Skip to main content
Log in

Treatment of superficial vascular lesions with the KTP 532-nm laser: experience with 647 patients

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Lasers in Medical Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Superficial vascular lesions are a common dermatological diagnosis but are often difficult to treat. Numerous lasers (especially the dye laser) and intense pulsed light sources have been used, but there have been very few reports on the effectiveness of the potassium-titanyl phosphate (KTP) laser. We have extensive experience of this modality at our institution, and the purpose of this survey is to report on the safety and efficacy of the KTP laser. Using an in-house database, we retrospectively collected data from patients who had undergone treatment with the KTP laser for superficial vascular lesions. Patients of Fitzpatrick skin type I–IV were included. Exclusion criteria were Fitzpatrick skin type V, patients with obvious suntan and those on potentially phototoxic medications or minocycline therapy. Diagnoses included discrete or matted telangiectasia, strawberry naevus, spider angioma, rosaceal erythema, rosaceal telangiectasia, telangiectatic naevus, angioma, combined rosaceal erythema/telangiectasia, port-wine stain, venous lake haemangioma and hereditary haemorrhagic telangiectasia. Patients underwent an initial test treatment and further treatment at 6-week intervals as required. Clinical photographs were taken pre- and post-treatment, and outcome was graded by patient and physician. Adverse effects were recorded including scarring, hypo- or hyperpigmentation, marked swelling, blistering, scabbing and bruising. Six hundred forty-seven patients with 13 diagnoses on 9 different body sites were recorded. Four hundred eighty-six were female, and the median age was 39.5 years. Of the lesions treated, 33.7 % (n = 218) were discrete telangiectases and 31.8 % (n = 206) were spider angiomas. A 92.7 % of lesions were on the face. Four hundred thirteen (77.6 %) patients who had outcomes recorded at 6 weeks were graded as “clearance” or “marked improvement”. Only 38 (5.8 %) patients experienced adverse effects, all of which were minor; the main adverse effect was swelling. Unlike the dye laser, there was only one case of bruising out of 647 patients. This is the largest survey of patients to have undergone KTP laser treatment reported in the literature. Our results show that the KTP laser is a safe and effective modality for the treatment of superficial vascular lesions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gupta G, Bilsland D (2000) A prospective study of the impact of laser treatment on vascular lesions. Br J Dermatol 143:356–359

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Shakespeare V, Shakespeare P, Cole RP (1998) Measuring patient satisfaction with pulsed dye laser treatment of vascular lesions. Lasers Med Sci 13:253–259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Anderson RR, Parrish JA (1983) Selective photothermolysis: precise microsurgery by selective absorption of pulsed radiation. Science 220:524–527

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Anderson RR, Parrish JA (1981) Microvasculature can be selectively damaged using dye lasers: a basic theory and experimental evidence in human skin. Lasers Surg Med 1:263–276

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Tan OT, Whitaker D, Garden JM, Murphy G (1988) Pulsed dye laser (577 nm) treatment of portwine stains: ultrastructural evidence of neovascularization and mast cell degranulation in healed lesions. J Invest Dermatol 90:395–398

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Woo S, Ahn H, Kim S, Kye Y (2006) Treatment of vascular skin lesions with the variable pulse 595 nm pulsed dye laser. Dermatol Surg 32:41–48

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Tan OT, Sherwood K, Gilchrist BA (1989) Treatment of children with port-wine stains using the flashlamp pulsed tunable dye laser. N Engl J Med 320:416–421

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Adrian RM, Tangehetti EA (1998) Long pulse 532-nm laser treatment of facial telangiectasia. Dermatol Surg 24:71–74

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Seukeran DC, Collins P, Sheehan-Dare RA (1997) Adverse reactions following pulsed tunable dye laser treatment of port wine stains in 701 patients. Br J Dermatol 136:725–729

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Goldberg DJ (2000) Laser treatment of vascular lesions. Clin Plastic Surg 27:173–180

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Cameron H, Ibbotson SH, Ferguson J, Dawe RS, Moseley H (2005) A randomised, blinded, controlled study of the clinical relevance of matching pulse duration to thermal relaxation time when treating facial telangiectasia. Lasers Med Sci 20:117–121

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Clark C, Cameron H, Moseley H, Ferguson J et al (2004) Treatment of superficial cutaneous vascular lesions: experience with the KTP 532 nm laser. Lasers Med Sci 19:1–5

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. West TB, Alster TS (1998) Comparison of the long-pulse dye (590–595 nm) and KTP (532 nm) lasers in the treatment of facial and leg telangiectasias. Dermatol Surg 24:221–226

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Cassuto DA, Ancona DM, Emanuelli G (2000) Treatment of facial telangiectasias with a diode-pumped Nd:YAG laser at 532 nm. J Cosmet Laser Ther 3:141–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Fenske NA, Millns JL, Greer KE (1980) Minocycline-induced pigmentation at sites of cutaneous inflammation. J Am Med Assoc 244:1103–1106

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Vesnaver A, Dovsak DA (2009) Treatment of large vascular lesions in the orofacial region with the Nd:YAG laser. J Cranio-Max Surg 37:191–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Chowdhury MM, Harris S, Lanigan SW (2001) Potassium titanyl phosphate laser treatment of resistant port-wine stains. Br J Dermatol 144:814–817

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Tierney E, Hanke W (2009) Randomized controlled trial: comparative efficacy for the treatment of facial telangiectasias with 532 nm versus 940 nm diode laser. Lasers Surg Med 41:555–562

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Werner A, Baumler W, Zietz S, Kuhnel T, Hohenleutner U (2008) Hereditary haemorrhagic telangiectasia treated by pulsed neodymium:yttrium-aluminium-garnet (Nd:YAG) laser (1,064 nm). Lasers Med Sci 23:385–391

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Galeckas KJ (2008) Update on lasers and light devices for the treatment of vascular lesions. Semin Cutan Med Surg 27:276–284

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Bencini PL, Toulaki A, De Giiorgi V, Galimberti M (2012) Laser use for cutaneous vascular alterations of cosmetic interest. Derm Ther 25:340–351

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Franca K, Chacon A, Ledon J, Savas J, Izakovic J, Nouri K (2012) Lasers for cutaneous congenital vascular lesions: a comprehensive overview and update. Lasers Med Sci (PMID:23093134)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to H. Moseley.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Becher, G.L., Cameron, H. & Moseley, H. Treatment of superficial vascular lesions with the KTP 532-nm laser: experience with 647 patients. Lasers Med Sci 29, 267–271 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-013-1330-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-013-1330-5

Keywords

Navigation