Skip to main content

The Role of a Self-Reference System in Spatial Navigation

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 2205))

Abstract

The self-reference system architecture developed to explain the retrieval of spatial knowledge from long-term memory is reviewed and expanded to include navigational tracking as one of its operations. A distinction is made between the operation of the self-reference system at a perceptual-motor and a representational level, and a case is made that if a representational self-reference system is to function as a navigational tracking device, it must be closely connected with the perceptual-motor level. Existing empirical evidence is reviewed and new empirical evidence is reported that explores the connections between the two levels of functioning. Additionally, the operations that would enable a self-reference system to function as a tracking device are derived from an animal model of sense of direction. The ideas explored in this manuscript rely on the premise that spatial memory systems evolved in the service of spatial navigation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Clark, H. H. (1973). Space, time, semantics, and the child. In T. E. Moore (Ed.), Cognitive development and the acquisition of language. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Easton, R. D., & Sholl, M. J. (1995). Object-array structure, frames of reference, and retrieval of spatial knowledge. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 483–500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franklin, N., Henkel, L. A., & Zangas, T. (1995). Parsing surrounding space into regions. Memory and Cognition, 23, 397–407.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franklin, N., & Tversky, B. (1990). Searching imagined environments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 119, 63–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallistel, C. R. (1990). The organization of learning. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loomis, J. M., Klatzky, R. L., Gollege, R. G., Cincinelli, J. G., Pellegrino, J. W., & Fry, P. A. (1993). Nonvisual navigation by blind and sighted: Assessment of path integration ability. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 122, 73–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • May, M. (2000, November). Imaginal repositioning in space: Transformation versus interference accounts. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society, New Orleans.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNaughton, B. L., Chen, L. L., & Markus, E. J. (1991). “Dead reckoning,” landmark learning, and the sense of direction: A neurophysiological and computational hypothesis. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 3, 190–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paillard, J. (1991). Motor and representational framing of space. In J. Paillard (Ed.), Brain and space (pp. 163–182). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pellegrino, J. W., & Kail, R.J. (1982). Process analysis of spatial aptitude. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Advances in the psychology of human intelligence (pp. 311–365). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poltrock, S. E., & Brown, P. (1984). Individual differences in visual imagery and spatial ability. Intelligence, 8, 93–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rieser, J. J. (1989). Access to knowledge of spatial structure at novel points of observation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15, 173–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shepard, R. N., & Hurwitz, S. (1984). Upward direction, mental rotation, and discrimination of left and right turns in maps. Cognition, 18, 161–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sholl, M. J. (1987). Cognitive maps as orienting schemata. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 13, 615–628.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sholl, M. J. (1995). The representation and retrieval of map and environment knowledge. Geographical systems, 2, 177–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sholl, M. J. (2000). The functional separability of self-reference and object-to-object systems in spatial memory. In S. O’Nuallain. (Ed.), Spatial Cognition: Foundations and Applications: Proceedings of the Mind III, Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society of Ireland, 1998. (pp. 45–67). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sholl, M. J., & Nolin, T. L. (1997). Orientation specificity in representations of place. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23, 1494–1507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Jeanne Sholl, M. (2001). The Role of a Self-Reference System in Spatial Navigation. In: Montello, D.R. (eds) Spatial Information Theory. COSIT 2001. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 2205. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45424-1_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45424-1_15

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-42613-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-45424-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics