Regular Article
Recruitment Strategies for Cervical Cancer Prevention Study

https://doi.org/10.1006/gyno.2002.6592Get rights and content

Abstract

Objective. The aim of this study was to describe recruitment strategies for a single-visit cervical cancer prevention study.

Methods. From January through December 1999, low-income, predominantly Latino women were recruited to participate in a single-visit cervical cancer prevention study. For the first 6 months, all women who had ever visited one of two community-based study clinics were invited to participate (clinic registry recruitment). For the remainder of the year, recruitment was modified to be primarily inclusive of advertisements in English- and Spanish-language community newspapers and fliers left in local businesses and organizations (media campaign recruitment). Eligible volunteers were randomized to one of two study arms, usual-care program or single-visit program. All study subjects completed demographic and medical questionnaires delivered by bilingual staff. Women who declined to participate in this study were asked to provide reasons for this preference. Statistical analyses included the use of chi-square, logistic regression, and Student's t test.

Results. The proportion of women who agreed to participate was higher in the media recruitment group than in the clinic registry group [51% (535/1041) compared to 26% (405/1542), P < 0.001]. The no-show rate among participants solicited from the media strategy was significantly less than that from the clinic registry. There were no significant differences in the median age, number of months since the last Papanicolaou smear, incidence of abnormal Papanicolaou smear, education, or income of the subjects based on the recruitment strategy.

Conclusion. A media-based recruitment strategy was effective for this single-visit cervical prevention study. This approach may be effective for recruitment of other low-income groups to clinical trials.

References (14)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (35)

  • Development of a cancer clinical trials multi-media intervention: Clinical Trials: Are they Right for You?

    2012, Patient Education and Counseling
    Citation Excerpt :

    Thus, innovative communication interventions are required to facilitate informed decision-making [6] and to prepare individuals for a discussion of CTs. There have been numerous efforts to improve communication about CTs published in peer-reviewed literature including interventions to increase awareness about cancer CTs through positive messaging [4,15,22–28]. CT communication interventions include educational brochures [15,25,26], fliers and patient letters [4,23], websites [15], newspaper advertisements [23], and audiovisual materials [24–27].

  • Recruiting underrepresented groups into the carbohydrates and related biomarkers (CARB) cancer prevention feeding study

    2012, Contemporary Clinical Trials
    Citation Excerpt :

    Media-based strategies successfully recruited a relatively higher proportion of African Americans, which may suggest broader readership of such media compared to Hispanics. Alternatively other factors not measured in this study (e.g., reluctance to participate in a “study” or work or childcare constraints [14]) may account for the differences observed in these groups. The stringent eligibility criteria and extensive study procedures meant that the “hit rate” (the number who enrolled in the study divided by the number who initially contacted the project office) was relatively low (9%).

  • Recruitment of minority and underserved populations in the United States: The centers for population health and health disparities experience

    2008, Contemporary Clinical Trials
    Citation Excerpt :

    These strategies were implemented individually by some Centers, and either incrementally or concurrently by other Centers. Some of these same strategies have resulted in successful recruitment in previous studies [34,52–68]. As with any study, there are several limitations and strengths in summarizing the Centers' approach to participant recruitment.

View all citing articles on Scopus

Presented at the 32nd Annual Meeting of the Society of Gynecologic Oncologists, Nashville, Tennessee, March 3–7, 2001.

2

To whom correspondence and reprint requests should be addressed at Epidemiology Division, Department of Medicine, University of California, Irvine, 224 Irvine Hall, Irvine, CA 92697-7550. Fax: (949) 824-4773. E-mail: [email protected].

View full text