Regular Article
Genomic Control, a New Approach to Genetic-Based Association Studies

https://doi.org/10.1006/tpbi.2001.1542Get rights and content

Abstract

During the past decade, mutations affecting liability to human disease have been discovered at a phenomenal rate, and that rate is increasing. For the most part, however, those diseases have a relatively simple genetic basis. For diseases with a complex genetic and environmental basis, new approaches are needed to pave the way for more rapid discovery of genes affecting liability. One such approach exploits large, population-based samples and large-scale genotyping to evaluate disease/gene associations. A substantial drawback to such samples is the fact that population heterogeneity can induce spurious associations between genes and disease. We describe a method called genomic control (GC), which obviates many of the concerns about population substructure by using the features of the genomes present in the sample to correct for stratification. Two such approaches are now available. The GC approach exploits the fact that population substructure generate “overdispersion” of statistics used to assess association. By testing multiple polymorphisms throughout the genome, only some of which are pertinent to the disease of interest, the degree of overdispersion generated by population substructure can be estimated and taken into account. The other approach, called Structured Association (SA), assumes that the sampled population, while heterogeneous, is composed of subpopulations that are themselves homogeneous. By using multiple polymorphisms throughout the genome, SA probabilistically assigns sampled individuals to these latent subpopulations. We review in detail the overdispersion GC. In addition to outlining the published ideas on this method, we describe several extensions: quantitative trait studies and case–control studies with haplotypes and multiallelic markers. For each study design our goal is to achieve control similar to that obtained for a family-based study, but with the convenience found in a population-based design.

References (48)

  • G.A. Satten et al.

    Accounting for unmeasured population substructure in case–control studies of genetic association using a novel latent-class model

    Am. J. Hum. Genet.

    (2001)
  • N.J. Schork et al.

    The future of genetic case–control studies

    Adv. Genet.

    (2001)
  • J.S. Sinsheimer et al.

    Gamete-competition models

    Am. J. Hum. Genet.

    (2000)
  • D.B. Allison

    Transmission-disequilibrium tests for quantitative traits

    Am. J. Hum. Genet.

    (1997)
  • S.-A. Bacanu et al.

    Association studies for quantitive traits in structured populations

    Genet. Epidemol.

    (2001)
  • Y. Benjamini et al.

    Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing

    J. R. Statist. Soc. B

    (1995)
  • L.L. Cavalli-Sforza et al.

    The History and Geography of Human Genes

    (1994)
  • B. Devlin et al.

    Statistical evaluation of DNA fingerprinting: A critique of the NRC's report

    Science

    (1993)
  • B. Devlin et al.

    Genomic control for association studies

    Biometrics

    (1999)
  • B. Devlin et al.

    Genomic control for association studies: A semiparametric test to detect excess haplotype-sharing

    Biostatistics

    (2000)
  • B. Devlin et al.

    Genome-wide distribution of linkage disequilibrium in the population of Palau and its implications for gene flow in Remote Oceania

    Hum. Genet.

    (2001)
  • W.J. Ewens et al.

    The transmission/disequilibrium test: History, subdivision and admixture

    Am. J. Hum. Genet.

    (1995)
  • R.A. Fisher

    Population genetics

    Proc. R. Soc. London B

    (1953)
  • Cited by (417)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    1

    To whom correspondence and reprint requests should be addressed at Department of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, 3811 O'Hara Street, Pittsburgh, PA 15213. E-mail: [email protected].

    View full text