Regular Article
Effect of Students' After-School Activities on Teachers' Academic Expectancies

https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1998.0999Get rights and content

Abstract

Teacher expectancies can have an impact on students' academic achievement. These expectancies can be based on diverse student characteristics, only one of which is past academic performance. The present study investigated three student individual differences that teachers may use when forming academic expectancies: the sex of the student, the family socioeconomic status (SES) of the student, and the student's after-school activities. Results indicated teachers held higher grade, graduation, and college attendance expectancies for females than for males and for middle-SES than low-SES students. Also, students who participated in extracurricular activities were expected to achieve more academically than either students who were employed after school or who did nothing after school. The latter two groups did not elicit different teacher expectancies. Interactions revealed that (a) lowest expectations were held for low-SES males who did nothing after school and (b) the difference in graduation expectancies between the SES groups was only half as great for students who took part in extracurricular activities than it was for students who had no involvements after school or who had jobs.

References (42)

  • R.P. Abelson

    Statistics as principled argument

    (1995)
  • E. Babad

    Pygmalion—25 years after interpersonal expectations in the classroom

  • J.G. Bachman et al.

    Correlates of employment among high school seniors

    (1986)
  • R.M. Baron et al.

    Social class, race, and teacher expectations

  • B.J. Becker et al.

    Models of science achievement: Forces affecting male and female performance in school science

  • J. Brophy

    Research on the self-fulfilling prophecy and teacher expectations

    Journal of Educational Psychology

    (1983)
  • J. Brophy et al.

    Teacher-student relationships: Causes and consequences

    (1974)
  • B.B. Brown et al.

    Noninstructional influences on adolescent engagement and achievement

    (1991)
  • W.G. Camp

    Participation in student activities and achievement: A covariance structural analysis

    Journal of Educational Research

    (1990)
  • M. Clifford et al.

    The effect of physical attractiveness on teacher expectation

    Sociology of Education

    (1973)
  • J. Cohen

    Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences

    (1988)
  • H.M. Cooper et al.

    The importance of race and social class information in the formation of expectancies about academic performance

    Journal of Educational Psychology

    (1975)
  • H.M. Cooper et al.

    Personality moderators of interpersonal expectancy effects: An integrative research review

    Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

    (1988)
  • H. Cooper et al.

    Teenage motherhood, mother-only households, and teacher expectations

    Journal of Experimental Education

    (1995)
  • H. Cooper et al.

    Relationships between five after-school activities and academic achievement

    Journal of Educational Psychology

    (1999)
  • J.M. Darley et al.

    Expectancy-confirmation processes arising in the social interaction sequence

    American Psychologist

    (1980)
  • J.M. Darley et al.

    A hypothesis-confirming bias in labeling effects

    Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

    (1983)
  • J.B. Dusek

    Introduction to teacher expectancy research

  • J.B. Dusek et al.

    The bases of teacher expectancies: A meta-analysis

    Journal of Educational Psychology

    (1983)
  • J.B. Dusek et al.

    The bases of teacher expectancies

  • Cited by (30)

    • Influence of teachers’ political orientation and values on their success prediction toward students from different socioeconomic background

      2020, Revue Europeenne de Psychologie Appliquee
      Citation Excerpt :

      Specifically, the occupations and extracurricular activities were systematically socially congruent in order to clearly activate a different socioeconomic background (i.e., socially high parental occupations combined with socially high extracurricular activities or socially low occupations combined with socially low extracurricular activities). Furthermore, the extracurricular and leisure activities were chosen with reference to the study by Van Matre et al. (2000) on the influence of such activities on teacher expectations. Thus, to induce a high socioeconomic environment, the parents’ professions were presented as “doctor” (father an emergency doctor, mother a freelance doctor, vignette 2); “architect” (father a freelance specialist in underwater architecture, mother an architect employed in a large group, vignette 4); “lawyer” (father a social lawyer, mother a criminal lawyer, vignette 8); or “teacher” (father a university English teacher, mother a high school mathematics teacher, vignette 10).

    • Self-fulfilling prophecies in the classroom: Teacher expectations, teacher feedback and student achievement

      2020, Learning and Instruction
      Citation Excerpt :

      Furthermore, studies have shown that inaccuracy in teacher expectations does not occur randomly but is systematic for different groups of students. For example, negative bias in teacher expectations has been found for students from socially disadvantaged families (e.g., de Boer et al., 2010; Lorenz, Gentrup, Kristen, Stanat, & Kogan, 2016; Ready & Wright, 2011; Timmermans, de Boer, & van der Werf, 2016; Timmermans, Kuyper, & van der Werf, 2015; van Matre, Valentine, & Cooper, 2000), for ethnic minority students (e.g., Holder & Kessels, 2017; Lorenz et al., 2016; McKown & Weinstein, 2008; Meissel, Meyer, Yao, & Rubie-Davies, 2017; Morris, 2005; Ready & Wright, 2011), for boys and girls in gender-untypical domains (e.g., Hinnant et al., 2009; Holder & Kessels, 2017; Lorenz et al., 2016; Meissel et al., 2017; Ready & Wright, 2011; Riegle-Crumb & Humphries, 2012; Rubie-Davies & Peterson, 2016) as well as for students with special educational needs or learning disability statuses (e.g., Hurwitz, Elliott, & Braden, 2007; Jenkins & Demaray, 2016; Shifrer, 2013, 2016). Teacher expectancy effects based on such systematically biased expectations have the potential to contribute to educational inequalities (e.g., de Boer et al., 2010; Gentrup & Rjosk, 2018; Muntoni & Retelsdorf, 2018).

    • The influence of juvenile preference for online social interaction on problematic Internet use: The moderating effect of sibling condition and the moderated moderating effect of age cohort

      2017, Computers in Human Behavior
      Citation Excerpt :

      Furthermore, when compared with boys, girls are gentler and more compassionate (Chapman, Duberstein, Sorensen, & Lyness, 2007). These differences in personality make girls more likely to win the trust and support of significant others in life (Van Matre, Valentine & Cooper, 2000). Based on the Self-Worth Orientation Theory (Jin & Shan, 2011; Jin, 2010), everyone is searching for self-worth and the meaning of life.

    • Teachers’ gender bias in STEM: Results from a vignette study

      2023, British Educational Research Journal
    View all citing articles on Scopus

    This project was conducted by Jill Van Matre as a Senior Honors Research project in George Frissell's Honors Research Methodology class. We thank Mr. Frissell and the students of his class for their assistance with this project. Jill C. Van Matre is now attending Indiana University—Bloomington.

    Address correspondence and reprint requests to Harris Cooper, Department of Psychology, McAlester Hall, University of Missouri—Columbia, Columbia, MO 65211.

    View full text