Regular Article
The Big Five as States: How Useful Is the Five-Factor Model to Describe Intraindividual Variations over Time?,☆☆

https://doi.org/10.1006/jrpe.1997.2206Get rights and content

Abstract

This study investigated the similarity between the factor structure of longitudinal variations in states and the factor structure of individual differences in traits. On 90 consecutive days, 22 students self-administered 30 self-report items that were markers of the Big Five. Most participants showed good discrimination among the 90 measurement occasions. Correlations were computed between items across measurement occasions. These P-correlations were factored, and the factor matrices were target rotated toward a reference factor structure of individual differences, using orthogonal Procrustes rotations. A substantial match was obtained between the factor structure of longitudinal correlations that had been averaged across participants and the factor structure of individual differences. For individual participants, this factor match was worse. It is concluded that the Big Five are useful to describe longitudinal variations in states. A sharp distinction between the five-factor model and the trait approach is recommended.

References (37)

  • P. Barrett

    Factor comparison: An examination of three methods

    Personality and Individual Differences

    (1986)
  • P. Borkenau

    The multiple classification of acts and the big five factors of personality

    Journal of Research in Personality

    (1988)
  • A. Angleitner et al.

    Towards a taxonomy of personality descriptors in German: A psycho-lexical study

    European Journal of Personality

    (1990)
  • P. Borkenau

    Toward an understanding of trait interrelations: Acts as instances for several traits

    Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

    (1986)
  • P. Borkenau

    Traits as ideal-based and goal-derived social categories

    Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

    (1990)
  • P. Borkenau

    Implicit personality theory and the five-factor model

    Journal of Personality

    (1992)
  • R.B. Cattell

    The description and measurement of personality

    (1946)
  • R.B. Cattell

    P-technique, a new method for analyzing the structure of personal motivation

    New York Academy of Sciences Transactions

    (1951)
  • R.B. Cattell

    The chief invariant psychological and psycho-physical functional units found by P-technique

    Journal of Clinical Psychology

    (1955)
  • R.B. Cattell

    Personality and mood by questionnaire

    (1957)
  • R.B. Cattell et al.

    P-technique demonstrated in determining psychophysiological source traits in a normal individual

    Psychometrika

    (1947)
  • R.B. Cattell et al.

    Comparison of the ergic and self-sentiment structures found in dynamic traits by R- and P-techniques

    Journal of Personality

    (1952)
  • W.F. Chaplin et al.

    Conceptions of states and traits: Dimensional attributes with ideals as prototypes

    Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

    (1988)
  • R.G. D'Andrade

    Memory and the assessment of behavior

    Measurement in the social science

    (1974)
  • L.A. Feldman

    Valence focus and arousal focus: Individual differences in the structure of affective experience

    Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

    (1995)
  • M.A. Gara et al.

    Linguistic factors in implicit personality theory

    Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

    (1981)
  • L.R. Goldberg

    The structure of phenotypic personality traits

    American Psychologist

    (1993)
  • M.D. Hakel

    Significance of implicit personality theories for personality research and theory

    Proceedings of the 77th Convention of the American Psychological Association

    (1969)
  • Cited by (0)

    We are indebted to the research participants for their patient cooperation, to Nadine Mauer for collecting the data and for her help in the data analysis, and to Lewis R. Goldberg, Susanne Hempel, Willem K. B. Hofstee, Robert R. McCrae, and Uwe Wolfradt for helpful comments on earlier drafts of this article.

    Address correspondence and reprint requests to Peter Borkenau, Institut fuer Psychologie, der Martin-Luther-Universitaet, Postfach 1108, D-06099 Halle, Germany. E-mail:p.borkenau @psych.uni-halle.de.

    ☆☆

    H. M. Balock

    View full text