Abstract
This study comprises two meta-analyses conducted to investigate relations between socioeconomic status (SES) and academic achievement, with a focus on macro-level, micro-level, and methodological moderating variables in primary and secondary education. The first meta-analysis is based on 326 empirical studies with 949,699 students from 47 countries and areas, and the second is based on three international large-scale assessments (i.e., PISA, TIMSS, and PIRLS) with 1230 independent samples of 5,095,283 students from 105 countries and areas. We found moderate correlations between SES and academic achievement across the world, rs = .22 ~ .28. Moderation analyses revealed that (a) these relations have strengthened since the 1990s; (b) GDP per capita and economic equality did not affect the relations; (c) higher net enrollment ratio and longer duration of compulsory education did not weaken these relations; (d) the relations stayed stable or even strengthened across grades in concurrent and longitudinal designs. Taken together, our findings suggest that educational expansion that focuses on increasing educational opportunities does not seem to reduce inequalities in academic outcomes between high- and low-SES school children in educational systems on the national level. Quality indicators for educational expansion, however, should be considered in setting educational policy to achieve inclusive, equitable education.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
In order to obtain the accurate estimation, we coded the original sampling year from the primary studies; however, if the study did not specify the sampling year, we calculated the sampling year by subtracting 2 from the publishing year as suggested by Hou (2015) to get a modest estimate of sampling year. Note that participants in some empirical studies from longitudinal projects were sampled before 1990, and thus we included these studies for the overall effect analysis, but we included only studies with sampling years from 1990 to 2021 for the moderation analysis.
For empirical studies, due to limited gender information extracted from primary studies, we did not examine the moderation effect of gender. For the international large-scale assessments, we could directly estimate separate correlation coefficients for boys and girls, so we examined the moderation effect of gender. The average correlations for girls and boys were significant: boys, r = 0.28, 95% CI [.27, .28]; girls, r = 0.29, 95% CI [.29, .30]. Then we tested the moderator effect and found that the SES–academic achievement correlation for girls was significantly stronger than that for boys after controlling for other moderators, β = 0.01, t = 2.44, p = 0.01. Findings for the large assessments can be found in the Supplementary file1.
References
References for all included empirical studies can be found in the online Supplementary file1.
Alfonso, M. (2008). Private resources in educational finance and equality implications: Evidence from Peru. In J. Zajda, K. Biraimah, & W. Gaudelli (Eds.), Education and social inequality in the global culture (pp. 103–121). Springer.
American Psychological Association, Task Force on Socioeconomic Status. (2007). Report of the APA task force on socioeconomic status. https://www.apa.org/pi/ses/resources/publications/task-force-2006.pdf
Assadi, S. M., Zokaei, N., Kaviani, H., Mohammadi, M. R., Ghaeli, P., Gohari, M. R., & Van de Vijver, F. J. R. (2007). Effect of sociocultural context and parenting style on scholastic achievement among Iranian adolescents. Social Development, 16(1), 169–180. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9507.2007.00377.x
Baker, D. P., Goesling, B., & LeTendre, G. K. (2002). Socioeconomic status, school quality, and national economic development: A cross-national analysis of the “Heyneman-Loxley Effect” on mathematics and science achievement. Comparative Education Review, 46(3), 291–312. https://doi.org/10.1086/341159
Barcellos, S. H., Carvalho, L. S., & Turley, P. (2019). Distributional effects of education on health (No. w25898). National Bureau of Economic Research. https://www.nber.org/system/files/working_papers/w25898/w25898.pdf
Broer, M., Bai, Y., & Fonseca, F. (2019). A review of the literature on socioeconomic status and educational achievement. In M. Broer, Y. Bai, & F. Fonseca (Eds.), Socioeconomic inequality and educational outcomes: Evidence from twenty years of TIMSS (p. 7–17). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11991-1_2
Bouhlila, D. S. (2015). The Heyneman-Loxley effect revisited in the Middle East and North Africa: Analysis using TIMSS 2007 database. International Journal of Educational Development, 42, 85–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2015.02.014
Breiner, J. M., Johnson, C. C., Harkness, S. S., & Koehler, C. M. (2012). What is STEM? A discussion about conceptions of STEM in education and partnerships. School Science and Mathematics, 112(1), 3–11. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2011.00109.x
Byun, S. Y., & Kim, K. K. (2010). Educational inequality in South Korea: The widening socioeconomic gap in student achievement. Research in the Sociology of Education, 17, 155–182. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1479-3539(2010)0000017008
Caro, D. H., McDonald, J. T., & Willms, J. D. (2009). Socio-economic status and academic achievement trajectories from childhood to adolescence. Canadian Journal of Education, 32(3), 558–590. https://journals.sfu.ca/cje/index.php/cje-rce/article/view/3052/2340
Castex, G., & Dechter, E. (2014). The changing roles of education and ability in wage determination. Journal of Labor Economics, 32(4), 685–710. https://doi.org/10.1086/676018
Casmar, S. P. (2004). Social reproduction in modern society. Academia. https://www.academia.edu/23146253/Social_Reproduction_in_Modern_Society
Cheung, M. W. L. (2015). Meta-analysis: A structural equation modeling approach. Wiley.
Chiu, M. M. (2010). Effects of inequality, family and school on mathematics achievement: Country and student differences. Social Forces, 88(4), 1645–1676. https://doi.org/10.1353/sof.2010.0019
Chiu, M. M., & Chow, B.W.-Y. (2015). Classmate characteristics and student achievement in 33 countries: Classmates’ past achievement, family socioeconomic status, educational resources, and attitudes toward reading. Journal of Educational Psychology, 107(1), 152–169. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036897
Chmielewski, A. K. (2019). The global increase in the socioeconomic achievement gap, 1964 to 2015. American Sociological Review, 84(3), 517–544. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122419847165
Chow, J. C., & Ekholm, E. (2018). Do published studies yield larger effect sizes than unpublished studies in education and special education? A Meta-Review. Educational Psychology Review, 30(3), 727–744. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-018-9437-7
Çiftçi, Ş. K., & Cin, F. M. (2017). The effect of socioeconomic status on students’ achievement. In E. Karadağ (Ed.), The factors effecting student achievement (pp. 171–181). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56083-0_10
Cohen, N. J., Farnia, F., & Im-Bolter, N. (2013). Higher order language competence and adolescent mental health. The Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 54(7), 733–744. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.12060
Conger, R. D., & Donnellan, M. B. (2007). An interactionist perspective on the socioeconomic context of human development. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 175–199. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.58.110405.085551
Crede, J., Wirthwein, L., McElvany, N., & Steinmayr, R. (2015). Adolescents’ academic achievement and life satisfaction: The role of parents’ education. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, Article 52. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00052
Curriculum Development Council. (2002). Basic education curriculum guide—Building on strengths (Primary 1–Secondary 3). https://www.gcedclearinghouse.org/sites/default/files/resources/BE_Eng.pdf
DiPrete, T. A., & Grusky, D. B. (1990). Structure and trend in the process of stratification for American men and women. American Journal of Sociology, 96(1), 107–143. https://doi.org/10.1086/229494
Dotterer, A. M., Hoffman, L., Crouter, A. C., & McHale, S. M. (2008). A longitudinal examination of the bidirectional links between academic achievement and parent-adolescent conflict. Journal of Family Issues, 29(6), 762–779. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X07309454
Duncan, G. J., Kalil, A., & Ziol-Guest, K. M. (2017). Increasing inequality in parent incomes and children’s schooling. Demography, 54(5), 1603–1626. http://www.jstor.org/stable/45047311
Duval, S., & Tweedie, R. (2000). Trim and fill: A simple funnel-plot-based method of testing and adjusting for publication bias in meta-analysis. Biometrics, 56(2), 455–463. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0006-341X.2000.00455.x
Egger, M., Smith, G. D., Schneider, M., & Minder, C. (1997). Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. British Medical Journal, 315(7109), 629–634. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.315.7109.629
Fernández-Alonso, R., Suárez-Álvarez, J., & Muñiz, J. (2015). Adolescents’ homework performance in mathematics and science: Personal factors and teaching practices. Journal of Educational Psychology, 107(4), 1075–1085. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000032
Finders, J. K., McClelland, M. M., Geldhof, G. J., Rothwell, D. W., & Hatfield, B. E. (2021). Explaining achievement gaps in kindergarten and third grade: The role of self-regulation and executive function skills. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 54, 72–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2020.07.008
Fisher, Z., & Tipton, E. (2015, March 7). robumeta: An R-package for robust variance estimation in meta-analysis. https://arxiv.org/abs/1503.02220
Gonzalez, H. B., & Kuenzi, J. J. (2012). Science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) education: A primer. Congressional Research Service. https://fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R42642.pdf
Hannum, E., & Buchmann, C. (2003). The consequences of global educational expansion: Social science perspectives. American Academy of Art and Sciences. https://www.issuelab.org/resources/8814/8814.pdf
Harwell, M., Maeda, Y., Bishop, K., & Xie, A. (2017). The surprisingly modest relationship between SES and educational achievement. The Journal of Experimental Education, 85(2), 197–214. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2015.1123668
Hedges, L. V., Tipton, E., & Johnson, M. C. (2010). Robust variance estimation in meta-regression with dependent effect size estimates. Research Synthesis Methods, 1(1), 39–65. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.5
Heyneman, S. P. (2005). Student background and student achievement: What is the right question? American Journal of Education, 112(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1086/444512
Heyneman, S. P., & Loxley, W. A. (1983). The effect of primary-school quality on academic achievement across twenty-nine high- and low-income countries. American Journal of Sociology, 88(6), 1162–1194. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2778968
Hines, P. J., & Stern, P. (2019). More than a tool for communication. Science, 366(6461), 48–49. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaz4133
Hou, J. (2015). Changes in the Chinese population’s fertility intentions: 1980–2011. Social Sciences in China, 36(1), 46–63. https://doi.org/10.1080/02529203.2015.1001482
Hox, J. J. (2010). Multilevel analysis: Techniques and applications (2nd ed.). Routledge.
Hunter, J. E., & Schmidt, F. L. (2000). Fixed effects vs. random effects meta-analysis models: Implications for cumulative research knowledge. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 8, 275–292. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2389.00156
Kalaycıoğlu, D. B. (2015). The influence of socioeconomic status, self-efficacy, and anxiety on mathematics achievement in England, Greece, Hong Kong, the Netherlands, Turkey, and the USA. Educational Sciences Theory and Practice, 15(5), 1391–1401. https://doi.org/10.12738/estp.2015.5.2731
Keeley, B. (2015). Income inequality: The gap between rich and poor. OECD. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264246010-en
Kim, S. W. (2019). Is socioeconomic status less predictive of achievement in East Asian countries? A systematic and meta-analytic review. International Journal of Educational Research, 97, 29–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2019.05.009
Kim, S. W., Cho, H., & Kim, L. Y. (2019). Socioeconomic status and academic outcomes in developing countries: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 89(6), 875–916. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654319877155
Kingdon, D., Serbin, L. A., & Stack, D. M. (2017). Understanding the gender gap in school performance among low-income children: A developmental trajectory analysis. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 41(2), 265–274. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165025416631836
Kırdar, M. G., Dayıoğlu, M., & Koc, I. (2016). Does longer compulsory education equalize schooling by gender and rural/urban residence? The World Bank Economic Review, 30(3), 549–579. https://doi.org/10.1093/wber/lhv035
Kirkland, K., Jetten, J., & Nielsen, M. (2019). But that’s not fair! The experience of economic inequality from a child’s perspective. In J. Jetten & K. Peters (Eds.), The social psychology of inequality (pp. 187–199). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28856-3_12
Lipsey, M. W., & Wilson, D. B. (2001). Practical meta-analysis. Sage.
Liu, J., Peng, P., & Luo, L. (2020). The relation between family socioeconomic status and academic achievement in China: A meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 32(1), 49–76. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-019-09494-0
Lohani, S., Singh, R. B., & Lohani, J. (2010). Universal primary education in Nepal: Fulfilling the right to education. Prospects, 40(3), 355–374. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11125-010-9162-6
Lucas, S. R. (2001). Effectively maintained inequality: Education transitions, track mobility, and social background effects. American Journal of Sociology, 106(6), 1642–1690. https://doi.org/10.1086/321300
Lucas, S. R., & Byrne, D. (2017). Effectively maintained inequality in education: An introduction. American Behavioral Scientist, 61(1), 3–7. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764216682992
Marks, G. N. (2005). Cross-national differences and accounting for social class inequalities in education. International Sociology, 20(4), 483–505. https://doi.org/10.1177/0268580905058328
Marks, G. N. (2009). Modernization theory and changes over time in the reproduction of socioeconomic inequalities in Australia. Social Forces, 88(2), 917–944. https://doi.org/10.1353/sof.0.0274
Marks, G. N., & Mooi-Reci, I. (2016). The declining influence of family background on educational attainment in Australia: The role of measured and unmeasured influences. Social Science Research, 55, 171–185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2015.10.002
Medeiros, M., Barbosa, R. J., & Carvalhaes, F. (2020). Educational expansion, inequality and poverty reduction in Brazil: A simulation study. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, 66, 100458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rssm.2019.100458
Murnane, R. J., & Willett, J. B. (2011). Methods matter: Improving causal inference in educational and social science research. Oxford University Press.
Musterd, S., Marcińczak, S., van Ham, M., & Tammaru, T. (2017). Socioeconomic segregation in European capital cities Increasing separation between poor and rich. Urban Geography, 38(7), 1062–1083. https://doi.org/10.1080/02723638.2016.122837
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2012). Equity and quality in education: Supporting disadvantaged students and schools. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264130852-en
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2019). PISA 2018 results (volume II): Where all students can succeed. https://doi.org/10.1787/19963777
Park, S., & Beretvas, S. N. (2018). Synthesizing effects for multiple outcomes per study using robust variance estimation versus the three-level model. Behavior Research Methods, 51(1), 152–171. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-018-1156-y
Peng, P., & Kievit, R. A. (2020). The development of academic achievement and cognitive abilities: A bidirectional perspective. Child Development Perspectives, 14(1), 15–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdep.12352
Peng, P., Lin, X., Ünal, Z. E., Lee, K., Namkung, J., Chow, J., & Sales, A. (2020). Examining the mutual relations between language and mathematics: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 146(7), 595–634. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000231
Peng, P., Wang, T., Wang, C., & Lin, X. (2019). A meta-analysis on the relation between fluid intelligence and reading/mathematics: Effects of tasks, age, and social economics status. Psychological Bulletin, 145(2), 189–236. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000182
Peters, J. L., Sutton, A. J., Jones, D. R., Abrams, K. R., & Rushton, L. (2008). Contour-enhanced meta-analysis funnel plots help distinguish publication bias from other causes of asymmetry. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 61(10), 991–996. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.11.010
Pomerantz, E. M., Altermatt, E. R., & Saxon, J. L. (2002). Making the grade but feeling distressed: Gender differences in academic performance and internal distress. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(2), 396. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.94.2.396
Pustejovsky, J. E., & Rodgers, M. A. (2019). Testing for funnel plot asymmetry of standardized mean differences. Research Synthesis Methods, 10(1), 57–71. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1332
Reardon, S. F. (2011). The widening academic achievement gap between the rich and the poor: New evidence and possible explanations. In G. J. Duncan & R. J. Murnane (Eds.), Whither opportunity? Rising inequality, schools, and children’s life chances (pp. 91–116). Russell Sage Foundation.
Rodríguez-Hernández, C. F., Cascallar, E., & Kyndt, E. (2020). Socio-economic status and academic performance in higher education: A systematic review. Educational Research Review, 29, 100305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2019.100305
Rosenthal, R. (1979). The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results. Psychological Bulletin, 86(3), 638–641. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.86.3.638
Sirin, S. R. (2005). Socioeconomic status and academic achievement: A meta-analytic review of research. Review of Educational Research, 75(3), 417–453. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543075003417
Sohr-Preston, S. L., Scaramella, L. V., Martin, M. J., Neppl, T. K., Ontai, L., & Conger, R. (2013). Parental socioeconomic status, communication, and children’s vocabulary development: A third-generation test of the family investment model. Child Development, 84(3), 1046–1062. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12023
Solt, F. (2019). The Standardized World Income Inequality Database, Versions 8-9: Harvard Dataverse.
Thomson, S. (2018). Achievement at school and socioeconomic background—An educational perspective. Npj Science of Learning, 3, Article 5. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-018-0022-0
Tian, H., & Sun, Z. (2018). Overview of academic achievement assessment. In H. Tian & Z. Sun (Eds.), Academic achievement assessment: Principles and methodology (pp. 15–34). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-56198-0_2
UNESCO. (2015). World Education Forum 2015: Final report. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000243724
UNESCO. (2016). Education for people and planet: Creating sustainable futures for all. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000245752
UNESCO. (2019). Migration, displacement and education: Building bridges, not walls. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000265866
UNESCO. (2020). Global education monitoring report 2020: Inclusion and education: All means all. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000373718
UNESCO Institute for Statistics. (2020, September 21). Compulsory education. http://uis.unesco.org/en/glossary-term/compulsory-education
Viechtbauer, W. (2010). Conducting meta-analyses in R with the metaphor package. Journal of Statistical Software, 36(3), 1–48. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v036.i03
Waters, N. E., Ahmed, S. F., Tang, S., Morrison, F. J., & Davis-Kean, P. E. (2021). Pathways from socioeconomic status to early academic achievement: The role of specific executive functions. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 54, 321–331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2020.09.008
Whaley, A. L., & Noel, L. T. (2013). Academic achievement and behavioral health among Asian American and African American adolescents: Testing the model minority and inferior minority assumptions. Social Psychology of Education, 16(1), 23–43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-012-9206-2
White, K. R. (1982). The relation between socioeconomic status and academic achievement. Psychological Bulletin, 91(3), 461–481. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.91.3.461
World Bank. (2020a). GDP per capita (current US$) . https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.PCAP.CD
World Bank. (2020b). School enrollment, primary (% net) . https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SE.PRM.NENR?view=chart%20(for%20primary%20school)
World Bank. (2020c). School enrollment, secondary (% net) . https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SE.SEC.NENR?view=chart%20(for%20secondary%20school)
World Bank. (2020d). Compulsory education, duration (years) . https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SE.COM.DURS
Funding
This work was supported by the Major Projects of National Social Science Fund of China (project number 16ZDA229).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Juan Liu, Peng Peng and Baobao Zhao contributed equally to this work and should be considered as co-first author. All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection and analysis were performed and the first draft of the manuscript was written by Juan Liu and Baobao Zhao. Peng Peng guided data analysis and edited the manuscript. Liang Luo edited the manuscript and provided funding support. All authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Liu, J., Peng, P., Zhao, B. et al. Socioeconomic Status and Academic Achievement in Primary and Secondary Education: a Meta-analytic Review. Educ Psychol Rev 34, 2867–2896 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-022-09689-y
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-022-09689-y