Skip to main content
Log in

Apparent distance reduction with moving stimuli (Tandem Effect): Evidence for an attention-shifting model

  • Published:
Psychological Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

When two vertical rods move through a horizontal window in close succession, the Tandem Effect can be observed. It consists of a spatial illusion (distance between the rods looking smaller than it actually is) and a temporal illusion (under certain conditions both rods are seen simultaneously in the window, though the first rod has left the window before the second rod enters it). We report six experiments that explored the distance-reduction illusion and tested an attentional model of the effect. It assumes that attention is initially focused on the first rod and then shifted to the second, when it enters the window. The percept of the pair of rods is integrated from the first rod's position at the beginning, and the second rod's position at the end, of the focus shift. Consequently their subjective distance will be smaller than their physical distance by the distance that they travel during the focus shift. Experiments 1 and 2 established the Tandem Effect as an empirical phenomenon and showed that its size depends on stimulus parameters such as window size and movement speed. Experiments 3–5 tested specific predictions from the attentional model. Experiment 6 examined a further illusion, the Fröhlich Effect, and showed that it can be subsumed under the model. The experiments produced some unexpected effects and some predictions from the model were only partly confirmed. It is shown that the main findings can be combined into two quantitative functions that describe the course of focusing. One implication is that visual attention does not “move” from one object to another; rather all attention shifts originate in the fovea. We discuss several alternative interpretations of our data and show that they are less satisfactory than the attentional model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Algom, D., & Cohen-Raz, L. (1984). Visual velocity input-output functions: The integration of distance and duration onto subjective velocity.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 10, 486–501.

    Google Scholar 

  • Algom, D., & Cohen-Raz, L. (1987). Sensory and cognitive factors in the processing of visual velocity.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 13, 3–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allport, A. (1968). Phenomenal simultaneity and the perceptual moment hypothesis.British Journal of Psychology, 59, 395–406.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allport, A. (1989). Visual attention. In M. I. Posner (Ed.),Foundations of cognitive sciences (pp. 631–681). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Angel, R. B. (1980).Relativity: The theory and its philosophy. Oxford: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ansbacher, H. L. (1944). Distorsion in the perception of real movement.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 34, 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anstis, S. M., & Atkinson, J. (1967). Distorsions of moving figures through a stationary slit.American Journal of Psychology, 80, 572–585.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banks, W. P., & Krajicek, D. (1990). Attentional selection of items and spatial locations.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 28, 37–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J. F. (1931a). The thresholds for visual movement.Psychologische Forschung, 14, 199–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J. F. (1931b). The visual perception of velocity.Psychologische Forschung, 14, 233–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, B. E., & Currie, A. (1986). On the nature of perceptual limits in vision: A new look at lateral masking.Psychological Research, 48, 201–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caelli, T. (1981).Visual perception: Theory and practice. Oxford: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caelli, T., Hoffman, W., & Lindman, H. (1978). Subjective Lorentz-transformation and the perception of motion.Journal of the Optical Society of America, 68, 402–411.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casco, C., & Morgan, M. (1984). The relationship between space and time in the perception of stimuli moving behind a slit.Perception, 13, 429–442.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chastain, G. (1991). Effects of abruptly appearing clutter on a peripherally precued covert attention shift.Journal of General Psychology, 118, 31–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Downing, C. J., & Pinker, S. (1985). The spatial structure of visual attention. In M. I. Posner, & O. S. Marin (Eds.),Attention and performance XI (pp. 171–187). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drösler, J. (1979). Relativistic effects in visual perception of real and apparent motion.Archiv für Psychologie, 131, 249–266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Driver, J., & Baylis, G. C. (1989). Movement and visual attention: The spotlight metaphor breaks down.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 15, 448–456.

    Google Scholar 

  • Einstein, A. (1905). Zur Elektrodynamik bewegter Körper [On the electrodynamics of moving bodies].Annalen der Physik, 17, 891–921.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eriksen, C. W., & Murphy, T. D. (1987). Movement of attentional focus across the visual field: A critical look at the evidence.Perception & Psychophysics, 42, 299–305.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eriksen, C. W., & St. James, J. D. (1986). Visual attention within and around the field of focal attention: A zoom lens model.Perception & Psychophysics, 40, 225–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, B. (1986). The role of attention in the preparation of visually guided eye and hand movements in monkey and man.Psychological Research, 48, 251–257.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fröhlich, F. W. (1923). Über die Messung der Empfindungszeit [On the measurement of sensation time].Zeitschrift für Sinnesphysiologie;54, 58–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fröhlich, F. W. (1929).Die Empfindungszeit: Ein Beitrag zur Lehre der Zeit-, Raum- und Bewegungswahrnehmung [Sensation time: A contribution to the study of time, space and motion perception]. Jena: Fischer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gehrke, E., & Lau, E. (1923). Versuche über das Sehen von Bewegung [Experiments on the perception of motion].Psychologische Forschung, 3, 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haber, R. N., & Nathanson, L. S. (1968). Post-retinal storage? Some further observations on Park's camel as seen through the eye of a needle.Perception & Pychophysics, 3, 349–355.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hays, W. L. (1974).Statistics for the social sciences. London: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jonides, J. (1981). Voluntary vs. automatic control over the mind's eyes' movements. In J. B. Long & A. D. Baddeley (Eds.),Attention and performance IX (pp. 187–203). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koch, C., & Ullman, S. (1985). Shifts in selective visual attention: Towards the underlying neural circuitry.Human Neurobiology, 4, 219–227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolbert, J., & Müsseler, J. (1981).Psychologische Untersuchungen an einem Phänomen der Bewegungswahmehung (Tandem-Effekt) [Psychological studies of a phenomenon of motion perception (Tandem Effect)]. Unpublished thesis. Bochum (FRG): Department of Psychology, Ruhr University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolbert, J., Müsseler, J., & Neumann, O. (1982).Scheinbare Abstandsverkürzung durch Bewegung: Der Tandem-Effekt [Apparent distance reduction through motion: The Tandem Effect]. Report No. 26/1982, Bochum: Department of Psychology, Ruhr University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kwak, H.-W., Dagenbach, D., & Egeth, H. (1991). Further evidence for a time-independent shift of the focus of attention.Perception & Psychophysics, 49, 473–480.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mashhour, M. (1964).Psychophysical relations in the perception of velocity. Stockholm: Almqvist and Wiksell.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCloskey, M., & Watkins, M. J. (1978). The seeing-more-than-isthere-phenomenon: Implications for the locus of iconic storage.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 4, 553–564.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, J. (1989). The control of attention by abrupt visual onsets and offsets.Perception & Psychophysics, 45, 567–594.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, M. J., Findlay, J. M., & Watt, R. J. (1982). Aperture viewing: A review and a synthesis.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 43A, 211–233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller, H. J., & Findlay, J. M. (1988). The effect of visual attention on peripheral discrimination thresholds in single and multiple element displays.Acta Psychologica, 69, 129–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller, H. J., & Rabbitt, P. M. A. (1989). Reflexive and voluntary orienting of visual attention: Time course of activation and resistance to interruption.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 15, 315–330.

    Google Scholar 

  • Müsseler, J. (1987).Aufmerksamkeitsverlagerungen und Relativität: Ein experimenteller Beitrag zurRaum-Zeit-Wahrnehmung anhand eines Kontraktionsphänomens (Tandem-Effekt) [Attention shifting and relativity: An experimental contribution to time-space perception using a contraction phenomenon (Tandem Effect)]. Munich: Minerva Publikation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neumann, O. (1979). Visuelle Aufmerksamkeit und der Mechanismus des Metakontrasts [Visual attention and the mechanism of metacontrast]. In L. Eckensberger (Ed.),Bericht über den 31. Kongress der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Psychologie (pp. 54–56). Göttingen: Hogrefe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neumann, O. (1980).Informationsselektion und Handlungssteuerung: Untersuchungen zur Funktionsgrundlage des Stroop-Interferenzphänomens [Information selection and action control: Studies on the functional basis of the Stroop interference phenomenon]. Unpublished doctoral thesis, Bochum: Department of Psychology, Ruhr University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neumann, O. (1982).Experimente zum Fehrer-Raab-Effekt und das ‘Wetterwart’-Modell der visuellen Maskierung [Experiments on the Fehrer-Raab effect and the ‘weather station’ model of visual masking]. Report No. 24/1982, Bochum: Department of Psychology, Ruhr University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neumann, O. (1984). Automatic processing: A review of recent findings and a plea for an old theory. In W. Prinz, & A. F. Sanders (Eds.),Cognition and motor processes (pp. 255–293). Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, Tokyo: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neumann, O. (1990). Visual attention and action. In O. Neumann, & W. Prinz (Eds.),Relationships between perception and action: Current approaches (pp. 227–267). Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, Tokyo: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neumann, O., & Müsseler, J. (1990a). ‘Judgment’ vs. ‘Response’: A general problem and some experimental illustrations. In H.-G. Geissler (Ed.),Psychophysical explorations of mental structures (pp. 445–455). Göttingen: Hogrefe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neumann, O., & Müsseler, J. (1990b). Visuelles Fokussieren: Das Wetterwart-Modell und einige seiner Anwendungen [Visual focusing: The weather station model and some of its applications]. In C. Meinecke, & L. Kehrer (Eds.),Bielefelder Beiträge zur Kognitionspsychologie (pp. 77–108). Göttingen: Hogrefe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parks, T. E. (1965). Post-retinal visual storage.American Journal of Psychology, 78, 145–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Posner, M. J. (1980). Orienting of attention.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 32, 3–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Posner, M. J. (1982). Cumulative development of attentional theory.American Psychologist, 37, 168–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Posner, M. J., & Cohen, Y. (1984). Components of visual orienting. In H. Bouma, & D. G. Bouwhuis (Eds.),Attention and Performance X. Control of language processes (pp. 531–556). London: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Posner, M. J., Walker, J. A., Friederich, F.J., & Rafal, R. D. (1984). Effects of parietal injury on covert orienting of attention.Journal of Neuroscience, 4, 1863–1874.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rayner, K. (1984). Visual selection in reading, picture perception, and visual search — a tutorial review. In H. Boumaa, & D. G. Bouwhuis (Eds.),Attention and Performance X. Control of language processes (pp. 67–97). London: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reeves, A. (1986). Attention and the order of items in short-term visual memory.Psychological Research, 48, 239–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reeves, A., & Sperling, G. A. (1986). Attentional gating in short-term visual memory.Psychological Review, 93, 180–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reinitz, M. T. (1990). Effects of spatially directed attention on visual encoding.Perception & Psychophysics, 47, 497–505.

    Google Scholar 

  • Remington, R., & Pierce, L. (1984). Moving attention: Evidence for time-invariant shifts of visual selective attention.Perception & Psychophysics, 35, 393–399.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rock, J., Halper, F., DiVita, J., & Wheeler, D. (1987). Eye movement as a cue to figure motion in anorthoscopic perception.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 13, 344–352.

    Google Scholar 

  • Runeson, S. (1974). Constant velocity — not perceived as such.Psychological Research, 37, 3–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Runeson, S. (1975). Visual predictions of collision with natural and nonnatural motion functions.Perception & Psychophysics, 18, 261–266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sagi, D., & Julesz, B. (1985). Fast noninertial shifts of attention.Spatial Vision, 2, 393–399.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shepherd, M., & Müller, H. J. (1989). Movement versus focusing of visual attention.Perception & Psychophysics, 46, 146–189.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shimojo, S., & Richards, W. (1986). ‘Seeing’ shapes that are almost totally occluded: A new look at Parks's camel.Perception & Psychophysics, 39, 418–426.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shulman, G. L., Wilson, J., & Sheehy, J. B. (1985). Spatial determinants of attention.Perception & Psychophysics, 35, 59–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, O. W., & Sherlock, L. (1957). A new explanation of the velocity-transposition phenomenon.American Journal of Psychology, 70, 102–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sperling, G., & Reeves, A. (1980). Measuring the reaction time of a shift of visual attention. In R. S. Nickerson (Ed.).Attention and performance VIII (pp. 347–360). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoffer, T. (1988).Dynamische Aspekte der visuellen Aufmerksamkeit [Dynamic aspects of visual attention]. Bielefeld: University of Bielefeld.

    Google Scholar 

  • Styles, E. A., & Allport, D. A. (1986). Perceptual integration of identity, location and colour.Psychological Research, 48, 189–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tassinari, G., Agliotti, S., Chelazzi, L., Marzi, C. A., & Berlucchi, G. (1987). Distribution in the visual field of the costs of voluntarily allocated attention and of the inhibitory after-effects of covert orienting.Neuropsychologia, 25, 55–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Theeuwes, J. (1991). Exogenous and endogenous control of attention: The effects of visual onsets and offsets.Perception & Psychophysics, 49, 83–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsal, Y. (1983). Movements of attention across the visual field.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 9, 523–530.

    Google Scholar 

  • van der Heijden, A. H. C. (1992).Selective attention in vision. London, New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vierordt, K. (1868).Der Zeitsinn nach Versuchen [The time sense according to experiments]. Tübingen: Laupp.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Helmholtz, H. (1910).Handbuch der physiologischen Optik: Die Lehre von den Gesichtswahrnehmungen 1, Bd. 3 [Handbook of physiological optics: The science of the visual perceptions (Vol. 3)]. Hamburg: Voss.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warner, C. B., Juola, J. F., & Koshino, H. (1990). Voluntary allocation versus automatic capture of visual attention.Perception & Psychophysics, 48, 243–251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolff, P. (1977).Entnahme derldentitäts- und Positionsinformation bei der Identifikation tachistoskopischer Buchstabenzeilen [Retrieval of identity and position information in the identification of tachistoscopically presented letter rows] Unpublished doctoral thesis. Bochum: Department of Psychology, Ruhr University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolff, P. (1984). Saccadic eye movements and visual stability: Preliminary considerations towards a cognitive approach. In W. Prinz, & A. F. Sanders (Eds.),Cognition and motor processes (pp. 121–137). Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, Tokyo: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yantis, S. (1988). On analog movements of visual attention.Perception & Psychophysics, 43, 203–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yantis, S., & Jonides, J. (1990). Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: Voluntary versus automatic allocation.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16, 121–134

    Google Scholar 

  • Zöllner, F. (1862). Über eine neue Art anorthoskopischer Zerrbilder [On a new kind of anorthoscopic distorted pictures].Annalen der Physik, Poggendorffs Annalen, 117, 477–484.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Müsseler, J., Neumann, O. Apparent distance reduction with moving stimuli (Tandem Effect): Evidence for an attention-shifting model. Psychol. Res 54, 246–266 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01358263

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01358263

Keywords

Navigation