Summary
If movement control is afforded through the advance planning, or preprogramming, of upcoming actions, then one of the behavioral outcomes should be an increase in reaction time (RT) as the movement becomes more complex. In some situations, however, RT does not increase across levels of complexity, rather it remains invariant. In these cases, on-line preparation is typically inferred. That is, the sequence is said to be prepared in parts throughout the movement, as opposed to entirely beforehand. Given that there is some planning occurring during the sequence, then evidence of this process should be apparent within the movement itself. Three such dependent variables appear to provide such evidence. Specifically, the number of times the underlying accelerations cross the zero line within the movement, the number of ‘significant deviations’ within the acceleration trace, and the length of time for which the muscles are active (as measured by EMG) in relation to the duration of the movement. In the present experiment, then, these variables were measured in addition to the time required to prepare and initiate a movement performed under conditions conducive to either preprogramming or online preparation. Specifically, the movements were either completed as fast as possible, or at a considerably slower, more controlled speed. Each of the dependent variables displayed evidence of preprogramming in the movements completed at the fast velocity, and on-line preparation in the slower paced movements. Thus, in the slow condition, subjects appeared to rely more heavily on on-line prepared adjustments to produce an accurate outcome. The convergence attained between the various dependent measures lends power to the conclusions regarding hypothesized modes of control within the different speeds of movement.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anson JG (1982) Memory drum theory: alternative tests and explanations for the complexity effects on simple reaction time. J Mot Behav 14:228–246
Anson JG (1989) Effects of moment of inertia on simple reaction time. J Mot Behav 21:60–71
Baba DM, Marteniuk RG (1983) Timing and torque involvement in the organization of a rapid forearm extension. Q J Exp Psychol 35:323–331
Botwinick J, Thompson LW (1966) Premotor and motor components of reaction time. J Exp Psychol 71:9–15
Brooks VB, Cooke JD, Thomas JS (1973) The continuity of movements. In: Stein RB, Pearson KG, Redford JB (eds) Control of, posture and locomotion. Plenum Press, New York
Canic MJ, Franks IM (1989) Response preparation and latency in patterns of tapping movements. Hum Mov Sci 8:123–139
Carlton LG (1981) Processing visual feedback information for movement control. J Exp Psychol 7:1019–1030
Christina RW, Rose DJ (1985) Premotor and motor reaction time as a function of response complexity. Res Q Exer Sp 56:306–315
Cooke JD (1980) The organization of simple skilled movements. In: Stelmach GE, Requin J (eds) Tutorials in motor behavior. North-Holland, Amsterdam
Crossman ERFW, Goodeve PJ (1983) Feedback control of handmovements and Fitts' law. Q J Exp Psychol 35A:251–278
Desmedt J, Godaux E (1979) Voluntary motor commands in human ballistic movements. Ann Neurol 5:415–421
Engelhorn R (1983) Agonist and antagonist muscle EMG activity pattern changes with skill acquisition. Res Q Exer Sp 54:315–323
Falkenberg LE, Newell KM (1979) Relative contribution of movement time, amplitude, and velocity to response initiation. J Exp Psychol 6:760–768
Fischman MG (1984) Programming time as a function of number of movement parts and changes in movement direction. J Mot Behav 16:405–423
Franks IM, Sanderson DJ, van Donkelaar P (1990) A comparison of directly recorded and derived acceleration data in movement control research. Hum Mov Sci (in press)
Franks IM, van Donkelaar P (1990) The effects of demanding temporal accuracy on the programming of simple tapping sequences. Acta Psychol (Amst) (in press)
Garcia-Colera A, Semjen A (1987) The organization of rapid movement sequences as a function of sequence length. Acta Psychol (Amst) 66:237–250
Garcia-Colera A, Semjen A (1988) Distributed planning of movement sequences. J Mot Behav 20:341–367
Glencross DJ (1980) Response planning and the organization of speed movements. In: Nickerson RS (eds) Attention and Performance VIII. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, New Jersey, pp 107–125
Hallett M, Shahani BT, Young RR (1975) EMG analysis of stereotyped voluntary movements in man. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 38:1154–1162
Henry FM, Rogers DE (1960) Increased response latency for complicated movements and a ‘memory drum’ theory of neuromotor control. Res Q Exer Sp 31:448–458
Hof AL (1984) EMG and muscle force: an introduction. Hum Mov Sci 3:119–153
Ivry RB (1986) Force and timing components of the motor program. J Mot Behav 18:449–474
Klapp ST, Wyatt EP (1976) Motor programming within a sequence of responses. J Mot Behav 8:19–26
MacKay DG (1983) A theory of representation and enactment of intentions. In: Magill RA (eds) Memory and control of action. North-Holland, Amsterdam
Meyer DE, Abrams RA, Kornblum S, Wright CE, Smith JEK (1988) Optimality in human motor performance: ideal control of rapid aimed movements. Psychol Rev 95:340–370
Newell KM, Carlton MJ, Carlton L, Halbert JA (1980) Movement velocity as a factor in movement timing accuracy. J Mot Behav 12:47–56
Newell KM, Hoshizaki LEF, Carlton MJ, Halbert JA (1979) Movement time and velocity as determinants of movement timing accuracy. J Mot Behav 11:49–58
Norman RW, Komi PV (1979) Electromechanical delays in skeletal muscle under normal movement conditions. Acta Physiol Scand 106:241–248
Restle F, Brown ER (1970a) Organization of serial pattern learning. In: Bower GH, Spence JT (eds) Psychology of learning and motivation. Academic Press, New York, pp 249–331
Restle F, Brown ER (1970b) Serial pattern learning. J Exp Psychol 83:120–125
Sidaway B (1988) Fractionated reaction time in lower leg responses: a note on response programming time. Res Q Exer Sp 59:248–251
Soechting JF, Lacquaniti F (1983) Modification of trajectory of a pointing movement in response to a change in target location. J Neurophysiol 49:548–564
Sternberg S, Monsell S, Knoll RL, Wright CE (1978) The latency and duration of rapid movement sequences: comparisons of speech and typewriting. In: Stelmach GE (eds) Information processing in motor control and learning. Academic Press, New York, pp 117–152
van Donkelaar P, Franks IM (1990) RT and reproduction accuracy in tapping movements with varying temporal structure. J Hum Mov Stud (in press)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
van Donkelaar, P., Franks, I.M. The effects of changing movement velocity and complexity on response preparation: evidence from latency, kinematic, and EMG measures. Exp Brain Res 83, 618–632 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00229840
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00229840