Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Applying an Occupational Lens to Thinking About and Addressing Sexuality

  • original paper
  • Published:
Sexuality and Disability Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A person’s sexuality exerts a powerful influence on their needs, desires, roles, social relationships and personal identity. This study, explored occupational therapists’ reasoning and practice in relation to the work they do (or do not do) with clients for whom sexual expression has become problematic. The lens used to explore reasoning and practice was a key conceptual framework adopted by occupational therapists, the occupational perspective of health, which considers humans need to do, be, become and belong. Using a qualitative, phenomenographic approach, 16 occupational therapists from across Australia were interviewed to understand the qualitatively variable ways in which they reasoned about practice in relation to the sexual needs of their clients. Four related, layers of ‘conception’ are presented. At a foundational level, we describe how participants conceived of their practice role in relation to assisting people in the doing aspect of sex(uality). At the next, more complex level, participants appeared to conceive of practice in relation to their clients’ being as a sexual person. The next conception related to how therapists think about their clients in their becoming as a sexual being and finally, in their belonging as a sexual being. These conceptual categories, derived both theoretically and empirically are presented as a hierarchically aligned framework, the occupational perspective of sexuality (OPS). While generated from a study of occupational therapists’ reasoning, the OPS has potential to enable a broader, more holistic consideration of sexuality, assisting health care professionals and educators to better understand the ways in which they may address their clients’ needs to do, be, become and belong to their sexuality.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Parker, M.G., Yau, M.K.: Sexuality, identity and women with spinal cord injury. Sex. Disabil. 30, 15–27 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Weeks, J.: Sexuality. Routledge, London (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Sakellariou, D., Algado, S.S.: Sexuality and disability: a case of occupational injustice. Br. J. Occup. Ther. 69(2), 69–76 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Hajjar, R.R., Kamel, H.K.: Sexuality in the nursing home, part 1: attitudes and barriers to sexual expression. J. Am. Med. Dir. Assoc. 5(2 Suppl), S42 (2004)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Lever, S., Pryor, J.: The impact of stroke on female sexuality. Disabil. Rehabil. 39, 1–10 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Couldrick, L.: Sexual issues: an area of concern for occupational therapists? Br. J. Occup. Ther. 61(11), 493–496 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hyland, A., McGrath, M.: Sexuality and occupational therapy in Ireland: a case of ambivalence? Disabil. Rehabil. 35(1), 73–80 (2013)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Chance, R.S.: To love and be loved: sexuality and people with physical disabilities. J. Psychol. Theol. 30(3), 195–208 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ostrander, N.: Sexual pursuits of pleasure among men and women with spinal cord injuries. Sex. Disabil. 27, 11–19 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Vansteenwegen, A., Jans, I., Revell, A.T.: Sexual experiences of women with a physical disability: a comparative study. Sex. Disabil. 21, 283–290 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Areskoug-Josefsson, K., Thidell, F., Rolander, B., Ramstrand, N.: Prosthetic and orthotic students’ attitudes toward addressing sexual health in their future profession. Int. Soc. Prosthet. Orthot. 00, 1–8 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Schmitz, M.A., Finkelstein, M.: Perspectives on poststroke sexual issues and rehabilitation needs. Top Stroke Rehabil. 17, 204–213 (2010)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Beckwith, A., Yau, M.: Sexual recovery: experiences of women with spinal injury reconstructing a positive sexual identity. Sex. Disabil. 31, 313–324 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Sakellariou, D., Sawada, Y.: Sexuality after spinal cord injury: the Greek male’s perspective. Am. J. Occup. Ther. 60(3), 311–319 (2006)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Bergan-Gander, R., Von Kürthy, H.: Sexual orientation and occupation: gay men and women’s lived experiences of occupational participation. Br. J. Occup. Ther. 69, 402–408 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Wilcock, A.A.: Reflections on doing, being and becoming. Aust. Occup. Ther. J. 46(1), 1–11 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Klinger, L.: Occupational adaptation: perspectives of people with traumatic brain injury. J. Occup. Sci. 12(1), 9–16 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Wilcock, A.A.: An occupational perspective of health. Slack Incorporated, Thorofare, NJ (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Wilcock, A.A.: Occupation and health: are they one and the same? J. Occup. Sci. 14, 3–8 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Hitch, D., Pepin, G., Stagnitti, K.: In the footsteps of Wilcock, part two: the interdependent nature of doing, being, becoming, and belonging. Occup. Ther. Health Care 28(3), 247–263 (2014)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Bowden, J.: The nature of phenomenographic research. In: Bowden, J., Walsh, E. (eds.) Phenomenography. RMIT University Press, Melbourne (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Svensson, L.: Theoretical foundations of phenomenography. High. Educ. Res. Dev. 16(2), 159–171 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Penna, S., Sheehy, K.: Sex education and schizophrenia: should occupational therapists offer sex education to people with schizophrenia? Scand. J. Occup. Ther. 7(3), 126–131 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Kingsley, P., Molineux, M.: True to our philosophy? Sexual orientation and occupation. Br. J. Occup. Ther. 63(5), 205–210 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. McGrath, M., Lynch, E.: Occupational therapists’ perspectives on addressing sexual concerns of older adults in the context of rehabilitation. Disabil. Rehabil. 36(8), 651–657 (2014)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Marton, F., Carlsson, M., Halasz, L.: Differences in understanding and the use of reflective learning in reading. Br. J. Educ. Psychol. 62(1), 1–16 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Säljö, R.: Talk as data and practice: a critical look at phenomenographic inquiry and the appeal to experience. High. Educ. Res. Dev. 16(2), 173–190 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. González, C.: What do university teachers think elearning is good for in their teaching? Stud. High. Educ. 35, 61–78 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Dahlgren, L.O., Fallsberg, M.: Phenomenography as a qualitative approach in social pharmacy research. J. Soc. Adm. Pharm. 8(4), 150–157 (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Chapparo, C., Ranka, J.L.: Occupational performance model. Occupational Performance Network, Sydney (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Mahar, A., Cobigo, V., Stuart, H.: Conceptualizing belonging. Disabil. Rehabil. 35(12), 1026–1032 (2013)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Hammell, K.W.: Quality of life, participation and occupational rights: a capabilities perspective. Aust. Occup. Ther. J. 62(2), 78–85 (2015)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Marton, F., Booth, S.: Learning and awareness. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, New Jersey (1997)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Claire Lynch.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Standards

All research procedures reported in this thesis were approved by the La Trobe University Faculty of Health Sciences Human Ethics Committee. No. FHEC 14/209.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lynch, C., Fortune, T. Applying an Occupational Lens to Thinking About and Addressing Sexuality. Sex Disabil 37, 145–159 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11195-019-09566-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11195-019-09566-7

Keywords

Navigation