Skip to main content
Log in

Sustaining a laparoscopic program in resource-limited environments: results and lessons learned over 13 years in Botswana

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Metrics of sustainability and frank descriptions of the unique challenges, successes, failures, and lessons learned from a longitudinal laparoscopic program in resource-limited environments are lacking. We set out to evaluate the safety and sustainability of the laparoscopic cholecystectomy program at Princess Marina Hospital, the largest tertiary and teaching hospital in Botswana.

Methods

We assessed the clinical outcomes of patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy, comparing them with patients who underwent open cholecystectomy from January 2013 to December 2018. Technical independence and sustainability factors were measured and discussed.

Results

Two hundred and twenty-six laparoscopic cholecystectomies (LC) and 39 open cholecystectomies (OC) were performed. Four surgeons who trained as part of the inaugural laparoscopic program performed 48.2% of LC. Eleven surgeons who trained elsewhere performed the remainder. Overall, 94.2% of LC were performed without expatriate surgeons. The conversion rate was 25/226 (11.1%). There were 3 bile duct injuries in the LC group (3/226, 1.3%) and none in the OC group. There was one mortality in the OC group (1/39, 2.6%) and none in the LC group. Fostering a trusting relationship among all stakeholder was identified as the major key to success, while the development of a system-based strategy was identified as the most significant ongoing challenge.

Conclusion

The laparoscopic cholecystectomy program in Botswana initially established between 2006 and 2012 has moved into its sustainability phase, characterized by increased usage of laparoscopy and greater independent operating by local surgeons, all while maintaining patient safety. Sustaining a laparoscopic program in resource-limited environments has particular challenges which may differ from country to country.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Chao TE, Mandigo M, Opoku-Anane J, Maine R (2016) Systematic review of laparoscopic surgery in low-and middle-income countries: benefits, challenges, and strategies. Surg Endosc 30(1):1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Choy I, Kitto S, Adu-Aryee N, Okrainec A (2013) Barriers to the uptake of laparoscopic surgery in a lower-middle-income country. Surg Endosc 27(11):4009–4015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Adisa AO, Lawal OO, Alatise OI, Adesunkanmi ARK (2011) An audit of laparoscopic surgeries in Ile-Ife, Nigeria. West Afr J Med 30(4):273–276

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Cawich SO, Mahadeo C, Rambaran M, Amir S, Rajkumar S, Crandon IW, Naraynsingh V (2016) Advancement of laparoscopic surgery in Guyana: a working model for developing countries. Adv Med Educ Pract 7:605

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Straub CM, Price RR, Matthews D, Handrahan DL, Sergelen D (2011) Expanding laparoscopic cholecystectomy to rural Mongolia. World J Surg 35(4):751–759

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Asbun HJ, Berguer R, Altamirano R, Castellanos H (1996) Successfully establishing laparoscopic surgery programs in developing countries. Surg Endosc 10(10):1000–1003

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Okrainec A, Henao O, Azzie G (2010) Telesimulation: an effective method for teaching the fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery in resource-restricted countries. Surg Endosc 24(2):417–422

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Gyedu A, Fugar S, Price R, Bingener J (2015) Patient perceptions about laparoscopy at KomfoAnokye teaching hospital, Ghana. Pan Afr Med J 20:422

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Teerawattananon Y, Mugford M (2005) Is it worth offering a routine laparoscopic cholecystectomy in developing countries? A Thailand case study. Cost Eff Resour Alloc 3(1):10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Manning RG, Aziz AQ (2009) Should laparoscopic cholecystectomy be practiced in the developing world? The experience of the first training program in Afghanistan. Ann Surg 249(5):794–798

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Wells KM, Lee YJ, Erdene S, Erdene S, Sanchin U, Sergelen O, et al (2016) Building operative care capacity in a resource limited setting: the Mongolian model of the expansion of sustainable laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surgery 160(2):509–517

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Baigrie RJ, Stupart D (2010) Introduction of laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery in developing nations. Br J Surg 97(5):625–627

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Long KL, Spears C, Kenady DE, Roth JS (2014) Implementation of a low-cost laparoscopic skills curriculum in a third-world setting. J Surg Educ 71(6):860–864

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Ismaila BO, Samaila SI, Ale AA (2013) Laparoscopic surgery in a Nigerian teaching hospital for 1 year: challenges and effect on outcomes. Niger J Med 22(2):134–137

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kitto S, Petrovic A, Gruen RL, Smith JA (2011) Evidence-based medicine training and implementation in surgery: the role of surgical cultures. J Eval Clin Pract 17(4):819–826

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Bedada AG, Hsiao M, Bakanisi B, Motsumi M, Azzie G (2014) Establishing a contextually appropriate laparoscopic program in resource-restricted environments. Ann Surg 261:807–811

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Mobolaji O, Fiemu N, Akanmu I, Kish P, Omolara W, Foluso O, Adebimpe A, et al (2013) Pathway to independence: implications for developing a sustainable MIS program in low resource settings. Niger Q J Hosp Med 23(4):309–313

    Google Scholar 

  18. Adisa AO, Lawal OO, Adejuyigbe O (2017) Trend over time for cholecystectomy following the introduction of laparoscopy in a Nigerian tertiary hospital. Niger J Surg 23(2):102–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. De Mestral C, Rotstein OD, Laupacis A, Hoch JS, Zagorski B, Alali AS, Nathens AB (2014) Comparative operative outcomes of early and delayed cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: a population-based propensity score analysis. Ann Surg 259(1):10–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Lipman JM, Claridge JA, Haridas M, Martin MD, Yao DC, Grimes KL, Malangoni MA (2007) Preoperative findings predict conversion from laparoscopic to open cholecystectomy. Surgery 142(4):556–565

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the personnel at the Princess Marina Hospital Medical Records Unit in their assistance in data retrieval.

Funding

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All three authors designed the study. AGB collected the data. AGB and MH analyzed the data. AGB wrote the first draft manuscript. All three authors interpreted the data and agreed to publish the current version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alemayehu Ginbo Bedada.

Ethics declarations

Disclosure

Alemayehu Ginbo Bedada, Marvin Marvin, and Georges Azzie have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bedada, A.G., Hsiao, M. & Azzie, G. Sustaining a laparoscopic program in resource-limited environments: results and lessons learned over 13 years in Botswana. Surg Endosc 35, 3716–3722 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-020-07854-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-020-07854-4

Keywords

Navigation