Elsevier

Learning and Motivation

Volume 33, Issue 1, February 2002, Pages 156-176
Learning and Motivation

Regular Article
Scalar Timing in Animals and Humans

https://doi.org/10.1006/lmot.2001.1105Get rights and content

Abstract

John Gibbon's lifetime work provided a deep understanding of the mechanisms whereby the time sense indexes the passage of time (its accumulation) and records, that is, stores, relevant time intervals in memory, enabling behavior to occur at the right time. The Scalar Expectancy Theory (SET; Gibbon, 1977) remains the most prominent of the theoretical accounts of animal and human timing. SET deals with the three principle psychophysical properties of timing data: flexible accuracy, multiplicative variance, and ratio comparisons. It differs from many other timing theories in its emphasis on scalar variability, a term that refers to the linear increase in the standard deviation of timing errors as a task's criterion time increases. Recently, research based on the conceptual framework and analytic tools of SET in John Gibbon's lab was expanded from a decades-long focus on nonhuman species to an assessment of timing performance in “normal” and brain-diseased human subjects, aimed at understanding the functional and neural mechanisms underlying interval timing in humans. This review is aimed at showing that animal and human data obtained with a variety of timing paradigms are both amenable to analyses of accuracy and scalar variability under the SET framework. In the second part of this report we discuss advances made in our understanding of neurobiological mechanisms underlying interval timing by taking advantage of the SET framework. Issues awaiting new theoretical developments in modeling time production and perception, as revealed by psychophysical findings of recent clinical research that are still not well understood (i.e., sources of nonscalar variability), are raised at the end.

References (63)

  • W.H. Meck

    Neuropharmacology of timing and time perception

    Cognitive Brain Research

    (1996)
  • D.J. O'Boyle

    On the human neuropsychology of timing of simple repetitive movements

  • D.S. Olton

    Frontal cortex, timing and memory

    Neuropsychologia

    (1989)
  • D.S. Olton et al.

    Separation of hippocampal and amygdaloid involvement in temporal memory dysfunctions

    Brain Research

    (1987)
  • D.S. Olton et al.

    Attention and the frontal cortex as examined by simultaneous temporal processing

    Neuropsychologia

    (1988)
  • A. Santi et al.

    The effect of scopolamine and physostigmine on working and reference memory in pigeons

    Behavioral and Neural Biology

    (1988)
  • C. Shaw et al.

    The ability of amnesic subjects to estimate time intervals

    Neuropsychologia

    (1994)
  • F.M. Sulzman et al.

    Circadian entrainment of the squirrel monkey by extreme photoperiods: Interactions between the phasic and tonic effects of light

    Physiology & Behavior

    (1982)
  • J. Artieda et al.

    Temporal discrimination is abnormal in Parkinson's disease

    Brain

    (1992)
  • J. Aschoff

    Circadian timing

    Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences

    (1984)
  • P.L. Brown et al.

    Autoshaping of the pigeon's key-peck

    Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior

    (1968)
  • D. Brunner et al.

    Choice between fixed and variable delays with different reward amounts

    Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes

    (1994)
  • A.C. Catania

    Reinforcement schedules and psychophysical judgments

  • R.M. Church

    Properties of the internal clock

  • C.L. Dale

    Range effects in repetitive time production

    Dissertation Abstracts International: The Sciences and Engineering

    (2000)
  • C.R. Gallistel

    The organization of learning

    (1990)
  • C.R. Gallistel et al.

    Time, rate, and conditioning

    Psychological Review

    (2000)
  • J. Gibbon

    Scalar expectancy theory and Weber's Law in animal timing

    Psychological Review

    (1977)
  • J. Gibbon

    The contingency problem in autoshaping

  • J. Gibbon et al.

    Trial and intertrial durations in autoshaping

    Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes

    (1977)
  • J. Gibbon et al.

    Spreading associations in time

  • Cited by (62)

    • Bayesian Computation through Cortical Latent Dynamics

      2019, Neuron
      Citation Excerpt :

      We manipulated the animals’ prior expectations by sampling ts from one of two uniform prior distributions, a “Short” prior ranging between 480 and 800 ms, and a “Long” prior ranging between 800 and 1,200 ms (Figure 1C). The task enabled us to also manipulate sensory uncertainty since measurements of time intervals become more variable for longer intervals, a property known as “scalar variability” (Malapani and Fairhurst, 2002). Since the two prior distributions overlapped at ts = 800 ms, the task further offered the opportunity to characterize how neural representations are independently modulated by prior beliefs.

    • Computational models of interval timing

      2016, Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences
    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Our acknowledgments to all the staff of the Temporal Cognition Unit (Katherine Dube, Patrick Kuznia, Sharon Lobo, Brian Rakitin, and Stefanie Trice) that shared with us this difficult time of transition. Correspondence and reprint requests should be addressed to Chara Malapani, Columbia University, Department of Psychiatry, 1051 Riverside Drive, New York, NY 10032. E-mail: [email protected].

    View full text