Elsevier

NeuroImage

Volume 13, Issue 1, January 2001, Pages 56-67
NeuroImage

Regular Article
Switching between the Forest and the Trees: Brain Systems Involved in Local/Global Changed-Level Judgments

https://doi.org/10.1006/nimg.2000.0678Get rights and content

Abstract

Visual targets can be coded, in relative terms, at either the local or the global level of stimuli. Previous studies have indicated that targets are identified more slowly when they appear at a new hierarchical level, compared to when they reappear at the same level as in the previous trial. In the present study, we used measures of reaction time and event-related fMRI to investigate factors affecting this switch cost. In particular, we examined the effects of the number of repeated-level trials preceding a switch and whether the cue to switch was either externally or internally mediated. At the behavioral level we found that (1) the time taken to identify a target on a changed-level trial is longer following four repeated-level trials compared to two repeated-level trials, but that runs of six do not produce additional costs over four, and (2) targets can be identified faster following externally cued switches compared to internally mediated switches. We then show that these behavioral effects are associated with distinct patterns of neural activation. Switches performed after two repeated-level trials preferentially activated the precuneus, while those performed after both four and six activated bilateral inferior parietal cortex and motor hand area. Relative to external switches, internal switches activated the putamen, while both kinds of switch conjointly activated the large-scale network proposed to underlie internal/external switches in nonhierarchical tasks. Our data further clarify the mechanisms mediating hierarchical selection.

References (38)

  • M. Corbetta et al.

    Voluntary orienting is dissociated from target detection in human posterior parietal cortex

    Nat. Neurosci.

    (2000)
  • S. Dehaene et al.

    Imaging unconscious semantic priming

    Nature

    (1998)
  • G.R. Fink et al.

    Neural mechanisms involved in the processing of global and local aspects of hierarchically organized visual stimuli

    Brain

    (1997)
  • G.R. Fink et al.

    Hemispheric specialization for global and local processing: The effect of stimulus category

    Proc. R. Soc. London B

    (1998)
  • P.W. Halligan et al.

    Toward a principled explanation of unilateral neglect

    Cognit. Neuropsychol.

    (1994)
  • H.J. Heinze et al.

    Neural mechanisms of global and local processing: A combined PET and ERP study

    J. Cognit. Neurosci.

    (1998)
  • J.B. Hopfinger et al.

    The neural mechanisms of top–down attentional control

    Nat. Neurosci.

    (2000)
  • L. Jänke et al.

    A parametric analysis of the ‘rate effect’ in the sensorimotor cortex: A functional magnetic resonance imaging analysis in human subjects

    Neurosci. Lett.

    (1998)
  • Cited by (41)

    • Responses to Navon tasks differ across development and between tasks with differing attentional demands

      2021, Vision Research
      Citation Excerpt :

      Interference is greater when irrelevant information is presented at an individual’s more dominant level, than at their less dominant level (Farran et al., 2003). In divided attention Navon tasks, studies with adults have identified an accuracy or RT cost on switch trials compared with stay trials while attentional resources are shifted from one level to the other (Katagiri et al., 2013; Wilkinson, Halligan, Marshall, Büchel, & Dolan, 2001). Although this has not been investigated in children, a divided attention study with a different proportion of global responses in each block, creating a response bias, found no effect of bias on 6-year-olds but there was an effect in the older age groups (Kovshoff, Iarocci, Shore, & Burack, 2015).

    • FMRI task parameters influence hemodynamic activity in regions implicated in mental set switching

      2013, NeuroImage
      Citation Excerpt :

      For example, studies employing tasks requiring both attribute and rule switches, such as card sorting tasks, can use simple stimuli requiring a forced choice option (e.g., Asari et al., 2005) or more complex stimuli which require the participant to choose from several possible options (e.g., Hampshire and Owen, 2006; Monchi et al., 2006; Nagahama et al., 1999). Likewise, experiments can employ response options that require a participant to either continually switch between stimulus–response set mappings (e.g., Crone et al., 2006; Derrfuss et al., 2004; Dove et al., 2000; Rubia et al., 2006; Wilkinson et al., 2001) or select from upwards of four different responses (e.g., Monchi et al., 2006). Paradigms employing these more complex motor response options also increase stimulus–response interference when selecting motor program for the correct response (e.g., Hazeltine et al., 2000; Jiang and Kanwisher, 2003).

    • Electrophysiological correlates of preparation and implementation for different types of task shifts

      2011, Brain Research
      Citation Excerpt :

      In the laboratory, using task-switching paradigms, researchers have investigated the underlying mechanisms involved in a task switch by employing various types of tasks. These tasks have included shifting between relevant dimensions of an object (e.g., Owen et al., 1991; Rogers et al., 2000; Rushworth, et al., 2005), between objects stored in working memory (e.g., Garavan, 1998), between stimulus–response rules (e.g., Cools et al., 2004; Rubinstein et al., 2001; Rushworth et al., 2002), between task-sets (a task-set includes stimulus-sets, response-sets, and the corresponding stimulus–response-mappings; Rogers and Monsell, 1995; Sohn and Anderson, 2001), between different target levels of a hierarchical stimulus (global vs. local aspect of a stimulus; e.g., Wilkinson et al., 2001), between semantic classifications (odd/even vs. vowel/consonant rules; e.g., Rogers and Monsell, 1995), between response modes (e.g., simple vs. choice response; e.g., Koch et al., 2004), and between response modalities (vocal vs. finger vs. foot response; e.g., Philipp and Koch, 2005). The diversity of task-shift types used in laboratory research raises the question of whether the same mechanism underlies the different types of task shifts.

    • Specific impairments in visual processing following lesion side in hemianopic patients

      2010, Cortex
      Citation Excerpt :

      Coherent with this hypothesis some authors have proposed that LSF conveyed by the magnocellular pathway reach higher order cortical areas (parietal and temporal cortices) more rapidly than HSF conveyed by the parvocellular pathway (for further details, see Bullier, 2001). Moreover, numerous behavioural and functional imagery studies using lateralized presentation of altered visual stimuli among healthy individuals as well as brain-damaged patients indicated that there could be a hemispheric asymmetry for LSF and HSF processing (Fink et al., 1996, 1997, 2000; Heinze et al., 1998; Robertson et al., 1988; Sergent, 1982; Wilkinson et al., 2001; Yamaguchi et al., 2000). These data revealed a left visual field/right hemisphere advantage for LSF yet a right visual field/left hemisphere advantage for HSF.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text