Regular ArticleThe Big Five as States: How Useful Is the Five-Factor Model to Describe Intraindividual Variations over Time?☆,☆☆
References (37)
Factor comparison: An examination of three methods
Personality and Individual Differences
(1986)The multiple classification of acts and the big five factors of personality
Journal of Research in Personality
(1988)- et al.
Towards a taxonomy of personality descriptors in German: A psycho-lexical study
European Journal of Personality
(1990) Toward an understanding of trait interrelations: Acts as instances for several traits
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
(1986)Traits as ideal-based and goal-derived social categories
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
(1990)Implicit personality theory and the five-factor model
Journal of Personality
(1992)The description and measurement of personality
(1946)P-technique, a new method for analyzing the structure of personal motivation
New York Academy of Sciences Transactions
(1951)The chief invariant psychological and psycho-physical functional units found by P-technique
Journal of Clinical Psychology
(1955)Personality and mood by questionnaire
(1957)
P-technique demonstrated in determining psychophysiological source traits in a normal individual
Psychometrika
(1947)
Comparison of the ergic and self-sentiment structures found in dynamic traits by R- and P-techniques
Journal of Personality
(1952)
Conceptions of states and traits: Dimensional attributes with ideals as prototypes
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
(1988)
Memory and the assessment of behavior
Measurement in the social science
(1974)
Valence focus and arousal focus: Individual differences in the structure of affective experience
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
(1995)
Linguistic factors in implicit personality theory
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
(1981)
The structure of phenotypic personality traits
American Psychologist
(1993)
Significance of implicit personality theories for personality research and theory
Proceedings of the 77th Convention of the American Psychological Association
(1969)
Cited by (0)
- ☆
We are indebted to the research participants for their patient cooperation, to Nadine Mauer for collecting the data and for her help in the data analysis, and to Lewis R. Goldberg, Susanne Hempel, Willem K. B. Hofstee, Robert R. McCrae, and Uwe Wolfradt for helpful comments on earlier drafts of this article.
Address correspondence and reprint requests to Peter Borkenau, Institut fuer Psychologie, der Martin-Luther-Universitaet, Postfach 1108, D-06099 Halle, Germany. E-mail:p.borkenau @psych.uni-halle.de.
- ☆☆
H. M. Balock
Copyright © 1998 Academic Press. All rights reserved.