5. Conclusion
In summary, several research design features are advocated here as potentially instrumental in establishing the absence of the kind of language and selection biases that are often confounded with culture effects. First, the use of bilinguals with similar levels of acculturation and reading comprehension in both the source and the target language reduces the likelihood of selection bias introduced by differences in language proficiency. Second, the use of a within-participant design eliminates the threat of selection bias that plagues non-equivalent groups in cross-cultural research. Third, the manipulation of language order can help rule out order effects such as recall of the source (e.g., English) version when responding to the target (e.g., Spanish) version. The kind of research design advocated here can test the cultural accommodation hypothesis, which predicts that when bilinguals respond to a measurement instrument, the language in which the instrument is taken influences the responses.
Problems of measurement calibration and sample equivalence are but two of the major issues involved in CC/CN. They provide challenges to researchers interested in comparing people across countries. With the globalization of the economy, cross-cultural comparisons are becoming more important than ever. Research procedures and measurement tools that minimize measurement and sampling error in cross-cultural comparisons are needed if we are to draw valid inferences about culture and nationality effects.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Berry, J. (1969). On cross-cultural comparability. International Journal of Psychology, 4:119–128.
Bollen, K.A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. New York: Wiley.
Bond, M. H. & Yang, R. (1982). Ethnic affirmation versus cross-cultural accommodation. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 13: 169–185.
Boyacigiller, N. A., & Adler, N. J. (1991). The parochial dinosaur: Organizational science in a global context. Academy of Management Journal, 16, 262–290.
Brislin, R. W. (1986). The wording and translation of research instruments. In W. J. Lonner & J. W. Berry (Eds.), Field Methods in Cross-Cultural Research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Byrne, B. M. (1994). Structural equation modeling with EQS and EQS Windows. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Byrne, B. M., Shavelson, R. J., & Muthén, B. (1989). Testing for the equivalence of factor covariance and mean structures: the issue of partial measurement invariance. Psychological Bulletin, 105, 456–466.
Candell, G. L., & Hulin, C. L. (1987). Cross-language and cross-cultural comparisons in scale translations. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 17: 417–440.
Church, A. T. & Lonner, W. J. (1998). The cross-cultural perspective in the study of personality: Rationale and current research. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 29, 32–62.
Geisinger, K. F. (1994). Cross-cultural normative assessment: Translation and adaptation issues influencing the normative interpretation of assessment instruments. Psychological Assessment, 6(4): 304–312.
Ghorpade, J., Hattrup, K., & Lackritz, J. R. (1999). The use of personality measures in cross-cultural research: A test of three personality scales across two countries. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 670–679.
Hulin, C. L. (1987). A psychometric theory of evaluations of item and scale translations. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 18: 115–142.
Hulin, C. L., & Mayer, L. J. (1986). Psychometric equivalence of a translation of the Job Descriptive Index into Hebrew. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71: 83–94.
Hulin, C. L., Drasgow, F., & Komocar, J. (1982). Application of item response theory to analysis of attitude scale translations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 67: 818–825.
Iwata, N., Umesue, M., Egashira, K., Hiro, H., Mizoue, T., Mishima, N., & Nagata, S. (1998). Can positive affect items be used to assess depressive disorder in the Japanese populations? Psychological Medicine, 28, 153–158.
Katerberg, R., Smith, F. J., & Hoy, S. (1977). Language, time, and person effects on attitude scale translations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 62: 385–391.
Lazarus, R. S. (1966). Psychological Stress and the Coping Process. New York: McGraw-Hill
Liu, C. (2003). A comparison of job stressors and job strains among employees holding comparable jobs in Western and Eastern societies. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, University of South Florida, Tampa.
Liu, C., Borg, I., & Spector, P. E. (2004). Measurement equivalence of a German job satisfaction survey used in a multinational organization: Implications of Schwartz’s culture model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 1070–1082.
Lonner, W. J. (1990). An overview of cross-cultural testing and assessment. In R. W. Brislin (Ed.), Applied Cross-Cultural Psychology, Vol 14. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Lytle, A. L., Brett, J. M., Barsness, Z. I., Tinsley, C. H., & Janssens, M. (1995). A paradigm for confirmatory cross-cultural research in organizational behavior. Research in Organizational Behavior, 17:167–214.
Maruyama, M. (1984). Alternative concepts of management: Insights from Asia and Africa. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 1(1): 100–111.
Narayanan, L., Menon, S., & Spector, P. E. (1999). A cross-cultural comparison of job stressors and reactions among employees holding comparable jobs in two countries. International Journal of Stress Management, 6, 197–212.
Ralston, D. A., Cunnif, M. K., Gustafson, D. J. (1995). Journal of Cross Cultural Psychology, 26: 714–727.
Raju, N. S., Laffitte, L. J., & Byrne, B. M. (2002). Measurement equivalence: A comparison of methods based on confirmatory factor analysis and item response theory. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 517–529.
Riordan, C. M., & Vandenberg, R. J. (1994). A central question in cross-cultural research: Do employees of different cultures interpret work-related measures in an equivalent manner? Journal of Management, 20(3): 643–671.
Ross, N. (2004). Culture & cognition: Implications for theory and method. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Ryan, A. M., Chan, D., Ployhart, R. E., & Slade, L. A. (1999). Employee attitude surveys in a multinational organization: Considering language and culture in assessing measurement equivalence. Personnel Psychology, 52: 37–58.
Rybowiak, V., Garst, H., Frese, M., & Batinic, B. (1999). Error orientation questionnaire (EOQ): Reliability, validity, and different language equivalence. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 20: 527–547.
Schaffer, B. S., & Riordan, C. M. (2003). A review of cross-cultural methodologies for organizational research: A best-practices approach. Organizational Research Methods, 6, 169–215.
Siu, O. L., & Cooper, C. L. (1998). A study of occupational stress, job satisfaction and quitting intention in Hong Kong firms: The role of locus of control and organizational commitment. Stress Medicine, 14: 55–66.
Smith, P. C., Kendall, L. M., & Hulin, C. L. (1969). Measurement satisfaction in work and retirement. Chicago: Rand McNally.
Spector, P. E. (1997). Job satisfaction. Application, assessment, causes, and consequences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Spector, P. E (1988). Development of the Work locus of Control Scale. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 61: 335–340.
Spector, P. E., Sanchez, J. I., Siu, O. L., Salgado, J., & Ma, J. (2004). Secondary control, socioinstrumental control, and work locus of control in China and the U.S. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 53, 38–60.
Spector, P. E., Van Katwyk, P. T., Brannick, M. T., & Chen, P. Y. (1997). When two factors don’t reflect two constructs: How item characteristics can produce artifactual factors. Journal of Management, 23, 659–677.
Spirrison, C. L., & Choi, S. (1998). Psychometric properties of a Korean version of the revised NEO-personality inventory. Psychological Reports, 83: 263–274.
Triandis, H. C. (1994a). Cross-cultural industrial and organizational psychology. In H. C. Triandis, M. D. Dunnette, and Leatta M. Hough (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 103–172). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
Triandis, H. C. (1994b). Culture and social behavior. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Vandenberg, R. J., & Lance, C. E. (2000). A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 3, 4–69.
Van de Vijver, F., & Leung, K. (1997). Methods and data analysis for cross-cultural research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Viswesvaran, C., Sanchez, J. I., & Fisher, J. (1999). The role of social support in the process of work stress: A meta-analysis. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 54, 314–334.
Weisz, J. R., Rothbaum, F. M., & Blackburn, T. C. (1984). Standing out and standing in: The psychology of control in America and Japan. American Psychologist, 39: 955–969.
Werner, O., & Campbell, D. (1970). Translating, working through interpreters, and the problem of decentering. In R. Carroll and R. Cohen (Eds.), A handbook of method in cultural anthropology, New York: Natural History Press, 398–420.
West, S. G., Finch, J. F., & Curran, P. J. (1995). Structural equation models with nonnormal variables: Problems and remedies. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications (pp. 56–75). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Wong, P. T. P. (1993). Effective management of life stress: The resource-congruence model. Stress Medicine, 9, 51–60.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2006 Springer Science+Business Media, Inc.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Sanchez, J.I., Spector, P.E., Cooper, C.L. (2006). Frequently Ignored Methodological Issues in Cross-Cultural Stress Research. In: Wong, P.T.P., Wong, L.C.J. (eds) Handbook of Multicultural Perspectives on Stress and Coping. International and Cultural Psychology. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-26238-5_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-26238-5_9
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-0-387-26236-9
Online ISBN: 978-0-387-26238-3
eBook Packages: Behavioral ScienceBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)