Skip to main content

Sexual Stigma and Sexual Prejudice in the United States: A Conceptual Framework

  • Chapter
Contemporary Perspectives on Lesbian, Gay, and Bisexual Identities

Part of the book series: Nebraska Symposium on Motivation ((NSM,volume 54))

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    1 The framework described here may have applicability across national and cultural boundaries, as suggested by the fact that some of its key underlying constructs have been developed outside the United States (e.g., Scambler & Hopkins, 1986). Because most of the data I discuss (including my own empirical research) are derived from US samples, however, I restrict my generalizations to American culture.

  2. 2.

    2 Felt stigma can be distinguished from stigma consciousness, which refers to the extent to which stigmatized individuals are chronically self-conscious of their own stigmatized status and expect to be stereotyped by others because of it (Pinel, 1999). Stigma consciousness can be understood as a manifestation of felt stigma, but the latter construct more broadly encompasses awareness of the general effects of stigma – enacted not only against oneself but also against others who mani fest the stigmatized characteristic. In addition, felt stigma is experienced by nonstigmatized indi viduals as well as the stigmatized.

  3. 3.

    3 The item wording matched the respondent's preferred self-label.

  4. 4.

    4 Although sexual prejudice is typically manifested by heterosexuals, it is also possible for sexual minority individuals to hold negative attitudes toward other gay, lesbian, and bisexual people. As with prejudiced heterosexuals, these attitudes result from the internalization of sexual stigma. Such attitudes are often closely associated with self-stigma. In addition, some sexual minority individuals harbor negative attitudes toward heterosexuals. These attitudes can be appropriately labeled sexual prejudice but, because heterosexuality is not a stigmatized category in society, such prejudice does not reflect the internalization of societal stigma (for further discussion of this point, see Herek, 2007).

  5. 5.

    5 Data from a heterosexual undergraduate student sample (described later and in the Appendix) illustrate this point. Respondents were asked to indicate how often they had engaged in each behavior on a list of 16 different acts. The list included 7 positive behaviors (e.g., “I started a conversation with a man whom I thought might be gay,” “I confronted someone who was making negative comments or hostile jokes about lesbians”) and 9 negative behaviors (e.g., “I damaged the property of a man I thought was gay,” “I made unfriendly remarks or hostile jokes about lesbians”), which were summed separately to yield an index of Positive Behaviors Toward Gay Men (or Lesbians) and an index of Negative Behaviors Toward Gay Men (or Lesbians). Overall, moderate correlations were observed between the behavior scales and the Attitudes Toward Gay Men (ATG) and Attitudes Toward Lesbians (ATL) scales. For the ATG, r(105) = −0.41 with positive behaviors toward gay men and 0.41 for negative behaviors toward gay men. For the ATL, r(120) = −.38 for positive behaviors toward lesbians. The correlation between ATL scores and negative behaviors toward lesbians could not be interpreted because most respondents (57%) reported never having engaged in such behaviors.

  6. 6.

    6 My discussion in the present chapter focuses mainly on research that has employed explicit or direct measures of sexual prejudice. Some researchers have assessed heterosexuals' attitudes uti lizing indirect measures, such as the Implicit Attitudes Test (e.g., Banse, Seise, & Zerbes, 2001; Dasgupta & Rivera, 2006; Gabriel, Banse, & Hug, 2007; Jellison et al., 2004; Rowatt et al., 2006; Steffens & Buchner, 2003). Although theoretical and methodological questions about such meas ures remain to be resolved (Arkes & Tetlock, 2004; Fazio & Olson, 2003), they hold promise for future research. A discussion of them, however, is beyond the scope of the present chapter.

  7. 7.

    7 My discussion of polling data relies on my own examination of the data in publicly available archives (especially the Roper Center at the University of Connecticut), as well as the published sources cited here.

  8. 8.

    8 The phrasing of the GSS question, which frames homosexual relations as wrong, might bias responses. In other surveys, however, responses to differently worded items about the morality of homosexual behavior have yielded similar findings. In Gallup polls between 2001 and 2007, for example, 49–55% of respondents believed that homosexual behavior is morally wrong, whereas 38–47% believed it is not morally wrong (Saad, 2007).

  9. 9.

    9 Indeed, some antigay initiatives have been rejected by voters (e.g., Donovan et al., 2000).

  10. 10.

    10 These questions are all framed in terms of granting civil liberties to a gay man. Because attitudes toward gay men often differ from attitudes toward lesbians (e.g., Herek, 2002a), it is conceivable that somewhat different patterns might emerge if the questions referred to a lesbian woman.

  11. 11.

    11 The items in the short form of the ATLG (as worded for the ATL subscale) are: (1) “Sex between two women is just plain wrong.” (2) “I think female homosexuals (lesbians) are disgusting.” (3) “Female homosexuality is a natural expression of sexuality in women.”

  12. 12.

    12 Although the ATLG scale predates Lakoff's analysis, the scale items coincide with key constructs in what Lakoff labeled “strict father morality,” a moral system that invokes a mythic model of the family and underlies modern conservative politics (Lakoff, 2002, p. 65). According to his analysis, this system of moral thought is based on multiple metaphors, including moral order (which posits a dominance hierarchy of God over people, adults over children, and men over women), moral boundaries (which delineate permissible and impermissible ranges of behavior), and moral purity (which designates violations of morality as impure and thus tainted and corrupting). According to Lakoff, challenges to the moral order are understood as wrong, transgressions of moral boundaries are regarded as unnatural, and moral impurities are viewed as disgusting.

  13. 13.

    13 Respondents were asked “How many friends, relatives, or close acquaintances have you ever had who were gay, lesbian, or homosexual?” A total of 80% reported having at least one such contact. When asked about their sole or closest relationship, 30% characterized the gay or lesbian person as a close friend, 44% as an acquaintance or distant friend, 10% as an immediate family member, and 16% as a relative outside the immediate family. In addition to the 41% who first learned about the gay or lesbian person's sexual orientation through the latter's self-disclosure, another 10% said they had talked with her or him about being lesbian or gay.

  14. 14.

    14 Data collection was conducted by The Henne Group and funded by the Gill Foundation. I express my sincere appreciation to Jeff Henne, Ethan Geto, and Murray Edelman for their assistance and support in this project.

  15. 15.

    15 The survey included experimental manipulations of the wording of the policy items. However, these manipulations did not significantly affect the response patterns and are not considered here.

References

  • Adam, B. D. (1995). The rise of a gay and lesbian movement (Rev. ed.). New York, NY: Twayne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (2005). The influence of attitudes on behavior. In D. Albarracin, B.T. Johnson, & M.P. Zanna (Eds.), The handbook of attitudes (pp. 173–221). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Albarracin, D., Zanna, M. P., Johnson, B. T., & Kumkale, G. T. (2005). Attitudes: Introduction and scope. In D. Albarracin, B.T. Johnson, & M.P. Zanna (Eds.), The handbook of attitudes (pp. 3–19). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allport, G. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Altemeyer, B. (1996). The authoritarian specter. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arkes, H. R., & Tetlock, P. E. (2004). Attributions of implicit prejudice, or “Would Jesse Jackson ‘fail’ the Implicit Association Test?”. Psychological Inquiry, 15, 257–278.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banse, R., Seise, J., & Zerbes, N. (2001). Implicit attitudes towards homosexuality: Reliability, validity, and controllability of the IAT. Zeitschrift Fuer Experimentelle Psychologie, 48(2), 145–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Batson, C. D., Floyd, R. B., Meyer, J. M., & Winner, A. L. (1999). “And who is my neighbor? ”: Intrinsic religion as a source of universal compassion. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 38, 445–457.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bayer, R. (1987). Homosexuality and American psychiatry: The politics of diagnosis (Rev. ed.). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernat, J. A., Calhoun, K. S., Adams, H. E., & Zeichner, A. (2001). Homophobia and physical aggression toward homosexual and heterosexual individuals. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 110, 179–187.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Berrill, K. T. (1992). Antigay violence and victimization in the United States: An overview. In G.M. Herek & K.T. Berrill (Eds.), Hate crimes: Confronting violence against lesbians and gay men (pp. 19–45). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bieschke, K. J., Perez, R. M., & DeBord, K. A. (Eds.). (2006). Handbook of counseling and psychotherapy with lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender clients (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blair, I. V., Park, B., & Bachelor, J. (2003). Understanding intergroup anxiety: Are some people more anxious than others? Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 6, 151–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bobo, L., & Licari, F. C. (1989). Education and political tolerance: Testing the effects of cognitive sophistication and target group affect. Public Opinion Quarterly, 53, 285–308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bosson, J. K., Haymovitz, E. L., & Pinel, E. C. (2004). When saying and doing diverge: The effects of stereotype threat on self-reported versus non-verbal anxiety. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 247–255.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bosson, J. K., Prewitt-Freilino, J. L., & Taylor, J. N. (2005). Role rigidity: A problem of identity misclassification? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 552–565.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bosson, J. K., Taylor, J. N., & Prewitt-Freilino, J. L. (2006). Gender role violations and identity misclassification: The roles of audience and actor variables. Sex Roles, 55, 13–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowers v. Hardwick, 478 U.S. 186 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  • Brewer, M. B., & Miller, N. (1984). Beyond the contact hypothesis: Theoretical perspectives on desegregation. In N. Miller & M.B. Brewer (Eds.), Groups in contact: The psychology of desegregation (pp. 281–302). Orlando, FL: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brewer, P. R. (2003). The shifting foundations of public opinion about gay rights. The Journal of Politics, 65, 1208–1220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, R., & Hewstone, M. (2005). An integrative theory of intergroup contact. In M.P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology Vol. 37, (pp. 255–343). San Diego, CA: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carmichael, S., & Hamilton, C. V. (1967). Black power: The politics of liberation in America. New York, NY: Vintage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chauncey, G., Jr. (1993). The postwar sex crime panic. In W. Graebner (Ed.), True stories from the American past (pp. 160–178). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clausell, E., & Fiske, S. T. (2005). When do subgroup parts add up to the stereotypic whole? Mixed stereotype content for gay male subgroups explains overall ratings. Social Cognition, 23, 161–181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clore, G. L., & Schnall, S. (2005). The influence of affect on attitude. In D. Albarracin, B.T. Johnson, & M.P. Zanna (Eds), The handbook of attitudes (pp. 437–489). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole, S. W. (2006). Social threat, personal identity, and physical health in closeted gay men. In A.M. Omoto & H.S. Kurtzman (Eds.), Sexual orientation and mental health: Examining identity and development in lesbian, gay, and bisexual people (pp. 245–267). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conger, J. J. (1975). Proceedings of the American Psychological Association, Incorporated, for the year 1974: Minutes of the annual meeting of the Council of Representatives. American Psychologist, 30, 620–651.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corrigan, P. W., & Watson, A. C. (2002). The paradox of self-stigma and mental illness. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 9, 35–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corrigan, P. W., Watson, A. C., Heyrman, M. L., Warpinski, A., Gracia, G., Slopen, N., Hall, L.L. (2005). Structural stigma in state legislation. Psychiatric Services, 56, 557–563.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cottrell, C. A., & Neuberg, S. L. (2005). Different emotional reactions to different groups: A sociofunctional threat-based approach to “prejudice”. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 770–789.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Crocker, J. (1999). Social stigma and self-esteem: Situational construction of self-worth. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 35, 89–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crocker, J., & Major, B. (1989). Social stigma and self-esteem: The self-protective properties of stigma. Psychological Review, 96, 608–630.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crocker, J., Major, B., & Steele, C. (1998). Social stigma. In D.T. Gilbert, S.T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology, Vol. 2 (4th ed.) (pp. 504–553). Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • D'Augelli, A. R., & Grossman, A. H. (2001). Disclosure of sexual orientation, victimization, and mental health among lesbian, gay, and bisexual older adults. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 16, 1008–1027.

    Google Scholar 

  • D'Augelli, A. R., Grossman, A. H., & Starks, M. T. (2006). Childhood gender atypicality, victimization, and PTSD among lesbian, gay, and bisexual youth. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 21, 1462–1482.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • D'Emilio, J. (1983). Sexual politics, sexual communities: The making of a homosexual minority in the United States 1940–1970. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dasgupta, N., & Rivera, L. M. (2006). From automatic antigay prejudice to behavior: The moderating role of conscious beliefs about gender and behavioral control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 268–280.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Derlega, V. J., Lewis, R. J., Harrison, S., Winstead, B. A., & Costanza, R. (1989). Gender differences in the initiation and attribution of tactile intimacy. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 13, 83–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Devine, P. G. (1989). Stereotypes and prejudice: Their automatic and controlled components. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 5–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Devine, P. G. (2005). Breaking the prejudice habit: Allport's “inner conflict” revisited. In J. Dovidio, P. Glick, & L. Rudman (Eds.), On the nature of prejudice: Fifty years after Allport (pp. 327–342). Malden, MA: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Devine, P. G., Monteith, M. J., Zuwerink, J. R., & Elliot, A. J. (1991). Prejudice with and without compunction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 817–830.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donovan, T., Wenzel, J., & Bowler, S. (2000). Direct democracy and gay rights initiatives after Romer. In C.A. Rimmerman, K.D. Wald, & C. Wilcox (Eds.), The politics of gay rights (pp. 161–190). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dovidio, J. F., Gaertner, S. L., & Kawakami, K. (2003). Intergroup contact: The past, present, and the future. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 6, 5–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunton, B. C., & Fazio, R. H. (1997). An individual difference measure of motivation to control prejudiced reactions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 316–326.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eagly, A. H., & Chaiken, S. (1993). The psychology of attitudes. Ft Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenstadt v. Baird, 405 U.S. 438 (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, S. (1999). Gay and lesbian movements in the United States: Dilemmas of identity, diversity, and political strategy. In B.D. Adam, J.W. Duyvendak, & A. Krouwel (Eds.), The global emergence of gay and lesbian politics: National imprints of a worldwide movement (pp. 30–90). Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Esses, V. M., Haddock, G., & Zanna, M. P. (1993). Values, stereotypes, and emotions as determinants of intergroup attitudes. In D.M. Mackie & D.L. Hamilton (Eds.), Affect, cognition and stereotyping: Interactive processes in intergroup perception communication (pp. 137–166). San Diego, CA: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fabrigar, L. R., MacDonald, T. K., & Wegener, D. T. (2005). The structure of attitudes. In D. Albarracin, B.T. Johnson, & M.P. Zanna (Eds), The handbook of attitudes (pp. 79–125). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Family Research Institute. (2006). Getting the facts: Same-sex marriage. Retrieved May 7, 2007, from http://familyresearchinst.org/

  • Fazio, R. H., & Olson, M. A. (2003). Implicit measures in social cognition research: Their meaning and uses. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 297–327.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fein, S., & Spencer, S. J. (1997). Prejudice as self-image maintenance: Affirming the self through derogating others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 31–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fine, M., & Asch, A. (1988). Disability beyond stigma: Social interaction, discrimination, and activism. Journal of Social Issues, 44, 3–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiske, S. T., Lin, M., & Neuberg, S. L. (1999). The continuum model: Ten years later. In S. Chaiken & Y. Trope (Eds.), Dual-process theories in social psychology (pp. 231–254). New York, NY: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frable, D. E. S., Wortman, C., & Joseph, J. (1997). Predicting self-esteem, well-being, and distress in a cohort of gay men: The importance of cultural stigma, personal visibility, community networks, and positive identity. Journal of Personality, 65, 599–624.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Franklin, K. (1998). Unassuming motivations: Contextualizing the narratives of antigay assailants. In G.M. Herek (Ed.), Stigma and sexual orientation: Understanding prejudice against lesbians, gay men, and bisexuals (pp. 1–23). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franklin, K. (2000). Antigay behaviors among young adults: Prevalence, patterns and motivators in a noncriminal population. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 15, 339–362.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freedman, E. (1989). “Uncontrolled desires”: The response to the sexual psychopath, 1920–1960. In K. Peiss & C. Simmons (Eds.), Passion and power: Sexuality in history. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gabriel, U., Banse, R., & Hug, F. (2007). Predicting private and public helping behaviour by implicit attitudes and the motivation to control prejudiced reactions. British Journal of Social Psychology, 46, 365–382.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gaertner, S. L., & Dovidio, J. F. (2005a). Categorization, recategorization, and intergroup bias. In J. Dovidio, P. Glick, & L. Rudman (Eds.), On the nature of prejudice: Fifty years after Allport (pp. 71–88). Malden, MA: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaertner, S. L., & Dovidio, J. F. (2005b). Understanding and addressing contemporary racism: From aversive racism to the Common Ingroup Identity model. Journal of Social Issues, 61, 615–639.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E. (1963). Stigma: Notes on the management of spoiled identity. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griswold et al. v. Connecticut, 381 U.S. 479 (1965).

    Google Scholar 

  • Haddock, G., Zanna, M. P., & Esses, V. M. (1993). Assessing the structure of prejudicial attitudes: The case of attitudes toward homosexuals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 1105–1118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haider-Markel, D. P., & Joslyn, M. R. (2005). Attributions and the regulation of marriage: Considering the parallels between race and homosexuality. PS: Political Science and Politics, 38(2), 233–239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haider-Markel, D. P., Querze, A., & Lindaman, K. (2007). Lose, win, or draw? A reexamination of direct democracy and minority rights. Political Research Quarterly, 60, 304–314.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamer, D. H., Hu, S., Magnuson, V. L., Hu, N., & Pattatucci, A. M. (1993). A linkage between DNA markers on the X chromosome and male sexual orientation. Science, 261, 321–327.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Harlow, C.W. (2005). Hate crime reported by victims and police. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice. Retrieved. July 4, 2006, from http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/pub/pdf/ hcrvp.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Hebl, M. R., Tickle, J., & Heatherton, T. F. (2000). Awkward moments in interactions between nonstigmatized and stigmatized individuals. In T.F. Heatherton, R.E. Kleck, M.R. Hebl, & J.G. Hull (Eds.), The social psychology of stigma. (pp. 275–306). New York, NY: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hegarty, P. (2002). ‘It's not a choice, it's the way we're built’: Symbolic beliefs about sexual orientation in the US and Britain. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 12, 153–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hegarty, P., & Golden, A. M. (2008). Attributional beliefs about the controllability of stigmatized traits: Antecedents or justifications of prejudice? Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 38(4), 1023–1044.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hegarty, P., & Pratto, F. (2004). The differences that norms make: Empiricism, social constructionism, and the interpretation of group differences. Sex Roles, 50, 445–453.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herek, G. M. (1984a). Attitudes toward lesbians and gay men: A factor analytic study. Journal of Homosexuality, 10(1–2), 39–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herek, G. M. (1984b). Beyond “homophobia”: A social psychological perspective on attitudes toward lesbians and gay men. Journal of Homosexuality, 10(1–2), 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herek, G. M. (1986). On heterosexual masculinity: Some psychical consequences of the social construction of gender and sexuality. American Behavioral Scientist, 29, 563–577.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herek, G. M. (1987a). Can functions be measured? A new perspective on the functional approach to attitudes. Social Psychology Quarterly, 50, 285–303.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herek, G. M. (1987b). Religious orientation and prejudice: A comparison of racial and sexual attitudes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 13, 34–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herek, G. M. (1988). Heterosexuals' attitudes toward lesbians and gay men: Correlates and gender differences. Journal of Sex Research, 25, 451–477.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herek, G. M. (1989). Hate crimes against lesbians and gay men: Issues for research and policy. American Psychologist, 44, 948–955.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Herek, G. M. (1994). Assessing heterosexuals' attitudes toward lesbians and gay men: A review of empirical research with the ATLG scale. In B. Greene & G.M. Herek (Eds.), Lesbian and gay psychology: Theory, research, and clinical applications (pp. 206–228). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herek, G. M. (1996). Why tell if you're not asked? Self-disclosure, intergroup contact, and heterosexuals' attitudes toward lesbians and gay men. In G.M. Herek, J. Jobe, & R. Carney (Eds.), Out in force: Sexual orientation and the military (pp. 197–225). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herek, G. M. (1997). The HIV epidemic and public attitudes toward lesbians and gay men. In M.P. Levine, P. Nardi, & J. Gagnon (Eds.), In changing times: Gay men and lesbians encounter HIV/AIDS (pp. 191–218). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herek, G. M. (1998). The Attitudes Toward Lesbians and Gay Men scale. In C.M. Davis, W.L. Yarber, R. Bauserman, G. Schreer, & S.L. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of sexuality-related measures (pp. 392–394). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herek, G. M. (2000a). The psychology of sexual prejudice. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 9, 19–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herek, G. M. (2000b). Sexual prejudice and gender: Do heterosexuals' attitudes toward lesbians and gay men differ? Journal of Social Issues, 56, 251–266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herek, G. M. (2002a). Gender gaps in public opinion about lesbians and gay men. Public Opinion Quarterly, 66, 40–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herek, G. M. (2002b). Heterosexuals' attitudes toward bisexual men and women in the United States. Journal of Sex Research, 39, 264–274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herek, G. M. (2004). Beyond “homophobia”: Thinking about sexual stigma and prejudice in the twenty-first century. Sexuality Research and Social Policy, 1(2), 6–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herek, G. M. (2006). Legal recognition of same-sex relationships in the United States: A social science perspective. American Psychologist, 61, 607–621.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Herek, G. M. (2007). Confronting sexual stigma and prejudice: Theory and practice. Journal of Social Issues, 63, 905–925.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herek, G. M. (2008). Sexual prejudice. In T. Nelson (Ed.), Handbook of prejudice, stereotyping and discriminatic. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herek, G. M. (in press). Hate crimes and stigma-related experiences among sexual minority adults in the United States: Prevalence estimates from a national probability sample. Journal of Interpersonal Violence.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herek, G. M., & Berrill, K. T. (Eds.). (1992). Hate crimes: Confronting violence against lesbians and gay men. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herek, G. M., & Capitanio, J. P. (1995). Black heterosexuals' attitudes toward lesbians and gay men in the United States. Journal of Sex Research, 32, 95–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herek, G. M., & Capitanio, J. P. (1996). “Some of my best friends”: Intergroup contact, conceal-able stigma, and heterosexuals' attitudes toward gay men and lesbians. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 412–424.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herek, G. M., & Capitanio, J. P. (1999a). AIDS stigma and sexual prejudice. American Behavioral Scientist, 42, 1130–1147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herek, G. M., & Capitanio, J. P. (1999b). Sex differences in how heterosexuals think about lesbians and gay men: Evidence from survey context effects. Journal of Sex Research, 36, 348–360.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herek, G. M., Chopp, R., & Strohl, D. (2007). Sexual stigma: Putting sexual minority health issues in context. In I. Meyer & M. Northridge (Eds.), The health of sexual minorities: Public health perspectives on lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender populations (pp. 171–208). New York, NY: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herek, G. M., Cogan, J. C., & Gillis, J. R. (2002). Victim experiences in hate crimes based on sexual orientation. Journal of Social Issues, 58, 319–339.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herek, G. M., Cogan, J. C., Gillis, J. R., & Glunt, E. K. (1998). Correlates of internalized homophobia in a community sample of lesbians and gay men. Journal of the Gay and Lesbian Medical Association, 2, 17–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herek, G. M., & Garnets, L. D. (2007). Sexual orientation and mental health. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 3, 353–375.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Herek, G. M., Gillis, J. R., & Cogan, J. C. (1999). Psychological sequelae of hate-crime victimization among lesbian, gay, and bisexual adults. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 67, 945–951.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Herek, G. M., & Gonzalez-Rivera, M. (2006). Attitudes toward homosexuality among U.S. residents of Mexican descent. Journal of Sex Research, 43, 122–135.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Herek, G. M., & Sims, C. (2008). Sexual orientation and violent victimization: Hate crimes and intimate partner violence among gay and bisexual males in the United States. In R.J. Wolitski, R. Stall, & R.O. Valdiserri (Eds.), Unequal opportunity: Health disparities among gay and bisexual men in the United States (pp. 35–71). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herman, D. (1997). The antigay agenda: Orthodox vision and the Christian Right. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hudson, W. W., & Ricketts, W. A. (1980). A strategy for the measurement of homophobia. Journal of Homosexuality, 5(4), 357–372.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Huebner, D. M., Rebchook, G. M., & Kegeles, S. M. (2004). Experiences of harassment, discrimination, and physical violence among young gay and bisexual men. American Journal of Public Health, 94, 1200–1203.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, L. M., & Esses, V. M. (1997). Of scripture and ascription: The relation between religious fundamentalism and intergroup helping. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 893–906.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jellison, W. A., McConnell, A. R., & Gabriel, S. (2004). Implicit and explicit measures of sexual orientation attitudes: Ingroup preferences and related behaviors and beliefs among gay and straight men. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 629–642.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jenness, V., & Grattet, R. (2001). Making hate a crime: From social movement to law enforcement. New York, NY: Russell Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, E. E., Farina, A., Hastorf, A. H., Markus, H., Miller, D. T., & Scott, R. A. (1984). Social stigma: The psychology of marked relationships. New York, NY: Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, D. (1960). The functional approach to the study of attitudes. Public Opinion Quarterly, 24, 163–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, I., & Hass, R. G. (1988). Racial ambivalence and American value conflict: Correlational and priming studies of dual cognitive structures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 893–905.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keen, L., & Goldberg, S. B. (1998). Strangers to the law: Gay people on trial. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelman, H. C. (1961). Processes of opinion change. Public Opinion Quarterly, 25, 57–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kilianski, S. E. (2003). Explaining heterosexual men's attitudes toward women and gay men: The theory of exclusively masculine identity. Psychology of Men and Masculinity, 4, 37–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kimmel, M. S. (1997). Masculinity as homophobia: Fear, shame and silence in the construction of gender identity. In M.M. Gergen & S.N. Davis (Eds.), Toward a new psychology of gender (pp. 223–242). New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kite, M. E., & Deaux, K. (1986). Attitudes toward homosexuality: Assessment and behavioral consequences. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 7, 137–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kite, M. E., & Whitley, B. E., Jr. (1998). Do heterosexual women and men differ in their attitudes toward homosexuality? A conceptual and methodological analysis. In G.M. Herek (Ed.), Stigma and sexual orientation: Understanding prejudice against lesbians, gay men, and bisexuals (pp. 39–61). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohut, A. (2004). Voters liked campaign 2004, but too much “mud-slinging”. Pew Research Center for the People and the Press. Retrieved November 12, 2004, from http://people-press.org/reports/pdf/233.pdf

  • Kunda, Z., & Spencer, S. J. (2003). When do stereotypes come to mind and when do they color judgment? A goal-based theoretical framework for stereotype activation and application. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 522–544.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lakoff, G. (2002). Moral politics: How liberals and conservatives think (2nd ed.). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larsen, K. S., Reed, M., & Hoffman, S. (1980). Attitudes of heterosexuals toward homosexuality: A Likert-type scale and construct validity. Journal of Sex Research, 16, 245–257.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence et al. v. Texas, 539 U.S. 558 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, appraisal, and coping. New York, NY: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, E. S., & Forthofer, R. N. (2006). Analyzing complex survey data (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • LeVay, S. (1991). A difference in hypothalamic structure between heterosexual and homosexual men. Science, 253, 1034–1037.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Levin, J., & McDevitt, J. (1993). Hate crimes: The rising tide of bigotry and bloodshed. New York, NY: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levine, M. P., Nardi, P. M., & Gagnon, J. H. (Eds.). (1997). In changing times: Gay men and lesbians encounter HIV/AIDS. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, G. B. (2006, September 2). Personal relationships and support for gay rights. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Political Science Association, Philadelphia, PA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, G. B. (2007, August). The friends and family plan: Knowing LGBs and supporting gay rights. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Psychological Association, San Francisco, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, R. J., Derlega, V. J., Clarke, E. G., & Kuang, J. C. (2006). Stigma consciousness, social constraints, and lesbian well-being. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 53, 48–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, R. J., Derlega, V. J., Griffin, J. L., & Krowinski, A. C. (2003). Stressors for gay men and lesbians: Life stress, gay-related stress, stigma consciousness, and depressive symptoms. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 22, 716–729.

    Google Scholar 

  • Link, B. G., & Phelan, J. C. (2001). Conceptualizing stigma. Annual Review of Sociology, 27, 363–385.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loftus, J. (2001). America's liberalization in attitudes toward homosexuality. American Sociological Review, 66, 762–782.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackie, D. M., Devos, T., & Smith, E. R. (2000). Intergroup emotions: Explaining offensive action tendencies in an intergroup context. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 602–616.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Maio, G. R., & Olson, J. M. (Eds.). (2000). Why we evaluate: Functions of attitudes. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Major, B., Schmidlin, A. M., & Williams, L. (1990). Gender patterns in social touch: The impact of setting and age. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 634–643.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Major, B., & Vick, S. B. (2005). The psychological impact of prejudice. In J. Dovidio, P. Glick, & L. Rudman (Eds.), On the nature of prejudice: Fifty years after Allport (pp. 139–154). Malden, MA: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malyon, A. K. (1981–1982). Psychotherapeutic implications of internalized homophobia in gay men. Journal of Homosexuality, 7(2–3), 59–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayfield, W. (2001). The development of an Internalized Homonegativity Inventory for gay men. Journal of Homosexuality, 41(2), 53–76.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McClosky, H., & Brill, A. (1983). Dimensions of tolerance: What Americans believe about civil liberties. New York, NY: Russell Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meier, B. P., Robinson, M. D., Gaither, G. A., & Heinert, N. J. (2006). A secret attraction or defensive loathing? Homophobia, defense, and implicit cognition. Journal of Research in Personality, 40, 377–394.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, I. H. (2003). Prejudice, social stress, and mental health in lesbian, gay, and bisexual populations: Conceptual issues and research evidence. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 674–697.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Micheler, S. (2002). Homophobic propaganda and the denunciation of same-sex-desiring men under National Socialism. Journal of the History of Sexuality, 11(1–2), 95–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, C. T., & Major, B. (2000). Coping with stigma and prejudice. In T.F. Heatherton, R.E. Kleck, M.R. Hebl, & J.G. Hull (Eds.), The social psychology of stigma (pp. 243–272). New York, NY: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, N. (2002). Personalization and the promise of contact theory. Journal of Social Issues, 58, 387–410.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mills, T. C., Paul, J., Stall, R., Pollack, L., Canchola, J., Chang, Y. J., Moskowitz, J.T., & Catania, J.A. (2004). Distress and depression in men who have sex with men: The Urban Men's Health Study. American Journal of Psychiatry, 161, 278–285. Minton, H. L. (2002).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Minton, H. L. (2002). Departing from deviance: A history of homosexual rights and emancipatory science in America. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohr, J. J., & Rochlen, A. B. (1999). Measuring attitudes regarding bisexuality in lesbian, gay male, and heterosexual populations. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 46, 353–369.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monteith, M. J., Sherman, J. W., & Devine, P. G. (1998). Suppression as a stereotype control strategy. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2, 63–82.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Monteith, M. J., Spicer, C. V., & Tooman, G. D. (1998). Consequences of stereotype suppression: Stereotypes on AND not on the rebound. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 34, 355–377.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, J. F., Waldo, C. R., & Rothblum, E. D. (2001). A model of predictors and outcomes of outness among lesbian and bisexual women. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 71, 61–71.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Munro, G. D., & Ditto, P. H. (1997). Biased assimilation, attitude polarization, and affect in reactions to stereotyped-relevant scientific information. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 636–653.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neuberg, S. L., Smith, D. M., Hoffman, J. C., & Russell, F. J. (1994). When we observe stigmatized and “normal” individuals interacting: Stigma by association. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20, 196–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pachankis, J. E. (2007). The psychological implications of concealing a stigma: A cognitive-affective-behavioral model. Psychological Bulletin, 133, 328–345.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Page, B. I., & Shapiro, R. Y. (1992). The rational public: Fifty years of trends in Americans' policy preferences. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parrott, D. J., & Zeichner, A. (2005). Effects of sexual prejudice and anger on physical aggression toward gay and heterosexual men. Psychology of Men and Masculinity, 6, 3–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parrott, D. J., Zeichner, A., & Hoover, R. (2006). Sexual prejudice and anger network activation: Mediating role of negative affect. Aggressive Behavior, 32, 7–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patel, S., Long, T. E., McCammon, S. L., & Wuensch, K. L. (1995). Personality and emotional correlates of self-reported antigay behaviors. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 10, 354–366.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, K. (2005, February 9). 50-state rundown on gay marriage laws. Retrieved June 5, 2007, from http://www.stateline.org/

  • Pettigrew, T. F. (1998). Intergroup contact theory. Annual Review of Psychology, 49, 65–85.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pettigrew, T. F., & Tropp, L. R. (2006). A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 751–783.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pew Research Center for the People and the Press. (2006, August 3). Pragmatic Americans liberal and conservative on social issues. Retrieved August 8, 2006, from http://people-press.org/reports/pdf/283.pdf

  • Phoenix, A., Frosh, S., & Pattman, R. (2003). Producing contradictory masculine subject positions: Narratives of threat, homophobia and bullying in 11–14 year old boys. Journal of Social Issues, 59(1), 179–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pilkington, N. W., & D'Augelli, A. R. (1995). Victimization of lesbian, gay, and bisexual youth in community settings. Journal of Community Psychology, 23, 34–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinel, E. C. (1999). Stigma consciousness: The psychological legacy of social stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 114–128.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Plant, E. A., & Devine, P. G. (1998). Internal and external motivation to respond without prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 811–832.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plummer, D. C. (2006). Sportophobia: Why do some men avoid sport? Journal of Sport and Social Issues, 30, 122–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poteat, V. P., & Espelage, D. L. (2007). Predicting psychosocial consequences of homophobic victimization in middle school students. Journal of Early Adolescence, 27, 175–191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poteat, V. P., Espelage, D. L., & Green, H. D., Jr. (2007). The socialization of dominance: Peer group contextual effects on homophobic and dominance attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 1040–1050.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pryor, J. B., Reeder, G. D., Yeadon, C., & Hesson-Mclnnis, M. (2004). A dual-process model of reactions to perceived stigma. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 436–452.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ratcliff, J. J., Lassiter, G. D., Markman, K. D., & Snyder, C. J. (2006). Gender differences in attitudes toward gay men and lesbians: The role of motivation to respond without prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 1325–1338.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ricketts, W. A., & Hudson, W. W. (1998). Index of Homophobia (Index of Attitudes Toward Homosexuals). In C.M. Davis, W.L. Yarber, R. Bauserman, G. Schreer, & S.L. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of sexuality-related measures (pp. 367–368). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roderick, T., McCammon, S. L., Long, T. E., & Allred, L. J. (1998). Behavioral aspects of homonegativity. Journal of Homosexuality, 36(1), 79–88.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Roe et al. v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  • Roese, N. J., Olson, J. M., Borenstein, M. N., Martin, A., & Shores, A. L. (1992). Same-sex touching behavior: The moderating role of homophobic attitudes. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 16, 249–259.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothbart, M., & John, O. P. (1985). Social categorization and behavioral episodes: A cognitive analysis of the effects of intergroup contact. Journal of Social Issues, 41(3), 81–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowatt, W. C., Tsang, J.-A., Kelly, J., LaMartina, B., McCullers, M., & McKinley, A. (2006). Associations between religious personality dimensions and implicit homosexual prejudice. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 45(3), 397–406.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, R. M., & Connell, J. P. (1989). Perceived locus of causality and internalization: Examining reasons for acting in two domains. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 749–761.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Saad, L. (2005). Gay rights attitudes a mixed bag. Gallup Poll News Service. Retrieved May 20, 2005, from http://www.gallup.com

  • Saad, L. (2007). Tolerance for gay rights at high ebb. Gallup Poll News Service. Retrieved May 29, 2007, from http://www.gallup.com

  • San Miguel, C. L., & Millham, J. (1976). The role of cognitive and situational variables in aggression toward homosexuals. Journal of Homosexuality, 2(1), 11–27.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Scambler, G. (1989). Epilepsy. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scambler, G., & Hopkins, A. (1986). Being epileptic: Coming to terms with stigma. Sociology of Health and Illness, 8, 26–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherman, J. W., Stroessner, S. J., Conrey, F. R., & Azam, O. A. (2005). Prejudice and stereotype maintenance processes: Attention, attribution, and individuation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 607–622.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sherrill, K., & Yang, A. (2000). From outlaws to in-laws: Anti-gay attitudes thaw. The Public Perspective, 11(1), 20–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shidlo, A. (1994). Internalized homophobia: Conceptual and empirical issues in measurement. In B. Greene & G.M. Herek (Eds.), Lesbian and gay psychology: Theory, research, and clinical applications (pp. 176–205). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sigelman, C. K., Howell, J. L., Cornell, D. P., Cutright, J. D., & Dewey, J. C. (1991). Courtesy stigma: The social implications of associating with a gay person. Journal of Social Psychology, 131, 45–56.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Simon, A. (1998). The relationship between stereotypes of and attitudes toward lesbians and gays. In G.M. Herek (Ed.), Stigma and sexual orientation: Understanding prejudice against lesbians, gay men, and bisexuals (pp. 62–81). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smart, L., & Wegner, D. M. (2000). The hidden costs of hidden stigma. In T.F. Heatherton, R.E. Kleck, M.R. Hebl, & J.G. Hull (Eds.), The social psychology of stigma (pp. 220–242). New York, NY: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, G. W. (1998). The ideology of “fag”: The school experience of gay students. Sociology Quarterly, 39, 309–335.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, M. B., Bruner, J. S., & White, R. W. (1956). Opinions and personality. New York, NY: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanley v. Georgia, 394 U.S. 557 (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  • Steele, C. M., & Aronson, J. (1995). Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of African Americans. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 797–811.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Steffens, M. C., & Buchner, A. (2003). Implicit Association Test: Separating transsituationally stable and variable components of attitudes toward gay men. Experimental Psychology, 50(1), 33–48.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stephan, W. G., & Finlay, K. (1999). The role of empathy in improving intergroup relations. Journal of Social Issues, 55, 729–743.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephan, W. G., & Stephan, C. W. (1985). Intergroup anxiety. Journal of Social Issues, 41(3), 157–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stouffer, S. A. (1955). Communism, conformity, and civil liberties: A cross-section of the nation speaks its mind. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strachan, E. D., Bennett, W. R. M., Russo, J., & Roy-Byrne, P. P. (2007). Disclosure of HIV status and sexual orientation independently predicts increased absolute CD4 cell counts over time for psychiatric patients. Psychosomatic Medicine, 69, 74–80.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Strand, D. A. (1998). Civil liberties, civil rights, and stigma: Voter attitudes and behavior in the politics of homosexuality. In G.M. Herek (Ed.), Stigma and sexual orientation: Understanding prejudice against lesbians, gay men, and bisexuals (pp. 108–137). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szymanski, D. M. (2005). Heterosexism and sexism as correlates of psychological distress in lesbians. Journal of Counseling and Development, 83, 355–360.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szymanski, D. M., & Chung, Y. B. (2003a). Feminist attitudes and coping resources as correlates of lesbian internalized heterosexism. Feminism and Psychology, 13, 369–389.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szymanski, D. M., & Chung, Y. B. (2003b). Internalized homophobia in lesbians. Journal of Lesbian Studies, 7(1), 115–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szymanski, D. M., Chung, Y. B., & Balsam, K. F. (2001). Psychosocial correlates of internalized homophobia in lesbians. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 34, 27–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tozer, E. E., & Hayes, J. A. (2004). Why do individuals seek conversion therapy? The role of religiosity, internalized homonegativity, and identity development. Counseling Psychologist, 32, 716–740.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ullrich, P. M., Lutgendorf, S. K., & Stapleton, J. T. (2003). Concealment of homosexual identity, social support and CD4 cell count among HIV-seropositive gay men. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 54, 205–212.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vescio, T. K., & Biernat, M. (2003). Family values and antipathy toward gay men. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 33, 833–847.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinberg, G. (1972). Society and the healthy homosexual. New York, NY: St. Martin's.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitley, B. E., Jr. (1990). The relationship of heterosexuals' attributions for the causes of homosexuality to attitudes toward lesbians and gay men. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 16, 369–377.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitley, B. E., Jr., & Lee, S. E. (2000). The relationship of authoritarianism and related constructs to attitudes toward homosexuality. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 30, 144–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilder, D. A. (1978). Reduction of intergroup discrimination through individuation of the out-group. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 1361–1374.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, I. R. (2000). Internalized homophobia and health issues affecting lesbians and gay men. Health Education Research, 15, 97–107.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wood, P. B., & Bartkowski, J. P. (2004). Attribution style and public policy attitudes toward gay rights. Social Science Quarterly, 85, 58–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, L. W. Jr., Adams, H. E., & Bernat, J. (1999). Development and validation of the Homophobia Scale. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 21, 337–347.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaller, J. R. (1992). The nature and origins of mass opinion. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Herek, G.M. (2009). Sexual Stigma and Sexual Prejudice in the United States: A Conceptual Framework. In: Hope, D.A. (eds) Contemporary Perspectives on Lesbian, Gay, and Bisexual Identities. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, vol 54. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-09556-1_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics