderly. Feminist Studies, 12, 419–497.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abel, E., & Nelson, M. K. (Eds.) (1990). Circles of care: Work and identity in women’s lives. Albany: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Acker, J. (1973). Women and social stratification: A case of intellectual sexism. American Journal of Sociology, 78, 936–945.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aptheker, B. (1989). Tapestries of life. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arcana, J. (1979). Our mother’s daughters. Berkeley, CA: Shameless Hussy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arthur, M. (1977). Liberated women: The classical era. In R. Bridenthal & C. Koonz (Eds.), Becoming visible: Women in European history (pp. 60–89). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrett, M. (1980). Women’s oppression today. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrett, M., & Mclntosh, M. (1982). The anti-social family. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bart, P. B. (1971). Sexism and social science: From the gilded cage to the iron cage, or, the perils of Paulene. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 33, 734–745.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belenky, M. F., Clinchy, B. M., Goldberger, N. R., & Tarule, J. M. (1986). Women’s ways of knowing. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, C., & Newby, H. (1976). Husbands and wives: The dynamics of the deferential dialectic. In D. L. Barker & S. Allen (Eds.), Dependence and exploitation in work and marriage (pp. 152–168). New York: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berg, B. (1978). The remembered gate: Origins of American feminism, 1800–1860. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernard, J. (1968). Marriage and family among Negroes. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernard, J. (1972). The future of marriage. New York: World Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernard, J. (1973). My four revolutions: An autobiographical history of the ASA. The American Journal of Sociology, 18, 115–191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernardez, T. (1978). Women and anger: Conflicts with aggression in contemporary women. Journal of the American Medical Women’s Association, 35, 215–219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blumberg, R. L. (1978). Stratification: Socio-economic and sexual inequality. Dubuque: Brown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boston Women’s Health Book Collective. (1984). Our bodies, ourselves. New York: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brenner, J., & Ramas, M. (1984). Rethinking women’s oppression. New Left Review, 144, 33–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bridenthal, R. (1982). The family: The view from a room of her own. In B. Thorne, with M. Yalom (Eds.), Rethinking the family: Some feminist questions (pp. 225–293). New York: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brownmiller, S. (1975). Against our will: Men, women and rape. New York: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgess, E. W., & Locke, H. (1945). The family: From institution to companionship. New York: American Book Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burr, W. R., Hill, R., Nye, F. I., & Reiss, I. L. (Eds.) (1979a). Contemporary theories about the family (Vol. I). New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burr, W. R., Hill, R., Nye, F. I., & Reiss, I. L. (Eds.) (1979b). Contemporary theories about the family (Vol. II). New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chafetz, J. S. (1984). Sex and advantage: A comparative, macrostructural theory of sex stratification. Totowa, NY: Rowman & Allanheld.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chamberlain, M. K. (Ed.) (1989). Women in academe: Progress and prospects. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chemin, K. (1985). The hungry self: Women, eating and identity. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chodorow, N. (1978). The reproduction of mothering. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chodorow, N., & Contratto, S. (1982). The fantasy of the perfect mother. In B. Thorne, with M. Yalom (Eds.), Rethinking the family: Some feminist questions (pp. 54–71). New York: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cixous, H. (1981). The laugh of the medusa. In E. Marks & I. deCourtivron (Eds), New French feminisms (pp. 245–264). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, P. H. (1989). A comparison of two works on black family life. Signs: A Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 14, 875–884.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, P. H. (1990). Black feminist thought. Boston: Unwin Hyman.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Combahee River Collective (1979). A black feminist statement. In Z. Eisenstein (Ed.), Capitalist patriarchy and the case for socialist feminism (pp. 362–372). New York: Monthly Review Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connell, R. W. (1987). Gender and power. Society, the person and sexual politics. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cott, N. F. (1983). Divorce and the changing status of women in eighteenth century. In M. Gordon (Ed), The American family in social-historical perspective (pp. 347–372). New York: St. Martin’s Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cott, N. F. (1987). The grounding of modern feminism. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daly, M. (1978). Gyn/ecology: The metaethics of radical feminism. Boston: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Beauvoir, S. (1953). The second sex. New York: Knopf. (Original work published 1949)

    Google Scholar 

  • Deegan, M. J. (1981). Early women sociologists and the American sociological society: The patterns of exclusion and participation. The American Sociologist, 16, 14–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deegan, M. J., & Hill, M. (1987). Women and symbolic interaction. Winchester, MA: Allen & Erwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Degler, C. N. (1980). At odds: Women and the family in America from the revolution to the present. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • D’Emelio, J., & Freedman, E. (1988). Intimate matters: A history of sexuality in America. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeVault, M. (1987). Doing housework: Feeding and family life. In N. Gertsl & H. E. Gross (Eds.), Families and work (pp. 178–191). Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • DiLeonardo, M. (1987). The female world of cards and holidays: Women, families, and the work of kinship. Signs, 12, 440–453.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dill, B. T. (1980). The means to put my children through: Child rearing goals and strategies among black female domestic servants. In L. F. Rogers-Rose (Ed.), The black woman (pp. 107–123). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dill, B. T. (1987). The dialectic of black womenhood. In S. G. Harding (Ed.), Feminism and methodology (pp. 97–108). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dinnerstein, D. (1977). The mermaid and the minotaur. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobash, R. E., & Dobash, R. (1979). Violence against wives: A case against patriarchy. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dworkin, A. (1981). Pornography: Men possessing women. New York: Perigree Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dworkin, A. (1987). Intercourse. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Easton, B. (1976). Industrialization and femininity. Social Problems, 23, 389–401.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrenreich, B., & English, D. (1978). For her own good: 150 years of the experts’ advice to women. Garden City, NY: Anchor Press/Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrensaft, D. (1987). Parenting together. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eichler, M. (1988). Nonsexist research methods: A practical guide. Boston: Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenstein, H. (1983). Contemporary feminist thought. Boston: Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenstein, H. (1985). Introduction. In H. Eisenstein & A. Jardine (Eds.), The future of difference (pp. xv–xxiv). New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, C. F. (1988). Deceptive distinctions. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fassinger, P. (1989) The impact of gender and past marital experiences on heading a household alone. In B. J. Risman & P. Schwartz (Eds), Gender in intimate relationships (pp. 165–180). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fausto-Sterling, A. (1985). Myths of gender: Biological theories about women and men. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson, K. E. (1984). The feminist case against bureaucracy. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferree, M. M. (1990). Beyond separate spheres: Feminism and family research. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 52, 866–884.

    Google Scholar 

  • Firestone, S. (1970). The dialectic of sex. New York: Bantam Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flax, J. (1987). Postmodernism and gender relations in feminist theory. Signs, 12, 621–643.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flax, J. (1990). Thinking fragments: Psychoanalysis, feminism, and postmodernism. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox-Genovese, E. (1987). Culture and consciousness in the intellectual history of European women. Signs, 12,(3), 528–547.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedan, B. (1963). The feminine mystique. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedl, E. (1967). The position of women: Appearance and reality. Anthropological Quarterly, 40, 97–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frye, M. (1983). The politics of reality. Trumansburg, NY: Crossing Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gagnon, J. H., & Simon, W. (1973). Sexual conduct. Chicago: Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilkes, C. (1981). From slavery to social welfare: Racism and the control of black women. In A. Smerdlow & H. Lessinger (Eds.), Class, race and sex: The dynamics of control (pp. 288–300). Boston: Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillespie, D. (1971). Who has the power? The marital struggle. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 33, 445–458.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilligan, D. (1982). In a different voice: Psychological theory and women’s development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilman, C. P. (1966). Woman and economics. New York: Harper & Row. (Original work published 1898, under the name C. P. Stetson)

    Google Scholar 

  • Glenn, E. N. (1986). Issei, nissei, war bride: Three generations of Japanese-American women in domestic service. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glenn, E. N. (1987). Gender and the family. In B. B. Hess & M. M. Ferree (Eds.), Analyzing gender: A handbook of social science research (pp. 348–380). Newberry Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldner, V. (1988). Generation and gender: Normative and covert hierarchies. Family Process, 27, 17–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodrich, T., Rampage, C., Ellman, B., & Halstead, K. (1988). Feminist family therapy: A casebook. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, L. (1979). The struggle for reproductive freedom: Three stages of feminism. In Z. R. Eisenstein (Ed.), Capitalist patriarchy and the case for socialist feminism (pp. 107–136). New York: Monthly Review Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, L. (1988). Heroes of their own lives. New York: Viking.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, S. (1980). Woman and nature: The roaring inside her. New York: Harper Colophon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gross, E. (1986). Conclusion: What is feminist theory? In C. Pateman & E. Gross (Eds.), Feminist challenges (pp. 190–204). Boston: Northeastern University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harding, S. (1986). The science question in feminism. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harding, S., & Hentikka, M. (Eds.) (1983). Discovering reality: Feminist perspectives on epistemology, metaphysics, methodology and philosophy of science. Dordrecht: Reidel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hare-Mustin, R. (1978). A feminist approach to family therapy. Family Process, 17, 181–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harley, S. (1990). For the good of family and race: Gender, work, and domestic roles in the black community, 1880–1930. Signs, 15, 336–349.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartmann, H. (1979). Capitalism, patriarchy, and job segregation by sex. In Z. R. Eisenstein (Ed.), Capitalist patriarchy and the case for socialist feminism (pp. 206–247). New York: Monthly Review Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartsock, N. C. (1983). Money, sex, and power: Toward a feminist historical materialism. New York: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayden, D. (1981). The grand domestic revolution: A history of feminist designs for American homes, neighborhoods, and cities. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, M. A. (1980). Charlotte Perkins Gilman: The making of a radical feminist, 1860–1896. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirsch, M., & Keller, E. F. (Eds.) (1990). Conflicts in feminism. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hochschild, A. (1989). The second shift: Working parents and the revolution at home. New York: Viking.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hooks, B. (1984). Feminist theory: From margin to center. Boston: South End Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iragaray, L. (1985). This sex which is not one (C. Porter, Trans.). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaggar, A. M. (1983). Feminist politics and human nature. (Totowa, NJ: Rowman & Allenheld.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaggar, A. M., & Rothenberg, P. S. (Eds.) (1984). Feminist frameworks: Alternative theoretical accounts of the relations between women and men. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, K., & McIntyre, D. (1983). The reproduction of families: The social role of family therapy. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 2, 119–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, M. (1989). Strong mothers, weak wives. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joseph, G., & Lewis, J. (1981). Common differences: Conflicts in black and white feminist perspectives. Garden City, NY: Anchor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller, E. F. (1985). Reflections on gender and science. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly-Gadol, J. (1977). Did women have a renaissance? In R. Bridenthal & C. Koonz (Eds.), Becoming visible: Women in European history (pp. 137–164). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly-Gadol, J. (1987). The social relation of the sexes: Methodological implications of women’s history. In S. Harding (Ed.), Feminism and methodology (pp. 15–28). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kessler, I. J., & McKenna, W. (1978). Gender: An ethnomethodological approach. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kessler-Harris, A. (1982). Out to work: A history of wage earning women in the United States. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kessler-Harris, A. (1986). Written testimony. Special section: Women’s history goes to trial: EEOC v. Sears Roebuck & Company Signs, 11, 767–779.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kimmel, M. S., & Messner, M. A. (1989). Men’s lives. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, D. K. (1988). Multiple jeopardy, multiple consciousness. Signs, 14, 42–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Komarovsky, M. (1962). Blue-collar marriage. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Komter, A. (1989). Hidden power in marriage. Gender & Society, 3, 187–216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kraditor, A. (1971). The ideas of the woman suffrage movement, 1890–1920. New York: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kristeva, J. (1982). Desire in language (L. Roudiez, Trans.). New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laslett, B., & Brenner, J. (1989). Gender and social reproduction: Historical perspectives. Annual Review of Sociology, 15, 381–404.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laws, J. L. (1979). The second x: Sex role and social role. New York: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leavitt, R. R. (1972). Women in other cultures. In V. Gornick & B. K. Moran (Eds.), Women and sexist society (pp. 276–303). New York: New American Library.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lerner, G. (1986). The creation of patriarchy. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewin, E. (1984). Lesbianism and motherhood: Implications for child custody. In T. Darby & S. Potter (Eds), Women-identified women (pp. 163–184). Palo Alto: Mayfield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindenbaum, J. P. (1985). The shattering of an illusion: The problem of competition in lesbian relationships. Feminist Studies, 11, 85–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lopata, H. Z., & Thorne, B. (1978). On the term “sex roles.” Signs, 3, 638–651.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorber, J. (1987). From the editor. Gender & Society, 1, 123–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorde, A. (1984). Sister, outsider. Trumansburg, NY: Crossing Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luepnitz, D. A. (1988). The family interpreted: Feminist theory in clinical practice. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lugones, M. C., & Spelman, E. V. (1983). Have we got a theory for you: Feminist theory, cultural imperialism, and the demand for “the woman’s voice.” Women’s Studies International Forum, 6, 573–581.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacKinnon, C. A. (1989). Toward a feminist theory of the state. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacKinnon, L. K., & Miller, D. (1987). The new epistemology and the Milan approach: Feminist and sociopolitical considerations. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 13, 139–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • May, M. (1987). The historical problem of the family wage: The Ford Motor Company and the five dollar day. In N. Gerstel & H. E. Gross (Eds), Families and work (pp. 111–131). Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mead, M. (1935). Sex and temperament in three primitive societies. New York: Morrow.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, J. B. (1976). Toward a new psychology of women, Boston: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Millett, K. (1970). Sexual politics. New York: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, J. (1971). Woman’s estate. New York: Pantheon Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monter, W. E. (1977). The pedestal and the stake: Courtly love and witchcraft. In R. Bridenthal & C. Koonz (Eds.), Becoming visible: Women in European history (pp. 119–136). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, D. H. J. (1985). The family, politics, and social theory. Boston: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, M. K. (1989). Negotiating care: Relationships between family daycare providers and mothers. Feminist Studies, 15, 7–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicholson, L. J. (Ed.) (1990). Feminism /postmodernism. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oakley, A. (1974). Woman’s work: The housewife, past and present. New York: Pantheon Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Okin, S. M. (1989). Justice, gender and the family. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Omolade, B. (1986). It’s a family affair: The real lives of black single mothers. Latham, NY: Kitchen Table: Women of Color Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osmond, M. W. (1980). Cross-societal family research: A macrosociological overview of the seventies. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 42, 995–1016.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osmond, M. W. (1981). Comparative marriage and the family. International Journal of Comparative Sociology, 22, 169–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osmond, M. W. (1987). Toward a radical-critical theory of marriage and the family. In M. B. Sussman & S. K. Stienmetz (Eds.), Handbook of Marriage and the Family. New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paige, K. E., & Paige, J. M. (1981). The politics of reproductive ritual. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, T. (1942). Age and sex in the social structure of the United States. American Sociological Review, 7, 353–369.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, T., & Bales, R. (Eds.) (1955). Family, socialization and interaction process. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Penley, C. (1986). Teaching in your sleep: Feminism and psychoanalysis. In C. Nelson (Ed.), Theory in the classroom (pp. 129–148). Chicago: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petchesky, R. (1979). Dissolving the hyphen: A report on marxist—feminist groups. In Z. R. Eisenstein (Ed.), Capitalist patriarchy and the case for socialist feminism (pp. 373–390). New York: Monthly Review Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poovey, M. (1988). Feminism and deconstruction. Feminist Studies, 14, 51–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pope, B. C. (1977). Angels in the devil’s workshop: Leisured and charitable women in nineteenth-century England and France. In R. Bridenthal & C. Koonz (Eds.), Becoming visible: Women in European history (pp. 296–324). Boston. Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rapp, R. (1975, published as R. R. Reiter). Introduction. In R. Rapp [Reiter] (Ed.) Toward an anthropology of women (pp. 11–19). New York: Monthly Review Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rapp, R. (1982). Family and class in contemporary America: Notes toward an understanding of ideology. In B. Thome, with M. Yalom (Eds.), Rethinking the family (pp. 168–187). New York: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rich, A. (1977). Of woman born: Motherhood as experience and institution. New York: Bantam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rich, A. (1980). Compulsory heterosexuality and lesbian existence. Signs, 5, 631–660.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rollins, J. (1985). Between women: Domestics and their employees. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosaldo, M. (1980). The use and abuse of anthropology: Reflections on feminism and cross cultural understanding. Signs, 5, 389–417.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, S. O. (1988). Gender antagonism and class conflict: Exclusionary strategies of male trade unionists in nineteenth century Britain. Social History, 2, 191–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, R. (1982). Beyond separate spheres: Intellectual roots of modern feminism. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rossi, A. (1969). Sex equality: The beginning of an ideology. In B. Roszak & T. Roszak (Eds.), Masculine/feminine (pp. 173–186). New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothman, B. K. (1989). Recreating motherhood: Ideology and technology in a patriarchal society. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, G. (1975). The traffic in women: Notes on the “political economy” of sex. In R. R. Reiter (Ed.), Toward an anthropology of women (pp. 157–210). New York: Monthly Review Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, G. (1984). Thinking sex: Notes for a radical theory of the politics of sexuality. In C. Vance (Ed), Pleasure and danger (pp. 267–320). Boston: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rush, F. (1980). The best kept secret: Sexual abuse of children. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sacks, K. (1975). Engels revisited: Women, the organization of production, and private property. In R. R. Reiter (Ed.), Toward an anthropology of women (pp. 211–234). New York: Monthly Review Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sacks, K. (1989). Toward a unified theory of class, race, and gender. American Ethnologist, 16, 534–550.

    Google Scholar 

  • Safilios-Rothschild, C. (1969). Family sociology or wives’ family sociology? A cross-cultural examination of decision making. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 31, 290–301.

    Google Scholar 

  • Safilios-Rothschild, C. (1970). The study of family power structure: A review of 1960–1969 Journal of Marriage and the Family, 32, 539–552.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schechter, S. (1982). Woman and male violence: The visions and struggles of the battered women’s movement. Boston: South End Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schur, E. M. (1984). Labeling women deviant: Gender, stigma and social control. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, J. W. (1988). Gender and the politics of history. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Segal, L. (1987). Is the future female? Troubled thoughts on contemporary feminism. New York: Bedrick Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, B. (1984). Between a rock and a hard place: Relationships between black and Jewish women. In M. Pratt, B. Smith, & E. Bulkin, (Eds.), Yours in struggle (pp. 65–87). New York: Long Haul Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, D. E. (1987). The everyday world as problematic: A feminist sociology. Boston: Northeastern University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spelman, E. V. (1988). Inessential women: Problems of exclusion in feminist theory. Boston: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stacey, J. (1990). Brave new families: Stories of domestic upheaval in late twentieth century America New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stacey, J., & Thome, B. (1985). The missing feminist revolution in sociology. Social Problems, 32, 301–316.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stack, C. (1974). All our kin: Strategies for survival in a black community. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanley, A. (1981). Daughters of Isis, daughters of Demeter: When women sowed and reaped. Women’s Studies International Quarterly, 4, 289–304.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanley, L., & Wise, S. (1983). Breaking out: Feminist consciousness and feminist research. Boston: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorne, B. (1987). Re-visioning women and social change: Where are the children? Gender & Society, 1, 85–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorne, B. (1978). “Gender … how is it best conceptualized?” Paper presented at annual meetings of the American Sociological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorne, B., with Yalom, M. (Eds.) (1982). Rethinking the family. New York: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tong, R. (1989). Feminist thought. San Francisco: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valverde, M. (1987). Sex, power and pleasure. Philadelphia: New Society Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vance, C. (Ed.) (1984). Pleasure and danger. Exploring female sexuality. Boston: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Velez-I, C. G. (1980). Se me acabo la cancion: An ethnography of non-consenting sterilizations among Mexican women in Los Angeles. In M. Mora & A. R. Del Castillo (Eds.), Mexican women in the United States (pp. 71—91). Los Angeles, UCLA Chicano Studies Research Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waller, W., & Hill, R. (1951). The family: A dynamic interpretation. New York: Holt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walters, M., Carter, B., Papp, P., & Silverstein, O. (1988). The invisible web: Gender patterns in family relationships. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weeks, J. (1985). Sexuality and its discontents. Boston: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinbaum, B., & Bridges, A. (1976). The other side of the paycheck: Monopoly capital and the structure of consumption. Monthly Review, 28, 88–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • West, C., & Zimmerman, D. H. (1987). Doing gender. Gender & Society, 1, 125–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler, D., Avis, J. M., Miller, L. A., & Chaney, S. (1986). Rethinking family therapy education and supervision: A feminist model. Journal of Psychotherapy and the family, 1, 53–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson, R. (1986). American tough: The tough-guy tradition and American character. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wollstonecraft, M. (1975). A vindication of the rights of women. Baltimore: Penguin. (Original work published 1792)

    Google Scholar 

  • Yeatman, A. (1986). Women, domestic life and sociology. In C. Pateman & E. Gross (Eds.), Feminist challenges: Social and political theory (pp. 157–172). Boston: Northeastern University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zihlmann, A. (1978). Women in evolution, part II: Subsistence and social organization among early hominids. Signs, 4, 4–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zinn, M. B. (1990). Family, feminism and race in America. Gender & Society, 14, 68–82.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Osmond, M.W., Thorne, B. (2009). Feminist Theories. In: Boss, P., Doherty, W.J., LaRossa, R., Schumm, W.R., Steinmetz, S.K. (eds) Sourcebook of Family Theories and Methods. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-85764-0_23

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-85764-0_23

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-306-44264-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-387-85764-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics