Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Solidarity and Prosocial Behavior pp 23–44Cite as

Prosocial Behavior, Solidarity, and Framing Processes

  • Chapter

Part of the book series: Critical Issues in Social Justice ((CISJ))

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Aarts, H., and Dijksterhuis, A. (2000). Habits as knowledge structures: Automaticity in goal-directed behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 53–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abelson, R.P. (1981). Psychological status of the script concept. American Psychologist, 36, 725–729.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin, M.W. (1992). Relational schemas and the processing of social information. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 461–484.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumeister, R.F. (1996). Self-regulation and ego threat: Motivated cognition, self deception, and destructive goal setting. In P.M. Gollwitzer and J.A. Bargh (Eds.), The psychology of action: Linking motivation and cognition to behavior (pp. 27–47). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bodenhousen, G.V., and Macrae, C.N. (1998). Stereotype activation and inhibition. In R.S. Wyer (Ed.), Stereotype activation and inhibition. Advances in social cognition 11 (pp. 1–52). Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowles, S. (1998). Endogenous preferences: The cultural consequences of markets and other economic institutions. Journal of Economic Literature, 36, 75–111

    Google Scholar 

  • Braspenning, J. (1992). Framing: De prospecttheorie en het discriminatiemodel. Dissertation Groningen University/ICS, the Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buskens, V. (2002). Social networks and trust. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Camerer, C.F. (2003). Behavioral game theory. New York: Russell Sage

    Google Scholar 

  • Caporael, L.R., Dawes, R.M., Orbell, J.M., and Van de Kragt, A.J.C. (1989). Selfishness examined: Cooperation in the absence of egoistic incentives. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 4, 683–698.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carnevale, P.J.D., and Lawler, E.J. (1986). Time pressure and the development of integrative agreements in bilateral negotiations. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 30, 636–659.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charness, G., and Rabin, M. (2002). Understanding social preferences with simple tests. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 117, 817–869.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, S., Lee-Chai, A.Y., and Bargh, J.A. (2001). Relationship orientation as a moderator of the effect of social power. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 173–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cialdini, R.B., Brown, S.L., Lewis, B.P., Luce, C., and Neuberg, S.L. (1997). Reinterpreting the empathy-altruism relationship: When one into one equals oneness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 481–494.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Dreu, C.K.W., and Boles, T.L. (1998). Share and share alike or winner take all?: The influence of social value orientation upon choice and recall of negotiation heuristics. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 76, 253–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunning, D. (2001). On the motives underlying social cognition. In A. Tesser and N. Schwarz (Eds.), Blackwell handbook of social psychology. Intraindividual processes (pp. 348–374). Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenberg, N. (2000). Emotion, regulation, and moral development. Annual Review of Psychology, 51, 665–695.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, S. (1993). Emotion and self-theory. In M. Lewis and J.M. Haviland (Eds.), Handbook of emotions (pp. 313–326). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fehr, E., and Fischbacher, U. (2002). Why social preferences matter-The impact of non-selfish motives on competition, cooperation and incentives. Economic Journal, 112, C1–C33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ford, T.E., and Kruglanski, A.W. (1995). Effects of epistemic motivations on the use of accessible constructs in social judgment. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 21, 950–962.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank, R. (1992). Frames of reference and the intertemporal wage profile. In G. Loewenstein and J. Elster (Eds.), Choice over time (pp. 371–382). New York: Russell Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frey, B.S., and Jegen, R. (2001). Motivational interactions: Effects on behaviour. Annales d’Economie et de Statistique, 63–64, 131–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gollwitzer, P.M., and Bargh, J. (Eds.). (1996). The psychology of action. Linking cognition and motivation to behavior. New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gollwitzer, P.M., and Bayer, U. (1999). Deliberative versus implemental mindsets in the control of action. In S. Chaiken and Y. Trope (Eds.), Dual-process theories in social psychology (pp. 403–422). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gollwitzer, P.M., and Moskowitz, G.B. (1996). Goal effects on action and cognition. In E.T. Higgins and A.W. Kruglanski (Eds.), Social psychology. Handbook of basic principles (pp. 361–399). London: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant, H., and Dweck, C.S. (2003). Clarifying achievement goals and their impact. Journal of Personality and Social Pscyhology, 85, 541–553.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Higgins, E.T., and Brendl, M. (1995). Accessibility and applicability: Some activation rules influencing judgment. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 31, 218–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hogg, M. (2001). Self-categorization and subjective uncertainty resolution: Cognitive and motivational facets of social identity and group membership. In J.P. Forgas, K.D. Williams, and L. Wheeler (Eds.), The social mind. Cognitive and motivational aspects of interpersonal behavior (pp. 323–349). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Houghton, G., and Tipper, S.P. (1996). Inhibitory mechanisms of neural and cognitive control: Applications to selective attention and sequential action. Brain and Cognition, 30, 20–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D. (1992). Reference points, anchors, norms and mixed feelings. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Making Processes, 51, 296–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D., and Tversky, A. (1984). Choices, values, and frames. American Psychologist, 39, 341–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kollock, P. (1997). Transforming social dilemmas: Group identity and cooperation. In P. Danielson (Ed.), Modeling rational and moral agents (pp. 186–210). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kruglanksi, A. W. (1996). Motivated social cognition: Principles of the interface. In E. T. Higgins and A.W. Kruglanski (Eds.), Social psychology. Handbook of basic principles (pp. 493–520). London: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ligthart, P.A.M. (1995). Solidarity in economic transactions: An experimental study of framing effects in bargaining and contracting. Amsterdam: Thela Thesis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindenberg, S.M. (1988). Contractual relations and weak solidarity: The behavioral basis of restraints on gain-maximization. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 144, 39–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindenberg, S.M. (1992). An extended theory of institutions and contractual discipline. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 148, 125–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindenberg, S.M. (1993). Club hierarchy, social metering and context instruction: Governance structures in response to varying self-command capital. In S.M. Lindenberg and H. Schreuder (Eds.), Interdisciplinary perspectives on organization studies (pp. 195–220). Oxford: Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindenberg, S.M. (1997). Grounding groups in theory: Functional, cognitive, and structural interdependencies. Advances in Group Processes, 14, 281–331.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindenberg, S.M. (1998). Solidarity: Its microfoundations and macro-dependence. A framing approach. In P. Doreian and T.J. Fararo (Eds.), The problem of solidarity: Theories and models (pp. 61–112). Amsterdam: Gordon and Breach.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindenberg, S.M. (2000). It takes both trust and lack of mistrust: The workings of cooperation and relational signaling in contractual relationships. Journal of Management and Governance, 4, 11–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindenberg, S.M. (2001a). Social rationality versus rational egoism. In J. Turner (Ed.), Handbook of sociological theory (pp. 635–668). New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindenberg, S.M. (2001b). Intrinsic motivation in a new light. Kyklos, 54, 317–342.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindenberg, S.M. (2003). Governance seen from a framing point of view: The employment relationship and relational signaling. In B. Nooteboom and F.E. Six (Eds.), The trust process in organizations, empirical studies of the determinants and the process of trust development (pp. 37–57). Cheltenham and Northampton: Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milgrom, P., and Roberts, J. (1992). Economics, organization and management. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Millar, M.G., and Tesser, A. (1992). The role of beliefs and feelings in guiding behavior: The mismatch model. In L.L. Martin and A. Tesser (Eds.), The construction of social judgement (pp. 277–300). Mahwah, N.J.: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mühlau, P., and Lindenberg, S.M. (2003). Efficiency wages: Signals or incentives? An empirical study of the relationship between wage and commitment. Journal of Management and Governance, 7, 385–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nunner-Winkler, G. (1997). The development of moral understanding and moral motivation. International Journal of Educational Research, 27, 587–603.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nunner-Winkler, G. (2000). Wandel in den Moralvorstellungen. Ein Generationenvergleich. In W. Edelstein and G. Nunner-Winkler (Eds.), Moral im sozialen Kontext (pp. 299–336). Frankfurt/Main: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rabin, M. (1998). Psychology and economics. Journal of Economic Literature, 36, 11–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, L., and Nisbett, R.E. (1991). The person and the situation: Perspectives of social psychology. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheff, T. J. (1967). Towards a sociological model of consensus. American Sociological Review, 32, 32–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scitovsky, T. (1976). The joyless economy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shah, J., and Kruglanski, A.W. (2003). When opportunity knocks: Bottom-up priming of goals by means and its effect on self-regulation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 1109–1122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H. (1957). Models of man: Social and rational. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smeesters, D., Warlop, L., Van Avermaet, E., Corneille, O., and Yzerbyt, V. (2003). Do not prime hawks with doves: The interplay of construct activation and consistency of social value orientation on cooperative behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 972–987.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stapel, D.A., and Koomen, W.M. (2005). Competition, cooperation, and the effects of others on me. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology Vol. 88(6). pp. 1029–1038.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stapel, D.A., Koomen, W., and Zeelenberg, M. (1998). The impact of accuracy motivation on interpretation, comparison, and correction processes: Accuracy x knowledge accessibility effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 878–893.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steglich, C. (2003). The framing of decision situations. Dissertation. Groningen University/ICS, the Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strack, F., and Deutsch, R. (2004). Reflective and impulsive determinants of social behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8, 220–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Terry, D.J., and Hogg, M.A. (2001). Attitudes, behavior, and social context: The role of norms and group membership in social influence processes. In J.P. Forgas and K.D. Williams (Eds.), Social influence: Direct and indirect processes (pp. 253–270). Philadelphia: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tesser, A. (1988). Toward a self-evaluation maintenance model of social behavior. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 21, pp. 181–227). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomasello, M. (1999). The cultural origins of human cognition. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uzzi, B. (1997). Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: The paradox of embeddedness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42,1, 35–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Lange, P.A.M. (2000). Beyond self-interest: A set of propositions relevant to interpersonal orientations. In W. Stroebe and M. Hewstone (Eds.), European review of social psychology (Vol. 11, pp. 297–331). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittek, R. (1999). Interdependence and informal control in organizations. Amsterdam: Thela Thesis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yamagishi, T. (1995). Social dilemmas. In K.S. Cook, G.A. Fine, and J.S. House (Eds.), Sociological perspectives on social psychology (pp. 311–335). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands, 9712 GL

    Siegwart Lindenberg

Authors
  1. Siegwart Lindenberg
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands

    Detlef Fetchenhauer , Andreas Flache , Bram Buunk  & Siegwart Lindenberg , ,  & 

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer Science+Business Media, Inc.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lindenberg, S. (2006). Prosocial Behavior, Solidarity, and Framing Processes. In: Fetchenhauer, D., Flache, A., Buunk, B., Lindenberg, S. (eds) Solidarity and Prosocial Behavior. Critical Issues in Social Justice. Springer, Boston, MA . https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-28032-4_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation