Exposure to violence, depression, and hostility in a sample of inner city high school youth

doi:10.1006/jado.1998.0198

Journal of Adolescence

Volume 22, Issue 1, February 1999, Pages 21-32

https://doi.org/10.1006/jado.1998.0198 Get rights and content

Abstract

This study examines the prevalence of violence in a non-randomly selected population of 337 inner city school students, the relationship between exposure to violence and symptoms of depression and hostility, and demographic differences in exposure to and effects of traumatic violence. Students responded to an anonymous survey asking them to enumerate how many times they had experienced each of six types of traumatic violence. Sixty-two per cent of students were exposed to an average of 3.0541 of the six types of violence listed. Exposure to most types of violence were highly intercorrelated. Males experienced more exposure to violence than females. Exposure to violence was predictive of hostility for both gender groups, and predictive of depression for females. Implications of exposure to traumatic violence on adolescent development are discussed.

References (0)

Cited by (77)

Gender differences in the effects of childhood maltreatment on adult depression and anxiety: A systematic review and meta-analysis
2018, Child Abuse and Neglect
Citation Excerpt :
Depression and anxiety disorders are more common among women compared to men (Kessler et al., 2005), and some research suggests that the effects of abuse may be larger for women (Gershon, Minor, & Hayward, 2008). However, individual empirical studies have had mixed results: some found a stronger association between childhood abuse and depression and anxiety for females (Brensilver, Negriff, Mennen, & Trickett, 2011; Dunn, Gilman, Willett, Slopen, & Molnar, 2012; Hanson et al., 2008; Iverson et al., 2013; Moses, 1999; Singer, Anglin, Song, & Lunghofer, 1995; Wainwright, & Surtees, 2002), while others showed similar associations or even larger effects for males (Dinwiddie et al., 2000; Pimlott-Kubiak, & Cortina, 2003; Reinherz, Paradis, Giaconia, Stashwick, & Fitzmaurice, 2003). These differences may be explained by methodological differences between studies, such as their designs, sample differences (clinical samples versus population-based samples, for example), as well as types of exposure and outcome measures.
Child maltreatment has well-documented long-term, adverse effects on mental health, but it is not clear whether there are gender differences in these effects. We conducted a systematic review to investigate whether there are gender differences in the effects of maltreatment on adult depression and anxiety. Medline, PsycINFO, Web of Science, and Lilacs were searched for relevant studies published up to May 2016. Eligible studies included population-based studies (with a cohort, case-control or cross-sectional design) which assessed maltreatment during childhood or adolescence (≤18 years) and its association with major depression or generalized anxiety disorder (DSM/ICD diagnostic criteria) in adulthood (>18 years) separately for females and males. Meta-analysis was performed to estimate the association between each exposure and outcome using fixed and random effects models. Pooled odds ratios (OR) were estimated separately for women and men and compared. Five studies of physical and sexual abuse were included in the meta-analyses. These provided twenty-two effects sizes estimates (11 for men, 11 for women) for associations between physical/sexual abuse and depression/anxiety. Exposure to each kind of abuse increased the odds of depression/anxiety. Associations were larger for women than for men, however, these gender differences were not statistically significant. Physical and sexual abuse in childhood/adolescence are risk factors for depression/anxiety in adulthood and the effect could be larger for women; however, currently there is insufficient evidence to definitively identify gender differences in the effects of maltreatment.
Neighbourhood risk factors for Common Mental Disorders among young people aged 10-20 years: A structured review of quantitative research
2013, Health and Place
Citation Excerpt :
Those studies using information on residential neighbourhoods collected independently of the adolescents in the study sample, drew upon administrative/census area statistics to typify area socioeconomic conditions, (Leventhal and Brooks-Gunn, 2003; Romano et al., 2005) or information on neighbourhood conditions reported by parents or by interviewers. Measures indicating greater socioeconomic poverty in neighbourhoods were positively related to greater risk of ‘internalising’ and ‘externalising’ CMD outcomes for young people including: externalising antisocial behaviour or conduct problems (Beyers et al., 2003; Romano et al., 2005; Schneiders et al., 2003; Schonberg and Shaw, 2007; Wheaton and Clarke, 2003; Mrug and Windle, 2009; Reijneveld et al., 2010) for the cross sectional association at baseline; Urban et al., 2009); psychological distress or depression (e.g. measured by the General Health Questionnaire, the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire, or the CES-D scale) (Fagg et al., 2006, 2008b; Leventhal and Brooks-Gunn, 2003 (for younger boys); Wickrama et al., 2005; Hull et al., 2008—though the relationship was attenuated by accounting for other environmental risk variables; Urban et al., 2009, for girls only); and suicidal thoughts or attempts (Dupere et al., 2009). With respect to degraded physical environment, the evidence is relatively sparse.
We present a critical review of research concerning the vulnerability of mental health of young people in the 10–20 year age range to neighbourhood factors that are theoretically associated with increased risk of Common Mental Disorders (CMDs). We interpreted ‘neighbourhood factors’ as attributes and processes in the local social and physical environment that young people inhabit, beyond the immediate household. We conducted an extensive search, and a structured method of assessment of the research papers that met our search criteria. We draw conclusions about the research evidence on this topic and identify issues needing further discussion and investigation. We focus particularly on quantitative research that aims to measure these relationships. We note that parallel to this research, a significant body of qualitative research on the geographical experiences of young people (though not specifically on their mental health) offers a rich source of background information to illuminate the statistical findings. We conclude with some reflections on the future challenges for research in this field.
Improving Adolescent Violent Trauma Outcomes With a Hospital-Based Violence Prevention Initiative
2023, Hospital Pediatrics
Violent Victimization, Stressful Events, and Depression: A Longitudinal Study of Young Adults in the U.S.
2021, Community Mental Health Journal
Adolescent Violent Trauma Prevention and Intervention
2021, Adolescent Gun Violence Prevention: Clinical and Public Health Solutions
Exposure to Gun Violence: Associations with Anxiety, Depressive Symptoms, and Aggression among Male Juvenile Offenders
2021, Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology

View all citing articles on Scopus

^f1: Reprint requests and correspondence should be addressed to A. Moses, Ph.D., The SPHERE Institute, 30 Alta Rd., Palo Alto, CA 94305, U.S.A.

View full text

Regular ArticleExposure to violence, depression, and hostility in a sample of inner city high school youth

Abstract

Regular Article
Exposure to violence, depression, and hostility in a sample of inner city high school youth