Summary
When two vertical rods move through a horizontal window in close succession, the Tandem Effect can be observed. It consists of a spatial illusion (distance between the rods looking smaller than it actually is) and a temporal illusion (under certain conditions both rods are seen simultaneously in the window, though the first rod has left the window before the second rod enters it). We report six experiments that explored the distance-reduction illusion and tested an attentional model of the effect. It assumes that attention is initially focused on the first rod and then shifted to the second, when it enters the window. The percept of the pair of rods is integrated from the first rod's position at the beginning, and the second rod's position at the end, of the focus shift. Consequently their subjective distance will be smaller than their physical distance by the distance that they travel during the focus shift. Experiments 1 and 2 established the Tandem Effect as an empirical phenomenon and showed that its size depends on stimulus parameters such as window size and movement speed. Experiments 3–5 tested specific predictions from the attentional model. Experiment 6 examined a further illusion, the Fröhlich Effect, and showed that it can be subsumed under the model. The experiments produced some unexpected effects and some predictions from the model were only partly confirmed. It is shown that the main findings can be combined into two quantitative functions that describe the course of focusing. One implication is that visual attention does not “move” from one object to another; rather all attention shifts originate in the fovea. We discuss several alternative interpretations of our data and show that they are less satisfactory than the attentional model.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Algom, D., & Cohen-Raz, L. (1984). Visual velocity input-output functions: The integration of distance and duration onto subjective velocity.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 10, 486–501.
Algom, D., & Cohen-Raz, L. (1987). Sensory and cognitive factors in the processing of visual velocity.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 13, 3–13.
Allport, A. (1968). Phenomenal simultaneity and the perceptual moment hypothesis.British Journal of Psychology, 59, 395–406.
Allport, A. (1989). Visual attention. In M. I. Posner (Ed.),Foundations of cognitive sciences (pp. 631–681). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Angel, R. B. (1980).Relativity: The theory and its philosophy. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
Ansbacher, H. L. (1944). Distorsion in the perception of real movement.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 34, 1–23.
Anstis, S. M., & Atkinson, J. (1967). Distorsions of moving figures through a stationary slit.American Journal of Psychology, 80, 572–585.
Banks, W. P., & Krajicek, D. (1990). Attentional selection of items and spatial locations.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 28, 37–40.
Brown, J. F. (1931a). The thresholds for visual movement.Psychologische Forschung, 14, 199–232.
Brown, J. F. (1931b). The visual perception of velocity.Psychologische Forschung, 14, 233–248.
Butler, B. E., & Currie, A. (1986). On the nature of perceptual limits in vision: A new look at lateral masking.Psychological Research, 48, 201–209.
Caelli, T. (1981).Visual perception: Theory and practice. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
Caelli, T., Hoffman, W., & Lindman, H. (1978). Subjective Lorentz-transformation and the perception of motion.Journal of the Optical Society of America, 68, 402–411.
Casco, C., & Morgan, M. (1984). The relationship between space and time in the perception of stimuli moving behind a slit.Perception, 13, 429–442.
Chastain, G. (1991). Effects of abruptly appearing clutter on a peripherally precued covert attention shift.Journal of General Psychology, 118, 31–44.
Downing, C. J., & Pinker, S. (1985). The spatial structure of visual attention. In M. I. Posner, & O. S. Marin (Eds.),Attention and performance XI (pp. 171–187). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Drösler, J. (1979). Relativistic effects in visual perception of real and apparent motion.Archiv für Psychologie, 131, 249–266.
Driver, J., & Baylis, G. C. (1989). Movement and visual attention: The spotlight metaphor breaks down.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 15, 448–456.
Einstein, A. (1905). Zur Elektrodynamik bewegter Körper [On the electrodynamics of moving bodies].Annalen der Physik, 17, 891–921.
Eriksen, C. W., & Murphy, T. D. (1987). Movement of attentional focus across the visual field: A critical look at the evidence.Perception & Psychophysics, 42, 299–305.
Eriksen, C. W., & St. James, J. D. (1986). Visual attention within and around the field of focal attention: A zoom lens model.Perception & Psychophysics, 40, 225–240.
Fischer, B. (1986). The role of attention in the preparation of visually guided eye and hand movements in monkey and man.Psychological Research, 48, 251–257.
Fröhlich, F. W. (1923). Über die Messung der Empfindungszeit [On the measurement of sensation time].Zeitschrift für Sinnesphysiologie;54, 58–78.
Fröhlich, F. W. (1929).Die Empfindungszeit: Ein Beitrag zur Lehre der Zeit-, Raum- und Bewegungswahrnehmung [Sensation time: A contribution to the study of time, space and motion perception]. Jena: Fischer.
Gehrke, E., & Lau, E. (1923). Versuche über das Sehen von Bewegung [Experiments on the perception of motion].Psychologische Forschung, 3, 1–8.
Haber, R. N., & Nathanson, L. S. (1968). Post-retinal storage? Some further observations on Park's camel as seen through the eye of a needle.Perception & Pychophysics, 3, 349–355.
Hays, W. L. (1974).Statistics for the social sciences. London: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Jonides, J. (1981). Voluntary vs. automatic control over the mind's eyes' movements. In J. B. Long & A. D. Baddeley (Eds.),Attention and performance IX (pp. 187–203). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Koch, C., & Ullman, S. (1985). Shifts in selective visual attention: Towards the underlying neural circuitry.Human Neurobiology, 4, 219–227.
Kolbert, J., & Müsseler, J. (1981).Psychologische Untersuchungen an einem Phänomen der Bewegungswahmehung (Tandem-Effekt) [Psychological studies of a phenomenon of motion perception (Tandem Effect)]. Unpublished thesis. Bochum (FRG): Department of Psychology, Ruhr University.
Kolbert, J., Müsseler, J., & Neumann, O. (1982).Scheinbare Abstandsverkürzung durch Bewegung: Der Tandem-Effekt [Apparent distance reduction through motion: The Tandem Effect]. Report No. 26/1982, Bochum: Department of Psychology, Ruhr University.
Kwak, H.-W., Dagenbach, D., & Egeth, H. (1991). Further evidence for a time-independent shift of the focus of attention.Perception & Psychophysics, 49, 473–480.
Mashhour, M. (1964).Psychophysical relations in the perception of velocity. Stockholm: Almqvist and Wiksell.
McCloskey, M., & Watkins, M. J. (1978). The seeing-more-than-isthere-phenomenon: Implications for the locus of iconic storage.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 4, 553–564.
Miller, J. (1989). The control of attention by abrupt visual onsets and offsets.Perception & Psychophysics, 45, 567–594.
Morgan, M. J., Findlay, J. M., & Watt, R. J. (1982). Aperture viewing: A review and a synthesis.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 43A, 211–233.
Müller, H. J., & Findlay, J. M. (1988). The effect of visual attention on peripheral discrimination thresholds in single and multiple element displays.Acta Psychologica, 69, 129–155.
Müller, H. J., & Rabbitt, P. M. A. (1989). Reflexive and voluntary orienting of visual attention: Time course of activation and resistance to interruption.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 15, 315–330.
Müsseler, J. (1987).Aufmerksamkeitsverlagerungen und Relativität: Ein experimenteller Beitrag zurRaum-Zeit-Wahrnehmung anhand eines Kontraktionsphänomens (Tandem-Effekt) [Attention shifting and relativity: An experimental contribution to time-space perception using a contraction phenomenon (Tandem Effect)]. Munich: Minerva Publikation.
Neumann, O. (1979). Visuelle Aufmerksamkeit und der Mechanismus des Metakontrasts [Visual attention and the mechanism of metacontrast]. In L. Eckensberger (Ed.),Bericht über den 31. Kongress der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Psychologie (pp. 54–56). Göttingen: Hogrefe.
Neumann, O. (1980).Informationsselektion und Handlungssteuerung: Untersuchungen zur Funktionsgrundlage des Stroop-Interferenzphänomens [Information selection and action control: Studies on the functional basis of the Stroop interference phenomenon]. Unpublished doctoral thesis, Bochum: Department of Psychology, Ruhr University.
Neumann, O. (1982).Experimente zum Fehrer-Raab-Effekt und das ‘Wetterwart’-Modell der visuellen Maskierung [Experiments on the Fehrer-Raab effect and the ‘weather station’ model of visual masking]. Report No. 24/1982, Bochum: Department of Psychology, Ruhr University.
Neumann, O. (1984). Automatic processing: A review of recent findings and a plea for an old theory. In W. Prinz, & A. F. Sanders (Eds.),Cognition and motor processes (pp. 255–293). Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, Tokyo: Springer.
Neumann, O. (1990). Visual attention and action. In O. Neumann, & W. Prinz (Eds.),Relationships between perception and action: Current approaches (pp. 227–267). Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, Tokyo: Springer.
Neumann, O., & Müsseler, J. (1990a). ‘Judgment’ vs. ‘Response’: A general problem and some experimental illustrations. In H.-G. Geissler (Ed.),Psychophysical explorations of mental structures (pp. 445–455). Göttingen: Hogrefe.
Neumann, O., & Müsseler, J. (1990b). Visuelles Fokussieren: Das Wetterwart-Modell und einige seiner Anwendungen [Visual focusing: The weather station model and some of its applications]. In C. Meinecke, & L. Kehrer (Eds.),Bielefelder Beiträge zur Kognitionspsychologie (pp. 77–108). Göttingen: Hogrefe.
Parks, T. E. (1965). Post-retinal visual storage.American Journal of Psychology, 78, 145–147.
Posner, M. J. (1980). Orienting of attention.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 32, 3–25.
Posner, M. J. (1982). Cumulative development of attentional theory.American Psychologist, 37, 168–169.
Posner, M. J., & Cohen, Y. (1984). Components of visual orienting. In H. Bouma, & D. G. Bouwhuis (Eds.),Attention and Performance X. Control of language processes (pp. 531–556). London: Erlbaum.
Posner, M. J., Walker, J. A., Friederich, F.J., & Rafal, R. D. (1984). Effects of parietal injury on covert orienting of attention.Journal of Neuroscience, 4, 1863–1874.
Rayner, K. (1984). Visual selection in reading, picture perception, and visual search — a tutorial review. In H. Boumaa, & D. G. Bouwhuis (Eds.),Attention and Performance X. Control of language processes (pp. 67–97). London: Erlbaum.
Reeves, A. (1986). Attention and the order of items in short-term visual memory.Psychological Research, 48, 239–250.
Reeves, A., & Sperling, G. A. (1986). Attentional gating in short-term visual memory.Psychological Review, 93, 180–206.
Reinitz, M. T. (1990). Effects of spatially directed attention on visual encoding.Perception & Psychophysics, 47, 497–505.
Remington, R., & Pierce, L. (1984). Moving attention: Evidence for time-invariant shifts of visual selective attention.Perception & Psychophysics, 35, 393–399.
Rock, J., Halper, F., DiVita, J., & Wheeler, D. (1987). Eye movement as a cue to figure motion in anorthoscopic perception.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 13, 344–352.
Runeson, S. (1974). Constant velocity — not perceived as such.Psychological Research, 37, 3–23.
Runeson, S. (1975). Visual predictions of collision with natural and nonnatural motion functions.Perception & Psychophysics, 18, 261–266.
Sagi, D., & Julesz, B. (1985). Fast noninertial shifts of attention.Spatial Vision, 2, 393–399.
Shepherd, M., & Müller, H. J. (1989). Movement versus focusing of visual attention.Perception & Psychophysics, 46, 146–189.
Shimojo, S., & Richards, W. (1986). ‘Seeing’ shapes that are almost totally occluded: A new look at Parks's camel.Perception & Psychophysics, 39, 418–426.
Shulman, G. L., Wilson, J., & Sheehy, J. B. (1985). Spatial determinants of attention.Perception & Psychophysics, 35, 59–65.
Smith, O. W., & Sherlock, L. (1957). A new explanation of the velocity-transposition phenomenon.American Journal of Psychology, 70, 102–105.
Sperling, G., & Reeves, A. (1980). Measuring the reaction time of a shift of visual attention. In R. S. Nickerson (Ed.).Attention and performance VIII (pp. 347–360). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Stoffer, T. (1988).Dynamische Aspekte der visuellen Aufmerksamkeit [Dynamic aspects of visual attention]. Bielefeld: University of Bielefeld.
Styles, E. A., & Allport, D. A. (1986). Perceptual integration of identity, location and colour.Psychological Research, 48, 189–200.
Tassinari, G., Agliotti, S., Chelazzi, L., Marzi, C. A., & Berlucchi, G. (1987). Distribution in the visual field of the costs of voluntarily allocated attention and of the inhibitory after-effects of covert orienting.Neuropsychologia, 25, 55–71.
Theeuwes, J. (1991). Exogenous and endogenous control of attention: The effects of visual onsets and offsets.Perception & Psychophysics, 49, 83–90.
Tsal, Y. (1983). Movements of attention across the visual field.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 9, 523–530.
van der Heijden, A. H. C. (1992).Selective attention in vision. London, New York: Routledge.
Vierordt, K. (1868).Der Zeitsinn nach Versuchen [The time sense according to experiments]. Tübingen: Laupp.
von Helmholtz, H. (1910).Handbuch der physiologischen Optik: Die Lehre von den Gesichtswahrnehmungen 1, Bd. 3 [Handbook of physiological optics: The science of the visual perceptions (Vol. 3)]. Hamburg: Voss.
Warner, C. B., Juola, J. F., & Koshino, H. (1990). Voluntary allocation versus automatic capture of visual attention.Perception & Psychophysics, 48, 243–251.
Wolff, P. (1977).Entnahme derldentitäts- und Positionsinformation bei der Identifikation tachistoskopischer Buchstabenzeilen [Retrieval of identity and position information in the identification of tachistoscopically presented letter rows] Unpublished doctoral thesis. Bochum: Department of Psychology, Ruhr University.
Wolff, P. (1984). Saccadic eye movements and visual stability: Preliminary considerations towards a cognitive approach. In W. Prinz, & A. F. Sanders (Eds.),Cognition and motor processes (pp. 121–137). Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, Tokyo: Springer.
Yantis, S. (1988). On analog movements of visual attention.Perception & Psychophysics, 43, 203–206.
Yantis, S., & Jonides, J. (1990). Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: Voluntary versus automatic allocation.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16, 121–134
Zöllner, F. (1862). Über eine neue Art anorthoskopischer Zerrbilder [On a new kind of anorthoscopic distorted pictures].Annalen der Physik, Poggendorffs Annalen, 117, 477–484.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Müsseler, J., Neumann, O. Apparent distance reduction with moving stimuli (Tandem Effect): Evidence for an attention-shifting model. Psychol. Res 54, 246–266 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01358263
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01358263