ReportJust Going Along: Nonconscious Priming and Conformity to Social Pressure☆
References (20)
- et al.
Modeling: An analysis in terms of category accessibility
Journal of Experimental Social Psychology
(1983) - et al.
Detecting and identifying change: Additions vs. deletions
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance
(1986) The Four Horsemen of automaticity: Awareness, intention, efficiency, and control in social cognition
- et al.
The generality of the automatic attitude activation effect
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
(1992) - et al.
Automaticity and social behavior: Direct effects of trait construct and stereotype activation
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
(1996) - et al.
Four hours in My Lai
(1971) - et al.
The American heritage word frequency book
(1971) - et al.
Automatic activation of impression formation and memorization goals: Nonconscious goal priming reproduces effects of explicit task instructions
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
(1997) - et al.
The chameleon effect: The perception–behavior link and social interaction
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
(1999)
Cited by (98)
Impact of tourist-to-tourist interaction on responsible tourist behaviour: Evidence from China
2022, Journal of Destination Marketing and ManagementThe Agentic–Communal Model of Advantage and Disadvantage: How Inequality Produces Similarities in the Psychology of Power, Social Class, Gender, and Race
2018, Advances in Experimental Social PsychologyLearning to cope with information security risks regarding mobile device loss or theft: An empirical examination
2015, Information and ManagementCitation Excerpt :This can be done on company portals or by emailing such information to users. Presumably, such social pressures have the capacity to drive conformity [21] and, ultimately, the abovementioned triple effect. Lastly, it is not sufficient to provide access to such countermeasures.
Conformity of Korean adolescents in their perceptions of social relationships and academic motivation
2015, Learning and Individual DifferencesCitation Excerpt :Levels of compliance can change depending on the characteristics of the task (difficulty, complexity, subjectivity, and prior commitment), the group (size, cohesion, credibility, and similarity between the group and the individual), and the individual (inclination to conform, social anxiety, need for affiliation, and fear of negative evaluation). The fact that individuals can conform subconsciously without the presence of explicit cues or pressure (Epley & Gilovich, 1999) suggests that it may be potentially beneficial or even desirable to do so. However, evidence has not been conclusive.
Conflicting social influences regarding controversial information systems: the case of online dating
2023, Information Technology and People
- ☆
This research was supported by Research Grant SBR9319558 from the National Science Foundation. We are grateful to David Dunning, Dennis Reagan, and Michael Spivey for commenting on an earlier draft of the manuscript and to Trey Billings, Kirsten Enterlin, Julie Gallagher, Andy Minor, David Rosen, and Tyler Story for their assistance with the research. Portions of this research were presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Society, 1997, Washington, DC.
Address correspondence and reprint requests to Nicholas Epley or Thomas Gilovich, Department of Psychology, Cornell University, Uris Hall, Ithaca, NY 14853-7601. E-mail: [email protected], [email protected].