Regular Article
The Phenomenology of Attention

https://doi.org/10.1006/ccog.1997.0313Get rights and content

Abstract

The effect of attention on perceived brightness and contrast was investigated in eight experiments. Attention was manipulated by engaging observers in an attention-demanding concurrent task (letter detection) or by directing attention to a location with a peripheral cue. In all of the dual-task manipulations, attention reduced the variability of responses. However, attention did not affect the brightness of stimuli, nor did it affect the amount of simultaneous brightness contrast. Results with peripheral location cues were similar; however, the effect of attention in these experiments could be attributed to nonperceptual factors. The metaphorical “spotlight” of attention reduces observers' uncertainty about the brightness of a stimulus, but it does not “illuminate” in terms of brightness or contrast.

References (63)

  • E. Brussell et al.

    The Gelb effect: Brightness contrast plus attention

    American Journal of Psychology

    (1973)
  • G. Chastain

    Feature mislocalizations and misjudgments of intercharacter distance

    Psychological Research

    (1982)
  • G. Chastain

    Evidence for feature perturbations from character misidentifications

    Perception and Psychophysics

    (1986)
  • M.L. Cheal et al.

    Evidence of limited capacity and noise reduction with single-element displays in the location-cuing paradigm

    Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance

    (1997)
  • C.L. Colby

    The neuroanatomy and neurophysiology of attention

    Journal of Child Neurology

    (1991)
  • S. Coren

    Brightness contrast as a function of figure–ground relations

    Journal of Experimental Psychology

    (1969)
  • J. Duncan

    The locus of interference in the perception of simultaneous stimuli

    Psychological Review

    (1980)
  • H. Ebbinghaus

    Psychology

    (1908)
  • J.T. Enns et al.

    Attention influences the apparent duration of briefly presented objects

    (1996)
  • W. Epstein et al.

    Automatic and attentional components in perception of shape-at-a-slant

    Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance

    (1985)
  • W. Epstein et al.

    Automatic and attentional components in perception of size-at-a-distance

    Perception and Psychophysics

    (1986)
  • L. Festinger et al.

    The effect of attention on brightness contrast and assimilation

    American Journal of Psychology

    (1970)
  • P.M. Fitts et al.

    Human performance

    (1967)
  • S.W. Hamilton

    Lectures on metaphysics and logic

    (1860)
  • G. Hatfield

    Attention in early scientific psychology

    Visual attention

    (1996)
  • H. Helson

    Studies of anomalous contrast and assimilation

    Journal of the Optical Society of America

    (1963)
  • J.M. Henderson

    Spatial precues affect target discrimination in absence of visual noise

    Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance

    (1996)
  • J.E. Hoffman

    Search through a sequentially presented visual display

    Perception and Psychophysics

    (1978)
  • J.E. Hoffman

    A two-stage model of visual search

    Perception and Psychophysics

    (1979)
  • J. Huttenlocher et al.

    Categories and particulars: Prototype effects in estimating spatial location

    Psychological Review

    (1991)
  • W. James

    The principles of psychology

    (1980)
  • Cited by (77)

    • Spatial attention alters visual appearance

      2019, Current Opinion in Psychology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Introspective subjective methods led to conflicting conclusions; for example, Helmholtz and James claimed that attention intensifies sensory impressions, but Fechner disagreed. Last century, a few empirical studies reported that attention reduces response variance, but does not change stimulus appearance, rendering a more veridical percept [26–28]. However, given their methodology, the results were inconclusive [3,29••,30].

    • Bias corrected double judgment accuracy during spatial attention cueing: Unmasked stimuli with non-predictive and semi-predictive cues

      2014, Vision Research
      Citation Excerpt :

      The signal enhancement mechanism improves perceptual processing of the stimuli within the attended spatial region as manifested as faster reaction times and improved discrimination accuracy (Herrmann, Heeger, & Carrasco, 2012; Herrmann et al., 2010; Kerzel, Gauch, & Buetti, 2010; Kerzel et al., 2010). The decision-level mechanism can occur through spatial uncertainty reduction of the target and can also be manifested as faster reaction times (Prinzmetal, Ha, & Khani, 2010; Prinzmetal, McCool, & Park, 2005) and improved discrimination accuracy (Prinzmetal, Long, & Leonhardt, 2008; Prinzmetal et al., 1997). The decision-level mechanism works by regulating the transfer of visual information into a system with fixed capacity that makes the decision whether the target is present (Duncan, 1980; Müller & Humphreys, 1991; Sperling, 1984).

    • Representationalism and attention

      2013, Dialogue-Canadian Philosophical Review
    View all citing articles on Scopus

    R. D. Wright

    1

    To whom correspondence and reprint requests should be addressed at Department of Psychology, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720. E-mail: [email protected].

    View full text